Can you all stop calling Paul supporters... - Page 2

General » General Discussion

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Can you all stop calling Paul supporters... (Page 2 of 8)

Posted: 1/2/2012 9:38:38 AM EDT

[#1]

OP hates freedom.

Posted: 1/2/2012 9:39:21 AM EDT

[#2]

Quoted:

Quoted:

free the weed

RP 2012

How could Kelly Clarkson be wrong?

http://i754.photobucket.com/albums/xx190/coolgirl97/Kelly%20Clarkson/b8712fc9.jpg

She went wrong a long time ago.

http://thisisdiversity.com/img/umedia/655/Image/Fat%20Kelly%20Clarkson.jpg

looks like a Paulbot, nothing up top

Posted: 1/2/2012 9:39:22 AM EDT

[#3]

Posted: 1/2/2012 9:39:34 AM EDT

[#4]

And please, for the love of all that is holy, can we PLEASE stop calling the sky blue?

Someone, somewhere is deeply offended.

Posted: 1/2/2012 9:40:29 AM EDT

[#5]

Quoted:
Call out thread? Nice..no really, we should all totally not do that anymore. Even after seeing a half a dozen posts every day for months about how great Ron Paul is while completely ignoring what Ron Paul says. It's not what he meant to say or he did'nt really mean to say that or he is just following the constitution. You treat the entire board as though they are low class retards that need to bow to your political brilliance and knowledge of what we need in a President. Right. Get right on that. You brought this on yourselves..and it will be part of ARFcom lore for years to come.

Crazy = Ron Paul supporter is what everyone is seeing. I think it's you paulbots that need to change the way you are viewed, not regular members. Calling a traitor a hero..there are no words to describe how totally insane that statement is, yet you still will vote for him. Who is crazier? The leader or the lemming?

You are a fun person, and I value our friendship.

Posted: 1/2/2012 9:41:29 AM EDT

[#6]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Maybe when they stop throwing around NeoCon, Rino, Hater of the Constitution, Imperialist Warmonger......etc, etc.

That ^^^ was my first thought. OP, I think we can put a stop to the insults leveled against you and yours immediately after you and yours stop with the nonsense about "hating the Constitution" and "hating freedom," etc. Deal?

Just answer this:

Does the CoC allow a poster to call another member "fucking lunatic,
batshit insane, or retarded idiot?"

Not directly, no. OTOH, I'm betting you are trying to make the point that an oblique reference constitutes a direct attack. "Anyone who who agrees with Ron Paul that America deserved the 9/11 attacks and Manning is a hero is a "fucking lunatic, batshit insane, or retarded idiot."" is perfectly acceptable. The fact you happen to fit that description (if you do) does not make it a "personal attack."

Posted: 1/2/2012 9:42:36 AM EDT

[#7]

Quoted:

And please, for the love of all that is holy, can we PLEASE stop calling the sky blue?

Someone, somewhere is deeply offended.

I find that Azure is usually a much more accurate description.

Posted: 1/2/2012 9:47:17 AM EDT

[#8]

Quoted:

Quoted:

free the weed

RP 2012

How could Kelly Clarkson be wrong?
http://i754.photobucket.com/albums/xx190/coolgirl97/Kelly%20Clarkson/b8712fc9.jpg

She went wrong a long time ago.

http://thisisdiversity.com/img/umedia/655/Image/Fat%20Kelly%20Clarkson.jpg

LIES! LIES! You dirty stinkin' liar!

I can smoke weed and date a 19 yr old Kelly Clarkson if I want to. Dont mess with my dreams man.

Posted: 1/2/2012 9:47:39 AM EDT

[#9]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Maybe when they stop throwing around NeoCon, Rino, Hater of the Constitution, Imperialist Warmonger......etc, etc.

That ^^^ was my first thought. OP, I think we can put a stop to the insults leveled against you and yours immediately after you and yours stop with the nonsense about "hating the Constitution" and "hating freedom," etc. Deal?

Just answer this:

Does the CoC allow a poster to call another member "fucking lunatic,
batshit insane, or retarded idiot?"

Not directly, no. OTOH, I'm betting you are trying to make the point that an oblique reference constitutes a direct attack. "Anyone who who agrees with Ron Paul that America deserved the 9/11 attacks and Manning is a hero is a "fucking lunatic, batshit insane, or retarded idiot."" is perfectly acceptable. The fact you happen to fit that description (if you do) does not make it a "personal attack."

