User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 4/15/2016 9:50:01 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Proud to have called Citizens United a past client!  I guess I'm semi-uninformed. Will someone explain citizens united? A link or thumbnail version will work. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2016 9:52:16 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I guess I'm semi-uninformed. Will someone explain citizens united? A link or thumbnail version will work. Citizens United opened the door to unlimited campaign donations. Wiki Link It's where they equated money to speech in an abominable decision. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2016 10:00:39 PM EDT
[#3]
I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. Except for the First Amendment...and the Second Amendment.... |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2016 10:06:28 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Citizens United opened the door to unlimited campaign donations. Wiki Link It's where they equated money to speech in an abominable decision. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I guess I'm semi-uninformed. Will someone explain citizens united? A link or thumbnail version will work. Citizens United opened the door to unlimited campaign donations. Wiki Link It's where they equated money to speech in an abominable decision. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2016 10:09:23 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It takes money to disseminate speech via the press, or via advertisement and publication of speech in any format beyond yelling on street corners, really. You just hate the decision because it went against the government clamping down on speech that opposes your grand desire for mankind to be under the boot heel of the Soviet-esque socialist state. I dislike the decision because it gave even more power to those with the most capital. You are seeing its results in your own party. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2016 10:09:53 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Shut up you tyrant cunt. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2016 10:15:36 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I dislike the decision because it gave even more power to those with the most capital. You are seeing its results in your own party. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: It takes money to disseminate speech via the press, or via advertisement and publication of speech in any format beyond yelling on street corners, really. You just hate the decision because it went against the government clamping down on speech that opposes your grand desire for mankind to be under the boot heel of the Soviet-esque socialist state. I dislike the decision because it gave even more power to those with the most capital. You are seeing its results in your own party. How do you feel about unions spending money to support their favored candidates? Don't worry, I don't expect you to be honest. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2016 10:18:57 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It's funny that you think I'm a Republican. But not as funny as pointing out how, logically, free speech is just yelling on the street corner unless you have the freedom to spend money to publish it, and your retort is to ignore that point and state that you dislike it, not because of sound logic or legal argument, but rather because of your feels. How do you feel about unions spending money to support their favored candidates? Don't worry, I don't expect you to be honest. I believe in publically funded elections. Let the ideas stand on their own and each side should play by the same rules. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2016 10:22:14 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I believe in publically funded elections. Let the ideas stand on their own and each side should play by the same rules. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: It's funny that you think I'm a Republican. But not as funny as pointing out how, logically, free speech is just yelling on the street corner unless you have the freedom to spend money to publish it, and your retort is to ignore that point and state that you dislike it, not because of sound logic or legal argument, but rather because of your feels. How do you feel about unions spending money to support their favored candidates? Don't worry, I don't expect you to be honest. I believe in publically funded elections. Let the ideas stand on their own and each side should play by the same rules. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2016 10:24:44 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
In what way are the two main parties, or "sides" not playing by the same rules? You can see the split in the democratic party between funding in the Sanders and Clinton campaign. You see it on the right with the establishment republicans opposing Trump. They represent the money's interest not their party's voters. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2016 10:25:24 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I disagree with you. They are holy from God. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't trust this current crop of politicians to touch anything and not turn it to sh*t.  The first 10 amendments are sacrosanct and thereby Uneditable. Fuck you you elephant ankled, carpet munching, communist cunt. The part in red is not true, but I get your point. I disagree with you. They are holy from God. There is nothing that prevents the states from amending any part of the Constitution, including any of the amendments, via the process laid out in Article V. I agree we have inalienable rights, as stated in the Declaration of Independence, that come from our Creator, not any man or government. Those rights cannot be "edited" by man. But the Constitution was created by men, and can be amended by men. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2016 10:32:08 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You can see the split in the democratic party between funding in the Sanders and Clinton campaign. You see it on the right with the establishment republicans opposing Trump. They represent the money's interest not their party's voters. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: In what way are the two main parties, or "sides" not playing by the same rules? You can see the split in the democratic party between funding in the Sanders and Clinton campaign. You see it on the right with the establishment republicans opposing Trump. They represent the money's interest not their party's voters. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2016 10:33:44 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It's not a good dodge when it's that obviously a dodge. I thought it was a pretty complete answer, since the question requires more than a "look at rule 1b" response. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2016 11:06:53 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
