User Panel
Didn't something similar happen just before Gulf War 1.0? They wanted to get rid of the A-10 then Saddam got uppity; then the A-10 proved its worth. |
|
View Quote How mad would you be if you were the guys that shot this? "I hit it! I hit it! Crap, why is it still flying???" |
|
Quoted:
you mean like men in the back of the truck Or do you mean all the tanks isil has? i hate to kill the jerkoff fest here but 30mm really sucks in that theatre which has been proven over and over. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
When it comes to just getting out there and trying to locate and destroy targets of opportunity, it is hard to beat the A-10. i hate to kill the jerkoff fest here but 30mm really sucks in that theatre which has been proven over and over. I've never heard that the 30mm DU rounds suck against mobile armor. Last I heard there was no mobile armor in existence that stands up to that round. |
|
Quoted:
Hell, we ought to make More of them! We've had a far greater need for CAS as opposed to A2A for the last 12 years! Saint Peter View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Just keep the damn plane already! We have nothing else effective to replace it! Hell, we ought to make More of them! We've had a far greater need for CAS as opposed to A2A for the last 12 years! Saint Peter Just build more of the same, it works. New designs are nice but overrun costs and time. |
|
Quoted:
I've never heard that the 30mm DU rounds suck against mobile armor. Last I heard there was no mobile armor in existence that stands up to that round. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
When it comes to just getting out there and trying to locate and destroy targets of opportunity, it is hard to beat the A-10. i hate to kill the jerkoff fest here but 30mm really sucks in that theatre which has been proven over and over. I've never heard that the 30mm DU rounds suck against mobile armor. Last I heard there was no mobile armor in existence that stands up to that round. Not a lot of armor to kill, mostly dispersed forces |
|
Quoted:
I've never heard that the 30mm DU rounds suck against mobile armor. Last I heard there was no mobile armor in existence that stands up to that round. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
When it comes to just getting out there and trying to locate and destroy targets of opportunity, it is hard to beat the A-10. i hate to kill the jerkoff fest here but 30mm really sucks in that theatre which has been proven over and over. I've never heard that the 30mm DU rounds suck against mobile armor. Last I heard there was no mobile armor in existence that stands up to that round. 30mm HE rounds probably penetrate into the soft soil/sand before detonating, reducing the blast effect/shrapnel. No reason to fire DU rounds at soft skin vehicles. It would just be a big machine gun at that point and cause less damage than HE. |
|
I live in Tucson and have spent a good part of my life here, next to Davis Monthan AFB. They have been flying overhead since I was a wee lad. My wifes girlfriend is married to an A10 pilot and I have seen them up close. The warhog is amazing to see in action, its a fucking shame that they wanted to moth ball it in the first place. Its not really a plane its a friggen giant gattling gun with wings, armor and a stick with seat. They can get torn to shit and still compleat mission and get home then land safe. It is known. They just upgraded these babys and they have years before anything comes close to taking their place. Here is one of the A10 patches I have.
http://imgur.com/Mnxc5Rm Ugly but well hung.... oh yea |
|
Quoted:
you mean like men in the back of the truck Or do you mean all the tanks isil has? i hate to kill the jerkoff fest here but 30mm really sucks in that theatre which has been proven over and over. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
When it comes to just getting out there and trying to locate and destroy targets of opportunity, it is hard to beat the A-10. i hate to kill the jerkoff fest here but 30mm really sucks in that theatre which has been proven over and over. The HEI used in the GAU-8 is a contact detonating round right? What if we replaced it with a proximity detonating pre-fragmented antipersonnel projectile? |
|
Quoted:
The HEI used in the GAU-8 is a contact detonating round right? What if we replaced it with a proximity detonating pre-fragmented antipersonnel projectile? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
When it comes to just getting out there and trying to locate and destroy targets of opportunity, it is hard to beat the A-10. i hate to kill the jerkoff fest here but 30mm really sucks in that theatre which has been proven over and over. The HEI used in the GAU-8 is a contact detonating round right? What if we replaced it with a proximity detonating pre-fragmented antipersonnel projectile? 30mm with a radar fuse wouldn't have much HE in it. |
|
Quoted:
30mm with a radar fuse wouldn't have much HE in it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
When it comes to just getting out there and trying to locate and destroy targets of opportunity, it is hard to beat the A-10. i hate to kill the jerkoff fest here but 30mm really sucks in that theatre which has been proven over and over. The HEI used in the GAU-8 is a contact detonating round right? What if we replaced it with a proximity detonating pre-fragmented antipersonnel projectile? 30mm with a radar fuse wouldn't have much HE in it. You're not looking for blast effects, the HE's only purpose is to get the tungsten BB's up to a lethal velocity. ETA: Plus with the already high muzzle velocity of the projectile you could tune the prox detonator for more stand off and use it like canister shot, raining 2-3,000 FPS tungsten pellets all over the place. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Yes, the T-72 and M-1 Abrams that the Islamic State has captured from the Syrian Army and the fleeing rabble formerly known as the Iraqi Army. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: you mean like men in the back of the truck Or do you mean all the tanks isil has?
