Post from SteyrAUG -
My sole objection to Israel is they exist at OUR expense for THEIR benefit.
View Quote
Nonsense, they fought three major wars without a red cent of our help or military involvement.
Remember the Truman Arms Embargo against the Middle East? The US faithfully upheld a ban on any and all arms shipments to Israel, while the Arabs and the Soviets were dumping their military wares all over their clients.
The US did not relent, however, even in the face of obvious violations by the Arab nations.
It was only [u]after[/u] the 1967 Six Day War that the US changed its mind regarding military support of Israel.
It was Israel's crushing victory over the combined Arab forces which caused this change of view. The following year, the United States sold Israel sophisticated planes (Phantom jets) for the first time. Washington shifted its Middle East policy from seeking a balance of forces to ensuring Israel enjoyed a qualitative edge over its enemies.
So right up until 1968 Israel was not, repeat, not existing simply because of US benefit, but had existed despite US neglect.
In 1968, Israel traded in its Mirage fighters for Phantoms at the urging of the United States!
Now that things may have changed a tad, you would want to reneg on that deal!
How sweet!
And I mean military actions, not their voting record in the UN. Nobody dies casting a vote in the General Assembly.
View Quote
Really. But a lot of people die [u]because[/u] of votes that are cast in the United Nations.
Ask Israel.
So why do we bother voting if it means nothing?
I disagree. If our allies supported us fully in the United Nations, the way Israel has supported us, well, who knows what might have happened in the past?
And your "rest assured they do something, even if WE don't know about it" is the same kind of bullshit I get from MY government. I object to that as well.
View Quote
Well then, what's the CIA's budget, ooops, we don't know that number do we.
Should we figure that something's being done on our behalf by the CIA even if we don't lnow what it might be?
That's why we elect the right people to the Presidency. If George W. Bush cannot deliver to us complete satisfaction that he is working the governement the way it should be worked, and producing policies to insure US hegemony on this globe, then he will be replaced just like his father before him!
If I can blame the Israeli government for its failure in the Jonathan Pollard affair, we should likewise be able to blame Bush should our country falter!
Eric The(Reasonable)Hun[>]:)]