User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 9:01:12 AM EDT
[#1]
... you can bank on it
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 9:01:20 AM EDT
[#2]
A lot of people would panic regardless of who gets appointed.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 9:01:40 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Assume nothing... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
As an FFL, I certainly hope so . . . 
Honestly, though, I believe Hillary is smarter than to turn the heat up on the gun control pot too much. My sense is that Bill C. got the message pretty clearly when the Democrats lost the House following the AWB in '94. Based on what I've read, I'd say that is a lifelong message for the Clintons. Yeah, it's OK to talk about guns a little bit just to rally the troops and raise some money but serious attempts to take away guns are a losing proposition politically. Assume nothing... Of course not. We've fought the battle before and we can fight it again. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 9:02:08 AM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Change title to "WHEN Hillary Gets Elected, there will be another panic." The woman has no chance. If the Dems want to win again, they need to find another candidate that the public doesn't scorn. Even die hard Dems despise the woman. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 9:02:31 AM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted: What suprises me is that" they" have not come up with a plan that allows you to have your guns, but you are taxed every year on each one you own. Kind of like personal property and real estate tax. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Were I a Dem bent on a federal gun ban this is how I would propose it. Everything perceived as "evil" produced/owned up to the date of a ban would be grandfathered but no others could be sold to the public by manufactures or transferred/sold to others by current owners. After all they know current gun owners are not a problem. Current gun owners could live out their lives surrounded by their EBRs, "hi-cap" mags, and such till they die and the antis would still win in the end. When the Dems figure that tactic out we are in big trouble. It would be passed overnight with strong bi-partisan support. Nobody ever accused the progressives of not taking the long view. Unless you have not been paying attention the progressives win at chess.  What suprises me is that" they" have not come up with a plan that allows you to have your guns, but you are taxed every year on each one you own. Kind of like personal property and real estate tax. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 9:03:59 AM EDT
[#6]
Probably. It sees to be the thing to do now days...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 9:04:15 AM EDT
[#7]
The Dems are solidly fixed on the Australian Solution... Take them away and give you some pay with no more say...
Remember, it doesn't really cost them anything, since they just print up whatever paper fiat currency they need at any time.. (see Obama and the Q.E. with the Fed) So if they go for the Australian plan, and then only compromise to meet in the middle with a Ban with comprehensive registration and no further sales , they seem "reasonable & common sense" ... Hillary WILL get the Dem nomination because she is a woman, a leftist and now has her "credentials" as a former NY Senator and Secretary of State... The Progressives / Liberals / Socialists ran a 1/2 black man, and now will run a white woman to get the vote demographic (50% of the population are women!) While Republicans always seem stuck in the rut of running the "tired old rich white guy" that the Republicans always seem to run (Bob Dole, McCain, Romney)... |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 9:06:04 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Were I a Dem bent on a federal gun ban this is how I would propose it. Everything perceived as "evil" produced/owned up to the date of a ban would be grandfathered but no others could be sold to the public by manufactures or transferred/sold to others by current owners. Worked like a charm up here. You can transfer prohibiteds to other license holders of their narrowly defined class, or you can pass them to on to your immediate family when you die (assuming they jump through all the legal hoops in a certain timeframe). If your license ever lapses, you can't ever get it back, and your property is forfeit. Given enough time those requirements slowly eliminate the entire class of firearms. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 9:06:10 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What suprises me is that" they" have not come up with a plan that allows you to have your guns, but you are taxed every year on each one you own. Kind of like personal property and real estate tax. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Were I a Dem bent on a federal gun ban this is how I would propose it. Everything perceived as "evil" produced/owned up to the date of a ban would be grandfathered but no others could be sold to the public by manufactures or transferred/sold to others by current owners. After all they know current gun owners are not a problem. Current gun owners could live out their lives surrounded by their EBRs, "hi-cap" mags, and such till they die and the antis would still win in the end. When the Dems figure that tactic out we are in big trouble. It would be passed overnight with strong bi-partisan support. Nobody ever accused the progressives of not taking the long view. Unless you have not been paying attention the progressives win at chess. What suprises me is that" they" have not come up with a plan that allows you to have your guns, but you are taxed every year on each one you own. Kind of like personal property and real estate tax. Well you can't tax a civil right but they do bring this up from time to time. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 9:11:07 AM EDT
[#10]
.22 LR sold out until 2024.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 9:15:57 AM EDT
[#11]
This....
