Quoted:Quoted:Quoted:Quoted:Quoted:
I'm with you. The previews show Lincoln as a die hard slavery opponent which is completely false. I'd like to hear if the whole movie reflects that
Yep, the continual re-writing of history...most kids today are just too fucking stupid or lazy to read history. Sad state of affairs.
The Republican Party was founded as an anti-Slavery party, Lincoln rode it to the top specifically due to his anti-Slavery views. His opponents often characterized him as a radical abolitionist who also wanted to grant all "negroes" full citizenship and voting rights, a charge Lincoln frequently deflected, preferring to appear more conservative.
This. Lincoln may not have believed in equality, but he was certainly anti-slavery.
But he waited to pass the emancipation proclamation until secession. His first priority was preserving the union. I guess I don't have to say this but the movie seems to portray him as an abolishonist no matter what. That's where my problem lies. If the states didn't secede after he was voted in I very highly disagree that emancipation would have been granted for the next decade at least
Looking at Lincoln's life and policies it's clear he was very anti-slavery. When he was young his family changed church congregations to one congregation that was anti-slavery, and one of the reasons Lincoln moved to Illinois was because it was a free state.
As a member of the US House of Representatives in 1846 he co-wrote a bill that would abolish slavery in D.C. with compensation to their former owners but the bill didn't get enough support and never went anywhere. Lincoln supported the Wilmot Proviso which would have banned slavery in any territory taken from Mexico.
In 1854, Lincoln gave his "Peoria Speech" in which he declared his opposition to slavery:
"Little by little, but steadily as man's march to the grave, we have been giving up the old for the new faith. Nearly eighty years ago we began by declaring that all men are created equal; but now from that beginning we have run down to the other declaration, that for some men to enslave others is a 'sacred right of self-government.' These principles cannot stand together. They are as opposite as God and Mammon; and whoever holds to the one must despise the other."
Lincoln didn't like slavery but felt that he couldn't do anything about it legally. That's why the bill he co-wrote in 1846 targeted DC, it was the only area that congress was able to abolish slavery in. The EP relied on Lincoln's war powers, which wasn't available to him until the rebellion started.
Let me ask this, the Southern states all seceded when Lincoln was elected President. Why did the Southern states have a problem with Lincoln?