User Panel
Well belloc if you look at history. There were gays in every power that be that ever existed. Even in the bible David and Jonathon were kissing each other. David was most likely gay (talk about a shit storm here)
Iam pretty sure somehow you feel threatened by homosexuality. Otherwise you wouldnt be so virulently pushing the same anti gay propaganda as the other bigots. Its ok to be gay belloc. Come to terms with it. |
|
This is some more homo-nazi propoganda. So if someone speaks out against the nazis it is really because they want to be one. The leader of the NAACP secretly wants to be the grand dragon of the KKK. When people speak out against pederasts it is because they have caches of child porn on their computer. Yeah, right. "Maybe" you're straight, but you're definitely an idiot. If someone speaks like a nazi, are they one? So who uses made up nazi-homo propoganda like "homophoibic" [sic] anyway. Well that would be Hillary Clinton, Jesse Jackson, Diane Fienstein, Charles Schumer. I think I will keep with the Founding Fathers. "The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able may have a gun." "Bad men cannot make good citizens. It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains. A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, is incompatible with freedom." Both from Patrick Henry |
|
|
This means that either you have NEVER said anything negative about pedophilia, or that you have but only because you yourself sexually molest children. Clearly a 50/50 chance either way with you. Also it is rather obvious that you are in fact a homo. Otherwise why would you be so virulently pushing the same pro homosexual progaganda as the other homo-nazis. |
|
|
Well actually as far as the catholic church you got it wrong. 100 percent of the abuxse cases were committed by pedophiles.
Im married and have a kid. Tha doesnt prove that im not gay. But the key point is I dont care what you think. Im comfortable enough about my sexuality that homosexuals are not a threat to me. Homos must be a threat to you some how though. Do you harbor secret desires to have your ass ploughed by a gang of rough burly men? |
|
|
No. Only a small percentage were cases of pedophilia. Most were cases of pederasty. And 90% of those were in fact committed by homosexuals. Now, do the research and try to refute just that much. |
|
|
Oh, phew, I feared that this thread might go off topic. All long as we all know that "the key point" here is that you don't care what I think. Great. I'm sure we can all rest easier now. |
|
|
I had to look up pederasty. Its another word for pedophilia. Pretty much the same unless your trying to say abuse of girls by men is less repugnant than abuse of boys.
Are you saying its ok to abuse girls but not ok to abuse boys? I always thought both were equally evil. Main Entry: ped·er·ast Pronunciation: 'pe-d&-"rast Function: noun Etymology: Greek paiderastEs, literally, lover of boys, from paid- ped- + erastEs lover, from erasthai to love -- more at Main Entry: pe·do·phil·ia Pronunciation: "pE-d&-'fi-lE-& Function: noun Etymology: New Latin : sexual perversion in which children are the preferred sexual object |
|
I sort of figured you would have to look it up. Pedophilia is the molestation of pre-pubescent children, age 7 or 8 or so. Pederasty is the sexual abuse of underage but sexually maturing children, age 11-15 or so. So the question then becomes, according to you, "So 90% of the abuse was committed by homosexuals, but why do you view them as such a threat?" And of course the answer comes back as before, that you're an idiot. Now if you will excuse me, I'm taking an advanced degree here in Rome in philosophy and symbolic logic. It's just after 2 in the afternoon Rome time and class begins shortly. |
|
|
Actually pedophilia is sexual abuse of Children. There are no laws against pedarasty becuase it is covered under pedophilia laws.
Not only did i look it up but i posted the dictionary entrys for it. And yet you still see a difference.
Sorry i dont want you to be late for your roman ass pounding. Have fun but remember just becuase your wearing a gladiator suit and covered in grease. That doesnt make you a warrior |
|
|
Whatever the hell your first statement has to do with anything only your warped tiny little excuse for a mind can figure out. There is a clinical psychological difference between the two conditions scooter. Shall we all wait for you to look up "clinical' or perhaps "psychological", heck maybe even "scooter"? But what is MOST telling is that it is clear now that you (even you) are starting to realize that the 90% of the abuse committed by homosexuals is not something that can be denied or refuted. Facts are stubborn things, as they say. |
|
|
Truly spoken like someone in the know. |
|
|
That must be a really relevant course of study. Pretty artsy, effeminant and gay. Do you also take underwater basket weaving? |
|
|
Well yes there is........It's called the USA |
|
|
An excellent book on this topic: "The Pink Swastika (Homosexuality in the Nazi Party)" by Scott Lively/ Kevin Abrams.
