Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 3
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 9:30:16 AM EDT
[#1]
"Would" resort to violence?   They DO resort to violence - regularly.  Just about every major violent event in recent domestic US history has been from the left.  School shootings, the entire "Occupy movement", Seattle WTO riots, just about any labor strike/picket line, ...
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 9:32:57 AM EDT
[#2]
In to see where this goes.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 9:33:48 AM EDT
[#3]



 
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 9:35:00 AM EDT
[#4]
Look Donald Kaul...the news contributor who called for gun owners to be shot. The left, no matter where it exists, uses violence as a tool. Whether it was the Nazis (which was a socialist movemnet) or Russia distributing weapons to communists movements around the world, the left uses chaos and violence as a means to an end.

Want an real world, Obama related example....I'll give you two.

His call for his own Brown shirt army....(I know, he disguised it in the way that he said it but that was what he was calling for)

And the DOJ smuggling guns to Mexico where the could be used to create chaos.....(why, so that he would have an excuse to gut the 2nd)

That is his philosophy, I'm sure it is all contained in the book "Rules for Radicals", he knows that book cover to cover.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 9:35:00 AM EDT
[#5]



Quoted:


I was a regular years ago.  I couldn't remember my old log in info so I rejoined.  I am not a troll.


Do your friends call you Bubba?



 
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 9:49:16 AM EDT
[#6]
Though I see do see whacky people from both sides, I do see more violent "tendencies" from the liberals. I spend a lot of time scouring news sites, both liberal and conservative and especially the comments section to see what real people are saying. I kinda have to agree with OP.

This is a comment pulled from an article on the Jan 19 Guns Across America rally. People like this are a lot more prevalent than you would think..
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 9:49:18 AM EDT
[#7]

Outfuckingstanding. Every year or so I go back and watch Yuri's video so I remember why our independent press, education system, churches and government seem to be taking crazy pills.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 9:53:04 AM EDT
[#8]
Quoted:
"Would" resort to violence?   They DO resort to violence - regularly.  Just about every major violent event in recent domestic US history has been from the left.  School shootings, the entire "Occupy movement", Seattle WTO riots, just about any labor strike/picket line, ...

I don't know how strictly accurate it is, but I saw this picture this morning and it seems applicable here.

Link Posted: 1/21/2013 9:54:27 AM EDT
[#9]



Quoted:





Outfuckingstanding. Every year or so I go back and watch Yuri's video so I remember why our independent press, education system, churches and government seem to be taking crazy pills.



Yep, and when he talks about things being put right in front of peoples faces and they still deny it is absolutely true....

 
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 9:55:31 AM EDT
[#10]



Quoted:


When they come at me swinging their cucumber veggy swords, I will simply laugh as I beat them to death with a steak.


Ladies and Gentlemen, this is Grade A sig-line material.







 
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 10:52:32 AM EDT
[#11]
I will just say this...
The 'left' some may like guns most dont but they would never dream of going head to head with the 'right.' you see they, and I witnessed this, think that their guns are the Govt/Military. They want to sick them on us. The Govt uses them as pawns in their game and they hope to use the Govt as a pawn in their own. They wield each other so to speak. You see the Govt only has as much power as the people allow them to have. They need the left to give them more power and they want more things from the Govt.
We are on our own, and I think that makes it that much important that we can all stand together and quit with all the petty drama.
Long live the Republic!
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 12:36:57 PM EDT
[#12]
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 12:38:24 PM EDT
[#13]
Quoted:
When they come at me swinging their cucumber veggy swords, I will simply laugh as I beat them to death with a steak.


Link Posted: 1/21/2013 12:40:08 PM EDT
[#14]
The Left would quickly resort to violence.

I suspect they'd abandon it pretty quickly once the whole "unintended consequences" thing bit them in the ass.

Link Posted: 1/21/2013 12:48:38 PM EDT
[#15]
Troll or not, OP is correct.

Trotsky spelled it out, and to a large degree, the leftist movement is on track with his teachings.

Let the lunatics out of the asylum? Done
Foment discord and hate amoung the desperate and lowest class that are prone to riot? Done
Disarm the lawfull  counter revolutionarys? Working on it.

