Oops! Stein's Recount Turns Up More Votes Than Voters in Detroit - Page 2

General » General Discussion

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Oops! Stein's Recount Turns Up More Votes Than Voters in Detroit (Page 2 of 4)

Posted: 12/15/2016 1:36:40 AM EDT

[#1]

Quote History

Quoted:
And the left won't care, and they'll continue to scream that Trump is racist because he talked about vote fraud, which doesn't exist, except for when Trump wins elections.

They want what they want and are willing to do anything they think they can get away with to do it. There are opeds floating around today trying to convince people to attack Electoral College meetups, now, for fuck's sake.

View Quote

That point severely undermines their usual response to voter fraud, that there isn't any. Why raise all this money and garner all these signatures and support if voter fraud doesn't exist?

I'm going to raise that point to every Lib I talk to about voter fraud from now on.

I hope Trump makes a huge issue of this once he's in office and actually investigates, it'd be sweet, sweet irony if this blows up in their face too.

Posted: 12/15/2016 1:39:44 AM EDT

[#2]

Posted: 12/15/2016 1:39:59 AM EDT

[#3]

Them pesky Russians

Posted: 12/15/2016 1:40:09 AM EDT

[#4]

Posted: 12/15/2016 1:41:38 AM EDT

[#5]

YES!!!!

Fuck them sideways. Democrats know when voter fraud is put to a stop, they're FUCKED.

Posted: 12/15/2016 1:42:57 AM EDT

[#6]

Quote History

Quoted:
https://forshiggles.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/tami.jpg

View Quote

Backstory?

Ballot stuffing I presume?

Posted: 12/15/2016 2:01:38 AM EDT

[#7]

Same crap in Oakland

Posted: 12/15/2016 2:20:36 AM EDT

[#8]

It is well known that dead people most always vote democratic but they are under represented in the census .

Posted: 12/15/2016 2:24:01 AM EDT

[#9]

So surprised

Posted: 12/15/2016 3:29:47 AM EDT

[#10]

Don't you love how the most important information alluded to in the story is omitted?

Sure they were cheating, they do it every time. The question isn't were they cheating but how great was the effect.

What is the fucking percentage?

Goddamn I loathe media.

Posted: 12/15/2016 3:37:05 AM EDT

[#11]

Quote History

Quoted:

DERP<img src=http://www.ar15.com/images/smilies/smiley_freak.gif border=0 align=middle>

Then why only the 3 key states Trump won by slim margins? Why didn't she do it in a state like California.....or Nevada......

Your theory is crap.

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:
This shit solidifies the idea that she wanted to uncover dem fraud, not a hopeful attempt to dethrone the frog.

DERP<img src=http://www.ar15.com/images/smilies/smiley_freak.gif border=0 align=middle>

Then why only the 3 key states Trump won by slim margins? Why didn't she do it in a state like California.....or Nevada......

Your theory is crap.

That and the recount immediately followed by "the Russians hacked the election" now has morons believing the Russians hacked votes and that is what Stein was trying to expose.

Posted: 12/15/2016 3:42:28 AM EDT

[#12]

If is odd that a judge shut down the recount Friday so there will be no official verification of the results. What a stroke of luck for the Democrat Party.

Posted: 12/15/2016 3:46:27 AM EDT

[#13]

Quote History

Quoted:
NPR claimed there's never been election fraud in this nation's history prior to the election.

View Quote

Fifty six counties in Indiana alone are under investigation for election fraud during the primaries. All the investigations revolve around Dem activities. Dem offices in Philly were raided during the Primaries for election fraud. They were fraudulently changing voter's personal information such as home addresses. And a county worker in Florida reported to authorities that she witnessed Dem officials filling out large stacks of stolen mail-in ballots. This occurred when the state was being flooded with complaints from voters who never received their mail-in ballots.

NPR knows this. They're nothing but a bunch of monotone, dim-witted lying sacks of shit.

Posted: 12/15/2016 3:47:01 AM EDT

[#14]

Quote History

Quoted:

Don't you love how the most important information alluded to in the story is omitted?

Sure they were cheating, they do it every time. The question isn't were they cheating but how great was the effect.

What is the fucking percentage?

Goddamn I loathe media.

View Quote

I don't think anybody knows the percentage (except maybe the ones doing it), and that's a big part of the problem. In this case the paper ballots didn't match the machine count, but even if we went back and hand counted all of the paper ballots we still wouldn't know how many of those were fraudulent in the first place.

Posted: 12/15/2016 3:47:20 AM EDT

[#15]

Quote History

Quoted:
Trump would have won the popular vote also if not for the vote fraud.

View Quote

The popular vote means absolutely nothing unless they count all of the absentee ballots. Which they haven't, in most states, and won't, because there aren't enough in some states to effect who won it. All counting them could do is sway the "popular vote", and that isn't used to elect the president, so states won't waste the money to do so, in that case.

So, the net effect is a popular vote that may, or may not, reflect reality, and there's no way of knowing, unless someone ponies up the money to count them. Short of that, the numbers mean absolutely nothing.

