User Panel
IF homosexuality in males were a single-gene trait, which I don't believe it is, then even through selective breeding (as one poster theorized earlier), the trait would never disappear unless the mutation rate at that locus were zero (which I'm sure it isn't).
|
|
Right - good point. Although I was just speculating that if it were a male trait (which I guess the posted article suggests that it isn't), the incidence of it would certainly drop like a rock, if every gay male was out of the closet, and nobody was pretending. But to suggest it would disappear is certainly too strong a statement. |
|
|
Why do I have a feeling I'm in a game of hot potato? Where's the "IT's BUSH's FAULT?" pictures when you need them? btw [warning hijack] I see multiple winners won the powerball after all. Did you save your ticket? |
|||
|
well, it would be tough to pass it down the paternal side, now wouldn't it?
|
|
I can't help buying guns and electric basses. Am I hotwired that way? Is it genetic? "I can't help it." |
|
|
The point is it's a free country. |
||
|
|
More crap from the psychiatric community because their under the gun from gay rights groups. It's simply a lifstyle choice based on developmental factors and the influence of poor parental skills. |
|
We haven't even approached scratching the surface as it relates to genetics and human behavior. I'm always amazed how much everyone here knows about the subject.
As far as homosexuality is concerned I suspect that there are varying degrees of genetic, hormonal and environmental components that effect sexual orientation. I'll never understand what one man sees in another mans hairy butt. I don't think anyone just chooses to be gay with no other factors involved. |
|
You are thinking in absolutes. During my medical phase in life I've known a few hermorphodites. These people were genetic and split 50/50 on sexual partner preference. These were people who's actual X/Y choromozones were in shift. Their actually bodies changed gaining physical traits of the gender they were switching to, however I saw no rhyme or reason to their sexual partner sexual preference. Maybe later, I don't know. There are people though very rare that genuinely have phsiological gender issues. Homosexuality as an absolute is almost impossible for me to put a finger on. For example most couples not just flings I have known in life have had one male and one female characteristic partner though the same sex. You see this more in lesbian relationships than males even. I can actually put more common traits not on phsyiology but behaviour and experience. For example most gay men I have known have had a strange fixation with their mothers usually adoring them to the point of being almost sexual and rarely have a fixation on their father. I admit I haven't met any that admitted to me personaly of being sexually assaulted by their father as a child but "Diddling" as they called it with other older boys was a common theme and most at an age considered child abuse though I got very few indications they saw it as such. I have little doubt how one is raised and early childhood experiences has a major impact on tendencies. You raise a boy as a girl you shouldn't be surprised if he acts like girl in many aspects and the inverse is true for girls. Ego plays a hell of a role in chosing the gay lifestyle. For you see any guy can bed a girl but it takes a guy quite confident in their sexuality to feel he can have a guy. I've known gay guys that claimed they could "Diddle" with any man they saw and they were dead serious about it. Now that's ego. You see this very much in people who are taken in their professions and appearence. Vanity plays a role in the choice. I'm not surprised in the least movie actors are such avid supporters of the gay lifestyle. As you can see much of my opinion is not based on what I have read but who I have known. I lived in Houston for ten years which has the second highest gay population in the US second only to San Fran. You see I accepted freedom of choice long long ago when gays were still in the closet. Not my thing but not a major turn off for me either. It was at one time but I out grew it. The overt sexuality like kissing bothers me but then I don't care for hetrosexuals being overt about their sexuality either. You see to tolerate or accept the gay lifestyle first you must be very confident and comfortable in your sexual preference and choice. Once you are, you don't feel threatened by others. Maybe one day I can not feel sorry for their choice and them as people but I doubt it in my lfietime. The social stignma isn't going away overnight and IMHO studies like this one, flaming fairies, and cram it down your throat political correctness hurts that acceptance and doesn't help it. I'm not a flaming homophobe and I don't claim it but live it. Some of the best employees I have ever had have been gay. I wouldn't be stupid enough to put them in outside sales though. Tj |
|
|
Yes it does have some serious longterm ramifications for society and the gay subculture. I think this is a good thing. As our knowledge increases about the human geonome (and protein folding) and tests are devised to detect genetic abnormalities within a fetus, it gives parents the knowledge to exercise abortion on genetically undesirable fetuses. Do anyone think that the Gay Movement which is mostly Pro-Abortion will switch to Pro-Life? And religious fundamentalists will switch on their positions? |
|
|
Yeah - I checked the ticket a couple of days ago and we got nothing. Oh well. Maybe next time I buy my once-a-decade lottery ticket I'll have better luck. |
|
|
You get more bang for your buck if you don't check it right away! |
||
|
Of course "acting on it" is a choice.....it's the attraction to the same sex that can't be helped. Thats why I called BS on people who say their "ex gay".....Their still queer as a three dollar bill, they have just decided for whatever reason to not "act gay". Which if that makes them happy than more power to them. |
||
|
Many mainstream people in academia (as opposed to the lunatic fringe) believe that there is both a genetic and "learned" component. I say learned because it is not consciously learned. Nor do any proponents of learning theory believe it can be unlearned. The theory has been manipulated by politicians who have no understanding of the science behind it.
