Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 3
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 12:02:37 PM EDT
[#1]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Agreed, especially on immigration.

There is no way we're going to boot out all the illegals, it's just not feasible.  Instead, give the ones who aren't breaking any (other than immigration) laws some sort of legal status.  Boot the ones who commit crimes, and the ones on public welfare back to Mehico.  And above all, secure the god damned borders.

It amuses me everybody's all scared of the Gitmo detainees coming to the US when any old terrorist can just get in Mexico and then be guaranteed access to get into the US.

More importantly, every poor Mexican that crosses the border is 1-100  Democrat/Big Government/Take My Money votes.  I say 1-100 because they have shitloads of children and in a few generations there will be a whole bunch of them.



God you guys are naive...


Actually, you are the very distilled essence of naivety.  It's core.

We currently have an open border.  We currently have maybe 15 million illegal immigrants in this country.

There exists no viable solution to deport 15 million or more people.  None.

So your solution is to instead do nothing and poo-poo the idea of giving most of them legal _non voting_ status?

Brilliant!  Status quo for the win
.


Holy fucking putting words in someone else mouth batman.

That's exactly what I said, "status quo."  

Is maroon your favorite color?



Link Posted: 6/16/2009 12:03:12 PM EDT
[#2]
I generally agree with all that.  

1.  Agree
2.  I disagree with amnesty, but we did need a meaningful immigration reform.  The republican party stomping on it was dumb.
3.  Agree
4.  Agree
5.  Agree
6.  Agree
7. Agree to a point.  The armed forces must remember that they serve the constitution above the CIC.  Most I believe do.  But some (like some of the OK guardsmen) don't.  Those guardsmen should be tried for violations of civil rights.  But we need a standing army, in spite of the risks.
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 12:05:21 PM EDT
[#3]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Agreed, especially on immigration.

There is no way we're going to boot out all the illegals, it's just not feasible.  Instead, give the ones who aren't breaking any (other than immigration) laws some sort of legal status.  Boot the ones who commit crimes, and the ones on public welfare back to Mehico.  And above all, secure the god damned borders.

It amuses me everybody's all scared of the Gitmo detainees coming to the US when any old terrorist can just get in Mexico and then be guaranteed access to get into the US.

More importantly, every poor Mexican that crosses the border is 1-100  Democrat/Big Government/Take My Money votes.  I say 1-100 because they have shitloads of children and in a few generations there will be a whole bunch of them.



God you guys are naive...


Actually, you are the very distilled essence of naivety.  It's core.

We currently have an open border.  We currently have maybe 15 million illegal immigrants in this country.

There exists no viable solution to deport 15 million or more people.  None.

So your solution is to instead do nothing and poo-poo the idea of giving most of them legal _non voting_ status?

Brilliant!  Status quo for the win
.


Holy fucking putting words in someone else mouth batman.

That's exactly what I said, "status quo."  

Is maroon your favorite color?





What is your proposal then?  Do you have a way to deport 8-20 million people that won't cost trillions of dollars and take decades?
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 12:07:32 PM EDT
[#4]
Quoted:
Seems accurate enough.

Especially on immigration. We need the 'worker bees' but haven't adequately provided enough reform in the way of work visas.


We don't "need" the worker bees.
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 12:08:13 PM EDT
[#5]
You are smoking dope if you think the Latino population would switch to R. McCain sucked Latino cock and all he managed to do was lose conservative votes instead of gaining Latino. Free shit will always trump alleged family values of minorities and the Dems have that on lock. Amnesty would have simply opened the flood gates to more illegals and create more votes for Dems.


Link Posted: 6/16/2009 12:09:43 PM EDT
[#6]
-3/10

For the 3 minutes of time I wasted read your long ass rant.   All rants should be limited to 250 characters, yours was over 400
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 12:10:40 PM EDT
[#7]
I love when people make these long posts explaining their thoughts on things. They seem to think that everyone else actually gives a shit about what you think.
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 12:11:14 PM EDT
[#8]
I generally agree with most of your points.

#1 - W. and Obama are two sides of the same coin.  W. laid the ground work, and Obama is steamrolling over all of us!

#2 - Illegal immigration is a problem, unfortunately, I haven't heard a good solution proposed by either side.

#3-6 - Read "The Creature from Jekyll Island"

#7 - As I said in another thread on this issue, the Military is a microcosm of the U.S. populace.  Some are their out of a sense of duty, some are there to suck off of the .gov teat.  Most would react accordingly.  If you want to see what would happen in the event of mass disorder, SHTF, etc..., look at what happened during the Civil War (spoiler alert: the .gov won that one)
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 12:11:16 PM EDT
[#9]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Agreed, especially on immigration.

There is no way we're going to boot out all the illegals, it's just not feasible.  Instead, give the ones who aren't breaking any (other than immigration) laws some sort of legal status.  Boot the ones who commit crimes, and the ones on public welfare back to Mehico.  And above all, secure the god damned borders.

It amuses me everybody's all scared of the Gitmo detainees coming to the US when any old terrorist can just get in Mexico and then be guaranteed access to get into the US.

More importantly, every poor Mexican that crosses the border is 1-100  Democrat/Big Government/Take My Money votes.  I say 1-100 because they have shitloads of children and in a few generations there will be a whole bunch of them.



God you guys are naive...


Actually, you are the very distilled essence of naivety.  It's core.

We currently have an open border.  We currently have maybe 15 million illegal immigrants in this country.

There exists no viable solution to deport 15 million or more people.  None.

So your solution is to instead do nothing and poo-poo the idea of giving most of them legal _non voting_ status?

Brilliant!  Status quo for the win
.


Holy fucking putting words in someone else mouth batman.

That's exactly what I said, "status quo."  

Is maroon your favorite color?





What is your proposal then?  Do you have a way to deport 8-20 million people that won't cost trillions of dollars and take decades?


Well, I havn't really drawn up a formal draft to submit to congress....but in another nut shell...

1.  Seal the border, troops, national guard, minutemen what have you.
2.  Make it criminal to employ someone who cannot prove they are hear legally.




Link Posted: 6/16/2009 12:13:42 PM EDT
[#10]
Quoted:

Quoted:
3. The payout of bonuses to AIG executives or ANY executive from any company that received TARP funding was a HUGE mistake, and the line that they had to be paid due to contractual obligations which would have resulted in court battles if violated is a bald faced lie. Why? Because no jury anywhere in this country would have awarded a single plug nickel to any executive of any company that would have gone bankrupt if not for TARP funding. The American people wanted these companies to go bankrupt and the anger at the execs was damn near at pitchfork and torches levels. These execs were paid their bonuses as a result of cronyism between government and the "private sector".

You bit into the media spin hook, line, and sinker.  The folks getting "bonuses" weren't getting them for performance.  Many of the were working for greatly reduced salaries, with the contractual understanding that they would get the remainder of their salary at a certain date.  Others were given retention bonuses.  In other words, they were the brains of their outfit and would have left, if not given a reason to stay.  You have to remember that almost all AIG departments were performing far above standards and were very profitable.  Further, it was contractually agreed to prior to AIG receiving any TARP funds.  You need to do research and find out the real story  CNN isn't telling you.

You are both right, and you are both saying totally different things.  People (generally) don't bitch about high executive pay at successful businesses.  They bitch when somebody is paid millions and runs a company into the ground.  I can do that for free.  So could anybody else.  Hence, they are not special, and don't deserve huge money.

4. The corporations in the so-called "private sector" are being run by gangs of professional thieves who rape their companies, rob their employees, deceive their investors and pillage the national treasury. The past 10 years has been an almost non-stop parade of instances of corporate fraud, embezzlement, bailouts and robbery. K-mart, Enron, MCI Worldcom, Arthur Andersen, Tyco, AIG, Microsoft and on and on. They are degreed gangsters and they exercise the same tactics as the freakin' mafia. They loan themselves money that they never repay while driving the company into the ground (K-Mart), the use extortion and threats to stop out competition (Microsoft), they extort their own employees (Enron) and they make up fraudulent records to try and throw everyone off of the trail (take your pick). Capitalism is dead, what is going on in Corporate America is nothing short of organized crime.