Posted: 12/15/2016 3:52:12 AM EDT

[#16]

Quote History

Quoted:

DERP<img src=http://www.ar15.com/images/smilies/smiley_freak.gif border=0 align=middle>

Then why only the 3 key states Trump won by slim margins? Why didn't she do it in a state like California.....or Nevada......

Your theory is crap.

View Quote

I dearly wish they would audit Nevada. Maybe we could undo Bloomturd's fuckery, that passed by a pretty slim margin.

Posted: 12/15/2016 3:58:16 AM EDT

[#17]

Quote History

Quoted:

The popular vote means absolutely nothing unless they count all of the absentee ballots. Which they haven't, in most states, and won't, because there aren't enough in some states to effect who won it. All counting them could do is sway the "popular vote", and that isn't used to elect the president, so states won't waste the money to do so, in that case.

So, the net effect is a popular vote that may, or may not, reflect reality, and there's no way of knowing, unless someone ponies up the money to count them. Short of that, the numbers mean absolutely nothing.

View Quote

People keep saying this about absentee votes not being counted but afaik, it's just not true.

Posted: 12/15/2016 4:12:57 AM EDT

[#18]

So, does this mean that...

Zombies (The Living Dead) do exist. And they can vote?

Aloha, Mark

Posted: 12/15/2016 4:17:15 AM EDT

[#19]

Quote History

Quoted:

Requiring ID to vote would pretty much fix it.

If you can find me one black person in the ghetto who doesn't know how to get a legit ID, I'll be impressed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrBxZGWCdgs

View Quote

These people are so fucked in the head it makes me want to stomp kittens

Posted: 12/15/2016 4:26:34 AM EDT

[#20]

Quote History

Quoted:
Trump should call for a recount in California, New York and New Jersey now. To ensure that the count is exactly correct in those states <img src=http://www.ar15.com/images/smilies/icon_smile_shy.gif border=0 align=middle> Watch her popular vote lead disappear drastically.

View Quote

THIS!!!!!!!

So very fucking this!!!!

Posted: 12/15/2016 7:38:07 AM EDT

[#21]

Quote History

Quoted:

Backstory?

Ballot stuffing I presume?

View Quote

Free Big Mac coupons, looks like.

Posted: 12/15/2016 7:39:04 AM EDT

[#22]

Russians fault.

Posted: 12/15/2016 7:40:57 AM EDT

[#23]

They need to do the right thing and nuke detroit.

Posted: 12/15/2016 7:44:06 AM EDT

[#24]

Quote History

Quoted:
The worst part is that MI has voter ID required.

View Quote

When the people "enforcing" the law at the polling places are part of the machine, then the voter ID law is meaningless.

Laws are only for the honest.

Posted: 12/15/2016 7:46:46 AM EDT

[#25]

Ha! Fck Detroit

Posted: 12/15/2016 7:54:12 AM EDT

[#26]

Quote History

Quoted:
This will disappear from the mainstream news in a day or two, if it even get that much attention. Gotta keep the "correct" narrative going.

View Quote

Yeah, sounds like "fake news" to me.

Posted: 12/15/2016 8:01:35 AM EDT

[#27]

I said from the beginning that the GOP should have pounced on this and sued several states (namely California) for recounts.

Any time your enemy slips up, be ready with the stiletto. And this was a wide open opportunity to show wide spread voter fraud (illegals, dead, etc.) And doing so only after it was initiated by the other side and from a winning perspective as opposed to being on the losing side ie sour grapes.

Posted: 12/15/2016 8:02:30 AM EDT

[#28]

Quote History

Quoted:

DERP

Then why only the 3 key states Trump won by slim margins? Why didn't she do it in a state like California.....or Nevada......

Your theory is crap.

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:
This shit solidifies the idea that she wanted to uncover dem fraud, not a hopeful attempt to dethrone the frog.

DERP

Then why only the 3 key states Trump won by slim margins? Why didn't she do it in a state like California.....or Nevada......

Your theory is crap.

Maybe she thought that was too expensive, or she would actually get less donations because Democrats wouldn't want to recount those states.

But if this is true, then she should get together with Trump, hold a press conference, and announce they are expanding the recounts to other states. She should also look at the rules that prevent recounting in those crooked Detroit precincts and demand those rules be eliminated. But if it ends here, then it was all a charade.

Posted: 12/15/2016 8:05:24 AM EDT

[#29]

Quote History

Quoted:
You don't say? In Democratic precincts?

Shocked, shocked I tell you.

View Quote

Nah, I blame the new math.

Posted: 12/15/2016 8:13:19 AM EDT

[#30]

Quote History

Quoted:

Backstory?

Ballot stuffing I presume?

View Quote

Yes.

Their excuse was "oh sometimes the original feeding of the ballot into the optical scanner didn't take so we had to do it again".

Why did this happen you might ask..............well because..............as usual the racists in Detroit gave their CONSISTENT canned response.

And that scanned response was.............wait for it...............for all intents and purposes they said.................."the white man only gives us old machines and they malfunction, blah, blah, blah".

Some things NEVER change under the sun.

They have been caught RED HANDED committing ballot stuffing voter fraud and fell back on their usual racist excuses to cover it all up.