Worst part is, it isn't a secret, and the assholes openly advocate "Revolutuon" on thier forums and in public at rallys, and no one bats an eye.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 1:16:46 PM EDT
[#16]
Quoted:
The Soviets used to pick you up at 3 or 4 in the morning by breaking down your door and dragging you out of bed. Or grab you from behind on the streets. Once the terror apparatus is in full swing, people simply give up and don't resist. A very few select individuals may have given a fight, but that's not what the vast majority of victims did.


And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? After all, you knew ahead of time that those bluecaps were out at night for no good purpose. And you could be sure ahead of time that you'd be cracking the skull of a cutthroat. Or what about the Black Maria sitting out there on the street with one lonely chauffeur -- what if it had been driven off or its tires spiked. The Organs (of state security) would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!
- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 1:32:13 PM EDT
[#17]
Quoted:
The Libs wouldn't do it themselves. That what the .gov is for.


I came in here to post something along these lines. Occasionally, I'll run across some kinda lefty spank session on the web where they are literally pissing themselves with glee at the thought of conservatives/gun owners/people they don't agree with being slaughtered in the streets, but there's always a common theme: it's someone ELSE doing the killing.

Those people disgust me. I simply can not understand an ideology which demands people fall in line at the threat of violence. Unfortunately, this seems to be the ultimate end-game of virtually all "progressive" political movements. To even call these types of people "liberals" is ludicrous to the extreme when you think about how far they have strayed from "classical liberalism".

Capitalism is a system of free exchange between individuals.
Socialism, is a system of government mandates enforced by the power of the state.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 1:32:52 PM EDT
[#18]





Quoted:





Quoted:


The Soviets used to pick you up at 3 or 4 in the morning by breaking down your door and dragging you out of bed. Or grab you from behind on the streets. Once the terror apparatus is in full swing, people simply give up and don't resist. A very few select individuals may have given a fight, but that's not what the vast majority of victims did.






And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? After all, you knew ahead of time that those bluecaps were out at night for no good purpose. And you could be sure ahead of time that you'd be cracking the skull of a cutthroat. Or what about the Black Maria sitting out there on the street with one lonely chauffeur -- what if it had been driven off or its tires spiked. The Organs (of state security) would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!


- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago





Which is exactly why I will never register or surrender my guns. I may lose, but I am not going out without a fight and hopefully I won't be going alone.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 1:37:24 PM EDT
[#19]
As long as they think they will get someone to do their fighting for them. In my experiences, the "party of tolerance" is the most threatening and vile group there is. However, when it gets real, they always....ALWAYS back down.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 1:45:26 PM EDT
[#20]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:
The Soviets used to pick you up at 3 or 4 in the morning by breaking down your door and dragging you out of bed. Or grab you from behind on the streets. Once the terror apparatus is in full swing, people simply give up and don't resist. A very few select individuals may have given a fight, but that's not what the vast majority of victims did.


And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? After all, you knew ahead of time that those bluecaps were out at night for no good purpose. And you could be sure ahead of time that you'd be cracking the skull of a cutthroat. Or what about the Black Maria sitting out there on the street with one lonely chauffeur -- what if it had been driven off or its tires spiked. The Organs (of state security) would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!
- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago

Which is exactly why I will never register or surrender my guns. I may lose, but I am not going out without a fight and hopefully I won't be going alone.

There are tens of thousands of gun owners who have spent all or part of the last decade fighting an insurgency on the other side of the world.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 1:48:42 PM EDT
[#21]
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 1:53:48 PM EDT
[#22]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:
They will lose, and it will be quick.

This. Even if the OP was accurate, which I don't necessarily think that.

WRONG.

You're thinking of living in a world where you still have the means to defend yourself. When they come for you, that ability will have been stripped from you. It will be the collective power of a national government against unarmed civilians filling the Gulag, and you will be powerless to do anything about it. The OP is 100% correct.
 


As far as they know anyway.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 1:57:19 PM EDT
[#23]
Quoted:
Never underestimate the violent tendencies of the left. They have a long, long history of exterminating their detractors.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile


+1, Keep your power dry, It would be real long & real nasty.

Link Posted: 1/21/2013 1:58:01 PM EDT
[#24]
Quoted:
I don't think they have the intestinal fortitude to do more than thumb wrestle.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile


Starting with the French Revolution and continuing through the Second Russian Revolution (at least), the Left has used criminals as their "shock troops".