No just the "Ron Paul supporters are .........." Statements.

I and others have already stated that we do not agree with every single thing Ron Paul has said.

Just like you don't with your candidate.

I will call Rick Perry an idiot, but I will not call a member one for instance.

I will question the moral convictions of someone who talks about freedom but would vote for Romney.... But I won't call that member an idiot.

Posted: 1/2/2012 9:48:33 AM EDT

[#10]

The alternative to Paul is some asshole who supports gun control, supports national healthcare, and ran the most fucked up liberal state in the union. Paulbots are crazy but not anywhere near as centrist if not downright liberal as Romney supporters. Give us a viable candidate but don't tell us that the only hope is some fucking Rino liberal shitbag. Until someone better comes along, I'm supporting the guy that believes in freedom rather than the candidate who supports an over reaching authoritarian socialist government.

7n6

Posted: 1/2/2012 9:49:08 AM EDT

[#11]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Maybe when they stop throwing around NeoCon, Rino, Hater of the Constitution, Imperialist Warmonger......etc, etc.

That ^^^ was my first thought. OP, I think we can put a stop to the insults leveled against you and yours immediately after you and yours stop with the nonsense about "hating the Constitution" and "hating freedom," etc. Deal?

Just answer this:

Does the CoC allow a poster to call another member "fucking lunatic,

batshit insane, or retarded idiot?"

Not directly, no. OTOH, I'm betting you are trying to make the point that an oblique reference constitutes a direct attack. "Anyone who who agrees with Ron Paul that America deserved the 9/11 attacks and Manning is a hero is a "fucking lunatic, batshit insane, or retarded idiot."" is perfectly acceptable. The fact you happen to fit that description (if you do) does not make it a "personal attack."

No just the "Ron Paul supporters are .........." Statements.

I and others have already stated that we do not agree with every single thing Ron Paul has said.

Just like you don't with your candidate.
I will call Rick Perry an idiot, but I will not call a member one for instance.

I will question the moral convictions of someone who talks about freedom but would vote for Romney.... But I won't call that member an idiot.

Thank you

Posted: 1/2/2012 9:49:12 AM EDT

[#12]

Quoted:
No just the "Ron Paul supporters are .........." Statements.

How do those differ from the countless remarks about Obama voters/supporters?

Posted: 1/2/2012 9:57:00 AM EDT

[#13]

Quoted:

Quoted:
No just the "Ron Paul supporters are .........." Statements.

How do those differ from the countless remarks about Obama voters/supporters?

You are exactly right.

If a member says, "I support Obama." And it is followed by "Obama supporters are fucking clueless morons." That is probably a coc violation.

We should be able to articulate that we disagree with a person's philosophy without insultig members.

Posted: 1/2/2012 9:57:25 AM EDT

[#14]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Maybe when they stop throwing around NeoCon, Rino, Hater of the Constitution, Imperialist Warmonger......etc, etc.

That ^^^ was my first thought. OP, I think we can put a stop to the insults leveled against you and yours immediately after you and yours stop with the nonsense about "hating the Constitution" and "hating freedom," etc. Deal?

Just answer this:

Does the CoC allow a poster to call another member "fucking lunatic,

batshit insane, or retarded idiot?"

Not directly, no. OTOH, I'm betting you are trying to make the point that an oblique reference constitutes a direct attack. "Anyone who who agrees with Ron Paul that America deserved the 9/11 attacks and Manning is a hero is a "fucking lunatic, batshit insane, or retarded idiot."" is perfectly acceptable. The fact you happen to fit that description (if you do) does not make it a "personal attack."

And this is where we live

Certainly, OP, you wouldn't believe those things-since only retarded double-fisting themselves monkeys would believe such nonsense.

So, I'm sure you aren't in that GROUP....

Nick

Posted: 1/2/2012 9:59:31 AM EDT

[#15]

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:00:09 AM EDT

[#16]

Quoted:
...batshit crazy and fucking insane traitors and all the other childish insults?

This request includes mods too.

Thanks!

I'm only a mirror reflecting the truth... Can't help it if you don't like what you see.

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:00:59 AM EDT

[#17]

Somebody send the OP some tissues and a Mr. Snuggles bear before he cries.

You all can be so mean

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:01:15 AM EDT

[#18]

I don't say it, but can we still think it?

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:01:20 AM EDT

[#19]

Quoted:
<snip>

We should be able to articulate that we disagree with a person's philosophy without insultig members.

