Quoted:
Quoted: Personaly I think everyone is reading way to much into this. To me, he is simply a liberal raised by liberal parents in the wrong place at the wrong time much like the bulldozer girl.
Tj
|
Once again, if we only listen to TJ. I agree, wholeheartedly. While most of us would just as soon punch Nick Berg's father in the face, I believe Nick Berg shared his father's politics. I believe he was there looking for a way to aid the enemy, a young left-wing, anti-war idealist in the wrong place at the wrong time.
|
As much as I hate to say it, I think this might be the case. Everyone keeps saying he was pro-War and pro-Bush, but I’ve seen nothing to support that idea. In fact, everything I’ve read makes him look like a liberal do-gooder, who was (at the very least) sympathetic to the Iraqis. Doesn’t excuse what happened though.
I REALLY doubt he was a spook. It just doesn’t make any sense.
The guy was a white American Jew. Sending him in to infiltrate al Qaeda would be like sending a black female Catholic in to infiltrate an all-gay male satanic KKK group. It would be murder to send him in, and it would be suicide to accept such a mission. Unless the CIA was trying to confuse the terrorists by the pure irony of the situation…
Don’t you think the CIA has Arab looking agents in Iraq and elsewhere? People that can speak the language and fake the same beliefs. Even if they don’t, surely they have turned some Iraqis. I really doubt they would send in an American Jew unless they were out of all other options.
*edited to add
If he really was a spook, I bet we wouldn't be hearing so much screaming from his parents. I doubt the CIA recruits agents who have anti-war/anti-gov't parents because there would be too much risk of the parents blowing the whistle (if they discovered who was signing their son's paycheck). And if the 'family' is employed by the CIA, I doubt they would want this much media attention.