When the D choices are a criminal cunt and a communist cuck, it's no wonder why a crazy capitalist is doing so well. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Shut up you tyrant cunt. When the D choices are a criminal cunt and a communist cuck, it's no wonder why a crazy capitalist is doing so well. ^^^^^ This is sig line material right here. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2016 11:13:57 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I thought it was a pretty complete answer, since the question requires more than a "look at rule 1b" response. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: It's not a good dodge when it's that obviously a dodge. I thought it was a pretty complete answer, since the question requires more than a "look at rule 1b" response. But, either way, and whether you like it or not, party nominations are not an elective process that is under federal jurisdiction. And it seems pretty clear, from the many opinions voiced on the matter, that if the GOP jumps the top candidates to emerge from the caucuses, primaries, and conventions, and stuffs some noncompetitive hack in as their nominee, they'll lose, and lose badly. So tell me again how that doesn't work itself out in the end? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2016 11:25:05 PM EDT
[#16]
She needs to be residing in a far distant Russian gulag.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2016 11:31:40 PM EDT
[#17]
Wow, tossing out the Constitution, and still has a chance to be President. That is a pretty sad platform.
Sure many shit on the 2nd, but the 1st, that is a new bold step. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2016 11:36:14 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So, if I say something about the sweat pouring down Soros' flabby belly onto Sanders' mostly bald head, while Soros front ends him, and Hillary's cackling wicked witch grin as she pegs him from behind... It's really vivid? So grateful for that filter, I am. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2016 11:37:34 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Wow, tossing out the Constitution, and still has a chance to be President. That is a pretty sad platform.
Sure many shit on the 2nd, but the 1st, that is a new bold step. Shitting on the 2nd is only the first step. The entire Bill Of Rights goes out the door once the 2nd is trashed. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 12:28:13 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That is a pretty sad platform.
Sure many shit on the 2nd, but the 1st, that is a new bold step. No different than the front runner in the Republican race. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 12:32:21 AM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Citizens United opened the door to unlimited campaign donations. Wiki Link It's where they equated money to speech in an abominable decision. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I guess I'm semi-uninformed. Will someone explain citizens united? A link or thumbnail version will work. Citizens United opened the door to unlimited campaign donations. Wiki Link It's where they equated money to speech in an abominable decision. Citizens United was a group of people that joined together and contributed money to make a film that was critical of Hilary Clinton. It is the very essence of why we have the First Amendment; to be able to criticize politicians.That the group of people formed a corporation to do so is somehow scary and evil. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 12:41:06 AM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Remember that her and her kind are our enemies. Not Trump, not Cruz, not the GOP. It's these fucks that want to take everything from us. QFMFT |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 12:42:28 AM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Citizens United was a group of people that joined together and contributed money to make a film that was critical of Hilary Clinton. It is the very essence of why we have the First Amendment; to be able to criticize politicians.That the group of people formed a corporation to do so is somehow scary and evil. Because it paved the way for our current problems. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 12:44:22 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Remember that her and her kind are our enemies. Not Trump, not Cruz, not the GOP. It's these fucks that want to take everything from us. The gop is no friend of freedom. Patriot act anyone? The republicans and democrats are 2 wings of the same chicken. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 12:54:05 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I dislike the decision because it gave even more power to those with the most capital. You are seeing its results in your own party. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