5. There is no such thing as a "private sector" in this country and it has not existed for a very long time. The so-called "private sector" has been interwoven with government for decades. The system of lobbying, cronyism, bribery, regulation and legislation have made corporate interests and the interests of politicians one and the same. For proof just look to the bankruptcy reform act (a bill law passed by the congress despite popular objection because the credit card companies lobbied for it very, very hard during the height of the bankruptcy wave from 2000-2006) or the Chrysler and GM bankruptcy dealership closings (dealers with political allies getting to keep their businesses, dealers belonging to political enemies of the current regime being closed without appeal, explanation or recourse).

I'll combine 4 and 5.  #4 happens because of #5.  There is no private sector.  This results in corruption.  If free market principles were truly allowed to function, without government interference, the crooks would never get to the top of companies.  These crooks use their Government protections and rules to get away with it.  Truly independent markets would have these places shut down long before any of the bad shit could happen.  In a truly free economy free of government interference, there can be no "monopoly".  Not that monopolies are necessarily a bad thing.  If someone can do something better than anyone else, and consumers know it, why shouldn't that person control the market?  Should they be forced to share their mind with other companies in the name of fairness?  If I invent something that would revolutionize industry in ways unimagined, why shouldn't I be allowed to charge whatever I want for it?  If people buy at the price I name, I'm charging the right price.  If they don't, I'll have to lower my prices.  That's how a free economy works.  Monopolies are NOT a bad thing.  

Markets are never truly independent, and as such some degree of regulation is required.  In some cases, these crooks did get to the top because of lousy controls.  But the controls should be mostly about ensuring transparency.  The rest is the markets job.



 


Link Posted: 6/16/2009 12:16:36 PM EDT
[#11]
Quoted:
2. We were wrong on immigration reform and it was a horrendous mistake for conservatives to oppose immigration reform and amnesty for illegals. Today the Democrats have undefeatable super majorities in both houses of Congress and they control the White House. President Obama has promised the immigration reform and amnesty are on his priority list for this year and passage of whatever plan he has in mind is a certainty. The Democrats will now win the loyalty of 30,000,000 new voters they are about to create and ensure majorities in ever national election for the foreseeable future.


You are DEAD wrong on this.  Support for amnesty in any shape way or form is a tactical and strategic mistake.  Sometimes you need to stand up for your principals even if it's a losing battle, just so when things turn bad 2 or 3 years from now you can contrast yourself with the ones that took the country down a road of ruin.

Latinos simply do not vote Republican.  2 out of 3 Latino voters will vote Democratic.  Take out multi-generational citizens and Cubans, and the percentage of Latinos voting Republican (or for conservative candidates) is negligible.  Economic freebies trump everything else for this demographic group, regardless of what Karl Rove says.  It doesn't help that just about every national Latino organization is rabidly liberal.  

Reaching out to Latinos is fine, but opening up the immigration floodgates by supporting amnesty is suicide.  

PEOPLE DO NOT VOTE REPUBLICAN SO THEY CAN GET DEMOCRAT LITE WHEN THEY CAN VOTE FOR THE REAL THING.

McCain SPONSORED AMNESTY.  The Latinos returned the favor by voting en masse for  Obama.
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 12:22:01 PM EDT
[#12]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:
Agreed, especially on immigration.

There is no way we're going to boot out all the illegals, it's just not feasible.  Instead, give the ones who aren't breaking any (other than immigration) laws some sort of legal status.  Boot the ones who commit crimes, and the ones on public welfare back to Mehico.  And above all, secure the god damned borders.

It amuses me everybody's all scared of the Gitmo detainees coming to the US when any old terrorist can just get in Mexico and then be guaranteed access to get into the US.

More importantly, every poor Mexican that crosses the border is 1-100  Democrat/Big Government/Take My Money votes.  I say 1-100 because they have shitloads of children and in a few generations there will be a whole bunch of them.


I don't think many people here would have the problem with illegals here to the extent that they have if the illegals would fucking assimilate to the American way of life, If they would fucking learn to speak English, if they would stop getting kazillions of dollars of free shit just because they are illegal, if they didn't protest in the streets demanding rights while waving the mexican flag WTF (remember, they are fucking illegal). So if a conservative candidate would talk about reform using the aforementioned items as part of some amnesty I think more people would be willing to make some concessions. damnit, we can't even get English as the national language


Actually, I would still want to kick them in the teeth.

I know enough people who came here legally, from MUCH farther away in MUCH worse conditions.  If they can do it, so can Mexicans.  Fuck em if they can't follow the law.
 


Yep.
We don't have to "boot them out".
We just have to make it so uncomfortable to be here that they leave.
Serious laws against hiring them.
No welfare.
No school.
No medical care beyond basic emergency assistance.
Catch them and they go to a work camp until they have earned a ticket home or their government comes for them.
DNA fingerprint them so they can't come back under an alias.
If they can't work or get assistance, the ones we don't catch will go home of their own volition.
We have enough illiterate peasants of our own. If they didn't have to compete with people who can afford to work for half the price we wouldn't have to furnish as much public assistance.
But you think you're entitled to have your house roofed for next to nothing.
We will ALWAYS have enough laborers.
Let capitalism work.
If the demand is high for unskilled labor, then pay the idiot who's planting your shrubs a wage he can support his family on. If demand is low, you get your deck on the cheap.

Link Posted: 6/16/2009 12:26:40 PM EDT
[#13]
Quoted:
1. If President Bush is demonized by history then it will not be for Iraq and Afghanistan. Iraq and Afghanistan no longer exist. They have been completely forgotten by the populace, the media and the government. They served their purpose of destroying Bush and the Republicans and now they are no longer important. If President Bush is demonized by history then it will be for TARP and the other instances of government intermixing with the "private sector" which opened the door for Obama to implement the socialist revolution which is now in full swing.

History won't demonize him for that, although it should

2. We were wrong on immigration reform and it was a horrendous mistake for conservatives to oppose immigration reform and amnesty for illegals. Illegals who committed crimes other than illegally entering the country would have been caught and prosecuted as they are now, as they have been, just as with any other criminal. Had immigration reform moved forward under Bush and the Republican congress then there would have eventually been funding for securing the border (which had already been approved), at least there would have been a chance. The worst tragedy is that the Republicans lost any chance of winning the loyalty of the Mexicans who would have become voters if immigration reform and amnesty had passed. In truth, the Mexicans Immigrants are natural allies for the Republican party. They believe in family values, they are hard working, they are socially conservative and they like guns. The Republicans listened to conservative voters who demanded that amnesty and immigration reform be defeated, demanded that border security come first and demanded that the immigration problem be solved by deportation. Despite the Republicans caving to their voter's demands, conservative voters stayed home on election day in November 2006 and allowed the Democrats to use their propaganda against Iraq to destroy the Republican majorities in both houses of Congress. Today the Democrats have undefeatable super majorities in both houses of Congress and they control the White House. President Obama has promised the immigration reform and amnesty are on his priority list for this year and passage of whatever plan he has in mind is a certainty. The Democrats will now win the loyalty of 30,000,000 new voters they are about to create and ensure majorities in ever national election for the foreseeable future. Given the populations of illegal aliens in states like Texas, Arizona and Oklahoma, the Democrats may even be able to turn the tide in these states to the left and get Democrats to unseat traditionally conservative state governments. It was stupid and shortsighted to opposed immigration reform and amnesty, and now we will lose everything. Shoulda, Coulda, Woulda.

I agree, and said as much at the time

3. The payout of bonuses to AIG executives or ANY executive from any company that received TARP funding was a HUGE mistake, and the line that they had to be paid due to contractual obligations which would have resulted in court battles if violated is a bald faced lie. Why? Because no jury anywhere in this country would have awarded a single plug nickel to any executive of any company that would have gone bankrupt if not for TARP funding. The American people wanted these companies to go bankrupt and the anger at the execs was damn near at pitchfork and torches levels. These execs were paid their bonuses as a result of cronyism between government and the "private sector".

Completely wrong.  Lots of companies were forced to take bailout money.  I will not support the government forcing companies to take money, and then using it as an excuse to dictate salaries.

