User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 7:40:58 PM EDT
[#1]
Page 2 says Seattle.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 8:02:26 PM EDT
[#2]
Go Seahawks
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 8:11:43 PM EDT
[#3]
Hawks will win, I just hope Rodgers is healthy so I don't have to hear Packers fans whine about his leg for the next year.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 8:13:32 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Is there a way both can lose? I guess I will pull for Seattle simply because the Packers are my Bears main enemy  You're into the bears huh? |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 8:17:57 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You're into the bears huh? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Is there a way both can lose? I guess I will pull for Seattle simply because the Packers are my Bears main enemy You're into the bears huh? Sometimes the jokes just write themselves. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 8:23:08 PM EDT
[#6]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 8:24:53 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted: No way "Gimpy" (a.k.a. Rogers) will come out on top of this one... |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 8:27:24 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: So apt. I was in Seattle last week and all the tower cranes had 12th man flags. Tons of 12th man stuff in general everywhere. Its retarded. 10 years ago nobody really gave a shit about the Seahawks.  Super Bowl 40 |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 8:29:41 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
He looked like he was having a hard time placing the ball accurately in his passes, due to not having a stable base to throw from. Seattle has a secondary that you really really don't want to throw inaccurately against. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
No way "Gimpy" (a.k.a. Rogers) will come out on top of this one... Not to mention the Seattle pass rush is brutal. Rodgers just won't be able to get out of his own way. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 8:33:43 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Everything I say is coming from a lifelong Packers supporter; they will be beaten by the Seahawks. The Seahawks have a faster, better tackling defense. Every week I see the Packers defense miss tackles that other teams make. I desperately want the Packers to win, but I don't like their chances.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 8:36:33 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Sometimes the jokes just write themselves. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Is there a way both can lose? I guess I will pull for Seattle simply because the Packers are my Bears main enemy You're into the bears huh? Sometimes the jokes just write themselves. I couldn't resist. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 8:48:51 PM EDT
[#12]
As someone that lives in the Seattle area, and watched nearly game between 1988-2010, I'm picking the Seahawks to win.
Having said that I half wish they will lose so all the bipolar sports fans up here (translated fans only when teams win) will shut up. All their "we," "us," "my" gibberish like they are a part of the team is mental. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 8:56:43 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
As someone that lives in the Seattle area, and watched nearly game between 1998-2010, I'm picking the Seahawks to win. Having said that I half wish they will lose so all the bipolar sports fans up here (translated fans only when teams win) will shut up. All their "we," "us," "my" gibberish like they are a part of the team is mental. I was basically born into being a fan (my dad started rooting for them in '76), and I watched damn near every game growing up. I think a lot of it has to do with the fact that Seattle just never has had much success with championships in any sport. I also believe that a lot of the bandwagoners will stick around when the Hawks finally fade away. Sure some will fall off, but a lot will stick around. Same way that the Stealers, Cowgirls, Whiners, and any number of other teams with past glory attract a ton of fans. It just so happens the Hawks are finally having that success now instead of in the past. Would you have been annoyed as a Niners fan in say the late 80's when they started attracting new fans? I really don't get annoyed by it. I love the fact that my favorite team is finally getting recognition! And there has always been a core of life long fans here, it's just the rest of the country hasn't been able to see it, since they never really operated on a national level. Also the whole, "I, we, us" thing, I really don't care what people say. It all comes from man's tribal mentality. I will say though that Seattle fans do have a much more significant impact on home games than many other teams, so there is something to saying "Us" for those lucky enough to attend... |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 8:58:12 PM EDT
[#14]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 8:58:25 PM EDT
[#15]
I believe the Hawks will win. They are at home and Rodgers is a gimp right now.
