User Panel
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Your tax dollars at work--either directly or through the tobacco settlement. Sick. View Quote Those tobacco settlements did some good at least here in MI. I get 1500$ a year to go to college because of the smokers. Everytime I see someone throwing down 4.50$ for a pack of camels, I thank them. Keving67 View Quote What's that grant called? View Quote It's called "selective taxing". The latest Socialist scheme. Demonize one group, then tax them extra. Sounds like we have some socialists right here! It's ok as long as they benefit, and someone else pays. Real American of ya...... View Quote Just to let you know, I vote against every single cig tax increase that appears on the ballot. No, I don't smoke and never have. And unless you live in the mountains and don't pay taxes, you're funding the war on drugs that you so despise. My solution: Live in the woods like Ted Kaczynsky. Guess I shouldn't apply for that student loan/grant cause it's payed for by evil cig taxes huh? And for those of you that think illegal drugs will somehow become legal in this country, DREAM ON. Just keep voting for those Libetarian pro-drug people. |
|
Quoted: Go back and actually read what I wrote. I never said ban anything. While I personally would never use crack, cocaine, marijuana, heroin, ecstasy, PCP, LSD, crystal meth or any other illicit drug, I never said anything about their legality. I don't smoke and rarely drink. All I'm saying is, if you decide you need to put garbage in your body, don't end up on my property or mess with my stuff because you're so out of it you don't know where you are or what you're doing. If you do, I will make you regret it. I believe in "live and let live". Just take precautions when you decide to drug yourself. Don't get behind the wheel and kill someone. Don't go jumping off a building because you're messed up and possibly damage the concrete below that my tax money paid for. USPC40 View Quote It is my tax money too... "live and let live", then get off the WAR on Drugs band wagon. I also follow good social etiquette when I've been drinking, I don't get behind the wheel, that is what the taxi driver is for. I don't let my personal freedoms encroach upon others. There you go proving my point again. It is the actions of the individual, not the substances clouding their judgement, or the tools in their hands, that make them a criminal. It matters not that they are drunk, stoned, or sober, when they murder, rape, or rob. Nor does it matter if they use a beltfed machinegun, a vehicle, or their bare hands and feet in the commission of their crimes. It is their actions that make them criminals. |
|
Quoted: maybe we need a poll...just to see how far off I am. Giving that same logic as I've seen, I suppose you boys think prostitution should be be legal too...and abortion. Hey who are we to point our "moral compass at others" Fuck the baby, that woman has a right to shurk her responsibilities... View Quote Yeah, in fact I'm in favor of both of those things being legal. Why the fuck is prostitution illegal? Does this make any sense? To borrow some of George Carlins words, "Selling is legal. Fucking is legal. So why isn't selling fucking legal? Why is it illegal to sell something that it's perfectly legal to give away?" As for abortion, I don't agree with it morally, as it seems to be murder, no matter how young your victim. But, we got a lot of people on this planet already, and it's easier to kill 'em while they're fetuses. Plus more economical, what with not having to deal with burial arrangements and coffins and all. Damn, after writing that, I'm not sure whether to laugh or gag. Since I'm not joking, I think that I'll gag. And drugs? As has been said before, if you drink/smoke/drink coffee, and you are infavor of a drug ban, you are either a hypocrite or a moron(and probably both). Not a single illegal drug causes anywhere near the fatalities that tobacco causes. And I would suspect that drunk driving claims more lives than illegal drugs. Yes, illegal drugs are dangerous, but legalizing them will not result in people running out to start doing them, and if someone commits a crime while under the influence, IT'S STILL A CRIME! If you kill someone while drunk, IT'S STILL A CRIME! Same as any other drug. And this whole demonizing marijuana shit, STOP BUYING INTO GOVERNMENT PROPAGANDA. Healthwise, it's far less dangerous than smoking cigarettes. And equating drug use with gun ownership is not retarded. Are drug use and gun ownership the same? Of course not. Are the arguments against both the same? Absolutely. One side thinks that a freedom is dangerous and they set about to convince everone else of this. And for all of you that want to kill all drug users, you better throw out all of the cigarettes, coffee and alcohol, because you too are "lowlife druggie fucks", whose drug of chioce just happens to be legal. Time for this lowlife to get some work done. |
|
To be quite honest, I never realized that there was a debate over the war on drugs, until about a year ago when I noticed that the libertarians want to legalize drugs....