If you don't think there is a ready made cadre of experienced killers in the US today, you haven't been paying attention.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:00:48 PM EDT
[#25]
Quoted:
I have all three volumes, and even though this is just one paragraph in thousand of pages it really stuck with me. It is indeed a very poignant "what if", but it seems like there is hardly ever any resistance to these activities. When decisive action is called for most people prefer to cower aside thinking "please don't let it be me, please don't let it be me" and just continue on; I'm pretty sure I'd take the cowardly way out too if I lived in that time.  

Just like the soul-searching consideration I gave the possibility of being able to pull the trigger on a human being that I undertook before buying my first handgun, and before enlisting in the Marine Corps, and before taking that first job in Iraq...people need to consider now what they're willing to take, and what they're willing to do when they are pushed beyond that point.

No one wants to be the guy considering the point while the OGPU DHS is battering down their door.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:05:23 PM EDT
[#26]
History has demonstrated this time and time again.  The left is intolerant of free speech, specifically speech that is counter to their agenda.  Whereas the right is tolerant of free speech or the left wouldn't have a voice at all.  As we move further and further left in this country you are witnessing first hand all sorts of free speech being under attack vehemently.  Eventually, the left has turned violent historically (worldwide) against free speech so yes it's quite possible and probable that the left will resort to violence if they feel emboldened enough.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:06:09 PM EDT
[#27]
Talk is cheap
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:09:14 PM EDT
[#28]
That's one of the reasons they want gun control.

They know that they are a bunch of lunatics and think everyone else is as well.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:10:40 PM EDT
[#29]
We all like to think we'll be able to keep our guns, but just like the previous poster talked about marginalizing gun ownership, don't think it won't be difficult.  Just think of your neighbor collecting a bounty for reporting you to the authorities, "see something, say something".
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:15:58 PM EDT
[#30]
Quoted:
For a more informed read, pick up some of David Horowitz's books like Left Illusions. He describes how violence, terror, and mass murder aren't offshoots of poorly run socialist/communist regimes but are inextricably REQUIRED for those ideologies to exist.

Bill Ayers and his Weather Underground have exactly that in store for you if their revolution had succeeded. Instead, he is friends with President Obama now.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWMIwziGrAQ
 


Disagree.  They've gotten into the education system and convinced people that their ideas are right.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/01/m-good_news_you_may_be_spared_execution.html#.UOwY5EVSr_k.twitter

Good News: You May Be Spared Execution
By Daren Jonescu

Back in those quaint days when KGB-supported communist subversives planning to overthrow a republic had to meet in secret to discuss their operations, William Ayers and his chums reportedly opined that during the post-revolutionary period of normalization, approximately twenty-five million Americans (ten percent) would have to be executed.  Today, however, I have good news: that number may now be reassessed at as low as ten million, which, when one factors in the increase in the overall American population since the original estimate was made, suggests as much as a seventy percent savings in the government's stockpile of ammunition.  There's a spending reduction we can all applaud.

To refresh your memory, Mr. Ayers -- now Dr. Ayers, of course -- while a leader of the youth outreach program known as the Weather Underground, was asked by one of his cohorts, FBI informant Larry Grathwohl, about the contingencies of power should the group actually succeed in its revolutionary activities.  Specifically, Grathwohl asked what might be done with that minority of the adult population that would continue to resist communism even after it had been so eloquently justified through the violent seizure of power.
...

I asked, "Well what is going to happen to those people that we can't re-educate, that are diehard capitalists?"  And the reply was that they'd have to be eliminated; and when I pursued this further they estimated that they would have to eliminate twenty-five million people in these re-education centers -- and when I say "eliminate," I mean kill; twenty-five million people....  And they were dead serious.

...
Since the goals of these two courses of action are essentially the same -- namely, the eradication of private property and the universal acceptance of the governing authority's right to control and distribute all material resources (including human resources) as it sees fit -- it is clear that the mass killings are necessary merely in order to ensure universal acceptance by eliminating the failures of the re-education system.

