Ask your libtard prof to show Moore's film Canadian Bacon next that would be more relevant.

Play the game, get the 'A', leave.

The people in charge are in charge. You can't change them or their viewpoints. Just play their game, fool them into thinking you're 'A' material, and leave.

Print out 30 copies of the website page and distribute one to each student ...

I have to call bullshit on this line of reasoning, used by you and others in this thread.

It is important to evaluate all legitimate data on an issue before coming to a conclusion and forming an opinion on an issue. If you are holding a strong opinion on something, then you should have already done this. As new legitimate information is presented, it is important to reevaluate your opinion with that new information in mind. That said, there is no reason to entertain illegitimate viewpoints, and absolutely no reason to repeatedly evaluate the same illegitimate viewpoint over and over again (assuming your original line of reasoning was sound).

College professors should not teach as legitimate viewpoints like the theory of geocentricity, the idea that the Earth is flat (or square, or conical, or curled up like a twisty straw), that alien phaetons are making us ill, or the idea that vampires walk among us and sparkle in the sunlight. There are trillions of illegitimate theories floating around in opposition to legitimate theories and laws and seriously entertaining them is not the responsibility, nor is it appropriate, of a college course.

Capitalism is a law––like the law of gravity, not a viewpoint subject to opinion. The sooner we get this through our heads and cease legitimizing the fictional notion of utopian communism by elevating that viewpoint to the same level as a law, the sooner we will see this plague of insanity exit the realms of reason.

Now, if someone wants to watch Michael Moore's movies or read Marx's ramblings, by all means, do so to learn about their psychology and thought processes. If you want to learn about economics, however, leave the fiction out of it.

Even within the realm of legitimate theories, there is also a time and a place. The OP has not given any indication how the viewing of Sicko in an English class is relevant to the course material. For that alone, he has reason to complain and such a complaint has nothing to do with how open-minded a person is or is not.

*Nightcrew bump* Class is tomorrow, still trying to get all the input I can.

voice recorder the prof if its legal, ask them what this has to do with composition, ask if there will be an assignment use any quotes against them.