4. The corporations in the so-called "private sector" are being run by gangs of professional thieves who rape their companies, rob their employees, deceive their investors and pillage the national treasury. The past 10 years has been an almost non-stop parade of instances of corporate fraud, embezzlement, bailouts and robbery. K-mart, Enron, MCI Worldcom, Arthur Andersen, Tyco, AIG, Microsoft and on and on. They are degreed gangsters and they exercise the same tactics as the freakin' mafia. They loan themselves money that they never repay while driving the company into the ground (K-Mart), the use extortion and threats to stop out competition (Microsoft), they extort their own employees (Enron) and they make up fraudulent records to try and throw everyone off of the trail (take your pick). Capitalism is dead, what is going on in Corporate America is nothing short of organized crime.

You greatly overstate the problems.  With the amount of companies in the US, I'd say the numbers of scandals are quite low.

5. There is no such thing as a "private sector" in this country and it has not existed for a very long time. The so-called "private sector" has been interwoven with government for decades. The system of lobbying, cronyism, bribery, regulation and legislation have made corporate interests and the interests of politicians one and the same. For proof just look to the bankruptcy reform act (a bill law passed by the congress despite popular objection because the credit card companies lobbied for it very, very hard during the height of the bankruptcy wave from 2000-2006) or the Chrysler and GM bankruptcy dealership closings (dealers with political allies getting to keep their businesses, dealers belonging to political enemies of the current regime being closed without appeal, explanation or recourse).

So?

6. The problems in point number 5 did not begin with the Obama Administration.

No, but he is making it worse.

7. Despite all of the unwavering support for the military on this board and in this country, standing armies are still a threat to liberty. Armies obey the orders of those who command the army and our military is no different. If there were to ever be a move by the people against the government, or conversely a move by the government against the people then I have no doubt that the US military would side with the government. For proof, one only needs to look to New Orleans. Oklahoma National Guard along with out of state police departments sent to help with the Katrina cleanup effort and to restore order did confiscate weapons from law abiding civilians without anything more than an order from the chief of police to do so. Oklahoma National Guardsmen (not even PROFESSIONAL soldiers, but "Citizen Soldiers") even admitted to cameras for ABC news that they were primed to shoot and kill Americans on the streets of New Orleans if they refused to cooperate with or resisted the National Guard. If you want proof of this then just ask our very own Bama-Shooter. He was there, he saw it with his own eyes and he has confirmed this to have been the case on several occasions. I support our troops when they are defending our freedoms overseas and fighting to protect our security from our enemies, but I remain skeptical about the willingness of the average American soldier to choose loyalty to the people of this nation over loyalty to the government of this nation.

You went off the deep end on this one.  You expect the Guard not to shoot back if they are being fired upon?  You say you support them when they are fighting overseas, why?  If it ever gets to the point where the US Military will be used against Americans, its way too late to do anything about it anyway.  


Fuck it, I'll continue.  The problem with this whole "I don't think the average American soldier would refuse orders" is that its not the average soldier who would be getting orders.  You're right, a 18yo is most likely going to say "aye Sir."  But orders don't come strait from the President to a PVT.  Fucking Katrina was a perfect example of that, with a General explicitly stating that his troops would NOT confiscate weapons.  But none of the "the military is out to get us" crazies ever mention that.

They say that whenever you speak the truth you should have one foot in a stirrup. Flame suit on!


Link Posted: 6/16/2009 12:29:10 PM EDT
[#14]
Well Steve, I think it was well written.

Most of these guys don't understand your point on immigration but that's ok.

The Dems will get amnesty for illegal's, this will happen soon, insuring a super voting majority for their side for many many years to come.

The Republicans came up with nothing.

The Republicans are fucked... but you know what... they are a bunch of curropt sons of bitches too...

God Bless America!
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 12:29:17 PM EDT
[#15]
Quoted:
Quoted:
1. If President Bush is demonized by history then it will not be for Iraq and Afghanistan. Iraq and Afghanistan no longer exist. They have been completely forgotten by the populace, the media and the government. They served their purpose of destroying Bush and the Republicans and now they are no longer important. If President Bush is demonized by history then it will be for TARP and the other instances of government intermixing with the "private sector" which opened the door for Obama to implement the socialist revolution which is now in full swing.

History won't demonize him for that, although it should

2. We were wrong on immigration reform and it was a horrendous mistake for conservatives to oppose immigration reform and amnesty for illegals. Illegals who committed crimes other than illegally entering the country would have been caught and prosecuted as they are now, as they have been, just as with any other criminal. Had immigration reform moved forward under Bush and the Republican congress then there would have eventually been funding for securing the border (which had already been approved), at least there would have been a chance. The worst tragedy is that the Republicans lost any chance of winning the loyalty of the Mexicans who would have become voters if immigration reform and amnesty had passed. In truth, the Mexicans Immigrants are natural allies for the Republican party. They believe in family values, they are hard working, they are socially conservative and they like guns. The Republicans listened to conservative voters who demanded that amnesty and immigration reform be defeated, demanded that border security come first and demanded that the immigration problem be solved by deportation. Despite the Republicans caving to their voter's demands, conservative voters stayed home on election day in November 2006 and allowed the Democrats to use their propaganda against Iraq to destroy the Republican majorities in both houses of Congress. Today the Democrats have undefeatable super majorities in both houses of Congress and they control the White House. President Obama has promised the immigration reform and amnesty are on his priority list for this year and passage of whatever plan he has in mind is a certainty. The Democrats will now win the loyalty of 30,000,000 new voters they are about to create and ensure majorities in ever national election for the foreseeable future. Given the populations of illegal aliens in states like Texas, Arizona and Oklahoma, the Democrats may even be able to turn the tide in these states to the left and get Democrats to unseat traditionally conservative state governments. It was stupid and shortsighted to opposed immigration reform and amnesty, and now we will lose everything. Shoulda, Coulda, Woulda.

I agree, and said as much at the time

3. The payout of bonuses to AIG executives or ANY executive from any company that received TARP funding was a HUGE mistake, and the line that they had to be paid due to contractual obligations which would have resulted in court battles if violated is a bald faced lie. Why? Because no jury anywhere in this country would have awarded a single plug nickel to any executive of any company that would have gone bankrupt if not for TARP funding. The American people wanted these companies to go bankrupt and the anger at the execs was damn near at pitchfork and torches levels. These execs were paid their bonuses as a result of cronyism between government and the "private sector".

Completely wrong.  Lots of companies were forced to take bailout money.  I will not support the government forcing companies to take money, and then using it as an excuse to dictate salaries.

4. The corporations in the so-called "private sector" are being run by gangs of professional thieves who rape their companies, rob their employees, deceive their investors and pillage the national treasury. The past 10 years has been an almost non-stop parade of instances of corporate fraud, embezzlement, bailouts and robbery. K-mart, Enron, MCI Worldcom, Arthur Andersen, Tyco, AIG, Microsoft and on and on. They are degreed gangsters and they exercise the same tactics as the freakin' mafia. They loan themselves money that they never repay while driving the company into the ground (K-Mart), the use extortion and threats to stop out competition (Microsoft), they extort their own employees (Enron) and they make up fraudulent records to try and throw everyone off of the trail (take your pick). Capitalism is dead, what is going on in Corporate America is nothing short of organized crime.

You greatly overstate the problems.  With the amount of companies in the US, I'd say the numbers of scandals are quite low.

5. There is no such thing as a "private sector" in this country and it has not existed for a very long time. The so-called "private sector" has been interwoven with government for decades. The system of lobbying, cronyism, bribery, regulation and legislation have made corporate interests and the interests of politicians one and the same. For proof just look to the bankruptcy reform act (a bill law passed by the congress despite popular objection because the credit card companies lobbied for it very, very hard during the height of the bankruptcy wave from 2000-2006) or the Chrysler and GM bankruptcy dealership closings (dealers with political allies getting to keep their businesses, dealers belonging to political enemies of the current regime being closed without appeal, explanation or recourse).

So?

6. The problems in point number 5 did not begin with the Obama Administration.

No, but he is making it worse.

7. Despite all of the unwavering support for the military on this board and in this country, standing armies are still a threat to liberty. Armies obey the orders of those who command the army and our military is no different. If there were to ever be a move by the people against the government, or conversely a move by the government against the people then I have no doubt that the US military would side with the government. For proof, one only needs to look to New Orleans. Oklahoma National Guard along with out of state police departments sent to help with the Katrina cleanup effort and to restore order did confiscate weapons from law abiding civilians without anything more than an order from the chief of police to do so. Oklahoma National Guardsmen (not even PROFESSIONAL soldiers, but "Citizen Soldiers") even admitted to cameras for ABC news that they were primed to shoot and kill Americans on the streets of New Orleans if they refused to cooperate with or resisted the National Guard. If you want proof of this then just ask our very own Bama-Shooter. He was there, he saw it with his own eyes and he has confirmed this to have been the case on several occasions. I support our troops when they are defending our freedoms overseas and fighting to protect our security from our enemies, but I remain skeptical about the willingness of the average American soldier to choose loyalty to the people of this nation over loyalty to the government of this nation.