Another: "Why We Will Never Win The War On AIDS" by Bryan J. Ellison and Peter H. Duesberg. Another: "Homosexuality and American Public Life" edited by Christopher Wolfe and Introduction by William Kristol. |
|
Well, there is a big difference between your Nazi example and Freudian-level repressed sexual desires. It okay though, you are still accepted here on Arfcom, so don't get so bent out of shape over it. Some men have homoerotic feelings, but you guys can't control them, and I at least don't blame you for them. Once you understand your tendencies, maybe you won't be so anti-gay, that's all. |
||
|
And you still have not answered my question |
||
|
Why does interior decorating, choreography and symbolic logic attract so many homosexuals?
I just dont get it. Is philosop[hy major and symbolic logic code words for gay college? anyone? |
|
And all we hear....is crickets. He's probably still coming to grips with the epiphany I pointed out for him above. |
|||
|
Well does anybody want to help Belloc out? Come on guys, you all like jumping in and pointing out how homosexuals are destroying the free world as we know it. No one has a solution to the "gay problem"? anybody?
|
|
I've been saying it all along. |
|||
|
Ok ill play the devils advocate.
We should banish all homosexuals to say....North Dakota and put them in camps. There they can be among there own kind and have pageants and show their sense of style. |
|
Social ostracism has worked nicely for millenia, thank you. I'm cool with that. So, just arrange for them all to crawl back into their closets and keep their collective mouths shut. Oh, they can continue to decorate our homes, fashion our clothing, be 'great friends' to our womenfolk, and even serve as prime ministers, preachers, and popes. But just SHUT UP about it. This social malady has gone, within the past 100 years, from Oscar Wilde's 'love that dare not speak its name' to the condition that 'can't keep its fucking mouth shut.' Eric The(TheyDon'tCallIt'Queer'ForNothing!)Hun |
|
|
Stonerstudent has never been shy in expressing the fact that he is gay.
never worried about it. Stoner, understand that vast majority of people (even on this board) don't really give a shit if you are gay or not. by the same token (pardon the use of the word in context, the irony is unintentional), we don't think you should get a junior G-man badge for the fact, either. AIDS is the most preventable disease in the world. And yet it still spreads. Most of us don't want to fund AIDS research because most of us are heterosexual and monogamous. In the United States, if you are either, you are safe from AIDS. Yet a militant lobby of homosexual and polygamous people want ME to shovel over my money to pay for what we see as a sulf-serving and destructive lifestyle. Then AIDS "Victims" cry that they have been attacked by this ravaging scourge of civilization. Sorry, ain't buying it. You, personally, have never done so. Yet by the openness of your sexuality some (myself NOT included) lump you in with that same militant, "I wanna fuck everybody bareback I see and then have you pay my $100,000 a year medication bills" crowd. Can you see what I am saying here? |
|
ya, know...
i always thought those white supremists were a bunch of homo's... they fight like girls too |
|
Homosexuality among top Nazis did exist; Roehm was a well-known and not particularly diffident fancier of lithe young men. There are heavy homoerotic themes in lots of Nazi propaganda - the kind of stuff that makes straight men say "Somethin' ain't right there, but I'm not sure what it is" and makes gay men roll on the floor laughing because it's so campy. What does it "mean?"
