User Panel
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Who could have seen that coming? Exactly. There is no end to the perversions that will be championed in the name of diversity and tolerance. Yes. If we don't get control of the government again soon, we are doomed. And just how is this going to effect your day-to-day life? Let's see... Imagine a Marine Rifleman who is training to become a killer for his Corps; endurance training, strength, unarmed combat, etc. Now because he has his new "rights" as a transgender, he begins getting estrogen treatments, growing breasts and becoming weaker. Not to mention, genuinely freaking out those around him, who have to bear witness to this general freak show. How does that NOT degrade readiness? Would you ask a man for his opinion and judgement during a life or death combat operation, if he has already demonstrated his capacity for sound judgement with the decision to have his penis sliced off? Pure conjecture. No sir, I believe it's called a proper refutal. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I am not military or former military, but l am not against letting gays having the same opportunity to serve as everybody else. Now, I see people with a gender identity crisis different though. There is something not right with such people mentally especially when they want to mutilate their bodies to look like the opposite sex. I see that along the same lines as somebody that wants to get rid of an arm or a leg. I don't believe it as acceptable to force women to accept a man into their showers with them and vice versa. But you're OK with having to force normal men to shower with OPENLY gay guys. How ironic. Sorry, but they're still the same sex. Obviously if they can't be professional about it, they don't belong. I don't see forcing women and men to shower with mentally ill people of the opposite sex as the same thing. But one sees the other as a potential sexual mate, while the other doesn't. Like I said, ironic that you don't see the difference. I have said this several times now... No reason not to go all coed all the time now, right? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I am not military or former military, but l am not against letting gays having the same opportunity to serve as everybody else. Now, I see people with a gender identity crisis different though. There is something not right with such people mentally especially when they want to mutilate their bodies to look like the opposite sex. I see that along the same lines as somebody that wants to get rid of an arm or a leg. I don't believe it as acceptable to force women to accept a man into their showers with them and vice versa. But you're OK with having to force normal men to shower with OPENLY gay guys. How ironic. Sorry, but they're still the same sex. Obviously if they can't be professional about it, they don't belong. I don't see forcing women and men to shower with mentally ill people of the opposite sex as the same thing. But one sees the other as a potential sexual mate, while the other doesn't. Like I said, ironic that you don't see the difference. I have said this several times now... No reason not to go all coed all the time now, right? Either that, or 100% private ETA: Guess which one will be more cost effective |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
The only way to LEGALLY get a sex-change operation or be provided with the hormones to begin that process, is to be diagnosed with a mental illness. Disqualified. Just as homosexuality up until recently was considered considered a mental illness. I'm certain within our lifetime we'll see kiddie diddlers and cross dressers also given equal protection under the guise of "diversity". This is all part of the conditioning to break down societal norms. The left needed to crack the military because the military has always been traditionally conservative. And homosexuality wasn't removed from the DSM due to new breakthroughs or studies refuting that it was a mental disorder. Homosexual activists took up the cause and got it purged. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Who could have seen that coming? Exactly. There is no end to the perversions that will be championed in the name of diversity and tolerance. Pedophiles are probably next This. Plus the American people will be expected to finance the cost of these operations once these cats are in the military. Just wait. |
|
Since when did individualism become so important in the military...?
|
|
Eventually everyone will have to become proficient in gay sex to pass boot camp.