I'm inclined to think that in at least some gay men their is a sizable genetic component based on the evidence of twin studies of twins that are separated at birth. However, there have been a lot of problems with the genetic camps research in the past. Rather than instantly claiming "sexual perversion" or "anti-Christian/ROP/etc" many people would do well to research the subject on a basic level. My familiarity with the topic comes only as an example of social learning theory which is something I know a little bit about. |
|
Learning theory absolutely states that being gay could not be unlearned as does any genetic hypothesis. As far as ALL of the research that is being done the one thing people agree on is that you can't become straight. Also, I should add while learning theory would attribute developmental factors to orientation, it is in no way related to good or poor parenting. It is essentially random. Also the notion that all gay people are exclusively gay is really a myth. It is estimated that only about 6% of the population exclusively engages in homosexual behavior throughout their life. Also, significantly less than half of people engage in exclusively heterosexual behavior throughout their life. Perhaps some people aren’t being honest here because there are only a few members that have the courage to admit it in such a hostile place. I’m certainly not gay, but sexuality is pretty much a non-issue to me in a political/moral sense. I don’t care what the preferences of my friends are, and I wouldn’t care about the preferences of family members. However, to the best of my knowledge I have no gay family members. |
|||
|
Well one of the biggest problems with do any real research on the subject is getting a straight answer from any subject....sorry for the pun. First you would have to decide what is and isn't...gay. Example I have a friend who says she Bi-sexual, she's married and has two kids. Her husband knows and is very happy about it [if he gets to join in] and they keep it away from the rest of their family. But she admitts [to me] that she isn't attracted to men and the only reason she is still with him is because she doesn't want to lose her family. Now I know that there are real Bi-sexuals and that being exclusively gay is rare. But if she's a bi-sexual I'm a jet pilot. |
||||
|
Dang, I always get into the good threads late.
I don't know this new research, but I was following the Hamer research investigating the Xq28 region of the mother's contribution to the 23rd pair of gay men. His family line research generally suggested it was on that chromosome, but isolating the region was more difficult. He found correlations with the Xq28 region, but subsequent researchers couldn't replicate the finding. Its interesting that they are finding something else from the mother. In general, we are still far away from understanding how particular sequences of nucleotides leads to being gay or straight, but the behavioral genetic evidence is there for sexuality and other behavioral traits like personality. In general, we're no longer starting from the position in behavioral sciences that behavior is genetic or environmentally caused, but rather behavior is caused by an interaction of genes and the environment. Human sexuality, whether it be gay, straight, or something in between, will likely fall in line with other behavior. It might seem like the gay gene should die out, unless it is strategy to help pass along genes. I know it sounds wrong, but it might be an interesting strategy of breeders to produce occasional nonbreeding offspring. Non breeding offspring are like the worker bees in families. They produce resources and then give those resources to the siblings who breed or the offspring of siblings. Anyone who has an uncle or aunt who never married or had kids (for whatever reason) probably received resources from them and that helped them survive and reproduce themselves. Of course nonbreeding offspring are 50% genetically identical to their breeding siblings and 25% similar to their nieces and nephews. It might not be the defect it appears. Well, thats one idea of why a gay gene may never die out. |
|
I also think that homosexuality is possibly some kind of genetic defect. People that are homosexual are born that way. Like DK-prof said, animals goal is to ultimately mate, this includes humans.