It means exactly the same thing as: some garbage men are homosexuals; some lawyers are homosexuals; some grocery store bagboys are homosexuals; some military men are homosexuals; some policemen are homosexuals; some burglars, murderers, and card cheats are homosexuals; et cetera, et cetera -- and they always have been. If you could read minds, you would find homosexuals doing everything you find heterosexuals doing. You wouldn't find many of them screwing women, but you'd find some of them doing that, too. That's what "gay Nazis" mean. There are homosexuals everywhere and there always have been. Some of them are sexually active, some of them (more than you'd guess) are deliberately celibate, some of them are nasty sluts (as are some heterosexuals of both genders) and some of them have been in sexually exclusive relationships with one person for decades. The only new thing about homosexuality is that relatively few of them are still obsessively quiet about being homosexuals. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yep......and my posts are not directed at most of the people on this board either. But at the people who lump me [and Kacer] in with the nazis,NAMBLA etc. Bummer about the junior G-man badge though...I was hoping to be in the running for it this year |
|
|
|
It's pointless to argue with people like Belloc. They are so wrapped up in their own self-righteousness and arrogant conviction of their own inherent and absolute moral superiority, that they are incapable of having a reasoned conversation. Notice how QUICKLY he reverts to insults and personal attacks - not something that people with a strong argument or logic ever need to do. If someone disagrees with him in this thread, it is only a matter of time before he accuses them of being gay. How pathetic is that |
|
|
No it hasn't........there are just as many of us as there always been, you just hear about it more. Plus if you think HIV/AIDS is bad now, Just push it back in to the closet again and see how bad it gets. Think Africa |
||
|
1 Samuel 18:3-4
And Jonathan made a covenant with David because he loved him as himself. Jonathan took off the robe he was wearing and gave it to David, along with his tunic, and even his sword, his bow and his belt. (NIV) 1 Samuel 20:41 After the boy had gone, David got up from the south side of the stone and bowed down before Jonathan three times, with is face to the ground. Then they kissed each other and wept together - but David wept the most.(NIV) The original Hebrew text says that they kissed each other and wept together until David became large |
|
Well I've wasted enuff bandwidth on this thread....now on to more important things. Like testfiring the M4forgery I just built for Kacer
|
|
Post from StonerStudent -
That's the point, my friend, I don't want to hear about your sexual proclivities any more than you wish to hear of mine! I cannot imagine anyone wanting to be known, most famously, for their sexual identity. That's the stuff of porn stars and screaming queens. Just don't tell me what you are, and I won't tell you what I am. And social ostracism of those who do tell has worked, as I say, for milennia.
Why? Will 'gay folks' suddenly become STUPID? Or will those who already engage in high risk behavior become any more asinine?
I try never to think of Africa. But AIDS is alive and well in Africa because the population is so uneducated! Tell me how many American AIDS sufferers think that having sex with uninfected infants might cure them of the disease? Surely once they're back in the closet, they won't be eating lead paint chips, will they? We don't need to 'Endlosung' homosexuals, as some of you seem to accuse Belloc of wishing, we just don't need to continue hear their racket. So, just pipe down! Eric The(AndIMeanThatInANonsexualWay)Hun |
|||
|
And yet time and time again the christian conservatives in this country wish to do away with sex education. Why is that Eric? So you can all go back to saying the stupid are just suffering from gods wrath? |
|
|
|
American Christian conservatives are to blame for lack of sex ed. in Africa? Where did that come from WiDuker?