I am only partially joking. The armed forces will be a laughing stock. Sexual orientation and skin color are superceding the competence, honor and devotion to duty that is the hallmark of the American Armed Forces and basically defines a real MAN. You don't have to be Hari Seldon to see that this is going to auger into the cesspool. |
|
Quoted:
Wow, I guess GD's homo-lovers aren't out in force yet School isn't out yet for the day. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Who could have seen that coming? Exactly. There is no end to the perversions that will be championed in the name of diversity and tolerance. Yes. If we don't get control of the government again soon, we are doomed. And just how is this going to effect your day-to-day life? Let's see... Imagine a Marine Rifleman who is training to become a killer for his Corps; endurance training, strength, unarmed combat, etc. Now because he has his new "rights" as a transgender, he begins getting estrogen treatments, growing breasts and becoming weaker. Not to mention, genuinely freaking out those around him, who have to bear witness to this general freak show. How does that NOT degrade readiness? Would you ask a man for his opinion and judgement during a life or death combat operation, if he has already demonstrated his capacity for sound judgement with the decision to have his penis sliced off? Pure conjecture. Of course it is. Because at this point such things are banned, as a result of the common sense analysis (or pure conjecture, as you like to call it) of how these things would affect readiness. What part of the scenario that I described would NOT be applicable, were there no restrictions on transgenders serving? Try to avoid conjecture. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I am not military or former military, but l am not against letting gays having the same opportunity to serve as everybody else. Now, I see people with a gender identity crisis different though. There is something not right with such people mentally especially when they want to mutilate their bodies to look like the opposite sex. I see that along the same lines as somebody that wants to get rid of an arm or a leg. I don't believe it as acceptable to force women to accept a man into their showers with them and vice versa. But you're OK with having to force normal men to shower with OPENLY gay guys. How ironic. Sorry, but they're still the same sex. Obviously if they can't be professional about it, they don't belong. I don't see forcing women and men to shower with mentally ill people of the opposite sex as the same thing. The ENTIRE reason that males and females shower seperately IS sexual attraction and the problems that can arise from such. So then lets just make co-ed shower and if soldiers arent being "professional enough about it", then we can just tell them they dont belong. That way everyone can oogle everyone (so long as they are professional about it) and nobody feels excluded. Sexual attraction- how does it work? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
pedophiles will be next. I don't know if this is sarcasm or not, but that's just fucking stupid. Who let you onto the internet? I'd like to kick them in the balls. Sure sure. Hey pedophiles were born that way. Discriminating against them is just like discriminating against black people....... (I'm remembering all the fucking retarded bullshit excuses for homosexuals that were brought up) Are you seriously equating somebody that prefers the company of another consenting adult of the same sex to that of somebody that wants to rape young children? Seriously? You think they are in the same category? REALLY? Yes there is a infinitesimal minority of fucking morons that believe pedophiles should be a protected class. They are nearly as mentally ill and fucked in the head as the pedophiles themselves if one themselves. The fact is pedophiles, or at least the ones that act on their urges (since thinking a certain way isn't a crime), are CRIMINALS, and should be imprisoned for the safety of the general public. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: pedophiles will be next. I don't know if this is sarcasm or not, but that's just fucking stupid. Who let you onto the internet? I'd like to kick them in the balls. Sure sure. Hey pedophiles were born that way. Discriminating against them is just like discriminating against black people....... (I'm remembering all the fucking retarded bullshit excuses for homosexuals that were brought up) Are you seriously equating somebody that prefers the company of another consenting adult of the same sex to that of somebody that wants to rape young children? Seriously? You think they are in the same category? REALLY? Yes there is a infinitesimal minority of fucking morons that believe pedophiles should be a protected class. They are nearly as mentally ill as fucked up as the pedophiles themselves if they aren't already one. The fact is pedophiles, or at least the ones that act on their urges, are CRIMINALS, and should be imprisoned executed for the general safety of the public. FIFY. |
|
This is all part of a greater plan. In the mid-90's the government socialists marked all conservatives as enemies of the state, made examples out of hunting them down, even so far as to kill American women and children along with broadcasting those examples over national television. The problem at the time was that the military was still very conservative and despite the efforts of the socialist elite to paint the right otherwise, the left was still limited without military support. However now they are breaking down the military, removing retirement benefits to retire the old "stuck in their ways" soldiers while allowing homo-sexuals and socialists to start filling the ranks. In addition the left is militantly stamping out open expression of religion across all portions of society in order to suppress moral objectivity. Within twenty or thirty years the military brass will be so conditioned that they will have no qualms to support a government that would strip away the Constitution while aiding those in power to round up the last dissenters of the socialist regime.
