General » General Discussion

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Kari Byron from Mythbusters (Page 2 of 3)

Posted: 6/16/2009 11:26:56 AM EDT

[#1]

Posted: 6/16/2009 11:27:57 AM EDT

[#2]

^ LMAO

Quoted:

Thank you for transporting me back into the '90s, Dead Eye Dick!

Badum

Badum

Badum

Ooorah

Great tune.

Posted: 6/16/2009 11:28:25 AM EDT

[#3]

Quoted:
Hell yes i still want, and i cant get her pregant anymore than she already is!!!!!!!!!!!!1

this, no need to pull out

Posted: 6/16/2009 11:37:37 AM EDT

[#4]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Hell yes i still want, and i cant get her pregant anymore than she already is!!!!!!!!!!!!1

this, no need to pull out

Wanna bet?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superfetation

Superfetation (also spelt superfoetation, based on a hypercorrection — see fetus) is the formation of a fetus while another fetus is already present in the uterus. When there are two separate instances of fertilisation during the same cycle, rather than different cycles, it is known as superfecundation.

Superfetation is claimed to be common in some species of animals,
but is extremely rare in humans. It can occur only where there are two
uteri, or where the menstrual cycle continues through pregnancy.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-508025/The-babies-born-just-minute-apart-ARENT-twins.html

The babies born just a minute apart who AREN'T twins

By BETH HALE

Last updated at 10:30 15 January 2008

Comments (14)

Add to My Stories

They grew in the same womb and were born only a minute apart.
Yet Thomas and Harriet Mullineux are not twins.

They were conceived three weeks apart thanks to an extraordinary
twist of nature.

Their mother Charlotte had been pregnant with twins when at
seven weeks she miscarried one of them. But two weeks later, she
discovered she was carrying another foetus - conceived separately
and still growing in her womb.

The surviving twin and the new baby were born last May and,
after a health scare, are now home and thriving.

Scroll down for more

Brother and sister: Charlotte Mullineux with Harriet, left, and
Thomas. They were conceived three weeks apart

Mrs Mullineux, 28, and her husband Matt, a contracts manager for
a scaffolding company, were thrilled when they discovered she was
pregnant in September 2006. They had been keen to expand their
family ever since their two-year-old son James was born.

But only a week later, Mrs Mullineux feared she was having a
miscarriage and went to hospital.

A scan revealed she had been carrying twins but one of the
foetuses had died and was being absorbed back into the womb.

Another blob was detected on this initial scan, but was thought
to be another egg that hadn't dissipated yet.

Mrs Mullineux, of Benfleet, Essex, was told to return in two
weeks to ensure all was fine.

"I was disappointed I had lost one of them but was more
concerned about the other one," she said last night. "Those two
weeks were agony for us. When I went back, I was astonished when
they said there was another baby.

"It turned out the blob that was on my last scan picture had
grown into a baby."

Mrs Mullineux was told she was expecting two babies - one three
weeks older than the other.

It was explained that hers was a rare case of superfetation,
where the body carries on releasing more eggs for fertilisation
after a pregnancy has already started. It meant that, technically,
Mrs Mullineux could have become pregnant again each month during
her pregnancy.

The pregnancy was not without its problems. Harriet did not grow
as quickly as her brother and had to be monitored carefully.

Thomas was born at 6.32pm on May 4, weighing 5lb 6oz, and
Harriet at 6.33pm weighing 4lb 1oz.

They were both taken to special care, where they remained for
three weeks before being allowed home. Harriet was desperately ill
at one stage after contracting pneumonia but made a remarkable
recovery.

Thomas is described as "tall and lanky" and "very laid-back"
while Harriet is "short and stumpy" and "interested in
everything".

Mrs Mullineux said: "We are thrilled to be parents again,
especially now that they are into a good routine of feeding and
sleeping."

SIIHP just to be safe!

Posted: 6/16/2009 11:42:55 AM EDT

[#5]

I woulda hit it 8 months ago....