[size=6] There is no such thing as a [b]logical debate[/b] over the legality of such drugs.[/size=6] I try to be objective, and no matter how much I try, but I can almost never convince myself that my original view was flawed, as in this case. Recreational drugs are wrong even including getting shitface drunk, deep down everyone knows they are wether you've taken any or not. Damn near everyone thinks they should be illegal, so WE have made them this way. The same way everybody knows prostitution is wrong. MOST places it is illegal too, because people want it that way. We (at least most of us) want drugs to be illegal. I don't know how in the hell one can compare the war on drugs to gun control.... Hell even illegal they are readily enough. To say that use would decrease if legalized....I just can't imagine that. I mean look at those other places I've brought up where they are legal. Kids runnin around high....[8P]..hookers...[sex]....pure E-VILLE[}:D] speakin of EVIL, I thought it was the LIBS that usually defend evil. The poll would I suggested was just to see how many thought dope smokin should be illegal... In the words of Steppinwolf: [size=6]GOD DAMN THE PUSHER MAN[/size=6] I agree that just because something is legal that it isn't right. I also believe that using the constitution to justify something that deep down you know is WRONG is just plain bovine defecation. |
|
This is TS. This is the M193 that TS bought. This is Bubba who sold TS the M193 thatTS bought. This is Winchester who supplied Bubba with the M193 that TS bought. This is SSGT X who was shot and paralized by Hamud who was supplied by Winchester.
So I'm responsible for SSGT X being shot because I and Hamud used Winchester ammo??? TS [X] |
|
Quoted: To be quite honest, I never realized that there was a debate over the war on drugs, until about a year ago when I noticed that the libertarians want to legalize drugs.... [size=6] There is no such thing as a [b]logical debate[/b] over the legality of such drugs.[/size=6] I try to be objective, and no matter how much I try, but I can almost never convince myself that my original view was flawed, as in this case. Recreational drugs are wrong even including getting shitface drunk, deep down everyone knows they are wether you've taken any or not. Damn near everyone thinks they should be illegal, so WE have made them this way. The same way everybody knows prostitution is wrong. MOST places it is illegal too, because people want it that way. We (at least most of us) want drugs to be illegal. I don't know how in the hell one can compare the war on drugs to gun control.... Hell even illegal they are readily enough. To say that use would decrease if legalized....I just can't imagine that. I mean look at those other places I've brought up where they are legal. Kids runnin around high....[8P]..hookers...[sex]....pure E-VILLE[}:D] speakin of EVIL, I thought it was the LIBS that usually defend evil. The poll would I suggested was just to see how many thought dope smokin should be illegal... In the words of Steppinwolf: [size=6]GOD DAMN THE PUSHER MAN[/size=6] I agree that just because something is legal that it isn't right. I also believe that using the constitution to justify something that deep down you know is WRONG is just plain bovine defecation. View Quote Don't worry Bign, they will never legalize drugs in this country. Drugs are on the permanent evil list just like guns. Downward spiral for both and we're all doomed. And there will PROBABLY be a major shooting or two sometime between now and the AW sunset ban. How come none of that other shit was supposed to sunset? 1934, 1968, 1989? Also don't bother with the poll, gauging from the responses here and on previous threads, I already know what the results will be. |
|
Quoted: It is my tax money too... "live and let live", then get off the WAR on Drugs band wagon. View Quote I'm not on any "WAR on Drugs band wagon". I've stated my OPINION on illicit drugs. I have no power to create new drug laws. My OPINION shouldn't threaten your freedoms in anyway. It is possible to not like something without wanting to take it away from others. I also follow good social etiquette when I've been drinking, I don't get behind the wheel, that is what the taxi driver is for. I don't let my personal freedoms encroach upon others. View Quote Good for you. There you go proving my point again. It is the actions of the individual, not the substances clouding their