You went off the deep end on this one.  You expect the Guard not to shoot back if they are being fired upon?  You say you support them when they are fighting overseas, why?  If it ever gets to the point where the US Military will be used against Americans, its way too late to do anything about it anyway.  


Fuck it, I'll continue.  The problem with this whole "I don't think the average American soldier would refuse orders" is that its not the average soldier who would be getting orders.  You're right, a 18yo is most likely going to say "aye Sir."  But orders don't come strait from the President.  Fucking Katrina was a perfect example of that, with a General explicitly stating that his troops would NOT confiscate weapons.  But none of the "the military is out to get us" crazies ever mention that.

They say that whenever you speak the truth you should have one foot in a stirrup. Flame suit on!




FINALLY!

Someone who thinks I'm full of shit!
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 12:30:03 PM EDT
[#16]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
1. If President Bush is demonized by history then it will not be for Iraq and Afghanistan. Iraq and Afghanistan no longer exist. They have been completely forgotten by the populace, the media and the government. They served their purpose of destroying Bush and the Republicans and now they are no longer important. If President Bush is demonized by history then it will be for TARP and the other instances of government intermixing with the "private sector" which opened the door for Obama to implement the socialist revolution which is now in full swing.

History won't demonize him for that, although it should

2. We were wrong on immigration reform and it was a horrendous mistake for conservatives to oppose immigration reform and amnesty for illegals. Illegals who committed crimes other than illegally entering the country would have been caught and prosecuted as they are now, as they have been, just as with any other criminal. Had immigration reform moved forward under Bush and the Republican congress then there would have eventually been funding for securing the border (which had already been approved), at least there would have been a chance. The worst tragedy is that the Republicans lost any chance of winning the loyalty of the Mexicans who would have become voters if immigration reform and amnesty had passed. In truth, the Mexicans Immigrants are natural allies for the Republican party. They believe in family values, they are hard working, they are socially conservative and they like guns. The Republicans listened to conservative voters who demanded that amnesty and immigration reform be defeated, demanded that border security come first and demanded that the immigration problem be solved by deportation. Despite the Republicans caving to their voter's demands, conservative voters stayed home on election day in November 2006 and allowed the Democrats to use their propaganda against Iraq to destroy the Republican majorities in both houses of Congress. Today the Democrats have undefeatable super majorities in both houses of Congress and they control the White House. President Obama has promised the immigration reform and amnesty are on his priority list for this year and passage of whatever plan he has in mind is a certainty. The Democrats will now win the loyalty of 30,000,000 new voters they are about to create and ensure majorities in ever national election for the foreseeable future. Given the populations of illegal aliens in states like Texas, Arizona and Oklahoma, the Democrats may even be able to turn the tide in these states to the left and get Democrats to unseat traditionally conservative state governments. It was stupid and shortsighted to opposed immigration reform and amnesty, and now we will lose everything. Shoulda, Coulda, Woulda.

I agree, and said as much at the time

3. The payout of bonuses to AIG executives or ANY executive from any company that received TARP funding was a HUGE mistake, and the line that they had to be paid due to contractual obligations which would have resulted in court battles if violated is a bald faced lie. Why? Because no jury anywhere in this country would have awarded a single plug nickel to any executive of any company that would have gone bankrupt if not for TARP funding. The American people wanted these companies to go bankrupt and the anger at the execs was damn near at pitchfork and torches levels. These execs were paid their bonuses as a result of cronyism between government and the "private sector".

Completely wrong.  Lots of companies were forced to take bailout money.  I will not support the government forcing companies to take money, and then using it as an excuse to dictate salaries.

4. The corporations in the so-called "private sector" are being run by gangs of professional thieves who rape their companies, rob their employees, deceive their investors and pillage the national treasury. The past 10 years has been an almost non-stop parade of instances of corporate fraud, embezzlement, bailouts and robbery. K-mart, Enron, MCI Worldcom, Arthur Andersen, Tyco, AIG, Microsoft and on and on. They are degreed gangsters and they exercise the same tactics as the freakin' mafia. They loan themselves money that they never repay while driving the company into the ground (K-Mart), the use extortion and threats to stop out competition (Microsoft), they extort their own employees (Enron) and they make up fraudulent records to try and throw everyone off of the trail (take your pick). Capitalism is dead, what is going on in Corporate America is nothing short of organized crime.

You greatly overstate the problems.  With the amount of companies in the US, I'd say the numbers of scandals are quite low.

5. There is no such thing as a "private sector" in this country and it has not existed for a very long time. The so-called "private sector" has been interwoven with government for decades. The system of lobbying, cronyism, bribery, regulation and legislation have made corporate interests and the interests of politicians one and the same. For proof just look to the bankruptcy reform act (a bill law passed by the congress despite popular objection because the credit card companies lobbied for it very, very hard during the height of the bankruptcy wave from 2000-2006) or the Chrysler and GM bankruptcy dealership closings (dealers with political allies getting to keep their businesses, dealers belonging to political enemies of the current regime being closed without appeal, explanation or recourse).

So?

6. The problems in point number 5 did not begin with the Obama Administration.

No, but he is making it worse.

7. Despite all of the unwavering support for the military on this board and in this country, standing armies are still a threat to liberty. Armies obey the orders of those who command the army and our military is no different. If there were to ever be a move by the people against the government, or conversely a move by the government against the people then I have no doubt that the US military would side with the government. For proof, one only needs to look to New Orleans. Oklahoma National Guard along with out of state police departments sent to help with the Katrina cleanup effort and to restore order did confiscate weapons from law abiding civilians without anything more than an order from the chief of police to do so. Oklahoma National Guardsmen (not even PROFESSIONAL soldiers, but "Citizen Soldiers") even admitted to cameras for ABC news that they were primed to shoot and kill Americans on the streets of New Orleans if they refused to cooperate with or resisted the National Guard. If you want proof of this then just ask our very own Bama-Shooter. He was there, he saw it with his own eyes and he has confirmed this to have been the case on several occasions. I support our troops when they are defending our freedoms overseas and fighting to protect our security from our enemies, but I remain skeptical about the willingness of the average American soldier to choose loyalty to the people of this nation over loyalty to the government of this nation.

You went off the deep end on this one.  You expect the Guard not to shoot back if they are being fired upon?  You say you support them when they are fighting overseas, why?  If it ever gets to the point where the US Military will be used against Americans, its way too late to do anything about it anyway.  


Fuck it, I'll continue.  The problem with this whole "I don't think the average American soldier would refuse orders" is that its not the average soldier who would be getting orders.  You're right, a 18yo is most likely going to say "aye Sir."  But orders don't come strait from the President.  Fucking Katrina was a perfect example of that, with a General explicitly stating that his troops would NOT confiscate weapons.  But none of the "the military is out to get us" crazies ever mention that.

They say that whenever you speak the truth you should have one foot in a stirrup. Flame suit on!




FINALLY!

Someone who thinks I'm full of shit!


Hey, I agree with you on immigration, that seems to be the one thing that everyone else has a problem with.
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 12:31:17 PM EDT
[#17]





Quoted:
What is your proposal then?  Do you have a way to deport 8-20 million people that won't cost trillions of dollars and take decades?



I bet we could get rid of the great majority of them within 5 years.





#1. $1 million dollar fine for any employer that hires an illegal.  Fine is PER illegal hired.  And this applies to Joe Blow picking them up at Home Depot as well.


#2. No free health care for illegals.  Lifesaving health care?  Sure.  But just enough to stabilize, then they get shipped off to the border.  Mexican Government gets the bill.


#3. No anchor babies.  To become an automatic citizen, you must be born to citizen parents.


#4. No government benefits. Period.  Nothing.


#5. Any illegals captured will be put in temporary holding where they will work on chain gangs cleaning up roadsides, etc.  Once they earn the price of a bus ticket, they go home.