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
pedophiles will be next. I don't know if this is sarcasm or not, but that's just fucking stupid. Who let you onto the internet? I'd like to kick them in the balls. Sure sure. Hey pedophiles were born that way. Discriminating against them is just like discriminating against black people....... (I'm remembering all the fucking retarded bullshit excuses for homosexuals that were brought up) Are you seriously equating somebody that prefers the company of another consenting adult of the same sex to that of somebody that wants to rape young children? Seriously? You think they are in the same category? REALLY? Yes there is a infinitesimal minority of fucking morons that believe pedophiles should be a protected class. They are nearly as mentally ill as fucked up as the pedophiles themselves if they aren't already one. The fact is pedophiles, or at least the ones that act on their urges, are CRIMINALS, and should be imprisoned executed for the general safety of the public. FIFY. I personally don't have a problem with that if they are guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Who could have seen that coming? Exactly. There is no end to the perversions that will be championed in the name of diversity and tolerance. Pedophiles are probably next This. Plus the American people will be expected to finance the cost of these operations once these cats are in the military. Just wait. It's not just the cost of money, it's to cost of time while the "patient" is off duty for whichever phase of treatment is current. |
|
Quoted:
Let's see... Imagine a Marine Rifleman who is training to become a killer for his Corps; endurance training, strength, unarmed combat, etc. Now because he has his new "rights" as a transgender, he begins getting estrogen treatments, growing breasts and becoming weaker. Not to mention, genuinely freaking out those around him, who have to bear witness to this general freak show. How does that NOT degrade readiness? Would you ask a man for his opinion and judgement during a life or death combat operation, if he has already demonstrated his capacity for sound judgement with the decision to have his penis sliced off? This. Just what in the blue FUCK is going on in D.C.? Oh wait... |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
pedophiles will be next. I don't know if this is sarcasm or not, but that's just fucking stupid. Who let you onto the internet? I'd like to kick them in the balls. Sure sure. Hey pedophiles were born that way. Discriminating against them is just like discriminating against black people....... (I'm remembering all the fucking retarded bullshit excuses for homosexuals that were brought up) Are you seriously equating somebody that prefers the company of another consenting adult of the same sex to that of somebody that wants to rape young children? Seriously? You think they are in the same category? REALLY? Yes there is a infinitesimal minority of fucking morons that believe pedophiles should be a protected class. They are nearly as mentally ill and fucked in the head as the pedophiles themselves if one themselves. The fact is pedophiles, or at least the ones that act on their urges (since thinking a certain way isn't a crime), are CRIMINALS, and should be imprisoned for the general safety of the public. Nobody is MORALLY equating them but you cant selectvely apply the "I was born that way" to groups you deem acceptable. Nobody is saying "hey, they should be allowed to do as they please"- but you cant go cherry picking which "born that way" behavior that you want to accept. The slippery slope is that if you do accept it as "born that way" then you have to have the "is it natural or a flaw" debate. If found to be "natural" then they become a protected class. No, not free to act on their instincts- but certainly under the umbrella of anti-discrimination and hate crime laws. The only difference between that and homosexuality is the "child" issue. Otherwise, homosexuality has taken the same slope. It went from something that was morally and legally punishable, to "I was born that way" to "its natural" to "im now a protected class". Because it is between consenting adults homosexuals are allowed to act on their instincts because of changes in law- and fall under the unmrella of anti-discrimination and hate crime laws. If you cant see the blueprints I cant help you. I can promise you that homosexual behavior was at one point held up to be just as henious as having sex with an underage child. The only difference is that the laws have changed due to social pressure and this- the practice is allowed. All that is required is a shift in public opinion and law- and its happend many times. And thats the only thing seperating the two isues currently. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Who could have seen that coming? Exactly. There is no end to the perversions that will be championed in the name of diversity and tolerance. Pedophiles are probably next This. Plus the American people will be expected to finance the cost of these operations once these cats are in the military. Just wait. It's not just the cost of money, it's to cost of time while the "patient" is off duty for whichever phase of treatment is current. You mean like a pregant woman.? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Who could have seen that coming? Exactly. There is no end to the perversions that will be championed in the name of diversity and tolerance. Pedophiles are probably next This. Plus the American people will be expected to finance the cost of these operations once these cats are in the military. Just wait. It's not just the cost of money, it's to cost of time while the "patient" is off duty for whichever phase of treatment is current. You mean like a pregant woman.? Leftist troll is leftist. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Who could have seen that coming? Exactly. There is no end to the perversions that will be championed in the name of diversity and tolerance. Pedophiles are probably next This. Plus the American people will be expected to finance the cost of these operations once these cats are in the military. Just wait. It's not just the cost of money, it's to cost of time while the "patient" is off duty for whichever phase of treatment is current. You mean like a pregant woman.? Leftist troll is leftist. |
|
These people won't be satisfied until heterosexuality is considered deviant... until straight laced people are forced to keep their sexual behavior a secret because so many homosexuals will be offended by the very thought of two members of the opposite sex having intimate relations.