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 9:31:49 AM EDT
[#12]
The problems that the Mentally Insane Hillary would cause are a far bigger concern to me than a panic run on guns.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 9:48:45 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
My money is on Elizabeth Warren, but it could be some other messiah that they're holding in reserve. It certainly won't be Hillary. The democrats haven't yet solidified their hold on power to the point where they can simply hold a sham election, and that's what a Hillary nomination would be. North Koreans aren't enthusiastic about electing Kim Jong Un, and Iraqis were never enthusiastic about electing Saddam Hussein because these elections didn't give them a choice. Hillary's so-called inevitability means that democrat supports feel disenfranchised because she was selected for the; they had no say in the matter. If they don't have any say in the matter, they're not engaged in the political process, they'll have no enthusiasm or reason to actually get out and support her, and their voter turnout will be sharply impacted to the point where the electoral shenanigans necessary to ensure a victory won't be able to be plausibly denied. She's a weak candidate, she has little or no grass-roots support, and engenders no enthusiasm from the democrat base. No one is excited about electing her. All she really has is the vagina vote, and a terribly weak hold on that due to her utter lack of charisma. She's an awful, awful candidate, and anyone capable of stealing the vag vote from her while simultaneously offering ANYTHING else will destroy her. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Hillary will not be the democrat nominee. Who then? My money is on Elizabeth Warren, but it could be some other messiah that they're holding in reserve. It certainly won't be Hillary. The democrats haven't yet solidified their hold on power to the point where they can simply hold a sham election, and that's what a Hillary nomination would be. North Koreans aren't enthusiastic about electing Kim Jong Un, and Iraqis were never enthusiastic about electing Saddam Hussein because these elections didn't give them a choice. Hillary's so-called inevitability means that democrat supports feel disenfranchised because she was selected for the; they had no say in the matter. If they don't have any say in the matter, they're not engaged in the political process, they'll have no enthusiasm or reason to actually get out and support her, and their voter turnout will be sharply impacted to the point where the electoral shenanigans necessary to ensure a victory won't be able to be plausibly denied. She's a weak candidate, she has little or no grass-roots support, and engenders no enthusiasm from the democrat base. No one is excited about electing her. All she really has is the vagina vote, and a terribly weak hold on that due to her utter lack of charisma. She's an awful, awful candidate, and anyone capable of stealing the vag vote from her while simultaneously offering ANYTHING else will destroy her. Good assessment. Still the CUNT is going to be crammed down our throats, and we will like it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 9:49:44 AM EDT
[#14]
Yep; prolly a good idea to just go ahead and panic now.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 9:51:37 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I'm going with yes. I won't be buying though. This  |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 10:18:45 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If history is any guide, the voters will elect a Republican President this time. Not since FDR has a party held the Presidency for more than two terms except when VP Bush got elected in 1988 and that was only because people thought he was a continuation of Reagan. Nobody sees Hillary as the continuation of Obama and she's a lousy campaigner in her own right. So, look for a Republican in the WH and no panic unless he has a change of heart. I see this as a high probability, better chances than the last election. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 10:43:17 AM EDT
[#17]
Quoted:
like in '08 when Obama was elected? Colt M4 for two grand? AR mags at forty bucks? Bushmasters lasting an hour on the shelf before being bought? What do we think? Funny. I was watching the local news this morning and they reported, "Gun ownership is down, even though gun sales are up." How does that even work? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 10:57:15 AM EDT
[#18]
Yeth.