#6. Seal the border.  Fences, NG, BP, whatever.  Mine the fucker if you have to.





#1 and 2 alone would send most of them packing.  If they couldn't find work, and couldn't get free shit, they would go home.
 
 
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 12:35:42 PM EDT
[#18]
rabble rabble loud noises
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 12:40:40 PM EDT
[#19]
Quoted:
1. If President Bush is demonized by history then it will not be for Iraq and Afghanistan. Iraq and Afghanistan no longer exist. They have been completely forgotten by the populace, the media and the government. They served their purpose of destroying Bush and the Republicans and now they are no longer important. If President Bush is demonized by history then it will be for TARP and the other instances of government intermixing with the "private sector" which opened the door for Obama to implement the socialist revolution which is now in full swing.
Iraq and Afghanistan still exist, conservatives talk about them everyday. The liberals just want us to forget the struggle continues so Obama won't have to take responsibility for American lives lost, he is the Messiah, after all. - "head in the sand, pretend it's not there and it will go away" mentality. Ellis Henican, a liberal reporter, defended the media's lack of coverage of the terrorist attack committed on American soil, against American soldiers, in Little Rock, by a radical Muslim extremist, by saying it wasn't "morally relevant". Do you personally feel that terrorist attacks on US soil aren't relevant?
Bush can't be legitimately demonized for actions in Iraq and Afghanistan, what we did there was sacrifice American lives to remove violent, despotic regimes and help build representative governments elected by the people....and liberals despise him for it.
You're correct about TARP. Bush set the stage for Obama to have the capital necessary to deal with our economic situation, but instead he turned it into his own personal checkbook.

I think it's safe to say Obama's legacy will make Bush look like a saint.

2. We were wrong on immigration reform and it was a horrendous mistake for conservatives to oppose immigration reform and amnesty for illegals. Illegals who committed crimes other than illegally entering the country would have been caught and prosecuted as they are now, as they have been, just as with any other criminal. Had immigration reform moved forward under Bush and the Republican congress then there would have eventually been funding for securing the border (which had already been approved), at least there would have been a chance. The worst tragedy is that the Republicans lost any chance of winning the loyalty of the Mexicans who would have become voters if immigration reform and amnesty had passed. In truth, the Mexicans Immigrants are natural allies for the Republican party. They believe in family values, they are hard working, they are socially conservative and they like guns. The Republicans listened to conservative voters who demanded that amnesty and immigration reform be defeated, demanded that border security come first and demanded that the immigration problem be solved by deportation. Despite the Republicans caving to their voter's demands, conservative voters stayed home on election day in November 2006 and allowed the Democrats to use their propaganda against Iraq to destroy the Republican majorities in both houses of Congress. Today the Democrats have undefeatable super majorities in both houses of Congress and they control the White House. President Obama has promised the immigration reform and amnesty are on his priority list for this year and passage of whatever plan he has in mind is a certainty. The Democrats will now win the loyalty of 30,000,000 new voters they are about to create and ensure majorities in ever national election for the foreseeable future. Given the populations of illegal aliens in states like Texas, Arizona and Oklahoma, the Democrats may even be able to turn the tide in these states to the left and get Democrats to unseat traditionally conservative state governments. It was stupid and shortsighted to opposed immigration reform and amnesty, and now we will lose everything. Shoulda, Coulda, Woulda.
The hispanic community will never rally around Republicans, no matter what they do. The Democrats have put far too much energy into falsely convincing minorities that Republicans are racist. Just so you're aware of it, 80% of Congressional Democrats voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It was passed with the Republican vote.
I agree that we need immigration reform, but we have a responsibility to control the flow of immigrants into this country. We can't handle unlimited immigration and in light of 9/11, our security depends on it. Politically, amnesty would have helped Bush, but when the Democrats are waiving driver's licenses, health insurance, free cookies, and welfare in the air as a promise to hispanics, nothing he could do would have been enough. Just by changing the title from "illegal alien" to "undocumented worker" doesn't suddenly make breaching our borders legal.


3. The payout of bonuses to AIG executives or ANY executive from any company that received TARP funding was a HUGE mistake, and the line that they had to be paid due to contractual obligations which would have resulted in court battles if violated is a bald faced lie. Why? Because no jury anywhere in this country would have awarded a single plug nickel to any executive of any company that would have gone bankrupt if not for TARP funding. The American people wanted these companies to go bankrupt and the anger at the execs was damn near at pitchfork and torches levels. These execs were paid their bonuses as a result of cronyism between government and the "private sector".
History lesson-The bonuses were originally stripped away in the Stimulus Bill. Tim Geithner and Chris Dodd have both acknowledged their responsibility for keeping the bonuses for AIG. Dodd denied involvement, then said "Yeah, I lied. Geithner asked me to do it". Geithner denied involvement, then said "Yeah, I lied. I asked Dodd to keep the bonuses in the Stimulus Bill, but at the direction of the White House". Who's the guy running the White House? I think his name is Barry?

4. The corporations in the so-called "private sector" are being run by gangs of professional thieves who rape their companies, rob their employees, deceive their investors and pillage the national treasury. The past 10 years has been an almost non-stop parade of instances of corporate fraud, embezzlement, bailouts and robbery. K-mart, Enron, MCI Worldcom, Arthur Andersen, Tyco, AIG, Microsoft and on and on. They are degreed gangsters and they exercise the same tactics as the freakin' mafia. They loan themselves money that they never repay while driving the company into the ground (K-Mart), the use extortion and threats to stop out competition (Microsoft), they extort their own employees (Enron) and they make up fraudulent records to try and throw everyone off of the trail (take your pick). Capitalism is dead, what is going on in Corporate America is nothing short of organized crime.
True, true true. But something we learned from the "real" great depression was the need to regulate, monitor, and only when necessary, intervene. We got too comfortable with the success of capitalism so BJ Clinton decided to deregulate and let it ride. Greed and corruption in all aspects of business and government led to what we have now. The solution is to bring back some of the regulation and monitoring, not deconstruct our entire society.

5. There is no such thing as a "private sector" in this country and it has not existed for a very long time. The so-called "private sector" has been interwoven with government for decades. The system of lobbying, cronyism, bribery, regulation and legislation have made corporate interests and the interests of politicians one and the same. For proof just look to the bankruptcy reform act (a bill law passed by the congress despite popular objection because the credit card companies lobbied for it very, very hard during the height of the bankruptcy wave from 2000-2006) or the Chrysler and GM bankruptcy dealership closings (dealers with political allies getting to keep their businesses, dealers belonging to political enemies of the current regime being closed without appeal, explanation or recourse).
Private sector doesn't just include large businesses, the country was built on the backs of the small businessman, but you make a valid point

6. The problems in point number 5 did not begin with the Obama Administration.
I couldn't agree with you more

7. Despite all of the unwavering support for the military on this board and in this country, standing armies are still a threat to liberty. Armies obey the orders of those who command the army and our military is no different. If there were to ever be a move by the people against the government, or conversely a move by the government against the people then I have no doubt that the US military would side with the government. For proof, one only needs to look to New Orleans. Oklahoma National Guard along with out of state police departments sent to help with the Katrina cleanup effort and to restore order did confiscate weapons from law abiding civilians without anything more than an order from the chief of police to do so. Oklahoma National Guardsmen (not even PROFESSIONAL soldiers, but "Citizen Soldiers") even admitted to cameras for ABC news that they were primed to shoot and kill Americans on the streets of New Orleans if they refused to cooperate with or resisted the National Guard. If you want proof of this then just ask our very own Bama-Shooter. He was there, he saw it with his own eyes and he has confirmed this to have been the case on several occasions. I support our troops when they are defending our freedoms overseas and fighting to protect our security from our enemies, but I remain skeptical about the willingness of the average American soldier to choose loyalty to the people of this nation over loyalty to the government of this nation.
Should be interesting to see how that would pan out. It's still illegal for Federal Troops to conduct law enforcement duties within our borders, that's why "State" controlled NG is used, but at the same time we're seeing things happen under Obama we never thought we would....a President who despises our country for one..."


They say that whenever you speak the truth you should have one foot in a stirrup. Flame suit on!