i hate to kill the jerkoff fest here but 30mm really sucks in that theatre which has been proven over and over. Yes, the T-72 and M-1 Abrams that the Islamic State has captured from the Syrian Army and the fleeing rabble formerly known as the Iraqi Army. PGMs are more effective and the dirty secret is the A10s gun is marginal against modern armor |
|
Adding the inductive fuze setting would require a massive modification of the GAU would probably be cheaper and easier to put the BMII in the aircraft
|
|
Quoted:
What's wrong with using 30mm AAAV ammo? The fuse is programmed buy the computer and armed by a device on the muzzle. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
30mm with a radar fuse wouldn't have much HE in it. What's wrong with using 30mm AAAV ammo? The fuse is programmed buy the computer and armed by a device on the muzzle. Now you need a radar on the plane that can give you a precise range to the target, a modified gun that can feed range data to the projectiles as they are fired, and expensive smart projectiles that you are firing at 70 rounds per second. Might as well drop a smart bomb on them. |
|
Quoted:
PGMs are more effective and the dirty secret is the A10s gun is marginal against modern armor View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: you mean like men in the back of the truck Or do you mean all the tanks isil has?
i hate to kill the jerkoff fest here but 30mm really sucks in that theatre which has been proven over and over. Yes, the T-72 and M-1 Abrams that the Islamic State has captured from the Syrian Army and the fleeing rabble formerly known as the Iraqi Army. PGMs are more effective and the dirty secret is the A10s gun is marginal against modern armor You think we were crazy enough to sell the Iraqis MODERN armor on their "export version" M-1 Abrams? |
|
Quoted:
Now you need a radar on the plane that can give you a precise range to the target, a modified gun that can feed range data to the projectiles as they are fired, and expensive smart projectiles that you are firing at 70 rounds per second. Might as well drop a smart bomb on them. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
30mm with a radar fuse wouldn't have much HE in it. What's wrong with using 30mm AAAV ammo? The fuse is programmed buy the computer and armed by a device on the muzzle. Now you need a radar on the plane that can give you a precise range to the target, a modified gun that can feed range data to the projectiles as they are fired, and expensive smart projectiles that you are firing at 70 rounds per second. Might as well drop a smart bomb on them. Radars are not accurate enough for range this purpose. The fuze is set to detonate after so many turns, which equates to distance to target and set a split second before firing via induction |
|
Quoted:
You think we were crazy enough to sell the Iraqis MODERN armor on their "export version" M-1 Abrams? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: you mean like men in the back of the truck Or do you mean all the tanks isil has?
i hate to kill the jerkoff fest here but 30mm really sucks in that theatre which has been proven over and over. Yes, the T-72 and M-1 Abrams that the Islamic State has captured from the Syrian Army and the fleeing rabble formerly known as the Iraqi Army. PGMs are more effective and the dirty secret is the A10s gun is marginal against modern armor You think we were crazy enough to sell the Iraqis MODERN armor on their "export version" M-1 Abrams? |
|
Quoted:
Faster jets don't get shot up as easily, and still have a reasonable chance of surviving hits. Two A-10 pilots were killed in Desert Storm, and three more were captured. This was in less than a month of fighting. Against ISIS, those three pilots would likely have been beheaded on camera. You fight savages like that with these things: http://www.unmannedsystemstechnology.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Predator-B-MQ-9-Reaper.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
It kills bad guys and comes home despite getting shot up. What's not to like. Faster jets don't get shot up as easily, and still have a reasonable chance of surviving hits. Two A-10 pilots were killed in Desert Storm, and three more were captured. This was in less than a month of fighting. Against ISIS, those three pilots would likely have been beheaded on camera. You fight savages like that with these things: http://www.unmannedsystemstechnology.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Predator-B-MQ-9-Reaper.jpg Only half your equation there, missing the cannon. It could probably be added to a UAV. Easy answer is to make a replacement unmanned airframe using COTS parts. Use the same or beefier cannon and commercial versions of the same motor. Even better if you could make the unmanned aircraft use common components from the old airframe in order to justify keeping them going until we get drones perfected. |
|
|
Quoted:
it's more modern than the armor on the T 62 the A-10 was designed to kill View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: you mean like men in the back of the truck Or do you mean all the tanks isil has?