I would rather see Green Bay win though. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 9:02:51 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I was basically born into being a fan (my dad started rooting for them in '76), and I watched damn near every game growing up. I think a lot of it has to do with the fact that Seattle just never has had much success with championships in any sport. I also believe that a lot of the bandwagoners will stick around when the Hawks finally fade away. Sure some will fall off, but a lot will stick around. Same way that the Stealers, Cowgirls, Whiners, and any number of other teams with past glory attract a ton of fans. It just so happens the Hawks are finally having that success now instead of in the past. Would you have been annoyed as a Niners fan in say the late 80's when they started attracting new fans? I really don't get annoyed by it. I love the fact that my favorite team is finally getting recognition! And there has always been a core of life long fans here, it's just the rest of the country hasn't been able to see it, since they never really operated on a national level. Also the whole, "I, we, us" thing, I really don't care what people say. It all comes from man's tribal mentality. I will say though that Seattle fans do have a much more significant impact on home games than many other teams, so there is something to saying "Us" for those lucky enough to attend... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
As someone that lives in the Seattle area, and watched nearly game between 1998-2010, I'm picking the Seahawks to win. Having said that I half wish they will lose so all the bipolar sports fans up here (translated fans only when teams win) will shut up. All their "we," "us," "my" gibberish like they are a part of the team is mental. I was basically born into being a fan (my dad started rooting for them in '76), and I watched damn near every game growing up. I think a lot of it has to do with the fact that Seattle just never has had much success with championships in any sport. I also believe that a lot of the bandwagoners will stick around when the Hawks finally fade away. Sure some will fall off, but a lot will stick around. Same way that the Stealers, Cowgirls, Whiners, and any number of other teams with past glory attract a ton of fans. It just so happens the Hawks are finally having that success now instead of in the past. Would you have been annoyed as a Niners fan in say the late 80's when they started attracting new fans? I really don't get annoyed by it. I love the fact that my favorite team is finally getting recognition! And there has always been a core of life long fans here, it's just the rest of the country hasn't been able to see it, since they never really operated on a national level. Also the whole, "I, we, us" thing, I really don't care what people say. It all comes from man's tribal mentality. I will say though that Seattle fans do have a much more significant impact on home games than many other teams, so there is something to saying "Us" for those lucky enough to attend... That's a huge part of it, when the Mariners got good people hopped on...until they traded everyone away 
The Seahawks had well over a decade of largely terrible drafts and signing big name players when they were super old. Until Holmgrim (a nickname some of my friends and I gave him) shifted the mentality of the franchise. The Sonics had tons of fans when they were good, but we know where they are now. If the support was there the city would have done what they wanted, it wasn't there. I get people jumping aboard but the people up here are mental about it. Boasting how they are lifelong fans, when they don't know who in the hell Kennedy, Warren, Easley, Watters, Etc. are, just to name a few. But they all know about the Boz 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 9:06:43 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That's a huge part of it, when the Mariners got good people hopped on...until they traded everyone away
The Seahawks had well over a decade of largely terrible drafts and signing big name players when they were super old. Until Holmgrim (a nickname some of my friends and I gave him) shifted the mentality of the franchise. The Sonics had tons of fans when they were good, but we know where they are now. If the support was there the city would have done what they wanted, it wasn't there. I get people jumping aboard but the people up here are mental about it. Boasting how they are lifelong fans, when they don't know who in the hell Kennedy, Warren, Easley, Watters, Etc. are, just to name a few. But they all know about the Boz Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
As someone that lives in the Seattle area, and watched nearly game between 1998-2010, I'm picking the Seahawks to win. Having said that I half wish they will lose so all the bipolar sports fans up here (translated fans only when teams win) will shut up. All their "we," "us," "my" gibberish like they are a part of the team is mental. I was basically born into being a fan (my dad started rooting for them in '76), and I watched damn near every game growing up. I think a lot of it has to do with the fact that Seattle just never has had much success with championships in any sport. I also believe that a lot of the bandwagoners will stick around when the Hawks finally fade away. Sure some will fall off, but a lot will stick around. Same way that the Stealers, Cowgirls, Whiners, and any number of other teams with past glory attract a ton of fans. It just so happens the Hawks are finally having that success now instead of in the past. Would you have been annoyed as a Niners fan in say the late 80's when they started attracting new fans? I really don't get annoyed by it. I love the fact that my favorite team is finally getting recognition! And there has always been a core of life long fans here, it's just the rest of the country hasn't been able to see it, since they never really operated on a national level. Also the whole, "I, we, us" thing, I really don't care what people say. It all comes from man's tribal mentality. I will say though that Seattle fans do have a much more significant impact on home games than many other teams, so there is something to saying "Us" for those lucky enough to attend... That's a huge part of it, when the Mariners got good people hopped on...until they traded everyone away
The Seahawks had well over a decade of largely terrible drafts and signing big name players when they were super old. Until Holmgrim (a nickname some of my friends and I gave him) shifted the mentality of the franchise. The Sonics had tons of fans when they were good, but we know where they are now. If the support was there the city would have done what they wanted, it wasn't there. I get people jumping aboard but the people up here are mental about it. Boasting how they are lifelong fans, when they don't know who in the hell Kennedy, Warren, Easley, Watters, Etc. are, just to name a few. But they all know about the Boz The BOZ! I, ashamedly so, admit I totally rocked a Bozworth mullet in kindergarten. Don't forget Warner, Largent, Kreig, or Zorn! |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 9:10:53 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Rodgers is going to get Discount Double Fucked. I'd like to see the Packers win but that made me laugh out loud. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 9:17:06 PM EDT
[#19]
I want to see the pack win, but, sadly, the Seattle D is too strong for Rodgers and co. to beat.