It takes money to disseminate speech via the press, or via advertisement and publication of speech in any format beyond yelling on street corners, really. You just hate the decision because it went against the government clamping down on speech that opposes your grand desire for mankind to be under the boot heel of the Soviet-esque socialist state. I dislike the decision because it gave even more power to those with the most capital. You are seeing its results in your own party. What's the matter? Things boring at the DU Clinton-Sanders love fest? Seriously, this is not the site for you. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 1:18:56 AM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What's the matter? Things boring at the DU Clinton-Sanders love fest? Seriously, this is not the site for you. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It takes money to disseminate speech via the press, or via advertisement and publication of speech in any format beyond yelling on street corners, really. You just hate the decision because it went against the government clamping down on speech that opposes your grand desire for mankind to be under the boot heel of the Soviet-esque socialist state. I dislike the decision because it gave even more power to those with the most capital. You are seeing its results in your own party. What's the matter? Things boring at the DU Clinton-Sanders love fest? Seriously, this is not the site for you. Why not? I don't agree with much of what he says, however he isn't a troll about it. He seems to state fairly consistent opinions that are contrary to the echo chamber. That type of dissent is important. Shutting down people with different views is wrong. Let his ideas stand or fall on their own, dont try to silence them. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 1:53:32 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Because it paved the way for our current problems. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Citizens United was a group of people that joined together and contributed money to make a film that was critical of Hilary Clinton. It is the very essence of why we have the First Amendment; to be able to criticize politicians.That the group of people formed a corporation to do so is somehow scary and evil. Because it paved the way for our current problems. Well that's kind of vague. Do you mean that criticizing politicians paved the way (what current problems? Isn't everything great with President Obama?). Or is it only acceptable to criticize politicians if you contribute to some other politician's campaign within the limits set by the government? Why is it okay for CBS, NBC, and ABC to give out millions (billions?) worth of free support but if a few guys from AR15.com want to pool our money that is bad? Face it, the current system protects incumbents at the expense of liberty. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 2:00:00 AM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
She needs to be residing in a far distant Russian gulag. Putin has invested far too much money in her for that to ever happen. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 7:49:05 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Looks like she has the same demagogic predilections of a certain liberal New York City "business" man running for President. Not surprised, Donald Trump is a supporter of hers. Birds of a feather and all that. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Hillary Says We Should Rewrite the First Amendment, If That’s What It Takes to Reverse Citizens United Hillary Clinton endorsed a constitutional amendment today to reverse the Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. FEC?. Clinton said that the Citizens United ruling should be reversed “once and for all, even if it takes a constitutional amendment,”
You know the talking heads keep ranting on how dangerous Trump would be as president but no matter what he does it would be benign compared to what this Hell-hound is capable of. Looks like she has the same demagogic predilections of a certain liberal New York City "business" man running for President. Not surprised, Donald Trump is a supporter of hers. Birds of a feather and all that. The difference between her and is Trump is Trump driven by profit and the power that comes of it, she is driven by something far more sinister. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 8:20:36 AM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Why not? I don't agree with much of what he says, however he isn't a troll about it. He seems to state fairly consistent opinions that are contrary to the echo chamber. That type of dissent is important. Shutting down people with different views is wrong. Let his ideas stand or fall on their own, dont try to silence them. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It takes money to disseminate speech via the press, or via advertisement and publication of speech in any format beyond yelling on street corners, really. You just hate the decision because it went against the government clamping down on speech that opposes your grand desire for mankind to be under the boot heel of the Soviet-esque socialist state. I dislike the decision because it gave even more power to those with the most capital. You are seeing its results in your own party. What's the matter? Things boring at the DU Clinton-Sanders love fest? Seriously, this is not the site for you. Why not? I don't agree with much of what he says, however he isn't a troll about it. He seems to state fairly consistent opinions that are contrary to the echo chamber. That type of dissent is important. Shutting down people with different views is wrong. Let his ideas stand or fall on their own, dont try to silence them. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 9:51:37 AM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It takes money to disseminate speech via the press, or via advertisement and publication of speech in any format beyond yelling on street corners, really. You just hate the decision because it went against the government clamping down on speech that opposes your grand desire for mankind to be under the boot heel of the Soviet-esque socialist state. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I guess I'm semi-uninformed. Will someone explain citizens united? A link or thumbnail version will work. Citizens United opened the door to unlimited campaign donations. Wiki Link It's where they equated money to speech in an abominable decision. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 9:56:31 AM EDT
[#32]
LOL. Like she'd ever cut off the Goldman Sachs graft spigot.