Link Posted: 6/16/2009 12:45:34 PM EDT
[#20]
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 12:48:02 PM EDT
[#21]
Re point 2: You're are dead wrong.  Of all the reasons to cave on an issue, political expediency is the most shameful.  IMO rejecting the amnesty bill was one of conservativism's greatest accomplishments during (and in spite of) the GWB administration.  I was proud that American's refused to pander to chaos and lawlessness.  

Re point 3: The AIG bonus fiasco was a media-creation. ,The criticism came from people who don't understand that "bonuses" are how people in the financial sector get paid.  It's hard for typical wage earners to understand and its even harder when they led by the nose into a populist rage.  In the end the winner was the rule of law (keeping contracts), despite the best efforts of the thugs in Washington and the corporate cronies.  The lesson we should take away from this is that the government has no business bailing out private concerns, and if they do stick their nose in that hornet's nest they should be bound by the previous contracts just as any other equity holder would be.

The rest of your points are well taken.

Link Posted: 6/16/2009 12:54:25 PM EDT
[#22]
Quoted:
Delete #2 and you're good to go.


agreed. The rest if fairly solid.
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 12:57:46 PM EDT
[#23]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Agreed, especially on immigration.

There is no way we're going to boot out all the illegals, it's just not feasible.  Instead, give the ones who aren't breaking any (other than immigration) laws some sort of legal status.  Boot the ones who commit crimes, and the ones on public welfare back to Mehico.  And above all, secure the god damned borders.

It amuses me everybody's all scared of the Gitmo detainees coming to the US when any old terrorist can just get in Mexico and then be guaranteed access to get into the US.

More importantly, every poor Mexican that crosses the border is 1-100  Democrat/Big Government/Take My Money votes.  I say 1-100 because they have shitloads of children and in a few generations there will be a whole bunch of them.



God you guys are naive...


It is not impossible to make a valid argument that amnesty/immigration reform would have backfired on the Republicans. However, not passing it has given the Democrats a golden opportunity to do so and they will absolutely do so. They will capitalize on the opportunity and they will win the loyalty of the entire Latino community for decades to come. That will give them the voting block that they need to secure their power for the foreseeable future.


So we give away our country to keep Republicans in office?
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 12:58:24 PM EDT
[#24]
Quoted:
Tag to read all of that later.


Link Posted: 6/16/2009 1:01:02 PM EDT
[#25]
Quoted:
I don't have a problem with immigration. But there's only so much land, and so many jobs. Once we've taken care of our own then we can worry about providing homes and work for those who have already destroyed their own country.  


I think you confuse immigration with colonization; Latin America is stealing this country right out from under our noses.
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 1:03:28 PM EDT
[#26]
As much as I respect Bush for most of his actions (I too had serious problems with his stand on immigration and spending $ like a drunken sailor) the thought strikes me how much truth there is to the axiom that his policies in certain areas and the vicious treatment he received by the press/politicians/etc., sure set "god" up for enormous popularity and celebrity status. It makes me wonder about the fantastic manipulation job done by "god's" handlers, not to mention the msm. I see/hear otherwise fairly intelligent people go ga-ga over that piece of crap pres. we now have, and I have to believe that although there are various other reasons for this, the whole mess almost seems to have choreographed since about midway through the last election campaign.

Some of the above is obvious, some a stretch, but the demos seemed to be so far ahead of the repubs that it was never really a contest at times, esp. at the end, regarding strategy.
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 1:04:47 PM EDT
[#27]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Agreed, especially on immigration.

There is no way we're going to boot out all the illegals, it's just not feasible.  Instead, give the ones who aren't breaking any (other than immigration) laws some sort of legal status.  Boot the ones who commit crimes, and the ones on public welfare back to Mehico.  And above all, secure the god damned borders.

It amuses me everybody's all scared of the Gitmo detainees coming to the US when any old terrorist can just get in Mexico and then be guaranteed access to get into the US.

More importantly, every poor Mexican that crosses the border is 1-100  Democrat/Big Government/Take My Money votes.  I say 1-100 because they have shitloads of children and in a few generations there will be a whole bunch of them.



God you guys are naive...


Actually, you are the very distilled essence of naivety.  It's core.

We currently have an open border.  We currently have maybe 15 million illegal immigrants in this country.

There exists no viable solution to deport 15 million or more people.  None.

So your solution is to instead do nothing and poo-poo the idea of giving most of them legal _non voting_ status?

Brilliant!  Status quo for the win
.


Holy fucking putting words in someone else mouth batman.

That's exactly what I said, "status quo."  

Is maroon your favorite color?





What is your proposal then?  Do you have a way to deport 8-20 million people that won't cost trillions of dollars and take decades?


With enough pressure they will self deport.  Do not make them feel welcome, deport them when caught, arrest and imprison those who knowingly hire them and eventually we'll have our country back.
For those that propose amnesty-what do you do with the ones that have been on welfare, committed ID theft, or otherwise have scammed the sysetm?
Forgive them and hand them citizenship?
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 1:09:46 PM EDT
[#28]
Quoted:
4. The corporations in the so-called "private sector" are being run by gangs of professional thieves who rape their companies, rob their employees, deceive their investors and pillage the national treasury. The past 10 years has been an almost non-stop parade of instances of corporate fraud, embezzlement, bailouts and robbery. K-mart, Enron, MCI Worldcom, Arthur Andersen, Tyco, AIG, Microsoft and on and on. They are degreed gangsters and they exercise the same tactics as the freakin' mafia. They loan themselves money that they never repay while driving the company into the ground (K-Mart), the use extortion and threats to stop out competition (Microsoft), they extort their own employees (Enron) and they make up fraudulent records to try and throw everyone off of the trail (take your pick). Capitalism is dead, what is going on in Corporate America is nothing short of organized crime.



You and others always like to make this claim, however realistically, there were criminal charges in all the cases you listed.  It is against the law to commit fraud, embezzle, etc.  The difference when the government is completely in charge is that nobody will be prosecuted, there will be even more fraud and robbery, and all of us will end up getting screwed.
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 1:19:38 PM EDT
[#29]
Quoted:
Yep, Motown_Steve is off his meds.
http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=887307&page=3


Yes, I said in that thread that I started missing President Bush in September of last year and that if he could have run for a third term then I would have voted for him again. I stand by that.

Please point out how anything that I have said in this thread contradicts that assertion, or at least point out the last time that I showed anything but support for President Bush.

The closest that I have come was to say that HISTORY would demonize Bush for instituting the TARP program and only because it has opened the door for Obama to implement his socialist revolution, which is now in full swing. That is in no way, shape or form a criticism of President Bush. I think that TARP was a mistake, but I don't believe that President Bush would have used it to seize control of the private sector. I believe that Bush would have let the banks start paying off by now (if they still felt motivated to do so) and used TARP the same way that the loans to Chrysler were used.

For someone who claims to be intelligent you sure have some very poor reading comprehension skills. Extremely poor reading comprehension.
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 1:24:02 PM EDT
[#30]
2. We were wrong on immigration reform and it was a horrendous mistake for conservatives to oppose immigration reform and amnesty for illegals. Illegals who committed crimes other than illegally entering the country would have been caught and prosecuted as they are now, as they have been, just as with any other criminal. Had immigration reform moved forward under Bush and the Republican congress then there would have eventually been funding for securing the border (which had already been approved), at least there would have been a chance. The worst tragedy is that the Republicans lost any chance of winning the loyalty of the Mexicans who would have become voters if immigration reform and amnesty had passed. In truth, the Mexicans Immigrants are natural allies for the Republican party. They believe in family values, they are hard working, they are socially conservative and they like guns. The Republicans listened to conservative voters who demanded that amnesty and immigration reform be defeated, demanded that border security come first and demanded that the immigration problem be solved by deportation. Despite the Republicans caving to their voter's demands, conservative voters stayed home on election day in November 2006 and allowed the Democrats to use their propaganda against Iraq to destroy the Republican majorities in both houses of Congress. Today the Democrats have undefeatable super majorities in both houses of Congress and they control the White House. President Obama has promised the immigration reform and amnesty are on his priority list for this year and passage of whatever plan he has in mind is a certainty. The Democrats will now win the loyalty of 30,000,000 new voters they are about to create and ensure majorities in ever national election for the foreseeable future. Given the populations of illegal aliens in states like Texas, Arizona and Oklahoma, the Democrats may even be able to turn the tide in these states to the left and get Democrats to unseat traditionally conservative state governments. It was stupid and shortsighted to opposed immigration reform and amnesty, and now we will lose everything. Shoulda, Coulda, Woulda.