judgement, or the tools in their hands, that make them a criminal. It matters not that they are drunk, stoned, or sober, when they murder, rape, or rob. Nor does it matter if they use a beltfed machinegun, a vehicle, or their bare hands and feet in the commission of their crimes. It is their actions that make them criminals. View Quote Basically what I already said. USPC40 [img]www.ar15.com/members/albums/USPC40/line.gif[/img] [url=www.nra.org][b][red]NRA[/red][/url] [url=www.nra.org][blue]Life Member[/blue][/url] [url=www.gunowners.org][b][red]GOA[/red] [/url] [url=www.gunowners.org][blue]Life Member[/blue][/url] [url=www.saf.org][red]SAF[/red][/url] [url=www.saf.org][blue]Supporter[/blue][/url] [url=sas-aim.org][red]SAS[/red][/url] [url=sas-aim.org][blue]Supporter[/blue][/b][/url] [img]www.ar15.com/members/albums/USPC40/alabamaflag.gif[/img] |
|
Quoted: This is TS. This is the M193 that TS bought. This is Bubba who sold TS the M193 thatTS bought. This is Winchester who supplied Bubba with the M193 that TS bought. This is SSGT X who was shot and paralized by Hamud who was supplied by Winchester. So I'm responsible for SSGT X being shot because I and Hamud used Winchester ammo??? TS [X] View Quote WTF???? Where'd Humud get his gun??? Is he in the country illegally??? Or is he on the battlefeild in Ashcanistan??? What's Bubba have to do with it???? Did TS suck bubba off for the gun[:d] Apples and rapists man, apples and rapists... and drugs are on the EVIL list for a reason boys....YOU KNOW drugs make people do crazy things and bring all sorts a crime and diseases and whorrin, you can say that drugs don't take themselves too, but fact is, drugs cause people to lose their minds, and [b]definately affect the safety of others.[/b] They lose the ability to obey the law when they're under the influence. Guns have been made to look that way by the LIBS shifting of responsibility from the murderers to the guns. That's about it on this thread from me fellas. I just can't take it no mo.[BD] [size=6]DEEP DOWN BOYS, DEEP DOWN[/size=6] LIB, Stacy is at it on TV agi'n, as I type[:D] If mama taught her kid how to act we would be having this discussion anyways. |
|
I am a former addict and can speak with some authority that some of the views on here are all fucked up but I wont change your mind and you wont change mine. So on with my point - everyone who commits a crime is not a drug addict or crack smoking projects raised black man and if you think so you really are a stupid fuck.
When was the last time someone smoked pot and drove thier car into an innocent family? Not nearly as many fatalities are caused by drug addicts as there are by drunks. I am not condoning drug use (I have drank nor used in over 10 years) but if we are going to slay drug addicts lets be honest and crucify the #1 abused drug in the USA alcohal. John |
|
Quoted: I am a former addict and can speak with some authority that some of the views on here are all fucked up but I wont change your mind and you wont change mine. So on with my point - everyone who commits a crime is not a drug addict or crack smoking projects raised black man and if you think so you really are a stupid fuck. When was the last time someone smoked pot and drove thier car into an innocent family? Not nearly as many fatalities are caused by drug addicts as there are by drunks. I am not condoning drug use (I have drank nor used in over 10 years) but if we are going to slay drug addicts lets be honest and crucify the #1 abused drug in the USA alcohal. John View Quote Precisely. |
|
Quoted: I am a former addict and can speak with some authority that some of the views on here are all fucked up but I wont change your mind and you wont change mine. So on with my point - everyone who commits a crime is not a drug addict or crack smoking projects raised black man and if you think so you really are a stupid fuck. John View Quote Correction- You speak with experience, not authority. This does not give you a pedestal to place yourself upon & judge the views of others as "fucked up". |
|