Point of order: "You hate freedom/liberty/the Constitution" and "You are a sheeple/RINO/Neocon" count. It works both ways.

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:01:46 AM EDT

[#20]

I prefer Crazy Uncle for RP and kooks for his supporters.

Hopefully the newly-minted kooks are only suffering temporary insanity.

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:02:05 AM EDT

[#21]

Quoted:
Maybe when they stop throwing around NeoCon, Rino, Hater of the Constitution, Imperialist Warmonger......etc, etc.

You forgot my personal favorite... Statist

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:04:17 AM EDT

[#22]

Quoted:

Quoted:
<snip>

We should be able to articulate that we disagree with a person's philosophy without insultig members.

Point of order: "You hate freedom/liberty/the Constitution" and "You are a sheeple/RINO/Neocon" count. It works both ways.

Each of those deals with political discussion, but......okay.

Hey TBK1,

Who do you support?

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:06:08 AM EDT

[#23]

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:06:09 AM EDT

[#24]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Maybe when they stop throwing around NeoCon, Rino, Hater of the Constitution, Imperialist Warmonger......etc, etc.

You forgot my personal favorite... Statist

This is one thing RP supporters seem to have in common with liberals. Some will call anyone who disagrees with them every name in the book, imply they're an idiot who is being bamboozled and just doesn't understand how things work...

But get their panties in a bunch if anyone returns the favor.

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:08:21 AM EDT

[#25]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Maybe when they stop throwing around NeoCon, Rino, Hater of the Constitution, Imperialist Warmonger......etc, etc.

That ^^^ was my first thought. OP, I think we can put a stop to the insults leveled against you and yours immediately after you and yours stop with the nonsense about "hating the Constitution" and "hating freedom," etc. Deal?

This was my first thought as well.

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:10:51 AM EDT

[#26]

Quoted:

Quoted:
<snip>

We should be able to articulate that we disagree with a person's philosophy without insultig members.

Point of order: "You hate freedom/liberty/the Constitution" and "You are a sheeple/RINO/Neocon" count. It works both ways.

Each of those deals with political discussion, but......okay.

Hey TBK1,

Who do you support?

As I've posted many times, it's too early for me to have settled on anyone. I'm still firmly in the "anyone who's not Obama" camp though.

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:12:40 AM EDT

[#27]

I am going to watch Logan's Run and follow this thread so keep up the good work mods.

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:13:32 AM EDT

[#28]

Ron Paul is our only hope, there is a reason behind all of his policies for our benefit to allow us to truly be free again.
True Respect for our civil liberties, the bill of rights, he is the reincarnation of our nation when it began.

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:13:41 AM EDT

[#29]

I think you'll find that "can" and "will" have different meanings.

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:14:49 AM EDT

[#30]

Quoted:

Quoted:
<snip>
O
We should be able to articulate that we disagree with a person's philosophy without insultig members.

Point of order: "You hate freedom/liberty/the Constitution" and "You are a sheeple/RINO/Neocon" count. It works both ways.

Each of those deals with political discussion, but......okay.

Hey TBK1,

Who do you support?

As I've posted many times, it's too early for me to have settled on anyone. I'm still firmly in the "anyone who's not Obama" camp though.

Anyone who hasn't decided yet is a worthless imbecile who probably can't decide what to put on first, socks or shoes.

See. It's not right.

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:14:51 AM EDT

[#31]

Quoted:
You Paulbots brought this on yourselves.

http://www.gregcornish.com/postgraphics/crybaby.jpg

This...

- georgestrings

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:14:57 AM EDT

[#32]

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:16:39 AM EDT

[#33]

Quoted:

Quoted:
<snip>

We should be able to articulate that we disagree with a person's philosophy without insultig members.

Point of order: "You hate freedom/liberty/the Constitution" and "You are a sheeple/RINO/Neocon" count. It works both ways.

Each of those deals with political discussion, but......okay.

But that's the whole point, isn't it?

If you are participating in a thread about auto repair, and someone disagrees with your opinion on an intake manifold, and then calls you a dirty traitor because you support Ron Paul, then of course that's a personal attack.

But if it's a thread on political discussion, and (for example) a Ron Paul supporter tell someone that they hate freedom and aren't a patriot because they support a RINO, and that person then says that the Ron Paul supporter is batshit crazy and insane because they support Ron Paul - then it's kind of all the same thing and part of a a heated political exchange, and one certainly isn't "more" of an insult than the other.