They are typical racist democrat scum who cheat and lie at every opportunity in order to win an election.

Posted: 12/15/2016 8:17:49 AM EDT

[#31]

The real story is that the main stream media won't report it
If the opposite were true, that more votes were cast in a Trump precinct it would be headlines for a month

Posted: 12/15/2016 8:21:30 AM EDT

[#32]

Quote History

Quoted:

DERP<img src=http://www.ar15.com/images/smilies/smiley_freak.gif border=0 align=middle>

Then why only the 3 key states Trump won by slim margins? Why didn't she do it in a state like California.....or Nevada......

Your theory is crap.

View Quote

Because a "slim margin" is the reason for the recount.

How would she be able to raise the funds to pay for a recount in a state that the Dems won handily?

Posted: 12/15/2016 8:21:43 AM EDT

[#33]

Quote History

Quoted:
The real story is that the main stream media won't report it
If the opposite were true, that more votes were cast in a Trump precinct it would be headlines for a month

View Quote

Correct and the CIA would blame the Russians.

Posted: 12/15/2016 8:26:32 AM EDT

[#34]

Unpossible.

Posted: 12/15/2016 8:33:42 AM EDT

[#35]

Quote History

Quoted:
If is odd that a judge shut down the recount Friday so there will be no official verification of the results. What a stroke of luck for the Democrat Party.

View Quote

This....

Posted: 12/15/2016 8:47:36 AM EDT

[#36]

Quote History

Quoted:

By targeting only states he won?

View Quote

Sure. That's how she gets the donations. Then she pays her people consulting fees of over a million bucks. It's all a scam like Trump said.

Posted: 12/15/2016 8:55:54 AM EDT

[#37]

I assume that those broken machines will be replaced with new ones that are not subject to ballot stuffing.

Posted: 12/15/2016 8:57:28 AM EDT

[#38]

Posted: 12/15/2016 9:04:34 AM EDT

[#39]

Quote History

Quoted:

DERP<img src=http://www.ar15.com/images/smilies/smiley_freak.gif border=0 align=middle>

Then why only the 3 key states Trump won by slim margins? Why didn't she do it in a state like California.....or Nevada......

Your theory is crap.

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:
This shit solidifies the idea that she wanted to uncover dem fraud, not a hopeful attempt to dethrone the frog.

DERP<img src=http://www.ar15.com/images/smilies/smiley_freak.gif border=0 align=middle>

Then why only the 3 key states Trump won by slim margins? Why didn't she do it in a state like California.....or Nevada......

Your theory is crap.

To be fair, those are the states where fraud would be most needed by the dems to win and thus the most likely for it to occur. There is no point in having an organized effort to commit voter fraud in California.

His theory holds up atleast in that respect even though I still don't buy it.

Posted: 12/15/2016 9:14:28 AM EDT

[#40]

Just so you know............TWO THIRDS of the unbalanced precincts had TOO MANY VOTES by the machines than there were actual ballots in the sealed containers.

CLEAR fraud...............CLEAR FRAUD!!

Posted: 12/15/2016 9:15:00 AM EDT

[#41]

Quote History

Quoted:
Just so you know............TWO THIRDS of the unbalanced precincts had TOO MANY VOTES by the machines than there were actual ballots in the sealed containers.

CLEAR fraud...............CLEAR FRAUD!!

View Quote

Posted: 12/15/2016 9:33:32 AM EDT

[#42]

A little more info.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/12/14/report-evidence-of-detroit-voter-fraud-too-many-votes-in-37-of-precincts/

Posted: 12/15/2016 9:45:33 AM EDT

[#43]

Quote History

Quoted:

with Trump being 20k votes ahead in states, do you really think she was going to change anything (or she thought she was)?

I'm not sure exactly what her reason was, but I'm 99.87% sure she knew she wasn't going to remove T-Money.

Maybe she's paying herself 87k an hour to 'work' on the recount, or it's to get the "not my president" dumb-asses to fall inline, or maybe to hurt the dems/help voters see how much fraud is going on.

who knows....

View Quote

Interesting theory.

Posted: 12/15/2016 9:48:00 AM EDT

[#44]

Motherfucking corrupt motherfuckers. Fuck them. Fuck Hillary. Fuck obama

Posted: 12/15/2016 9:54:07 AM EDT

[#45]

More than a century of Democratic Party voter fraud and corruption and we are suddenly upset about it because we found some in Detroit????
The Democrats will not change their ways because we suddenly became aware.
The most that will happen is someone will get sentenced to home detention.

Posted: 12/15/2016 9:55:02 AM EDT

[#46]

Quote History

Quoted:
More than a century of Democratic Party voter fraud and corruption and we are suddenly upset about it because we found some in Detroit????
The Democrats will not change their ways because we suddenly became aware.
The most that will happen is someone will get sentenced to home detention.

View Quote

Well of course they WILL NOT change.............they are fucking dishonest fucking scum.

Posted: 12/15/2016 10:00:59 AM EDT

[#47]

I went over and looked for the companion story on democratic underground. They said, nothing. Can't seem to find one on Democrat over votes in Detroit.

Shitload of treason allegations though.