At once, Ayers' synthesizing epiphany arises.  The traditional, time-honored pattern of leftist revolution -- overthrow the regime, establish a re-education program, kill the bitter clingers -- is a recipe for trouble and frustration.  Much preferable would be a reordering of events to reduce the uncertainties of political overthrow and the wasteful inconveniences of mass murder.  Re-educate first -- "pre-educate," if you will.  Done well, this makes overthrow unnecessary, as the majority of the population will eventually hand you the reins of power when you ask for them; when your "social justice" rhetoric seems as American as apple pie, you will know the population is baked to progressive perfection.
...
Now think hard, and honestly.  Do you believe there are twenty-five million adults left in the United States today who are truly, intransigently committed to individual liberty on principle?  And do not answer by citing voter turnout for Mitt Romney; people who want lower taxes, who believe the economy is handled better by Republicans, who disapprove of abortion or gay marriage, or who worry about over-regulation, all voted for Romney -- but none of those views indicate a person who necessarily rejects the entire progressive worldview, let alone one who would actually die for something as antiquated and petty as individual freedom.

Let us look at it another way: the vast majority of those Romney voters have willingly sent their children to the Dewey-Ayers pre-education centers for years.  These people tell themselves the system just needs better teacher training, more school prayer, or a tougher stance on bad behavior.

That "twenty-five million" figure is only really disturbing to people who suspect that they would be a part of it -- that Bill Ayers, and the guys from his neighborhood, want to kill them.

These people should be happy to welcome reforms to the Marxist model that reduce the number of necessary victims.  If I am correct, and public education has by now secured a much higher percentage of the U.S. population as the kind of well-adjusted, ultimately accommodating worker-units the revolution requires, then in all likelihood there are no more than, say, ten million American adults who truly care enough about life, liberty, or property to resist whatever confiscations, restrictions, or redistributions are judged appropriate by the most "forward"-looking Chicago/Washington experts and planners.


It's a long article, but basically points out that millions of resisters are gone due to indoctrination.

So they don't have to resort to as much violence, because now it's so easy to make you into bad guy - and so many people are ready to "kill their parents" - because they already have in their mind.  Their parents' ideas are dead.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:16:33 PM EDT
[#31]
Do a little research on Billie Ayers, Bernadette Dorn and the rest of Obamam's , to get a true feel as to what their true feelings are on resistance to their plans for us. Billie was a great proponent of killing at least 22 million of us to get the country right.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:17:40 PM EDT
[#32]
I thought that was the whole point of trying to disarm us!!!
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:18:48 PM EDT
[#33]
Quoted:

Quoted:

I'm sorry but I can kill more than a few with a knife, I might get shot in the end but some are coming with me.
I have a fighting knife that I don't even touch much at all unless I'm cleaning it, it is sharp as a scalpel and would cut right through a leather coat and disembowel the attacker
(hypothetical you understand)
 

The Soviets used to pick you up at 3 or 4 in the morning by breaking down your door and dragging you out of bed. Or grab you from behind on the streets. Once the terror apparatus is in full swing, people simply give up and don't resist. A very few select individuals may have given a fight, but that's not what the vast majority of victims did.
 


Major Pugachev's Last Battle.

http://www.amazon.com/Kolyma-Tales-Classic-20th-Century-Penguin/dp/0140186956
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:19:59 PM EDT
[#34]
Quoted:
That's one of the reasons they want gun control.

They know that they are a bunch of lunatics and think everyone else is as well.


Naw, they may be lunatics but they aren't stupid. At least they are bright enough to know if they go up against an armed society some of it might not go so good for them.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:22:33 PM EDT
[#35]
Quoted:
Though I see do see whacky people from both sides, I do see more violent "tendencies" from the liberals. I spend a lot of time scouring news sites, both liberal and conservative and especially the comments section to see what real people are saying. I kinda have to agree with OP.

This is a comment pulled from an article on the Jan 19 Guns Across America rally. People like this are a lot more prevalent than you would think..
http://i907.photobucket.com/albums/ac275/tallincito/ScreenShot2013-01-21at103544AM.png


I was going to make a statement using the word preemptive but thought better of it.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:26:11 PM EDT
[#36]
Quoted:
Never underestimate the violent tendencies of the left. They have a long, long history of exterminating their detractors.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile


And their supporters
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:26:22 PM EDT
[#37]





Quoted:





Quoted:


For a more informed read, pick up some of David Horowitz's books like Left Illusions. He describes how violence, terror, and mass murder aren't offshoots of poorly run socialist/communist regimes but are inextricably REQUIRED for those ideologies to exist.





