Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Link Posted: 3/1/2002 6:35:07 AM EDT
[#1]
This may be a stupid question, but was the UZI in question a pre-ban???

The Court says "...922 contains a grandfather clause allowing the continued possession of an UZI "otherwise lawfully possessed under
Federal law on the date of enactment of this subsection [September13, 1994],"  

Actually it is an exemption from 922.

Link Posted: 3/2/2002 9:35:26 PM EDT
[#2]
If the receiver was not assembled as a complete fire arm before the "date" it is not legal. In court you had better have undisputeable proof that your pre ban was a complete fire arm before the "date"..
Link Posted: 3/2/2002 9:37:38 PM EDT
[#3]
or that the receiver in question was assmbled as a complete fire arm before a new upper ect. was placed on it.
Link Posted: 3/2/2002 11:21:05 PM EDT
[#4]
As Road Kill correctly pointed out, status [b]before[/b] the date is not the important factor.  Status [b]ON[/b] the date of enactment is the real key.
Link Posted: 3/3/2002 12:03:15 PM EDT
[#5]
54 posts on this question? The answer is clearly you cannot track the history. Since the forms are most likely held by the dealer and not the federal government, you have no chance to use the freedom information act. You are SOL and will have to rely on the information from the seller.
Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top