She LIVES on Citizen's United. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 9:57:09 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
This is wish fulfilment and projection on your part. I don't know if he would tear her a new asshole, I don't know if he would build a wall, I don't know if he would protect the 2ndA. The "I don't know" comes from Donald Trump's lifelong inconsistencies in words and deeds on political matters of policy and practicality. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Hillary Says We Should Rewrite the First Amendment, If That’s What It Takes to Reverse Citizens United Hillary Clinton endorsed a constitutional amendment today to reverse the Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. FEC?. Clinton said that the Citizens United ruling should be reversed “once and for all, even if it takes a constitutional amendment,”
You know the talking heads keep ranting on how dangerous Trump would be as president but no matter what he does it would be benign compared to what this Hell-hound is capable of. Looks like she has the same demagogic predilections of a certain liberal New York City "business" man running for President. Not surprised, Donald Trump is a supporter of hers. Birds of a feather and all that. If he's such a supporter of hers why would he tear that bitch a new ass hole in the GE? This is wish fulfilment and projection on your part. I don't know if he would tear her a new asshole, I don't know if he would build a wall, I don't know if he would protect the 2ndA. The "I don't know" comes from Donald Trump's lifelong inconsistencies in words and deeds on political matters of policy and practicality. To be fair, the only thing we can be sure about Trump is that he would tear her up in the general election. That is Trump, attack, demean, insult and make vague promises. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 10:12:16 AM EDT
[#34]
Quoted:
Hillary Says We Should Rewrite the First Amendment, If That’s What It Takes to Reverse Citizens United Hillary Clinton endorsed a constitutional amendment today to reverse the Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. FEC?. Clinton said that the Citizens United ruling should be reversed “once and for all, even if it takes a constitutional amendment,”
You know the talking heads keep ranting on how dangerous Trump would be as president but no matter what he does it would be benign compared to what this Hell-hound is capable of. You do know that Trump wants to change/repeal the first amendment as well to restrict political speech? Why is it ok for Trump to want to prosecute newspapers who say mean things about him, but it is not ok for Hillary to change the first to overturn citizens united? Newsflash, they are both shitheads. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 10:20:49 AM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
He will probably be worse... 
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
If Bernie Sanders wins the election and becomes President, I'll say, "At least we don't have to deal with Clinton." He will probably be worse...
We can move our capital to the middle east then.... |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 10:23:16 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryI definitely would vote for Hitlery going to the Federal Penitentiary. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 10:26:38 AM EDT
[#37]
Gotta love how corporations are evil but unions are not.
In MD, the *only* time you can picket outside someone's home is if the picketer is taking part in a labor dispute. Kharn Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 10:33:37 AM EDT
[#38]
Much worse..........Hllary is crony-Socialist lite...........Bernie is Socialism all the way, and we don't want either one
Quote HistoryQuoted:
He will probably be worse...
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
If Bernie Sanders wins the election and becomes President, I'll say, "At least we don't have to deal with Clinton." He will probably be worse...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 10:50:59 AM EDT
[#39]
the words you SAY, are good enough to IMPRISON you, get your dog shot, your babies flashbanged!