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:17:11 AM EDT

[#34]

Quoted:

Quoted:

<snip>

O

We should be able to articulate that we disagree with a person's philosophy without insultig members.

Point of order: "You hate freedom/liberty/the Constitution" and "You are a sheeple/RINO/Neocon" count. It works both ways.

Each of those deals with political discussion, but......okay.
Hey TBK1,

Who do you support?

As I've posted many times, it's too early for me to have settled on anyone. I'm still firmly in the "anyone who's not Obama" camp though.

Anyone who hasn't decided yet is a worthless imbecile who probably can't decide what to put on first, socks or shoes.
See. It's not right.

You are just upset that by not telling you a name you have no one to attack.

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:19:46 AM EDT

[#35]

Quoted:

Quoted:
<snip>
O
We should be able to articulate that we disagree with a person's philosophy without insultig members.

Point of order: "You hate freedom/liberty/the Constitution" and "You are a sheeple/RINO/Neocon" count. It works both ways.

Each of those deals with political discussion, but......okay.

Hey TBK1,

Who do you support?

As I've posted many times, it's too early for me to have settled on anyone. I'm still firmly in the "anyone who's not Obama" camp though.

Anyone who hasn't decided yet is a worthless imbecile who probably can't decide what to put on first, socks or shoes.

See. It's not right.

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:20:05 AM EDT

[#36]

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:21:46 AM EDT

[#37]

Coming into GD and asking people to stop calling Ron Paul names, is like going into a kindergarten class and telling people to act grown up.

The average person in GD is: bitter, short tempered, somewhat childish and not an intellectual. There's a lot of smart people I look up to here, but most people I could do without. Asking them to change is like asking a Ron Paul voter to consider other candidates. Or asking a Paul hater to not personally attack Ron.

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:22:16 AM EDT

[#38]

Quoted:

Quoted:
<snip>
O
We should be able to articulate that we disagree with a person's philosophy without insultig members.

Point of order: "You hate freedom/liberty/the Constitution" and "You are a sheeple/RINO/Neocon" count. It works both ways.

Each of those deals with political discussion, but......okay.

Hey TBK1,

Who do you support?

As I've posted many times, it's too early for me to have settled on anyone. I'm still firmly in the "anyone who's not Obama" camp though.

Anyone who hasn't decided yet is a worthless imbecile who probably can't decide what to put on first, socks or shoes.

See. It's not right.

10-1 says Mike won't start a thread whining about you being mean for saying that. Then again, I'm pretty sure you won't take this bet either.

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:22:39 AM EDT

[#39]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Maybe when they stop throwing around NeoCon, Rino, Hater of the Constitution, Imperialist Warmonger......etc, etc.

That ^^^ was my first thought. OP, I think we can put a stop to the insults leveled against you and yours immediately after you and yours stop with the nonsense about "hating the Constitution" and "hating freedom," etc. Deal?

Just answer this:

Does the CoC allow a poster to call another member "fucking lunatic,
batshit insane, or retarded idiot?"

Not directly, no. OTOH, I'm betting you are trying to make the point that an oblique reference constitutes a direct attack. "Anyone who who agrees with Ron Paul that America deserved the 9/11 attacks and Manning is a hero is a "fucking lunatic, batshit insane, or retarded idiot."" is perfectly acceptable. The fact you happen to fit that description (if you do) does not make it a "personal attack."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

- georgestrings

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:23:44 AM EDT

[#40]

Quoted:

Quoted:
can we call them assholes?

Does the COC allow it ?

I don't know. We have two mods here that could answer.

No, of course not.

Calling someone an asshole is clearly a personal attack.

Yeah?

What do you want?

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:26:19 AM EDT

[#41]

If Ron Paul makes it through the primary, it will actually be the surest sign I can imagine that the electorate has no say in our election process. If he is nominated, it will be despite the most strenuous efforts of his detractors and his supporters both, with most of the defamatory credit going to the latter group.

"Well... What Ron Paul WinstonSmith really MEANT was..."

You guys are your own worst enemies. You're unconvincing. You not only fail to inspire thought, but instead actively conspire against it. I find myself having to hold my nose to get through the thick Paulbot crust to find out what the man actually thinks about issues, and it's neither easy nor particularly rewarding once the task is complete.

Your silence would serve your candidate better than anything you've said in support of him. You are actually the Anti-Paul Campaign. Congratulations. If he loses, you have nobody to thank but yourselves.

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:27:36 AM EDT

[#42]

Quoted:

Quoted:
<snip>
O
We should be able to articulate that we disagree with a person's philosophy without insultig members.