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It's not just the cost of money, it's to cost of time while the "patient" is off duty for whichever phase of treatment is current. You mean like a pregant woman.? Leftist troll is leftist. Never been called a leftist troll before. Thank you |
|
They will never be happy. They will always push to plunge the human soul to deeper and deeper depths of depravity.
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It's not just the cost of money, it's to cost of time while the "patient" is off duty for whichever phase of treatment is current. You mean like a pregant woman.? Leftist troll is leftist. Never been called a leftist troll before. Thank you I looked at your avatar and was confused by your comment. Admit it, you equating a pregnant female soldier delivering her child to a transgender homosexual getting his plumbing surgically re-routed was pretty damn leftist. |
|
Quoted:
These people won't be satisfied until heterosexuality is considered deviant... until straight laced people are forced to keep their sexual behavior a secret because so many homosexuals will be offended by the very thought of two members of the opposite sex having intimate relations. Ever hear of the term "breeder"? Its already begun. |
|
Quoted:
This is all part of a greater plan. In the mid-90's the government socialists marked all conservatives as enemies of the state, made examples out of hunting them down, even so far as to kill American women and children along with broadcasting those examples over national television. The problem at the time was that the military was still very conservative and despite the efforts of the socialist elite to paint the right otherwise, the left was still limited without military support. However now they are breaking down the military, removing retirement benefits to retire the old "stuck in their ways" soldiers while allowing homo-sexuals and socialists to start filling the ranks. In addition the left is militantly stamping out open expression of religion across all portions of society in order to suppress moral objectivity. Within twenty or thirty years the military brass will be so conditioned that they will have no qualms to support a government that would strip away the Constitution while aiding those in power to round up the last dissenters of the socialist regime. Very well said, except I don't think it will be another 20 or 30 years. I think that it is here now. You can tell by some of the posts here that the pc mind control has taken hold quite well. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It's not just the cost of money, it's to cost of time while the "patient" is off duty for whichever phase of treatment is current. You mean like a pregant woman.? Leftist troll is leftist. Never been called a leftist troll before. Thank you I looked at your avatar and was confused by your comment. Admit it, you equating a pregnant female soldier delivering her child to a transgender homosexual getting his plumbing surgically re-routed was pretty damn leftist. No, actually I was comparing the amount of time they wouldn't be able to perform their job as a soldier. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Who could have seen that coming? Exactly. There is no end to the perversions that will be championed in the name of diversity and tolerance. Pedophiles are probably next This. Plus the American people will be expected to finance the cost of these operations once these cats are in the military. Just wait. It's not just the cost of money, it's to cost of time while the "patient" is off duty for whichever phase of treatment is current. You mean like a pregant woman.? Leftist troll is leftist. Lurk moar, turbo |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
pedophiles will be next. I don't know if this is sarcasm or not, but that's just fucking stupid. Who let you onto the internet? I'd like to kick them in the balls. Sure sure. Hey pedophiles were born that way. Discriminating against them is just like discriminating against black people....... (I'm remembering all the fucking retarded bullshit excuses for homosexuals that were brought up) Are you seriously equating somebody that prefers the company of another consenting adult of the same sex to that of somebody that wants to rape young children? Seriously? You think they are in the same category? REALLY? Yes there is a infinitesimal minority of fucking morons that believe pedophiles should be a protected class. They are nearly as mentally ill and fucked in the head as the pedophiles themselves if one themselves. The fact is pedophiles, or at least the ones that act on their urges (since thinking a certain way isn't a crime), are CRIMINALS, and should be imprisoned for the general safety of the public. Nobody is MORALLY equating them but you cant selectvely apply the "I was born that way" to