THAT IS WHAT THIS MEANS! How the fuck can you vote for this piece of shit cunt? How? WTF? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 11:37:07 AM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The difference between her and is Trump is Trump driven by profit and the power that comes of it, she is driven by something far more sinister. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Hillary Says We Should Rewrite the First Amendment, If That’s What It Takes to Reverse Citizens United Hillary Clinton endorsed a constitutional amendment today to reverse the Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. FEC?. Clinton said that the Citizens United ruling should be reversed “once and for all, even if it takes a constitutional amendment,”
You know the talking heads keep ranting on how dangerous Trump would be as president but no matter what he does it would be benign compared to what this Hell-hound is capable of. Looks like she has the same demagogic predilections of a certain liberal New York City "business" man running for President. Not surprised, Donald Trump is a supporter of hers. Birds of a feather and all that. The difference between her and is Trump is Trump driven by profit and the power that comes of it, she is driven by something far more sinister. I find little to distinguish between Hillary's ambition and Donald's. Profit is great as long as one does not lie, steal or cheat and we have yet to see a tax return. In each of their ambition we can observe that it is a difference without a distinction. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 11:43:05 AM EDT
[#41]
She is just a matronly old grandma looking out for the little guy. You guys are just being hateful and paranoid. You weren't afraid of your dear old granny.......were you?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 11:50:22 AM EDT
[#42]
I really hate to say I agree with Hillary on something
Why should a corporation receive the same protections as a person? The individuals IN the Corporation should never lose their inalienable rights, but The Constitution lays out a government of the people by the people and for the people. Not a series of fucking fiefdoms where CEO's get to dictate policy. I mean if you guys are cool with being serfs then by all means. I however refuse to bow to a king or baron just because he is in the private sector. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 12:19:19 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I really hate to say I agree with Hillary on something Why should a corporation receive the same protections as a person? The individuals IN the Corporation should never lose their inalienable rights, but The Constitution lays out a government of the people by the people and for the people. Not a series of fucking fiefdoms where CEO's get to dictate policy. I mean if you guys are cool with being serfs then by all means. I however refuse to bow to a king or baron just because he is in the private sector. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 12:23:27 PM EDT
[#44]
Quoted:
Hillary Says We Should Rewrite the First Amendment, If That’s What It Takes to Reverse Citizens United Hillary Clinton endorsed a constitutional amendment today to reverse the Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. FEC?. Clinton said that the Citizens United ruling should be reversed “once and for all, even if it takes a constitutional amendment,”
You know the talking heads usual suspects keep ranting on how dangerous Trump would be as president but no matter what he does it would be benign compared to what this Hell-hound is capable of. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 12:29:02 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I find it downright frightening that a leading candidate is openly calling for edits to the bill of rights.... The 1st is first, and then the 2nd is second... 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/16/2016 12:29:57 PM EDT
[#46]
Quoted:
Hillary Says We Should Rewrite the First Amendment, If That’s What It Takes to Reverse Citizens United Hillary Clinton endorsed a constitutional amendment today to reverse the Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. FEC?. Clinton said that the Citizens United ruling should be reversed “once and for all, even if it takes a constitutional amendment,”
You know the talking heads keep ranting on how dangerous Trump would be as president but no matter what he does it would be benign compared to what this Hell-hound is capable of. So is she refusing their money? Hell no, she's taking more than all the others combined. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/19/2016 10:48:12 AM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Because it paved the way for our current problems. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Citizens United was a group of people that joined together and contributed money to make a film that was critical of Hilary Clinton. It is the very essence of why we have the First Amendment; to be able to criticize politicians.That the group of people formed a corporation to do so is somehow scary and evil. Because it paved the way for our current problems. Hardly. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/19/2016 10:50:02 AM EDT
[#48]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/19/2016 11:10:09 AM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I dislike the decision because it gave even more power to those with the most capital. You are seeing its results in your own party. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
It takes money to disseminate speech via the press, or via advertisement and publication of speech in any format beyond yelling on street corners, really. You just hate the decision because it went against the government clamping down on speech that opposes your grand desire for mankind to be under the boot heel of the Soviet-esque socialist state. I dislike the decision because it gave even more power to those with the most capital. You are seeing its results in your own party. Actually, the Trumps of the world would be the only ones with enough money to get their message out. Citizens United says anyone can pool their money (incorporate) to be able to get a message out. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/19/2016 11:17:35 AM EDT
[#50]
Money doesn't decide elections, votes do. We have seen several elections where candidates were badly outspent, but still won because they had the better platform.
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