Point of order: "You hate freedom/liberty/the Constitution" and "You are a sheeple/RINO/Neocon" count. It works both ways.

Each of those deals with political discussion, but......okay.

Hey TBK1,

Who do you support?

As I've posted many times, it's too early for me to have settled on anyone. I'm still firmly in the "anyone who's not Obama" camp though.

Anyone who hasn't decided yet is a worthless imbecile who probably can't decide what to put on first, socks or shoes.

See. It's not right.

Im offended

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:29:29 AM EDT

[#43]

Quoted:

...batshit crazy and fucking insane traitors

Nope, because they are. Come on do you really thinking letting the Nazi's do whatever they wanted and staying out of WWII in Europe would be a good thing? Ron Paul does. If you support Ron Paul then you support his batshit crazy ideas.

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:29:51 AM EDT

[#44]

Quoted:

Quoted:
<snip>
O
We should be able to articulate that we disagree with a person's philosophy without insultig members.

Point of order: "You hate freedom/liberty/the Constitution" and "You are a sheeple/RINO/Neocon" count. It works both ways.

Each of those deals with political discussion, but......okay.

Hey TBK1,

Who do you support?

As I've posted many times, it's too early for me to have settled on anyone. I'm still firmly in the "anyone who's not Obama" camp though.

Anyone who hasn't decided yet is a worthless imbecile who probably can't decide what to put on first, socks or shoes.

See. It's not right.

Im offended

Only one thing to do... Start a thread!

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:31:30 AM EDT

[#45]

Quoted:

Quoted:
<snip>
O
We should be able to articulate that we disagree with a person's philosophy without insultig members.

Point of order: "You hate freedom/liberty/the Constitution" and "You are a sheeple/RINO/Neocon" count. It works both ways.

Each of those deals with political discussion, but......okay.

Hey TBK1,

Who do you support?

As I've posted many times, it's too early for me to have settled on anyone. I'm still firmly in the "anyone who's not Obama" camp though.

Anyone who hasn't decided yet is a worthless imbecile who probably can't decide what to put on first, socks or shoes.

See. It's not right.

So, it is right?

Go on record then.

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:31:55 AM EDT

[#46]

Quoted:
Ron Paul is our only hope, there is a reason behind all of his policies for our benefit to allow us to truly be free again.
True Respect for our civil liberties, the bill of rights, he is the reincarnation of our nation when it began.

Holy shit! We have a live one here. Our only hope...for our benefit...truly be free...True respect...he is the re-incarnation of our nation...shit is so thick you have to cut it with a chainsaw!

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:33:18 AM EDT

[#47]

Quoted:

Quoted:

<snip>

O

We should be able to articulate that we disagree with a person's philosophy without insultig members.

Point of order: "You hate freedom/liberty/the Constitution" and "You are a sheeple/RINO/Neocon" count. It works both ways.

Each of those deals with political discussion, but......okay.
Hey TBK1,

Who do you support?

As I've posted many times, it's too early for me to have settled on anyone. I'm still firmly in the "anyone who's not Obama" camp though.

Anyone who hasn't decided yet is a worthless imbecile who probably can't decide what to put on first, socks or shoes.
See. It's not right.

That's not a personal attack.

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:33:30 AM EDT

[#48]

Quoted:

maybe it's just me, but i find it irresistible when a woman cries.

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:33:40 AM EDT

[#49]

Quoted:

Quoted:

<snip>

O

We should be able to articulate that we disagree with a person's philosophy without insultig members.

Point of order: "You hate freedom/liberty/the Constitution" and "You are a sheeple/RINO/Neocon" count. It works both ways.

Each of those deals with political discussion, but......okay.
Hey TBK1,

Who do you support?

As I've posted many times, it's too early for me to have settled on anyone. I'm still firmly in the "anyone who's not Obama" camp though.

Anyone who hasn't decided yet is a worthless imbecile who probably can't decide what to put on first, socks or shoes.
See. It's not right.

So, it is right?
Go on record then.

Do the extra lines between your sentences add credibility, you know like all caps or bold?

It just makes for a really annoying quote tree. But you might know a thing or two about annoying.

Posted: 1/2/2012 10:34:20 AM EDT

[#50]

Fuck Ron Paul

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Can you all stop calling Paul supporters... (Page 2 of 8)

General » General Discussion

Warning

Confirm Action

About AR15.COM

Stay Connected

Newsletter

Contact Us