groups you deem acceptable. Nobody is saying "hey, they should be allowed to do as they please"- but you cant go cherry picking which "born that way" behavior that you want to accept. The slippery slope is that if you do accept it as "born that way" then you have to have the "is it natural or a flaw" debate. If found to be "natural" then they become a protected class. No, not free to act on their instincts- but certainly under the umbrella of anti-discrimination and hate crime laws. The only difference between that and homosexuality is the "child" issue. Otherwise, homosexuality has taken the same slope. It went from something that was morally and legally punishable, to "I was born that way" to "its natural" to "im now a protected class". Because it is between consenting adults homosexuals are allowed to act on their instincts because of changes in law- and fall under the unmrella of anti-discrimination and hate crime laws. If you cant see the blueprints I cant help you. I can promise you that homosexual behavior was at one point held up to be just as henious as having sex with an underage child. The only difference is that the laws have changed due to social pressure and this- the practice is allowed. All that is required is a shift in public opinion and law- and its happend many times. And thats the only thing seperating the two isues currently. Couldn't have said it better. (but I was trying to through sarcasm) |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It's not just the cost of money, it's to cost of time while the "patient" is off duty for whichever phase of treatment is current. You mean like a pregant woman.? Leftist troll is leftist. Never been called a leftist troll before. Thank you I always knew there was something not quite right about you... |
|
Doubt this will get far, John Hopkins closed it's sexual reassignment center for a reason.... In this case the military has legitimate reasons for saying no besides could you imagine the flood of Michaels joining the military so they could become Michelle's for free.
Submit that to tricare |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It's not just the cost of money, it's to cost of time while the "patient" is off duty for whichever phase of treatment is current. You mean like a pregant woman.? Leftist troll is leftist. Never been called a leftist troll before. Thank you I always knew there was something not quite right about you... Now I'm crushed |
|
Anyone crazy enough to want to chop of their dick or sew up their bajingo so they can go all Buffalo Bill and pretend to be something they aren't should be booted right the fuck out of the military. (And society in general, while we're at it.)
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It's not just the cost of money, it's to cost of time while the "patient" is off duty for whichever phase of treatment is current. You mean like a pregant woman.? Leftist troll is leftist. Never been called a leftist troll before. Thank you I always knew there was something not quite right about you... Now I'm crushed I know a former Air Force doctor who might be able to check you out, see if he can do something for that... |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I always knew there was something not quite right about you... Now I'm crushed I know a former Air Force doctor who might be able to check you out, see if he can do something for that... I still feel violated OTH, I have demanded a female Doc since |
|
Quoted: These people won't be satisfied until heterosexuality is considered deviant... until straight laced people are forced to keep their sexual behavior a secret because so many homosexuals will be offended by the very thought of two members of the opposite sex having intimate relations. That seems like the path its taking. Can't turn on the TV without some sort of homosexual on every fucking channel. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I always knew there was something not quite right about you... Now I'm crushed I know a former Air Force doctor who might be able to check you out, see if he can do something for that... I still feel violated OTH, I have demanded a female Doc since Turn your head and cough, thilly Thargeant! |
|
Quoted:
Anyone crazy enough to want to chop of their dick or sew up their bajingo so they can go all Buffalo Bill and pretend to be something they aren't should be booted right the fuck out of the military. (And society in general, while we're at it.) But they were born that way. Studies have shown that animals like: clownfish, wrasses(wrassi?), some snails and slugs, and other "animals" (im using the term loosely) change their sexes. Must be natural right? Inclusion into normal behavior will follow the "acceptace outline" that I posted above. Next? (sarcasm) |
|
I wanna be a transgendered ranger, I want to live a life of a sex changer...