I stopped here.
You demonstrate a tremendous lack of history knowledge.
Compressive reform has been done once under Reagan, and once under Clinton, and each time it was swore to by Congress that the border would be secured and immigration would be solved.
Didn't happen and any legislation passed would have changed nothing about the border, as the legislation is already there to close and secure the border, Congress just will not fund it.
The border is not secure because they do not want it secure, and nothing has changed to change that.
If and when a WMD comes across the border and kills a couple of K of citizens, THEN the border will be closed. Not before, not by Obama, not by the Democrats, not by the Republicans, not until there is a reason to close it.
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 1:27:44 PM EDT
[#31]
1. I agree with you about TARP being Bush's fault, but I doubt history will remember Bush for TARP.  If anything, Bush's involvement with TARP will be an interesting but little known factoid that only future history buffs will know about.  Standard history stories are streamlined and comic-bookish for easy digestion by school children - Bush will be remembered for 9/11, Iraq, and A-stan.



2. Totally disagree with you on this one.



3. Totally agree.



4. Totally agree.  Lots of people go ape-shit over collectivized labor but think collectivized capital in the form of a government-chartered artificial legal entities ("Corporations") are a-okay and totally in tune with free market ethics.



5. Totally agree.



6. Totally agree.



7. Totally agree.



Carry on.

Link Posted: 6/16/2009 1:30:37 PM EDT
[#32]
2. We were wrong on immigration reform and it was a horrendous mistake for conservatives to oppose immigration reform and amnesty for illegals.


How many times must this ridiculous Neocon lie be curb stomped? The GOP could promise to hug every invader that sneaks across the border, and they would still vote Democrat, because the Democratic party will offer them more government freebies!

Otherwise, I mostly agree with the rest of your points.
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 1:39:31 PM EDT
[#33]


1. If President Bush is demonized by history then it will not be for Iraq and Afghanistan. Iraq and Afghanistan no longer exist. They have been completely forgotten by the populace, the media and the government. They served their purpose of destroying Bush and the Republicans and now they are no longer important. If President Bush is demonized by history then it will be for TARP and the other instances of government intermixing with the "private sector" which opened the door for Obama to implement the socialist revolution which is now in full swing.




Bush will be savaged by history for two wars, TARP, the Patriotit Act and more.. Excluding the Middle East barry and rahm continue the idiotic bush policies.





5sub





Yeah, I voted for the damn fool [bush] twice.

Yes, I voted for that all time fool mccain too.



However, though I've been a life long Republican, I'm through. No more R's and D's........too little difference. Next election I'll vote for Mickey fucking Mouse.
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 2:19:12 PM EDT
[#34]
That's it?

Not one accusation of communist leanings and only one person questioning my mental capacity.

Are you guys feeling OK?
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 2:20:18 PM EDT
[#35]
Wow, Steve.  Just wow.

Even by your pathetic, post whoring, standards that is a new low.  Your naiveté & lack of education sure shows up big time in that post.

I assume that your still a self centered sensitive little guy who internalizes every criticism & lashes out at anybody who criticizes you, so I won't go through the faulty arguments individually but you've just proved the old adage about "never miss a chance to keep your mouth shut."

 of  

Link Posted: 6/16/2009 2:22:55 PM EDT
[#36]
motown_steve, I can't remember, were you always a Paulbot or are you a recent convert?


Link Posted: 6/16/2009 2:24:17 PM EDT
[#37]
Quoted:


Cliff notes?  




The republicans really messed things up
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 2:28:26 PM EDT
[#38]
Quoted:
motown_steve, I can't remember, were you always a Paulbot or are you a recent convert?


Still not a Paulbot. Actually, I was and remain a supporter of President Bush. I voted for him twice, volunteered for this 2004 re-election campaign, volunteered for McCain's Presidential Campaign, donated to McCain/Palin and voted for McCain/Palin.

How do you like THAT wrecking ball to your inane generalization?

Link Posted: 6/16/2009 2:29:02 PM EDT
[#39]
Quoted:
Quoted:


Cliff notes?  




The republicans really messed things up


ERRRRRRR!

Wrong answer!
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 2:30:53 PM EDT
[#40]
i like it.  ARFCOM disagreeing with OP's statement that they will disagree.....

almost forgot for the post count,


THIS IS SPARTA !
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 2:31:48 PM EDT
[#41]
Once again, Steve demonstrates that he buys the media bullshit hook, line, and sinker.

You might want to be careful, Obama may want to replace Biden with you in the next election!
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 2:32:39 PM EDT
[#42]
Quoted:
Quoted:
1. If President Bush is demonized by history then it will not be for Iraq and Afghanistan. Iraq and Afghanistan no longer exist. They have been completely forgotten by the populace, the media and the government. They served their purpose of destroying Bush and the Republicans and now they are no longer important. If President Bush is demonized by history then it will be for TARP and the other instances of government intermixing with the "private sector" which opened the door for Obama to implement the socialist revolution which is now in full swing.

2. We were wrong on immigration reform and it was a horrendous mistake for conservatives to oppose immigration reform and amnesty for illegals. Illegals who committed crimes other than illegally entering the country would have been caught and prosecuted as they are now, as they have been, just as with any other criminal. Had immigration reform moved forward under Bush and the Republican congress then there would have eventually been funding for securing the border (which had already been approved), at least there would have been a chance. The worst tragedy is that the Republicans lost any chance of winning the loyalty of the Mexicans who would have become voters if immigration reform and amnesty had passed. In truth, the Mexicans Immigrants are natural allies for the Republican party. They believe in family values, they are hard working, they are socially conservative and they like guns. The Republicans listened to conservative voters who demanded that amnesty and immigration reform be defeated, demanded that border security come first and demanded that the immigration problem be solved by deportation. Despite the Republicans caving to their voter's demands, conservative voters stayed home on election day in November 2006 and allowed the Democrats to use their propaganda against Iraq to destroy the Republican majorities in both houses of Congress. Today the Democrats have undefeatable super majorities in both houses of Congress and they control the White House. President Obama has promised the immigration reform and amnesty are on his priority list for this year and passage of whatever plan he has in mind is a certainty. The Democrats will now win the loyalty of 30,000,000 new voters they are about to create and ensure majorities in ever national election for the foreseeable future. Given the populations of illegal aliens in states like Texas, Arizona and Oklahoma, the Democrats may even be able to turn the tide in these states to the left and get Democrats to unseat traditionally conservative state governments. It was stupid and shortsighted to opposed immigration reform and amnesty, and now we will lose everything. Shoulda, Coulda, Woulda.

3. The payout of bonuses to AIG executives or ANY executive from any company that received TARP funding was a HUGE mistake, and the line that they had to be paid due to contractual obligations which would have resulted in court battles if violated is a bald faced lie. Why? Because no jury anywhere in this country would have awarded a single plug nickel to any executive of any company that would have gone bankrupt if not for TARP funding. The American people wanted these companies to go bankrupt and the anger at the execs was damn near at pitchfork and torches levels. These execs were paid their bonuses as a result of cronyism between government and the "private sector".

4. The corporations in the so-called "private sector" are being run by gangs of professional thieves who rape their companies, rob their employees, deceive their investors and pillage the national treasury. The past 10 years has been an almost non-stop parade of instances of corporate fraud, embezzlement, bailouts and robbery. K-mart, Enron, MCI Worldcom, Arthur Andersen, Tyco, AIG, Microsoft and on and on. They are degreed gangsters and they exercise the same tactics as the freakin' mafia. They loan themselves money that they never repay while driving the company into the ground (K-Mart), the use extortion and threats to stop out competition (Microsoft), they extort their own employees (Enron) and they make up fraudulent records to try and throw everyone off of the trail (take your pick). Capitalism is dead, what is going on in Corporate America is nothing short of organized crime.

5. There is no such thing as a "private sector" in this country and it has not existed for a very long time. The so-called "private sector" has been interwoven with government for decades. The system of lobbying, cronyism, bribery, regulation and legislation have made corporate interests and the interests of politicians one and the same. For proof just look to the bankruptcy reform act (a bill law passed by the congress despite popular objection because the credit card companies lobbied for it very, very hard during the height of the bankruptcy wave from 2000-2006) or the Chrysler and GM bankruptcy dealership closings (dealers with political allies getting to keep their businesses, dealers belonging to political enemies of the current regime being closed without appeal, explanation or recourse).

