Quoted:
As awesome and pretty the Liberty safes are, the idea of a modular safe pique my interest. Reason is moving and mobility.
Saw this and wondering if they are legit safes?
https://www.snapsafe.com/modular-safes/
View Quote
For modular safes, there are three choices: Zanotti, Dakota Interloc XP, and the Snapsafe Titan series. I did a ton of research and went with the Snapsafe as my space was limited and it fit the best. My first choice would have been a Zanotti.
Here's a link to detailed reviews of the Snapsafe from me and others:
https://www.ar15.com/forums/armory/Snap-Safe-Titan-Review/46-475297/
The Snapsafe isn't garbage. I would call it "OK". Much better than a lot of big box brands I looked at. It had a few shortcomings outlined in the review in the link above. I did some modifications to overcome them. Briefly:
- It didn't come with a slip clutch. I constructed a replacement spindle from hardware store parts, building in multiple shear points.
- I reinforced the frame by expoxying 7/16" steel bar into the frame channels. From the factory, the frame was pretty standard in this price range of RSC's.
- I reinforced the bolt work. Most big box safes have huge, impressive-looking chrome bolts that are actually held into the frame by nothing more than a 1/4" bolt. The Snapsafe is far superior to this as the bolts are instead pressed into the frame and get their strength from the entire width of their bases. The frame rail they're pressed into is far beefier than most other brands. Even so, they could stand a little bolstering.
- I added a hard plate behind the lock. This is a major fail on the part of Snapsafe, as the lock mounting-frame looks to be built with a hard plate in mind. It would have cost them about 5 bucks to put one in.
Altogether, the modifications cost about a hundred of my dollars, but a great deal of my time with planning and experimenting. I don't mind as I love to do that kind of tinkering and designing and it was actually satisfying and fun. Kind of a hobby. But yes, there are better things to do with one's time. If Snapsafe originally made the same modifications, it would have probably added no more than 15 bucks to their bottom line.
The fit of the Snapsafe panels is very tight. Cannot fit a razor blade in between 99% of the seams, and hardly a pocket knife tip into the remainder. The bolts holding it together are stout. The recessed door is 3/16" steel and has very little gap in between the frame, preventing prying.
The two-ply "9 gauge" steel in the middle of the panels is fine. Its purpose is to defend against hammer and smash attacks. With the present availability of portable power tools, the gauge of a safe's walls is irrelevant. A grinder or similar machine will cut through whether it's 14-gauge or 1/4" steel.
The Snapsafe uses fire-resistant blankets instead of drywall like most other brands. From what I understand, only concrete-filled, upper-end safes provide true fire protection. I have no idea how well the blankets would work.
Snapsafes no longer come with mechanical locks, which would be a deal breaker for me if I were now shopping.
I saw a used Zanotti safe in person and was able to examine the bolt works. It is insanely strong, as the bolts are solid round bars that span the entire width of the door -- far better than anything else in its price range. The Zanotti itself is extremely well built. Despite the lack of fireproofing, which is somewhat dubious in the first place, it will be my first choice next time.