One possibility is that a certain gene triggers, causing attraction to the same sex in order to prevent them from passing on their genes. This is possibly because their genes are flawed in some way. Believe it or not, there are gay animals. I've seen one with my own eyes, and have heard of many more. I don't think they are in it for the "sexual perversion ", there has to be something at work on the genetic level. |
|
"women randomly process the chromosomes in one of two ways -- half go one way, half go the other..."
There you go, not being able to make a decision goes much, much deeper than which lipstick to put on... |
|
Irresponsible, idiot reporters. Those results are meaningless in isolation. The reporter read in a link between a genetic process and a cognitive behavioral trait that wasn't there. That should be damning enough to this story.
There might be, and probably is a genetic component, but if anyone thinks determing that link through the maze of biochemical, genetic, and cognitive processes is going to happen any time soon, they are sadly mistaken. |
|
What about people who dabble in both ink wells. WTH are they??? I mean, don't get me wrong...I can look at Angie Jolie and say she's hot, but I have absolutely NO desire to perform cunnilingus on her Anne Heche went from men to women to men again. WTF is that about. And I think you meant "they're" (contraction of they are) not "their" (possesive pronoun). |
|||
|
Agreed, we are only in the beginning stages of understanding how particular nucleotide sequences lead to differences in cogntive, sexual, or any type of behavior (except in the most simple cases like PKU). |
|
|
Here's a short version: men who hate fags are kinda gay themselves and they react positively to gay porn. |
||
|
In my experience, this is absolutely true. Working in the Bay Area, and particularly in San Fran, I've worked with and associated with a LOT of gay and lesbian people. Some of them were born homosexual, and knew their inclination from the time they were children. Many tried to act otherwise, dating people of the opposite gender to fit in, but were always gay. Others were molested as children, and the trauma of that "flipped a switch" in them that "reset" their sexual orientation. Many of these people specifically are attracted to the type of person who molested them, or to people who are the extreme opposite of the person who molested them. It's also very clear that the vast majority of men are either totally straight or totally gay, with very few in the middle (a deep bell curve), while with women, the curve is much flatter. As far as the genetics go, it makes sense. We know that both animals and humans evolve, and we also know that part of that occurs through genetic mutation over time. That is normal and healthy to the human race overall, if not always to the individual. Many children with birth defects never reproduce, yet new children with those same birth defects are born every day, so simply not reproducing the trait sexually doesn't mean that it will disappear entirely, at least not fast enough for us to notice it. Why is it so hard to believe that homosexuality is a (recessive) genetic trait, or perhaps a genetic defect? Why is it easier to accept that birth marks, bad skin, big feet, or cleft pallets are genetic? Why is it easier to accept that some people are born *smart*, and some are born *not so bright*, and some have an amazing gift in one particular area but are failures in others? StonerStudent made a great point: if you believe that homosexuality is just a choice in behavior, then you believe that YOU have the capability to be a homosexual yourself. I know I don't; I'm attracted to women, and have always been, and there's nothing I could do about that. I didn't choose to be attracted to women, I just am. A gay person similarly doesn't choose his or her attraction, it's just there. Granted, in some, it was a result of early childhood trauma, but by the onset of puberty, the attraction is what it is. No one is saying that you have to embrace homosexuality as "normal", anymore than you'd embrace cancer or MS as "normal." But understand it for what it is. -Troy |
|
|
Depends on why they're dabbling in both sexes, if they're actually attracted to both then they're Bi sexual. But if they're like my friend who just thinks that being "Bi" is more socially acceptable..then it's BS. Poor ol Anne Heche has got issues..not because she's flopping around sexually....she thinks she been abduced by aliens And I too think Angie Jolie is pretty......but I don't want to perform cunnilingus on her either. |
|
|
