If memory serves me, he says things like: Since there is no other book like the bible the bible must be true. Since there is historical writings (secondary sources) to support the existence of Jesus, he must have been a real person. If he was a real person and the bible is true then therefore the whole thing must be true.

The whole bit about him trying to disprove Jesus but then reversing course is just a marketing ploy, churches eat that up in the years before click bait titles.

I'm going to need some primary sources on that one.

Cute concept, but it's written by an evangelist who specifically addresses this kind of crap. Your source is not credible!

Josh McDowell

But you kind of jumped the guy that stated;

Except Jesus was a real, historical man. Documents outside of the Bible prove his existence.

Nothing about miracles or messiah

The date of celebrating Christmas and Easter does not indicate the heavy modification of Christianity

A case for Christ


There is a lot more to it but he was raised from the dead and that is what seals the deal.

take it from this man who used to be an atheist until he did his research.

What is with this stuff lately? Gd is getting flooded with religious crap. I wonder if they think it's helping. It just makes me hate Christians more.

Well aren't you special

if you can believe in 1 god and religion, how can you not LOGICALLY believe in the other gods and religions?... and then how can you say who is right?

i gave my wife this example...


SUBJECT: xmas time, Elf on the shelf....


Q: how do we control the kids behavior?  

A: we make up a story about a magic elf that watches them and reports what he sees to santa and based on that, they may or may not get things they want for xmas..


Q:does that theme not sound familer to you?




then she mumbles something about church and morals...


Q: who is the "better" person... someone doing good to suck up to their god, or someone doing good because its the right thing to do?

A: mumble...mumble/.....mumble.....