i hate to kill the jerkoff fest here but 30mm really sucks in that theatre which has been proven over and over. Yes, the T-72 and M-1 Abrams that the Islamic State has captured from the Syrian Army and the fleeing rabble formerly known as the Iraqi Army. PGMs are more effective and the dirty secret is the A10s gun is marginal against modern armor You think we were crazy enough to sell the Iraqis MODERN armor on their "export version" M-1 Abrams? You know that the A-10 is meant to use missiles against modern armor and the 30MM against lighter stuff like APCs, trucks, people, etc. Yes the 30mm is capable against older heavy armor but the main weapon against a modern MBT will be the anti-tank missile. I think it would make sense with our missile technology to do away with the GAU-8 and go with something smaller so that more ammunition can be carried to better support ground forces against light armor and infantry. |
|
Here is my only question about this.
How well would an A-10 fare if shot at with the a US stinger? Because ISIS has quite a few of them they got off the iraq army..... |
|
Paint them all up to look like flying pulled pork sandwiches, and then let them do some nice CAP and let that 30 mike mike rip....BBBBRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!!!!
|
|
|
Obama is donating A10s to ISIS?
Jeez, the nerve of that guy. |
|
Quoted:
Here is my only question about this. How well would an A-10 fare if shot at with the a US stinger? Because ISIS has quite a few of them they got off the iraq army..... View Quote Probably a lot better than a F-16 would. Twin engines, redundant control surfaces - the A-10 is designed to fly with some 40% of the airframe disabled, I believe. |
|
Quoted:
Faster jets don't get shot up as easily, and still have a reasonable chance of surviving hits. Two A-10 pilots were killed in Desert Storm, and three more were captured. This was in less than a month of fighting. Against ISIS, those three pilots would likely have been beheaded on camera. You fight savages like that with these things: http://www.unmannedsystemstechnology.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Predator-B-MQ-9-Reaper.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
It kills bad guys and comes home despite getting shot up. What's not to like. Faster jets don't get shot up as easily, and still have a reasonable chance of surviving hits. Two A-10 pilots were killed in Desert Storm, and three more were captured. This was in less than a month of fighting. Against ISIS, those three pilots would likely have been beheaded on camera. You fight savages like that with these things: http://www.unmannedsystemstechnology.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Predator-B-MQ-9-Reaper.jpg You don't do CAS with things like those. |
|
Quoted:
You don't do CAS with things like those. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It kills bad guys and comes home despite getting shot up. What's not to like. Faster jets don't get shot up as easily, and still have a reasonable chance of surviving hits. Two A-10 pilots were killed in Desert Storm, and three more were captured. This was in less than a month of fighting. Against ISIS, those three pilots would likely have been beheaded on camera. You fight savages like that with these things: http://www.unmannedsystemstechnology.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Predator-B-MQ-9-Reaper.jpg You don't do CAS with things like those. What prevents it? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Here is my only question about this. How well would an A-10 fare if shot at with the a US stinger? Because ISIS has quite a few of them they got off the iraq army..... Better than most other modern jets. Surviving a hit, probably so. Avoiding getting hit, probably not as good. |
|
Quoted:
https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/products/warthog/ View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
It kills bad guys and comes home despite getting shot up. What's not to like. http://simhq.com/forum/files/usergals/2011/02/full-11236-7023-pic_013.png http://www.jetav8r.com/A10Gallery1/0420.jpg https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/products/warthog/ Yea. He posted a pic of DCS. Although it is about as real as you can get at your home PC. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It kills bad guys and comes home despite getting shot up. What's not to like. Faster jets don't get shot up as easily, and still have a reasonable chance of surviving hits. Two A-10 pilots were killed in Desert Storm, and three more were captured. This was in less than a month of fighting. Against ISIS, those three pilots would likely have been beheaded on camera. You fight savages like that with these things: http://www.unmannedsystemstechnology.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Predator-B-MQ-9-Reaper.jpg You don't do CAS with things like those. What prevents it? The need to be low and accurate in the vicinity of friendly forces for one. That coms delay isn't a big deal at altitude, but down near the floor with friendlies around? |