Thinking it is Seahawks/Patriots in the SB, and I hope the Seattle D crushes Brady 5 ways. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 9:19:13 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I want to see the pack win, but, sadly, the Seattle D is too strong for Rodgers and co. to beat. Thinking it is Seahawks/Patriots in the SB, and I hope the Seattle D crushes Brady 5 ways. *looks at Seattle's D*  |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 9:25:48 PM EDT
[#21]
Seattle Seahawks for the win. I just hope Aaron Rodgers doesn't get further injured.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 9:26:59 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Seattle Seahawks for the win. I just hope Aaron Rodgers doesn't get further injured. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 9:33:45 PM EDT
[#23]
Go Seahawks
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 9:35:32 PM EDT
[#24]
SEA!!!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 9:37:53 PM EDT
[#25]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 9:38:46 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote History |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 9:39:19 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
SEA!!! HAWKS! |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 9:41:31 PM EDT
[#28]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 9:42:13 PM EDT
[#29]
I like both teams
 Think I'll just drink beer and see who wins
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 9:43:03 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Would have been interesting if the Broncos had won. All four teams in the next round would have had a QB with at least one ring. Quote HistoryQuoted:
That would have been pretty cool. Which reminds me of something interesting about this year! It's the first time since 1083 (and only the second time ever), where 3 of the final four QB's are Super Bowl champs, and one QB isn't. The QB that didn't have a ring that year was Dave Kreig! |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 9:43:25 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Shamelessly stolen for FB Quote HistoryReddit in my case
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 9:44:34 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That would have been pretty cool. Which reminds me of something interesting about this year! It's the first time since 1083 (and only the second time ever), where 3 of the final four QB's are Super Bowl champs, and one QB isn't. The QB that didn't have a ring that year was Dave Kreig! Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
That would have been pretty cool. Which reminds me of something interesting about this year! It's the first time since 1083 (and only the second time ever), where 3 of the final four QB's are Super Bowl champs, and one QB isn't. The QB that didn't have a ring that year was Dave Kreig! 1983? |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 9:46:18 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
1983? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That would have been pretty cool. Which reminds me of something interesting about this year! It's the first time since 1083 (and only the second time ever), where 3 of the final four QB's are Super Bowl champs, and one QB isn't. The QB that didn't have a ring that year was Dave Kreig! 1983? Nope, 1083!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 9:47:54 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Nope, 1083! Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That would have been pretty cool. Which reminds me of something interesting about this year! It's the first time since 1083 (and only the second time ever), where 3 of the final four QB's are Super Bowl champs, and one QB isn't. The QB that didn't have a ring that year was Dave Kreig! 1983? Nope, 1083! The Saxons always did have a weak offensive line. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 9:48:18 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: 1983? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Would have been interesting if the Broncos had won. All four teams in the next round would have had a QB with at least one ring. That would have been pretty cool. Which reminds me of something interesting about this year! It's the first time since 1083 (and only the second time ever), where 3 of the final four QB's are Super Bowl champs, and one QB isn't. The QB that didn't have a ring that year was Dave Kreig! 1983? |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 10:01:55 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Rodgers is going to get Discount Double Fucked. That Wroggers guy too
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 10:36:22 PM EDT
[#37]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 10:40:22 PM EDT
[#38]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 10:42:13 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryWith questionable accuracy (I suspect due to a poor platform, with the injured leg), that could be a very, very bad goad to rise to. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 10:42:39 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryYoink! |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 10:43:54 PM EDT
[#41]
<----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 10:47:56 PM EDT
[#42]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 10:48:20 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Seahawks lead nearly every defensive category. Also in top 25% of offensive ones. They will win again...handily. Yup........ |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 11:11:08 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I want to see the pack win, but, sadly, the Seattle D is too strong for Rodgers and co. to beat. Thinking it is Seahawks/Patriots in the SB, and I hope the Seattle D crushes Brady 5 ways. If Seattle beats the Pack, they will beat the Patriots. The two teams are way too similar in methodology and composition. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/13/2015 11:12:34 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Well he is right... No one thought Seattle had any chance the previous several decades as they languished at the bottom... But then 10 years ago they did make it to the Superbowl. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: So apt. I was in Seattle last week and all the tower cranes had 12th man flags. Tons of 12th man stuff in general everywhere. Its retarded. 10 years ago nobody really gave a shit about the Seahawks. Super Bowl 40Well he is right... No one thought Seattle had any chance the previous several decades as they languished at the bottom... But then 10 years ago they did make it to the Superbowl. And were robbed by the Steeler loving referees. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/18/2015 1:54:37 PM EDT
[#46]
Today is the day...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/18/2015 1:58:54 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What is your hard-on for the CLink? What's so different about Hawks fans than anywhere else? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I guess I should root for the Seahawks as Wilson grew up here in Virginia but I can't stand that rainy netherworld of a stadium and the retarded fans. Go Packers.  What is your hard-on for the CLink? What's so different about Hawks fans than anywhere else? Seattle fans are new to this whole "winning" thing, and there's a certain arrogance that, when combined with the ignorance shown by the majority of the bandwagon fans (and let's face it, the majority of Seattle fans ARE bandwaggoners), it's a horrible combination full of WTF and Derp. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/18/2015 2:14:18 PM EDT
[#48]
The Legion of Boom is going to shut down the Double Check guy.
The Packers running game is going to be hard to slow down.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/18/2015 2:19:19 PM EDT
[#49]
The weather here is fucking horrible. 40mph wind, driving rain, dark as fuck.
SEA |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/18/2015 2:25:58 PM EDT
[#50]
I want the Packers to win, but it will probably be the Seachickens. They are clearly the better team this year. But in football, all that matters is who plays better today, not who is the better team. And the Packers have improved a lot since the last time they played, so it should be a good game.
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