Quoted: To be quite honest, I never realized that there was a debate over the war on drugs, until about a year ago when I noticed that the libertarians want to legalize drugs.... There is no such thing as a [b]logical debate[/b] over the legality of such drugs. View Quote Why becuause YOU think you are right no ono can debate this ? We (at least most of us) want drugs to be illegal. View Quote We've been thru this 100 times on this board and the concenus is that drugs should be legal. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: This is TS. This is the M193 that TS bought. This is Bubba who sold TS the M193 thatTS bought. This is Winchester who supplied Bubba with the M193 that TS bought. This is SSGT X who was shot and paralized by Hamud who was supplied by Winchester. So I'm responsible for SSGT X being shot because I and Hamud used Winchester ammo??? TS [X] View Quote WTF???? Where'd Humud get his gun??? Is he in the country illegally??? Or is he on the battlefeild in Ashcanistan??? What's Bubba have to do with it???? Did TS suck bubba off for the gun[:d] Apples and rapists man, apples and rapists... and drugs are on the EVIL list for a reason boys....YOU KNOW drugs make people do crazy things and bring all sorts a crime and diseases and whorrin, you can say that drugs don't take themselves too, but fact is, drugs cause people to lose their minds, and [b]definately affect the safety of others.[/b] They lose the ability to obey the law when they're under the influence. Guns have been made to look that way by the LIBS shifting of responsibility from the murderers to the guns. That's about it on this thread from me fellas. I just can't take it no mo.[BD] [size=6]DEEP DOWN BOYS, DEEP DOWN[/size=6] LIB, Stacy is at it on TV agi'n, as I type[:D] If mama taught her kid how to act we would be having this discussion anyways. View Quote The reason you can't take it no mo is because you are placing the blame on the object/substance, and not on the individual. You are using the same logic and emotion that is the hallmark of the anti-gun establishment. You have not countered any of the facts presented. The debate is not over the evilness of drugs. The debate is about freedom from the oppression of a government operating outside of its limits as defined by the Constitution, and is trampling over our God given rights. You have asked for Constitutional proof, and I have provided it along with historical proof of the use of drugs during the first 144 years that this country existed. [b]Before any substance can be declared illegal by the Federal Government, the Constitution must be amended, as set by the precedence of the 18th and 21st Amendments, or by the constitution of the several states, or by local ordinances as determined by the people.[/b] It is pathetic that there is such a number of members who have taken oaths to support and defend the Constitution, but only defend the parts they agree with. |
|
Damm hate it when I get hot headed and type something like that.. Sorry for the fucked up remark ;o)
And I meant I should be the authority ;o) |
|
I would love to just go and send all current and future drug users off to CHina to be used for organ harvestation, laborers, or to just rot in jail. I would even go as far as to accept ONLY $1 for every person we ship over there to be killed, enslaved, or otherwise. Drug use would die out. FAST! BTW: Which Kaliban (Taliban of Kalifornistan) said that weed was less ahrmful than a cig? I will hav eyou sent over first you drug growing criminal. Also: I wouldn't mind send every prostitute in the nation to Pakistan to be stoned. He, serves those whores right.
SIG out, Doggonti (Smokin' .45's) |
|
Quoted: I would love to just go and send all current and future drug users off to CHina to be used for organ harvestation, laborers, or to just rot in jail. I would even go as far as to accept ONLY $1 for every person we ship over there to be killed, enslaved, or otherwise. Drug use would die out. FAST! BTW: Which Kaliban (Taliban of Kalifornistan) said that weed was less ahrmful than a cig? I will hav eyou sent over first you drug growing criminal. Also: I wouldn't mind send every prostitute in the nation to Pakistan to be stoned. He, serves those whores right. SIG out, Doggonti (Smokin' .45's) View Quote I'd pay a $1 just to see if someone could pull that big stick out of your butt you hate spewing monkeyfucker. From the looks of your post you should of spent more time in the school parking lot smoking joints than in the locker room smoking poles. |
|