Yeth, there will be. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 1:17:38 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The woman has no chance. If the Dems want to win again, they need to find another candidate that the public doesn't scorn. Even die hard Dems despise the woman. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Change title to "WHEN Hillary Gets Elected, there will be another panic." The woman has no chance. If the Dems want to win again, they need to find another candidate that the public doesn't scorn. Even die hard Dems despise the woman. You've got a VERY short memory. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 1:19:08 PM EDT
[#20]
WHEN Bernie Sanders is elected will there be a panic. He is Obamacizing Hillary just like 2008
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 1:23:55 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Hope you're right.. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
If history is any guide, the voters will elect a Republican President this time. Not since FDR has a party held the Presidency for more than two terms except when VP Bush got elected in 1988 and that was only because people thought he was a continuation of Reagan. Nobody sees Hillary as the continuation of Obama and she's a lousy campaigner in her own right. So, look for a Republican in the WH and no panic unless he has a change of heart. Hope you're right.. Who's to say voting even matters anymore? I wouldn't be surprised if the next president has already been picked. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 1:25:52 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The woman has no chance. If the Dems want to win again, they need to find another candidate that the public doesn't scorn. Even die hard Dems despise the woman. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Change title to "WHEN Hillary Gets Elected, there will be another panic." The woman has no chance. If the Dems want to win again, they need to find another candidate that the public doesn't scorn. Even die hard Dems despise the woman. http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/01/politics/donald-trump-poll-hillary-clinton-jeb-bush/ lol. She's beating every republican candidate by at least 10%. She's going to win easy. Got any facts to back up your statements? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 1:41:13 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You can count on it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 2:49:03 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/01/politics/donald-trump-poll-hillary-clinton-jeb-bush/ lol. She's beating every republican candidate by at least 10%. She's going to win easy. Got any facts to back up your statements? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Change title to "WHEN Hillary Gets Elected, there will be another panic." The woman has no chance. If the Dems want to win again, they need to find another candidate that the public doesn't scorn. Even die hard Dems despise the woman. http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/01/politics/donald-trump-poll-hillary-clinton-jeb-bush/ lol. She's beating every republican candidate by at least 10%. She's going to win easy. Got any facts to back up your statements? lol. I'm not disagreeing that Cliton stands a good chance at winning....yes, the American people are that stupid....but using this poll....again, lol. Clinton is currently the only serious Dem contender. The GOP has what now? 17? Let the dust settle after the convention and then let your panties get in a wad if you want. Choosing Clinton now, based on a current poll?...one, final....lol...no.... 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 2:56:44 PM EDT
[#25]
The GOP will snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 3:09:13 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Change title to "WHEN Hillary Gets Elected, there will be another panic." This was my first thought . |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 3:42:36 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Not sure the previous paradigms apply any more....we just saw SCOTUS essentially violate their oath. My instinct is that if Clinton gets elected she may go for a quantum leap of gun control...as in you get turn in the vast majority of them, maybe with some compensation or maybe not. I also think we'll see some type of Euro ammo arsenal law.....My uncle in Germany lost his guns for a year because his ammo log showed that he should have had something like 112 rounds of 9mm and he had about 150. This was discovered by the police during and unannounced weapons inspection at his home. The BL is that the highest court has demonstrated that the Constitution is no longer the foundational benchmark....it's now social justice. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
As an FFL, I certainly hope so . . .
Honestly, though, I believe Hillary is smarter than to turn the heat up on the gun control pot too much. My sense is that Bill C. got the message pretty clearly when the Democrats lost the House following the AWB in '94. Based on what I've read, I'd say that is a lifelong message for the Clintons. Yeah, it's OK to talk about guns a little bit just to rally the troops and raise some money but serious attempts to take away guns are a losing proposition politically. Not sure the previous paradigms apply any more....we just saw SCOTUS essentially violate their oath. My instinct is that if Clinton gets elected she may go for a quantum leap of gun control...as in you get turn in the vast majority of them, maybe with some compensation or maybe not. I also think we'll see some type of Euro ammo arsenal law.....My uncle in Germany lost his guns for a year because his ammo log showed that he should have had something like 112 rounds of 9mm and he had about 150. This was discovered by the police during and unannounced weapons inspection at his home. The BL is that the highest court has demonstrated that the Constitution is no longer the foundational benchmark....it's now social justice. The SCOTUS has been "violating their oath" for many years. MI SP v Sitz, Terry v Ohio, the ACA rulings, etc. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 3:44:07 PM EDT
[#28]
thats what the MRAPs are for... prepper your self.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 5:15:38 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
A lot of people would panic regardless of who gets appointed. This. And I'm not participating. I'm set with what I have and don't need to neckbeard. Y'all have at it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/1/2015 5:52:10 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I think we should start speculating now and panic early. Peak panic. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