Posted: 6/16/2009 11:51:29 AM EDT

[#6]

Quoted:

Quoted:
http://i43.tinypic.com/2q07z0l.gif

Still want?

i have a want for the female preg-asaurus..........all of them, she still looks good to me.

REALLY! All of them. That's quite a statement.

http://myweb.cableone.net/williambeav2/pregoanimation.gif

Good gracious! What is she carrying????? Me????

Posted: 6/16/2009 11:53:27 AM EDT

[#7]

Quoted:

Quoted:

She is still drop dead gorgeous.

That is just the pregnancy hormones tricking your simple male mind. It is part of the plan to keep the male around to protect the mother while she is pregnant.

..... You serious?

Posted: 6/16/2009 11:58:06 AM EDT

[#8]

Hit it with extreme prejudice.

Posted: 6/16/2009 12:00:53 PM EDT

[#9]

So, are the topless photos of her real? If they are, I am most definitely a fan now.

Posted: 6/16/2009 12:05:18 PM EDT

[#10]

Quoted:

no sir

You're right, kind of unfair only putting a cute chick in this thread.....clearly that's not your flavor and the OP should have given options.

This more your speed?

Posted: 6/16/2009 12:07:45 PM EDT

[#11]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Who's the father?

Here's the father Paul Urich

http://img44.imageshack.us/img44/6692/pkariandpaulurichshow.jpg

He's either very wealthy or very endowed.

No kidding.

In for killing him and making him disappear?

Posted: 6/16/2009 12:09:12 PM EDT

[#12]

Quoted:
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/ll285/Petermaxi/KariByron.gif

I just freakin' hurt my tongue biting it, sometimes this place is dangerous at work

Posted: 6/16/2009 12:10:21 PM EDT

[#13]

Hell yeah, them tig bitties be all a floppy and full

Posted: 6/16/2009 12:17:23 PM EDT

[#14]

I'd hit repeatedly... that kid would come out with its head looking like a Titleist.

Posted: 6/16/2009 12:20:40 PM EDT

[#15]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Who's the father?

Here's the father Paul Urich

http://img44.imageshack.us/img44/6692/pkariandpaulurichshow.jpg

Seriously, if that does it for y'all... congrats.

While she's not ugly, I just dont find her to be attractive. I'd probably fuck her, but only because I could say "I banged the myth busters chick."

Posted: 6/16/2009 12:26:50 PM EDT

[#16]

Hell yes

Posted: 6/16/2009 12:28:06 PM EDT

[#17]

Hello mother, want another?

Posted: 6/16/2009 12:32:57 PM EDT

[#18]

"Got Milk?"

Posted: 6/16/2009 12:34:00 PM EDT

[#19]

i'd ride the hump !

Posted: 6/16/2009 12:34:44 PM EDT

[#20]

Didn't want before the baby. She's a 6 or 7 at best.

Posted: 6/16/2009 12:35:44 PM EDT

[#21]

Quoted:

no sir

Posted: 6/16/2009 12:39:42 PM EDT

[#22]

Leggo my preggo!!!

Posted: 6/16/2009 12:42:43 PM EDT

[#23]

If she keeps this up, I'm going to start thinking that she doesn't really love me.

I don't know why I even bother stalking her anymore.

Posted: 6/16/2009 1:09:35 PM EDT

[#24]

Yea, she was cute before and the pregnancy hasn't affected that. Of course my wife is 22 weeks so I'm learning how to like the additional curves on pregnant women.

Posted: 6/16/2009 1:23:05 PM EDT

[#25]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Too fat.

Uh dude, its called being pregnant.

Never heard of it.

She needs to lose that nasty beer gut......hit the gym fatty!

Posted: 6/16/2009 1:31:05 PM EDT

[#26]

Quoted:
I'd Hit it.

Like I was driving rail road spikes!

Posted: 6/16/2009 3:09:30 PM EDT

[#27]

Quoted:
http://www.btfh.net/posting/humping-smiley.gif

http://www.blacksnowman.com/img/I%27d%20hit%20it%20so%20hard.jpg

I chuckled. but i think that castle is neuschwanstein castle in germany.