It's the Christian conservatives who are spreading AIDS with all their talk of monogamy and fidelity... btw you're knowledge and understand of the bible is tragically pathetic...the Hebrew word you reference above is 'gadal'. It means 'greater' as in Davids weeping was 'greater' than Jonathans. If you're going to misrepresent scripture, at least find a more effective or convincing way to do it. |
|
The more I try to back away the more they pull we back in.....thanks Eric sorry I tried that for long time......and watch three friends of mine fired from their jobs. And the funny thing about it was they never told anybody they where gay. Just looked gay to my buddy[the boss] and he pulled every trick in the book to get them shit canned from the job he and I worked. So no I'm NEVER going to PIPE DOWN ever...you want to put an end to my gay posts its easy.... BAN THE ANTIGAY THREADS or BAN ME . |
|
|
Post from WiDuker -
What an idiotic worldview you must have, my friend. How ignorant you must truly be in the real world when it comes to some subjects. I see where you have a child and are married. Do you think that it is YOUR responsibility to teach your own child what you wish him or her to know about such essentially private matters as sex, or do you think that it is the responsibility of some unknown, picked at random, person who thought that teaching health in an elementary school was better work than anything else he or she could likely get elsewhere? Who knows what idiocy has been taught in schools and what idiocy will always be taught in schools? Is there an agenda that the 'Flaming Left' have, which is shared by a great many folks, to teach that sex is a smorgasbord from which everyone should pick and choose? And even if you don't like the hogshead cheese, go ahead and eat the hogshead cheese, lest you offend those who truly love the hogshead cheese. These teachers, WiDuker cannot even teach math and science, and you wish them to tackle this subject? Bullshiite! Let health classes continue as they always have. I can say for a fact that in all of the health classes that I had in good old, White Christian Herterosexual Texas schools in the 1950s and 1960s, they told us that bad things would likely happen IF you put your private parts where they were NOT supposed to go. I'm down with that! By the way, these classes were sometimes segergated by sex. Boys went to one classroom and girls went to another, whenever films were to be viewed. How quaint! Probably the most popular sexual education texts in American high schools at present is one entitled: Changing Bodies, Changing Lives. This textbook says that "bisexuality is an openness to loving, sexual relationships with both sexes - our true nature," and graphically describes sexual practices of homosexuals. Then there is Learning About Sex, which observes that "Sado-masochism may be very acceptable and safe for sexual partners who know each other's needs." Learning About Sex also in effect recommends adultery: "Some people are now saying that partnerships - married or unmarried - should not be exclusive. They believe that while a primary relationship is maintained with one person, the freedom for both partners to love and share sex with others should also be present." Now, remember, this if for HIGH SCHOOL students. WTF do High School students NEED to know about 'bisexuality', 'sado-masochism', or 'adultery', simply to learn how NOT to get pregnant or to contract a loathesome disease? This is social engineering. Pure and simple. And just look around and see how it is changing the face of this country. Your child will have a much, much better life when you permit others to teach him or her about such matters as 'bisexuality', 'sado-masochism', and 'adultery.' Eric The(PrivatelyChristianSchoolingHisGranddaughter)Hun |
|
|
'We' back in? Who's this 'we' business? You have a trouser mouse in your pocket?
They were fired simply because 'everyone' knew they were gay? If 'everyone' knew they were gay, there's likely a reason for that, and you aren't telling us.
Are you certain about that?
'Looked gay'? What the dickens does that mean? I assume that your buddy, the Boss, explained that to you in detail? So, why does this pathetic-excuse-for-a-human-being buddy of yours, hang around with you? 'Cause you don't look gay? Act gay? Whatever?
Sorry, but if I were in a position to ban anything, I would never ban either pro- or anti-gay threads, nor would I ban folks who self-identified themselves as gay. Or racist. Or intolerant. Or bisexual. Or masochistic. Or whatever. Not my style. Eric The(Tolerable)Hun |
||||||
|
|
BTW, WiDuker, that's a pic that I would remove from the 'My Pictures' section of Windows!
Your child might inadvertantly see it. And be scarred for life. It may also violate the Code of Conduct here at ARFCOM, but I'll let others decide that! Eric The(TskTskTsk)Hun |
|
Keep the pic, keep the pic |
|
|
You would know all about pathetic. Why did you feel it important to ignore who started with the insults? Why is it that someone who points out the fact (that no one has been able to deny) that over 90% of the abuse of children was committed by homosexuals is being "self-righteous"? Why is it that while I have only responded to attacks in kind, I have at least stated facts in ALL of my posts but that cannot be said of the pro-homosexual posters? Why is it that when someone is accused of being gay because he states it is wrong you never point out their nonsense? No on has refuted ANY of my points, but you like to ignore that. |
||
|
Where exactly do you think i got it from. Its from the funniest arfcomm thread i have ever read. Some guy here was getting his pictures ripped off by an ebay person. So he changed the pictures with that one and pickles the cat. As far as my daughter goes shes 5 and has her own computer. Wi(I dont give a rats ass about your veiled threats ) Duker |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.