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
pedophiles will be next. I don't know if this is sarcasm or not, but that's just fucking stupid. Who let you onto the internet? I'd like to kick them in the balls. Sure sure. Hey pedophiles were born that way. Discriminating against them is just like discriminating against black people....... (I'm remembering all the fucking retarded bullshit excuses for homosexuals that were brought up) Are you seriously equating somebody that prefers the company of another consenting adult of the same sex to that of somebody that wants to rape young children? Seriously? You think they are in the same category? REALLY? Yes there is a infinitesimal minority of fucking morons that believe pedophiles should be a protected class. They are nearly as mentally ill and fucked in the head as the pedophiles themselves if one themselves. The fact is pedophiles, or at least the ones that act on their urges (since thinking a certain way isn't a crime), are CRIMINALS, and should be imprisoned for the general safety of the public. Nobody is MORALLY equating them but you cant selectvely apply the "I was born that way" to groups you deem acceptable. Nobody is saying "hey, they should be allowed to do as they please"- but you cant go cherry picking which "born that way" behavior that you want to accept. The slippery slope is that if you do accept it as "born that way" then you have to have the "is it natural or a flaw" debate. If found to be "natural" then they become a protected class. No, not free to act on their instincts- but certainly under the umbrella of anti-discrimination and hate crime laws. The only difference between that and homosexuality is the "child" issue. Otherwise, homosexuality has taken the same slope. It went from something that was morally and legally punishable, to "I was born that way" to "its natural" to "im now a protected class". Because it is between consenting adults homosexuals are allowed to act on their instincts because of changes in law- and fall under the unmrella of anti-discrimination and hate crime laws. If you cant see the blueprints I cant help you. I can promise you that homosexual behavior was at one point held up to be just as henious as having sex with an underage child. The only difference is that the laws have changed due to social pressure and this- the practice is allowed. All that is required is a shift in public opinion and law- and its happend many times. And thats the only thing seperating the two isues currently. What does being born mentally ill have to do with having the desire to screw somebody of the same sex? Who made the argument that they deserve the right to serve because they were "born that way?" I thought they deserved the chance to serve because their preference for which gender and consenting adults to sex up was nobody's damn business. The mentally ill do not have the right to serve nor do pedophiles, who are ALSO mentally ill. This reminds me of the liberal morons arguing about what guns are sporting and for hunting. The Second Amendment doesn't say a damn thing about sporting or hunting. If the "born that way" argument was what they are using to get DADT repealed, they are using the wrong argument. They are consenting adults and it's nobody's business what they do in a bedroom. That should have been their point, and it IS a valid one. |
|
Quoted:
I wanna be a transgendered ranger, I want to live a life of a sex changer... Missing one syllable in the second cadence, might I suggest sexual, instead of sex? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Who could have seen that coming? Exactly. There is no end to the perversions that will be championed in the name of diversity and tolerance. Yes. If we don't get control of the government again soon, we are doomed. And just how is this going to effect your day-to-day life? Let's see... Imagine a Marine Rifleman who is training to become a killer for his Corps; endurance training, strength, unarmed combat, etc. Now because he has his new "rights" as a transgender, he begins getting estrogen treatments, growing breasts and becoming weaker. Not to mention, genuinely freaking out those around him, who have to bear witness to this general freak show. How does that NOT degrade readiness? Would you ask a man for his opinion and judgement during a life or death combat operation, if he has already demonstrated his capacity for sound judgement with the decision to have his penis sliced off? You are old enough to remember those are EXACTLY the arguements advanced to keep the old system before DADT of keeping gays out of the military. As usual, it boiled down to 95% of the population having to accept the old way was hopelessly bigoted, and they were standing in the way of 1% of the population who wanted to break down barriers. The basic problem is defining a deviancy is a ultimately a political question. If a group of activist shrinks redefine a deviancy as not a deviancy, the rest of us have to adapt. I understand the rewrite of the DSM4 removes an extreme narcissistic personality disorder as a diagnosis. I wonder why? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Who could have seen that coming? Exactly. There is no end to the perversions that will be championed in the name of diversity and tolerance. Yes. If we don't get control of the government again soon, we are doomed. And just how is this going to effect your day-to-day life? Let's see... Imagine a Marine Rifleman who is training to become a killer for his Corps; endurance training, strength, unarmed combat, etc. Now because he has his new "rights" as a transgender, he begins getting estrogen treatments, growing breasts and becoming weaker. Not to mention, genuinely freaking out those around him, who have to bear witness to this general freak show. How does that NOT degrade readiness? Would you ask a man for his opinion and judgement during a life or death combat operation, if he has already demonstrated his capacity for sound judgement with the decision to have his penis sliced off? Pure conjecture. Of course it is. Because at this point such things are banned, as a result of the common sense analysis (or pure conjecture, as you like to call it) of how these things would affect readiness. What part of the scenario that I described would NOT be applicable, were there no restrictions on transgenders serving? Try to avoid conjecture. In such a case, that person would have to be reclassed. It would depend on the given situation if it should be a punishable action(how long it was since the original qualification, a recent qualification or recruit should have never take a male-only position if he truly believed himself to be female). If this individual is unfit to be a service-member due to feminizing then it would stand to reason that a real female is unfit for service as well. Your stance is based on your emotional reaction to transgendered or in this case, transexual people. Not all transgendered people are transexual(throwing out the mutilization arguement) and it could be argued that flamboyant homosexuals are indeed transgendered due to their adoption of feminine mannerisms and roles. I for one do not condone(neither do I condemn) such behavior since it doesn't impact nor harm me. However, if homosexuals can behave in an open manner on-duty, then it's unfair and discriminatory to not allow the transgendered to do the same. And yes, I do hold a more conservative view of the issue and hold that DADT was the fairest policy to protect both homosexual and heterosexual SMs and to foster better unit cohesion and readiness. DADT would necessarily prevent transgendered people from serving for the most part. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I am not military or former military, but l am not against letting gays having the same opportunity to serve as everybody else. Now, I see people with a gender identity crisis different though. There is something not right with such people mentally especially when they want to mutilate their bodies to look like the opposite sex. I see that along the same lines as somebody that wants to get rid of an arm or a leg. I don't believe it as acceptable to force women to accept a man into their showers with them and vice versa. But you're OK with having to force normal men to shower with OPENLY gay guys. How ironic. Correct me if I am wrong, but weren't heterosexual soldiers showering with homosexual soldiers prior to repeal of DADT? |
|
I don't remember anything in the UCMJ saying I couldn't wear a cocktail dress when I was off duty.
<cue The Lumberjack Song> Problem fucking solved |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I am not military or former military, but l am not against letting gays having the same opportunity to serve as everybody else. Now, I see people with a gender identity crisis different though. There is something not right with such people mentally especially when they want to mutilate their bodies to look like the opposite sex. I see that along the same lines as somebody that wants to get rid of an arm or a leg. I don't believe it as acceptable to force women to accept a man into their showers with them and vice versa. But you're OK with having to force normal men to shower with OPENLY gay guys. How ironic. Correct me if I am wrong, but weren't heterosexual soldiers showering with homosexual soldiers prior to repeal of DADT? I don't understand that argument, because knowing you are showering with a homo is different from not knowing. Can you see that? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Who could have seen that coming? Exactly. There is no end to the perversions that will be championed in the name of diversity and tolerance. Yes. If we don't get control of the government again soon, we are doomed. And just how is this going to effect your day-to-day life? Excuse us for being concerned about a general demise in morality, throughout the world. Some of us don't want to see the modern world go the way of Sodom&Gomorrah. Your a day late and a dollar short then. Western nations have been circling the morality drain for a long time. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.