Posted: 6/16/2009 3:30:25 PM EDT

[#28]

Quoted:

Quoted:
no sir

You're right, kind of unfair only putting a cute chick in this thread.....clearly that's not your flavor and the OP should have given options.

This more your speed?
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/12/92021377_bb2fe6f870.jpg

I realize that you are so desperate for sex that a pregnant woman is "sexy" to you.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile

Posted: 6/16/2009 3:45:26 PM EDT

[#29]

Quoted:

Quoted:
no sir

You're right, kind of unfair only putting a cute chick in this thread.....clearly that's not your flavor and the OP should have given options.

This more your speed?
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/12/92021377_bb2fe6f870.jpg

I realize that you are so desperate for sex that a pregnant woman is "sexy" to you.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile

Never boned a preggers then, I'm assuming?

ALL the blood rushes to her naughty parts. I had to speed up and/or accomodate wifey's needs during ours; she kept beating me to the punch.

Posted: 6/16/2009 3:48:38 PM EDT

[#30]

Quoted:

Quoted:
no sir

You're right, kind of unfair only putting a cute chick in this thread.....clearly that's not your flavor and the OP should have given options.

This more your speed?
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/12/92021377_bb2fe6f870.jpg

I realize that you are so desperate for sex that a pregnant woman is "sexy" to you.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile

This is ARFCOM, you're gay if you won't fuck ANYTHING with a vagina, including this:

Keep this in mind when giving opinions on the female form here.

Posted: 6/16/2009 3:55:35 PM EDT

[#31]

Quoted:
http://i43.tinypic.com/2q07z0l.gif

Still want?

Of course! Just after things are somewhat back to normal.

Posted: 6/16/2009 4:11:27 PM EDT

[#32]

Her mouth still works doesn't it?

Posted: 6/16/2009 4:15:46 PM EDT

[#33]

Oh man, she's one of those weirdo vegan chicks. Hit it once to satisfy your curiosity and EJECT!

Posted: 6/16/2009 4:21:07 PM EDT

[#34]

Whatever happened to the girl with the tatoos ? She was kinda hot.

Posted: 6/16/2009 4:25:21 PM EDT

[#35]

Quoted:
Generally speaking, a woman who is normally attractive is even more so when pregnant (in my opinion).

YMMV

Hell Yeah!

Posted: 6/16/2009 4:32:01 PM EDT

[#36]

Quoted:
Generally speaking, a woman who is normally attractive is even more so when pregnant (in my opinion).

YMMV

That pretty well sums it up.

Posted: 6/16/2009 6:02:38 PM EDT

[#37]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Who's the father?

Here's the father Paul Urich

http://img44.imageshack.us/img44/6692/pkariandpaulurichshow.jpg

This is the most conclusive proof I have ever seen that America truly is the greatest country on earth.

If this guy can marry Kari Byron, then any nerd in our great country can tag a supermodel.

USA! USA! USA!

Posted: 6/16/2009 6:03:06 PM EDT

[#38]

fail you lose sir

Posted: 6/16/2009 6:12:59 PM EDT

[#39]

Quoted:
Whatever happened to the girl with the tatoos ? She was kinda hot.

Ya mean this one?

Posted: 6/16/2009 6:16:48 PM EDT

[#40]

Quoted:
http://i43.tinypic.com/2q07z0l.gif

Still want?

I take it you've never had 2nd trimester sex...

Posted: 6/16/2009 6:18:48 PM EDT

[#41]

That is somebody's wife you guys are talking about. Have some respect a-holes.

Posted: 6/16/2009 7:33:12 PM EDT

[#42]

Quoted:
That is somebody's wife you guys are talking about. Have some respect a-holes.

Dude, that is like the highest form of male respect, to say your wife is fucking SMOKING ass hot.