Bill Ayers and his Weather Underground have exactly that in store for you if their revolution had succeeded. Instead, he is friends with President Obama now.





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWMIwziGrAQ


 






Disagree.  They've gotten into the education system and convinced people that their ideas are right.





http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/01/m-good_news_you_may_be_spared_execution.html#.UOwY5EVSr_k.twitter
Good News: You May Be Spared Execution


By Daren Jonescu





Back in those quaint days when KGB-supported communist subversives planning to overthrow a republic had to meet in secret to discuss their operations, William Ayers and his chums reportedly opined that during the post-revolutionary period of normalization, approximately twenty-five million Americans (ten percent) would have to be executed.  Today, however, I have good news: that number may now be reassessed at as low as ten million, which, when one factors in the increase in the overall American population since the original estimate was made, suggests as much as a seventy percent savings in the government's stockpile of ammunition.  There's a spending reduction we can all applaud.





To refresh your memory, Mr. Ayers -- now Dr. Ayers, of course -- while a leader of the youth outreach program known as the Weather Underground, was asked by one of his cohorts, FBI informant Larry Grathwohl, about the contingencies of power should the group actually succeed in its revolutionary activities.  Specifically, Grathwohl asked what might be done with that minority of the adult population that would continue to resist communism even after it had been so eloquently justified through the violent seizure of power.


...





I asked, "Well what is going to happen to those people that we can't re-educate, that are diehard capitalists?"  And the reply was that they'd have to be eliminated; and when I pursued this further they estimated that they would have to eliminate twenty-five million people in these re-education centers -- and when I say "eliminate," I mean kill; twenty-five million people....  And they were dead serious.





...


Since the goals of these two courses of action are essentially the same -- namely, the eradication of private property and the universal acceptance of the governing authority's right to control and distribute all material resources (including human resources) as it sees fit -- it is clear that the mass killings are necessary merely in order to ensure universal acceptance by eliminating the failures of the re-education system.





At once, Ayers' synthesizing epiphany arises.  The traditional, time-honored pattern of leftist revolution -- overthrow the regime, establish a re-education program, kill the bitter clingers -- is a recipe for trouble and frustration.  Much preferable would be a reordering of events to reduce the uncertainties of political overthrow and the wasteful inconveniences of mass murder.  Re-educate first -- "pre-educate," if you will.  Done well, this makes overthrow unnecessary, as the majority of the population will eventually hand you the reins of power when you ask for them; when your "social justice" rhetoric seems as American as apple pie, you will know the population is baked to progressive perfection.


...


Now think hard, and honestly.  Do you believe there are twenty-five million adults left in the United States today who are truly, intransigently committed to individual liberty on principle?  And do not answer by citing voter turnout for Mitt Romney; people who want lower taxes, who believe the economy is handled better by Republicans, who disapprove of abortion or gay marriage, or who worry about over-regulation, all voted for Romney -- but none of those views indicate a person who necessarily rejects the entire progressive worldview, let alone one who would actually die for something as antiquated and petty as individual freedom.





Let us look at it another way: the vast majority of those Romney voters have willingly sent their children to the Dewey-Ayers pre-education centers for years.  These people tell themselves the system just needs better teacher training, more school prayer, or a tougher stance on bad behavior.





That "twenty-five million" figure is only really disturbing to people who suspect that they would be a part of it -- that Bill Ayers, and the guys from his neighborhood, want to kill them.





These people should be happy to welcome reforms to the Marxist model that reduce the number of necessary victims.  If I am correct, and public education has by now secured a much higher percentage of the U.S. population as the kind of well-adjusted, ultimately accommodating worker-units the revolution requires, then in all likelihood there are no more than, say, ten million American adults who truly care enough about life, liberty, or property to resist whatever confiscations, restrictions, or redistributions are judged appropriate by the most "forward"-looking Chicago/Washington experts and planners.






It's a long article, but basically points out that millions of resisters are gone due to indoctrination.





So they don't have to resort to as much violence, because now it's so easy to make you into bad guy - and so many people are ready to "kill their parents" - because they already have in their mind.  Their parents' ideas are dead.



A little overly Libertarian in some of the assumptions, but the characterization of the leftist model for our present situation is pretty accurate. The insinuation that people who oppose gay marriage and abortion would embrace Marxism because they're not ideologically Libertarian enough is bullshit.