Quoted: I would love to just go and send all current and future drug users off to CHina to be used for organ harvestation, laborers, or to just rot in jail. I would even go as far as to accept ONLY $1 for every person we ship over there to be killed, enslaved, or otherwise. Drug use would die out. FAST! BTW: Which Kaliban (Taliban of Kalifornistan) said that weed was less ahrmful than a cig? I will hav eyou sent over first you drug growing criminal. Also: I wouldn't mind send every prostitute in the nation to Pakistan to be stoned. He, serves those whores right. SIG out, Doggonti (Smokin' .45's) View Quote Ignorant morons like you are why they want to take our guns away and then we wonder why? Now go back to what ever trailer you were raised in and study for that GED. By the way how is this better than California?? New Jersey law restricts the ownership of certain semi-automatic and other firearms based upon their military appearance. The list includes: Algimec AGM1 type Any shotgun with a revolving cylinder such as the "Street Sweeper" or "Striker 12" Armalite AR-180 type Australian Automatic Arms SAR Avtomat Kalashnikov type semi-automatic firearms Beretta AR-70 and BM59 semi-automatic firearms Bushmaster Assault rifle Calico M-900 Assault carbine and M-900 CETME G3 Chartered Industries of Singapore SR88 type Colt AR-15 and CAR-15 series Daewoo K-1, K-2, Max 1 and Max 2, AR 100 types Demro TAC-1 carbine type Encom MP-9 and MP-45 carbine types FAMAS MAS 223 types FN-FAL, FN- AR, or FN-FNC type semi-automatic firearms Franchi SPAS 12 and LAW 12 Shotguns G3SA type Galil type Heckler and Koch HK91, HK93, HK94, MP5, PSG-1 Intratec TEC-9 and 22 semi-automatic firearms M1 carbine type M1 4S type, MAC10, MAC11, MAC11 9mm carbine type firearms PJK M-68 carbine type Plainfield Machine Co. Carbine Ruger K-Mini-14/5F and Mini-1 4/5RF SIG AMT, SIG 550SP, SIG 551SP, SIG-PE-57 types SKS with detachable magazine type Spectre Auto carbine type Springfield Armory BM59 and SAR-48 type Sterling MK-6, MK-7, and SAR types Steyr AUG semi-automatic firearms USAS 12 semi-automatic type shotgun Uzi type semi-automatic firearms Valmet M62, M71S, M76, or M78 type semi-automatic firearms Weaver Arms Nighthawk |
|
Quoted: Quoted: I would love to just go and send all current and future drug users off to CHina to be used for organ harvestation, laborers, or to just rot in jail. I would even go as far as to accept ONLY $1 for every person we ship over there to be killed, enslaved, or otherwise. Drug use would die out. FAST! BTW: Which Kaliban (Taliban of Kalifornistan) said that weed was less ahrmful than a cig? I will hav eyou sent over first you drug growing criminal. Also: I wouldn't mind send every prostitute in the nation to Pakistan to be stoned. He, serves those whores right. SIG out, Doggonti (Smokin' .45's) View Quote Ignorant morons like you are why they want to take our guns away and then we wonder why? Now go back to what ever trailer you were raised in and study for that GED. By the way how is this better than California?? New Jersey law restricts the ownership of certain semi-automatic and other firearms based upon their military appearance. The list includes: Algimec AGM1 type Any shotgun with a revolving cylinder such as the "Street Sweeper" or "Striker 12" Armalite AR-180 type Australian Automatic Arms SAR Avtomat Kalashnikov type semi-automatic firearms Beretta AR-70 and BM59 semi-automatic firearms Bushmaster Assault rifle Calico M-900 Assault carbine and M-900 CETME G3 Chartered Industries of Singapore SR88 type Colt AR-15 and CAR-15 series Daewoo K-1, K-2, Max 1 and Max 2, AR 100 types Demro TAC-1 carbine type Encom MP-9 and MP-45 carbine types FAMAS MAS 223 types FN-FAL, FN- AR, or FN-FNC type semi-automatic firearms Franchi SPAS 12 and LAW 12 Shotguns G3SA type Galil type Heckler and Koch HK91, HK93, HK94, MP5, PSG-1 Intratec TEC-9 and 22 semi-automatic firearms M1 carbine type M1 4S type, MAC10, MAC11, MAC11 9mm carbine type firearms PJK M-68 carbine type Plainfield Machine Co. Carbine Ruger K-Mini-14/5F and Mini-1 4/5RF SIG AMT, SIG 550SP, SIG 551SP, SIG-PE-57 types SKS with detachable magazine type Spectre Auto carbine type Springfield Armory BM59 and SAR-48 type Sterling MK-6, MK-7, and SAR types Steyr AUG semi-automatic firearms USAS 12 semi-automatic type shotgun Uzi type semi-automatic firearms Valmet M62, M71S, M76, or M78 type semi-automatic firearms Weaver Arms Nighthawk View Quote The HK MSG90 isn't on the list. It's probably banned now but I wonder if you could've bought it back then. Was it even sold in the states? The Enfield L85 ain't on the list either. WTF is the FAMAS doing on the list? Driveby moron wouldn't even know how to operate that thing. |
|
C'mon.. We ALL KNOW that Kalifornistan sucks!
