I Just read this about the death of Petty Officer Roberts on one of the links Tuuka provided –
“BMF,
The story I heard was that upon falling from the helo, PO Roberts was able to get to cover abot 75yds away where he waited for a rescue helo. When the rescue helo arrived it came under intense machinegun fire from Al Queda troops. Roberts then moved from his position of cover killing the entire machinegun crew with his pistol and was killed in the ensuing fire fight.
This was first reported here by Class29wc and verified by Frog...it was also reported on FOXNEWS last night. Is it possible that the dragging and execution happend after the heroic action described above?”
End
I think this clears up something that has been bothering me since this happened – Why were Rumsfeld and Franks playing down the execution story?
Consider this strange exchange between Rumsfeld, Franks, and the press .
Q: General Franks, to follow up on that, you did not see the tape of the incident where the -- where Petty Officer Roberts fell out of the helicopter, right?
Franks: Right.
Q: A couple of days ago, you said that he fell out, but you didn't mention that he was dragged away by enemy forces and executed.
Franks: Right.
Q: Did you not know that at the time?
Franks: To be very honest with you, I know of -- I have been told of the report. No, I did not know that at that time. And to be very honest with you, I don't know that for myself yet.
I have spoken with people who in fact were on that mission, as I said on Monday, and the view that I got was I think there are a variety of possibilities of the way this occurred. On Monday what I knew, and what I still know, is that the petty officer in fact fell out of the aircraft. Whether he had been wounded before he fell out of the aircraft, whether he was wounded when he was on the ground, or whether the case, as has been pointed out, I'm told, in the media took place, I'm not sure yet. And I think as we work our way through this we will come to some greater clarity. But right now, I think we'll -- if we're not careful, we'll be victimized by what we know to be the truth, and that is the first two or three reports are likely to be wrong.
And so we will continue to provide the facts as we know them.
(Cross talk.)
Rumsfeld: Wait -- wait -- wait -- wait one second. Wait one second.
I think it's a terribly important point. What we're doing is people in the press are with these forces and they're reporting what they see, and what they see is a certain perspective. They see it from a certain angle, they see an aspect. We're getting reports back from people, and as the general says, they're first reports or second reports. And we know that history is replete with instances where the first or second reports are wrong. It was announced that there were nine dead Americans. It turns out there were eight.
And so you're faced with a choice. Do you try to respond as fully as you can and caution people that the first reports may not be correct, or -- and then be subjected to, "Well, didn't you know this when you said that?" -- that type of a question that you posed. And it seems to me that people have to develop the ability to absorb these kinds of reports in the press, reports from the podium, with an understanding that they're going to be calibrated, they're inevitably going to be calibrated as a day or two or 48 hours goes by and additional perspectives come in.