If I was married, and people said shit like this about my babe, I'd fucking walk tall

Posted: 6/17/2009 5:29:23 AM EDT

[#43]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Hell yes i still want, and i cant get her pregant anymore than she already is!!!!!!!!!!!!1

this, no need to pull out

Wanna bet?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superfetation

Superfetation (also spelt superfoetation, based on a hypercorrection — see fetus) is the formation of a fetus while another fetus is already present in the uterus. When there are two separate instances of fertilisation during the same cycle, rather than different cycles, it is known as superfecundation.

Superfetation is claimed to be common in some species of animals,but is extremely rare in humans. It can occur only where there are twouteri, or where the menstrual cycle continues through pregnancy.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-508025/The-babies-born-just-minute-apart-ARENT-twins.html

The babies born just a minute apart who AREN'T twins

By BETH HALE

Last updated at 10:30 15 January 2008

They grew in the same womb and were born only a minute apart.Yet Thomas and Harriet Mullineux are not twins.

They were conceived three weeks apart thanks to an extraordinarytwist of nature.

Their mother Charlotte had been pregnant with twins when atseven weeks she miscarried one of them. But two weeks later, shediscovered she was carrying another foetus - conceived separatelyand still growing in her womb.

The surviving twin and the new baby were born last May and,after a health scare, are now home and thriving.

Scroll down for more

http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/01_03/mullineuxDM1301_468x383.jpg

Brother and sister: Charlotte Mullineux with Harriet, left, andThomas. They were conceived three weeks apart

Mrs Mullineux, 28, and her husband Matt, a contracts manager fora scaffolding company, were thrilled when they discovered she waspregnant in September 2006. They had been keen to expand theirfamily ever since their two-year-old son James was born.

But only a week later, Mrs Mullineux feared she was having amiscarriage and went to hospital.

A scan revealed she had been carrying twins but one of thefoetuses had died and was being absorbed back into the womb.

Another blob was detected on this initial scan, but was thoughtto be another egg that hadn't dissipated yet.

Mrs Mullineux, of Benfleet, Essex, was told to return in twoweeks to ensure all was fine.

"I was disappointed I had lost one of them but was moreconcerned about the other one," she said last night. "Those twoweeks were agony for us. When I went back, I was astonished whenthey said there was another baby.

"It turned out the blob that was on my last scan picture hadgrown into a baby."

Mrs Mullineux was told she was expecting two babies - one threeweeks older than the other.

It was explained that hers was a rare case of superfetation,where the body carries on releasing more eggs for fertilisationafter a pregnancy has already started. It meant that, technically,Mrs Mullineux could have become pregnant again each month duringher pregnancy.

The pregnancy was not without its problems. Harriet did not growas quickly as her brother and had to be monitored carefully.

Thomas was born at 6.32pm on May 4, weighing 5lb 6oz, andHarriet at 6.33pm weighing 4lb 1oz.

They were both taken to special care, where they remained forthree weeks before being allowed home. Harriet was desperately illat one stage after contracting pneumonia but made a remarkablerecovery.

Thomas is described as "tall and lanky" and "very laid-back"while Harriet is "short and stumpy" and "interested ineverything".

Mrs Mullineux said: "We are thrilled to be parents again,especially now that they are into a good routine of feeding andsleeping."

SIIHP just to be safe!

wow, never knew

Posted: 6/17/2009 5:33:31 AM EDT

[#44]

Quoted:

if the doctor put in a couple extra stitches...

LOL! Told my Daughter's moms doctor that exact line.... He didn't find it amusing!

Posted: 6/17/2009 5:38:49 AM EDT

[#45]

Scottie Chapman FTW:

Scottie=awesome
.

Posted: 6/17/2009 5:40:39 AM EDT

[#46]

Quoted:

Quoted:
She is still drop dead gorgeous.

That is just the pregnancy hormones tricking your simple male mind. It is part of the plan to keep the male around to protect the mother while she is pregnant.

..... You serious?

Well, whatever the reason, it works on most of us...