6. The problems in point number 5 did not begin with the Obama Administration.

7. Despite all of the unwavering support for the military on this board and in this country, standing armies are still a threat to liberty. Armies obey the orders of those who command the army and our military is no different. If there were to ever be a move by the people against the government, or conversely a move by the government against the people then I have no doubt that the US military would side with the government. For proof, one only needs to look to New Orleans. Oklahoma National Guard along with out of state police departments sent to help with the Katrina cleanup effort and to restore order did confiscate weapons from law abiding civilians without anything more than an order from the chief of police to do so. Oklahoma National Guardsmen (not even PROFESSIONAL soldiers, but "Citizen Soldiers") even admitted to cameras for ABC news that they were primed to shoot and kill Americans on the streets of New Orleans if they refused to cooperate with or resisted the National Guard. If you want proof of this then just ask our very own Bama-Shooter. He was there, he saw it with his own eyes and he has confirmed this to have been the case on several occasions. I support our troops when they are defending our freedoms overseas and fighting to protect our security from our enemies, but I remain skeptical about the willingness of the average American soldier to choose loyalty to the people of this nation over loyalty to the government of this nation.

They say that whenever you speak the truth you should have one foot in a stirrup. Flame suit on!


You lost me there.  Coming to the United States is NOT a universal entitlement.  FAIL.


Not it is not a right ,but Motown is right on the immigration issue .
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 2:37:11 PM EDT
[#43]
Where is Dave_A? He's starting to slack!
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 2:39:29 PM EDT
[#44]
Mulling...
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 2:39:42 PM EDT
[#45]
Quoted:
Once again, Steve demonstrates that he buys the media bullshit hook, line, and sinker.

You might want to be careful, Obama may want to replace Biden with you in the next election!




Link Posted: 6/16/2009 2:39:53 PM EDT
[#46]
Youre right on some things and not right about other things.  (op)  True, government has been in our face big time since the Carter years.  The one thing that your rant overlooked was the fact that there has been a change in morality.  It has been slow, insidious and infected with greed.  It is a "perfect storm" where all the negatives have came together, corporate greed, corrupt government and a diminish of moral values throughout society.  On top of all of this, illegal immigration and the lack of will of corrupt government to take a stand on the issue has contibuted enormously to the decay of the United States.

Nothing can help us now, except we, the people.  It wont happen because we ARE the people.   I cant flame your post because you have made good points therein.

God help us.
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 2:40:25 PM EDT
[#47]
Quoted:
1. If President Bush is demonized by history then it will not be for Iraq and Afghanistan. Iraq and Afghanistan no longer exist. They have been completely forgotten by the populace, the media and the government. They served their purpose of destroying Bush and the Republicans and now they are no longer important. If President Bush is demonized by history then it will be for TARP and the other instances of government intermixing with the "private sector" which opened the door for Obama to implement the socialist revolution which is now in full swing.

2. We were wrong on immigration reform and it was a horrendous mistake for conservatives to oppose immigration reform and amnesty for illegals. Illegals who committed crimes other than illegally entering the country would have been caught and prosecuted as they are now, as they have been, just as with any other criminal. Had immigration reform moved forward under Bush and the Republican congress then there would have eventually been funding for securing the border (which had already been approved), at least there would have been a chance. The worst tragedy is that the Republicans lost any chance of winning the loyalty of the Mexicans who would have become voters if immigration reform and amnesty had passed. In truth, the Mexicans Immigrants are natural allies for the Republican party. They believe in family values, they are hard working, they are socially conservative and they like guns. The Republicans listened to conservative voters who demanded that amnesty and immigration reform be defeated, demanded that border security come first and demanded that the immigration problem be solved by deportation. Despite the Republicans caving to their voter's demands, conservative voters stayed home on election day in November 2006 and allowed the Democrats to use their propaganda against Iraq to destroy the Republican majorities in both houses of Congress. Today the Democrats have undefeatable super majorities in both houses of Congress and they control the White House. President Obama has promised the immigration reform and amnesty are on his priority list for this year and passage of whatever plan he has in mind is a certainty. The Democrats will now win the loyalty of 30,000,000 new voters they are about to create and ensure majorities in ever national election for the foreseeable future. Given the populations of illegal aliens in states like Texas, Arizona and Oklahoma, the Democrats may even be able to turn the tide in these states to the left and get Democrats to unseat traditionally conservative state governments. It was stupid and shortsighted to opposed immigration reform and amnesty, and now we will lose everything. Shoulda, Coulda, Woulda.

3. The payout of bonuses to AIG executives or ANY executive from any company that received TARP funding was a HUGE mistake, and the line that they had to be paid due to contractual obligations which would have resulted in court battles if violated is a bald faced lie. Why? Because no jury anywhere in this country would have awarded a single plug nickel to any executive of any company that would have gone bankrupt if not for TARP funding. The American people wanted these companies to go bankrupt and the anger at the execs was damn near at pitchfork and torches levels. These execs were paid their bonuses as a result of cronyism between government and the "private sector".

4. The corporations in the so-called "private sector" are being run by gangs of professional thieves who rape their companies, rob their employees, deceive their investors and pillage the national treasury. The past 10 years has been an almost non-stop parade of instances of corporate fraud, embezzlement, bailouts and robbery. K-mart, Enron, MCI Worldcom, Arthur Andersen, Tyco, AIG, Microsoft and on and on. They are degreed gangsters and they exercise the same tactics as the freakin' mafia. They loan themselves money that they never repay while driving the company into the ground (K-Mart), the use extortion and threats to stop out competition (Microsoft), they extort their own employees (Enron) and they make up fraudulent records to try and throw everyone off of the trail (take your pick). Capitalism is dead, what is going on in Corporate America is nothing short of organized crime.

5. There is no such thing as a "private sector" in this country and it has not existed for a very long time. The so-called "private sector" has been interwoven with government for decades. The system of lobbying, cronyism, bribery, regulation and legislation have made corporate interests and the interests of politicians one and the same. For proof just look to the bankruptcy reform act (a bill law passed by the congress despite popular objection because the credit card companies lobbied for it very, very hard during the height of the bankruptcy wave from 2000-2006) or the Chrysler and GM bankruptcy dealership closings (dealers with political allies getting to keep their businesses, dealers belonging to political enemies of the current regime being closed without appeal, explanation or recourse).

6. The problems in point number 5 did not begin with the Obama Administration.

7. Despite all of the unwavering support for the military on this board and in this country, standing armies are still a threat to liberty. Armies obey the orders of those who command the army and our military is no different. If there were to ever be a move by the people against the government, or conversely a move by the government against the people then I have no doubt that the US military would side with the government. For proof, one only needs to look to New Orleans. Oklahoma National Guard along with out of state police departments sent to help with the Katrina cleanup effort and to restore order did confiscate weapons from law abiding civilians without anything more than an order from the chief of police to do so. Oklahoma National Guardsmen (not even PROFESSIONAL soldiers, but "Citizen Soldiers") even admitted to cameras for ABC news that they were primed to shoot and kill Americans on the streets of New Orleans if they refused to cooperate with or resisted the National Guard. If you want proof of this then just ask our very own Bama-Shooter. He was there, he saw it with his own eyes and he has confirmed this to have been the case on several occasions. I support our troops when they are defending our freedoms overseas and fighting to protect our security from our enemies, but I remain skeptical about the willingness of the average American soldier to choose loyalty to the people of this nation over loyalty to the government of this nation.

They say that whenever you speak the truth you should have one foot in a stirrup. Flame suit on!


Yup.
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 2:41:50 PM EDT
[#48]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Once again, Steve demonstrates that he buys the media bullshit hook, line, and sinker.

You might want to be careful, Obama may want to replace Biden with you in the next election!






Except he's right.  And it's getting really old.
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 2:42:23 PM EDT
[#49]





Some of your answers reveal a lack of command of the facts.
Link Posted: 6/16/2009 2:43:03 PM EDT
[#50]
#1 is spot on. I would add "No Child Left Behind" to the list.
Page / 3
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top