 
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:27:07 PM EDT
[#38]
Quoted:
The Left would quickly resort to violence.
I suspect they'd abandon it pretty quickly once the whole "unintended consequences" thing bit them in the ass.



I said many times when the Patriot Act was being discussed that people inthe Conservative side supporting it "should think about the powers of such a law at the hands of  President Hillary Clinton."  I could not imagine GW Bush using that law for nefarious purposes, but that power in the hands of his potential succesors...  And I never considered someone to the far left of Hilary, like we have now when fears of unintended consequences resulting from that law are being realized.

I think the Left really needs to give thought of what they may be sowing for themselves.  For the nightmares th Patriot Acts gave some conservatives with the idea of a Leftist government being able to use it, I don't think the Left has given any consideration to what that law and the NDAA could mean if turned on them.

History shows that there will be a pushback in the opposite direction that is as strong or stronger than the push we are currently experiencing.  If the Left cannot imagine the actions called for in their rehtoric being applied to themselves, they will continue down the path where they will face unintended consequences far beyond their worse dreams for us.

I wonder if the revenge inflected upon the leaders and "nomenclatura" during the collapse of Communist Romania are part of any reading by members of the Left these days?  If people don't get their heads out of their rectums and back off, those horrors and more with unique American twists might be in store, making people on the recieving end long for the simple treatment Mussolini went through.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:29:18 PM EDT
[#39]



Quoted:


I thought that was the whole point of trying to disarm us!!!


It is.

 



I am convinced that the moment The Left believes it has grabbed enough of the guns to minimize resistance they will throw up the razor wire fences and fire up the ovens.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:29:48 PM EDT
[#40]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:
The Soviets used to pick you up at 3 or 4 in the morning by breaking down your door and dragging you out of bed. Or grab you from behind on the streets. Once the terror apparatus is in full swing, people simply give up and don't resist. A very few select individuals may have given a fight, but that's not what the vast majority of victims did.


And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? After all, you knew ahead of time that those bluecaps were out at night for no good purpose. And you could be sure ahead of time that you'd be cracking the skull of a cutthroat. Or what about the Black Maria sitting out there on the street with one lonely chauffeur -- what if it had been driven off or its tires spiked. The Organs (of state security) would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!
- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago

Which is exactly why I will never register or surrender my guns. I may lose, but I am not going out without a fight and hopefully I won't be going alone.


You are not alone.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:31:49 PM EDT
[#41]
They were weaned believing that the needs of the many out way the needs of the few or of the one.  They would kill their own children to promote their agenda.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:31:53 PM EDT
[#42]



Quoted:



Quoted:

"Would" resort to violence?   They DO resort to violence - regularly.  Just about every major violent event in recent domestic US history has been from the left.  School shootings, the entire "Occupy movement", Seattle WTO riots, just about any labor strike/picket line, ...


I don't know how strictly accurate it is, but I saw this picture this morning and it seems applicable here.



http://www.ar15.com/media/viewFile.html?i=46873


It seems like they only go after defenseless people and children.



 
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:35:24 PM EDT
[#43]
That is easily the truth.
Leftists have generally much less to lose (or dont appreciate what they have since they havent really earned their wealth) than Conservatives.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:36:09 PM EDT
[#44]
You take a look at any liberal, socialist, communist movement and you will find violence, Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Hitler, etc, and you will find violence at it's core.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:37:27 PM EDT
[#45]
tag
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:40:05 PM EDT
[#46]
peaceful liberals. I dont think so.

violent little creatures.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:43:49 PM EDT
[#47]
With what their prius's and a unicorn????
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:44:29 PM EDT
[#48]
Quoted:
Am I actually the first to jump on this??

Seems kinda rhetorical talk for not much time on here.
Familiar?

Join date?
Post count?

What exactly are you trying to get out of us?  A hitlist or something...not here Mr Man.


Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:45:35 PM EDT
[#49]
goldstien seems to be a popular troll name now a days your the second or third one correct comrade?
a ficticious enemy ment to drum up the masses eh.......
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 2:46:14 PM EDT
[#50]
Every one of you should read the gulag archipelago.

Archive.org has it for free. It'll change you.
Page / 3
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top