They don't have even have one of these: [:D] [img]rbad.ar15.com/demotrash.jpg[/img] And they don't have a "Torch" ! [img]http://media.abcnews.com/media/Politics/images/ap_nj_torricelli_020103_nv.jpg[/img] OR... one of these scumbags: [img]http://thumb-1.image.altavista.com/image/148336990[/img] |
|
Quoted: I would love to just go and send all current and future drug users off to CHina to be used for organ harvestation, laborers, or to just rot in jail. View Quote I like your thought process -- That's an outstanding idea ! (we should also include pedophiles in the shipment) |
|
Yeah I don't care for those commercials either. What is funny is you could make the same point with a gallon of gas. Gas consumption can be linked back to Saudi Arabia or other terrorist funding States that kill innocent people. But we will never see that on TV.
|
|
Quoted: I would love to just go and send all current and future drug users off to CHina to be used for organ harvestation, laborers, or to just rot in jail. I would even go as far as to accept ONLY $1 for every person we ship over there to be killed, enslaved, or otherwise. Drug use would die out. FAST! BTW: Which Kaliban (Taliban of Kalifornistan) said that weed was less ahrmful than a cig? I will hav eyou sent over first you drug growing criminal. View Quote Sadly, even that won't end drug use. People can go to jail for 20+ years for drug use, some for life, yet they still use drugs. Also, you can never get all the drug users and dealers. And Finally, the punishment is not proportional to the crime and is un-american. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: I would love to just go and send all current and future drug users off to CHina to be used for organ harvestation, laborers, or to just rot in jail. View Quote I like your thought process -- That's an outstanding idea ! (we should also include pedophiles in the shipment) View Quote Yes, pedophiles especially (Including those frickin' homo priests, I am Catholic, very devout too, but once a priest does something like that he is damned forever in my mind.) Anyways, Jaguar man, I am obviously extremely overexagerating with the whole kill-all-druggies bit but the pedophiles I truly mean. Ok, so lets not kill all drug users, but at least kill 4 of the worst offenders on national TV to make a statement. Again, exageration.... Lock 'em up and make them work. I want to see hard labor in prison again!!!! Prisoners are gettign off too easy. Color TV, 3 meals a day. They even have time to rape each other!?! SIG out, Doggonit |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Your tax dollars at work--either directly or through the tobacco settlement. Sick. View Quote Those tobacco settlements did some good at least here in MI. I get 1500$ a year to go to college because of the smokers. Everytime I see someone throwing down 4.50$ for a pack of camels, I thank them. Keving67 View Quote What's that grant called? View Quote Michigan Competitive Scholarship If you score above a certian score on the MEAP test (our state's high school proficency exam) youget the scholarship |
|
Quoted: Quoted: You are watching Fox News with a 4 year old? I think you got off pretty light if thats all you had to explain. View Quote Hehehe EASY Stuff (especially when his liberal parents are not supervising me)! [b]Uncle RBAD, Why are those people knocking down that building? [/b] Because those buildings house EVIL people -- the same kind of people who flew the planes into the building where your Uncle Greg worked. Remember Uncle Greg? He's a VP at Solomon Smith Barney and had alot of his friends die on 9-11-01, and had to live at your house for a few months because his apartment was contaminated with asbestos. Do you remember all of the horrid stories from Uncle RBAD's friends on the squad who went in to do search and rescue? AND-- Special Note to the Kiddies... Note that the Israelis are the only ones with BALLS enough to do such things to curb future terrorism. [b]Uncle RBAD, Why is that women hitting her kid for no reason?[/b] SShhhh! Or you will see why UP CLOSE --> Remember that video the next time you leave your toys out! [:D] [b]Uncle RBAD, Why are those people running in the streets screaming at the guys knocking down that abandoned building?[/b] Those are evil people who wear diapers on the wrong parts of the body. They are breaking the curfew laws and (hopefully) will be shot down soon enough. [:D] [b]You got off easy man. Except for the Uncle RBAD heading, thats what I got to answer today when I visited teh family. [/b] Feel free to use MY answers ! [:D] View Quote Man, where were youat when I was getting grilled by the little guy? If you don't mind, I just might keep those answers in the back of my mind next time I babysit the little tike. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Your tax dollars at work--either directly or through the tobacco settlement. Sick. View Quote Those tobacco settlements did some good at least here in MI. I get 1500$ a year to go to college because of the smokers. Everytime I see someone throwing down 4.50$ for a pack of camels, I thank them. Keving67 View Quote What's that grant called? View Quote It's called "selective taxing". The latest Socialist scheme. Demonize one group, then tax them extra. Sounds like we have some socialists right here! It's ok as long as they benefit, and someone else pays. Real American of ya...... View Quote Calm down, i also smoke too. Basically I am paying to put myself through college on tobacco alone. Keving67 |
|
[thinking].........well nevermind it only lasted
a second........... |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.