|
Quoted:
The need to be low and accurate in the vicinity of friendly forces for one. That coms delay isn't a big deal at altitude, but down near the floor with friendlies around? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It kills bad guys and comes home despite getting shot up. What's not to like. Faster jets don't get shot up as easily, and still have a reasonable chance of surviving hits. Two A-10 pilots were killed in Desert Storm, and three more were captured. This was in less than a month of fighting. Against ISIS, those three pilots would likely have been beheaded on camera. You fight savages like that with these things: http://www.unmannedsystemstechnology.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Predator-B-MQ-9-Reaper.jpg You don't do CAS with things like those. What prevents it? The need to be low and accurate in the vicinity of friendly forces for one. That coms delay isn't a big deal at altitude, but down near the floor with friendlies around? CAS does not need to be low, the PGMS shot from Preds and Reapers are of equal accuracy as when they are used by any other platform, the com latency really is not all that bad. |
|
|
Quoted:
CAS does not need to be low, the PGMS shot from Preds and Reapers are of equal accuracy as when they are used by any other platform, the com latency really is not all that bad. View Quote Sure, as long as you can ID your target correctly. I suspect the troops on the ground are not going to be happy with you firing towards them from 10kft from the safety of your air conditioned trailer. |
|
Airforce doesn't want A10s give them to the Marines I'm sure we can find a use for them, and a way to add another cannon.
|
|
I think it would make sense with our missile technology to do away with the GAU-8 and go with something smaller so that more ammunition can be carried to better support ground forces against light armor and infantry. View Quote The A-10's forward fuselage would need to be redesigned to accommodate a smaller gun. And really the A-10 itself would need a complete redesign if you're going to do all that, the newest airframe was made in the early 1980's. Keep the overall shape and concept and reliability of the A-10, make it a two seater, give it the ability to fire Hellfires, IFR from a drog, lengthen the airframe for more ammo, fuel, and center line hard points, make the wing slightly larger, wider, stronger, and then better engines, with more power. A-10E Super Hawg. |
|
Quoted:
Paint them up in the Arkansas razorback logo. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Paint them all up to look like flying pulled pork sandwiches, and then let them do some nice CAP and let that 30 mike mike rip....BBBBRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!!!! Paint them up in the Arkansas razorback logo. Saw that in another A-10 thread. Pretty sure the ANG win in Arkansas has a few painted up that way. Very well done I might add. |
|
|
Quoted:
Hell, we ought to make More of them! We've had a far greater need for CAS as opposed to A2A for the last 12 years! Saint Peter View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Just keep the damn plane already! We have nothing else effective to replace it! Hell, we ought to make More of them! We've had a far greater need for CAS as opposed to A2A for the last 12 years! Saint Peter It would make much more sense to acquire more AC-130 spectre gunships and to get rid of the A-10. The AC-130's have much greater loiter time and kick way more ass. |
|
No body else got this yet?
Warthog Hog. Haji don't get snackbar'd when he's killed by a pig right? |
|
Quoted:
Well IS has some russian tanks and APCs. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
God forbid we ever engage Russian Tanks, but I hope one lucky pilot gets a chance to fulfill the initial role of that beautiful bastard. Well IS has some russian tanks and APCs. And some Abrams. |
|
|
Someday, someone is going to figure out that in a world where MANPADS are prolific, arty is the only the that can make CAS effective.
|
|
Quoted: Someday, someone is going to figure out that in a world where MANPADS are prolific, arty is the only the that can make CAS effective. View Quote These are the same folks that put bases in the bottom of bowls b/c the road junction is convenient to bring in the weekly lobster for the troops. You want them to remember how to use artillery? |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.