Then is sexual preference learned or genetic? I don't expect you to have the answer...I'm merely giving you scenarios where it could be either or both. I dunno...I don't think a mom makes her son gay, but I do wonder how it happens. When researching my difficult eldest's challenging behavior, I leaned that temperament is both learned and instilled from birth. I wonder then if sexuality is the same. |
||
|
Well your right...I'm just speaking from past experinces. I'm my case I would genetic..I have always been attracted to men. But even I was "in love" with a women once, my first real girlfriend when I was about 23 yrs old. We where together for about a year and when it ended I thought I would die. But I figured out after a few years that it wasn't her I was in love with as much as the idea of a family...which was and is a big facture with me. It took me along time to come to the idea that a family is what you make of it...not just being with someone you can marry and have kids with. |
|||
|
How would you explain other genetic "birth defects"? How do those happen? And, BTW, while the gene in question may be the female gene in this case, as baldness may be part of the male gene, don't look at CAUSE as "blame." If your kid has red hair, flat feet, or droopy eyes, you (or your mate) may be the genetic "cause", but there is no *blame* to be associated with those things. -Troy |
|
|
Shoot, we MAY find out that BOTH parents MUST have the trait in order for the effct (gayness) to even be a POSSIBILITY in their offspring! (Isn't Cistic Fibrosis, or some disorer like that? If BOTH "contributing" parental units don't have the marker then no problem? -It's not a DEFINITE, I'm thinking it's like a 25% chance or something???) ((Sorry, I'm recalling this from a L&O ep I saw a Loooonnnnggg time ago where a "fertility doc" used his own sperm to "impregnate" women to save costs on testing for HIV & other STDs of doners and PAYING doners etc..)) COULD be BOTH parent's being the "cause" this is just one potential "contributing factor". Who knows? Who CARES?? I don't... but it IS interesting... IMO. |
|||||
|
Actually, baldness is on the X chromosome of the X-Y pair. You inherit it from your mother's side. Same with haemophilia. |
||
|
71's right on this one, Troy. If you wanna know if you'll be bald or not, look at you Maternal grandfather. You mom carried his "hair gene." As far as OTHER genetic "birth defects" they happen due to a slipped or malformed gene. An extra in the bunch (or one missing) that's what a "genetic birth defect" is, not how *I* would personally explain it. I'm saying I don't buy that homosexuality is genetic. I'm not saying it ISN'T. I'm saying, whoa, Nelly! Let's not blame mom YET. |
|||
|
Personally, I think it can be either OR both, depending upon the individual.I think for myself, it's just hardwired. But some have attraction to same, both, or opposite sex, and then have various experiences that "influence" or maybe even "reinforce" those prefrences. Then I think there are some who are born ONE way then because of various negative influences go het or homo.... IMO, this is why it's all so complicated... why some believe VERY strongly that it MUST be a "choice" while others insist JUST as vehemently it's not. See, people who are BORN straight cannot IMAGINE being ATTRACTED ("that way") to a member of the SAME sex, therefore, gays "must" choose to be that way.... just as I cannot fathom WHY anyone would be attracted ("that way") to ANY guy. Difference is, I have a functional brain, and figure it MUST be that it's just the way they were born, and they can't help it. Otherwise, WTF???? No offense intended to anyone here attracted to guys, "that way" ... I d/ on't "get" it, though, I DO admit I get it a BIT more w/ gay guys... there are just advandages to being THAT familiar w/the equipment. Things MORE in common, etc... I just plain DO NOT GET str8 women. But then I don't HAVE to either . I also do NOT get why ANYONE enjoys eating cooked spinach...... or likes dogs (enough to own/be owned by one, anyway). I don't HAVE to. I accept that they are/do, and move on to the really interesting stuff. |
|
|
Yup. Don't look to dad, look to your mom's dad. Damn that mitochondrial DNA! (Mitochondrial DNA is is only inherited through the mother.) |
|
|
Ummm.... I MIGHT agree that by in LARGE the "justice" drive has a genetic COMPONENT, therefore, as FIREARMS are the most EFFECTIVE way to INSURE your liberty.... in THAT waythe "buying guns" bit I'll buy, but otherwise, it's a choice, and learned behavoir (GOOD behavior, as long as it doesn't threaten to wreck your marriage/relationship) but Learned behavior none-the-less. Nice try tho! |
||
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.