User Panel
Posted: 1/2/2020 2:04:32 AM EDT
I know the market is very soft from the few things I have managed to pick up over the last year and now I'm looking for a RR shooter condition, ideally small pin. I know this is a stretch but looking for $17k or less, ideally on a Form 3 so i can prey that it clears before the next election. I dont really care what condition the finish is in, if it includes anything else, hell a stripped receiver would be 110% a-ok with me.
I figure what better way to find such a thing than to ping the arfcom internet wizards, I have scoured my sources and am now considering paying a bounty via PP or Venmo for the person that finds such an item. |
|
[#1]
A search of the EE NFA section has these:
https://www.ar15.com/forums/equipment-exchange/FS-Colt-SP1-RR-M16/118-1936878/ https://www.ar15.com/forums/equipment-exchange/Frankford-Arsenal-SGW-Oly-M16-21K/118-1940777/ |
|
[#2]
$250 over budget...and it’s an SP1 conversion. M60Joe can handle the front push pin conversion I believe.
http://www.nfasales.com/nfawp/product/colt-m16/ Attached File |
|
[#3]
Quoted:
$250 over budget...and it’s an SP1 conversion. M60Joe can handle the front push pin conversion I believe. http://www.nfasales.com/nfawp/product/colt-m16/ https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/2980/1281894E-AAED-4CDA-AB81-D2959FCD3109_png-1217419.JPG View Quote |
|
[#4]
|
|
[#5]
My only advice is get exactly what you want because you may never have the opportunity to upgrade
Sure saving $1000 because it is a large pan front may seem like a good idea but if you're the kind of person that it would bother I would say just do it right the first time. Although you may be fortunate enough to buy it such a good price that you could sell it later and transition into what you really want do not count on it |
|
[#6]
I am not aware of anybody converting SP1s to a push pin as the SP1s lack the fence on the side of the receiver where the push pin detent pin/spring is located.
M60Joe used to convert SP1s from large hole to small hole (no pushpin) using bushings held in with a pin. I believe at one point Norrell and Mike Klos did welded or soldered in bushings. If an SP1 is converted to small hole you will still need to have one of the front take-down pins with some sort of retaining ability (like a KNS pin). I have two forged Olympic lowers, one of which I sent to M60Joe for blueprinting and then to US Anodizing and its a great receiver. I need to send the other one in to US Anodizing at some point as they will do both the blueprinting work and anodizing now. The older of the two I bought in 2001-ish timeframe and it has an enormous number of rounds through it and it still 100% other than cosmetic wear on the outside. As much as folks will bash Oly, their forged receivers if the original conversion was done well and if the receiver was blueprinted to spec and then reanodized are solid receivers in my experience and you should be able to find an Oly in your pricerange and then send it off to be blueprinted and reanodized. |
|
[#7]
Quoted:
I am not aware of anybody converting SP1s to a push pin as the SP1s lack the fence on the side of the receiver where the push pin detent pin/spring is located. M60Joe used to convert SP1s from large hole to small hole (no pushpin) using bushings held in with a pin. I believe at one point Norrell and Mike Klos did welded or soldered in bushings. If an SP1 is converted to small hole you will still need to have one of the front take-down pins with some sort of retaining ability (like a KNS pin). I have two forged Olympic lowers, one of which I sent to M60Joe for blueprinting and then to US Anodizing and its a great receiver. I need to send the other one in to US Anodizing at some point as they will do both the blueprinting work and anodizing now. The older of the two I bought in 2001-ish timeframe and it has an enormous number of rounds through it and it still 100% other than cosmetic wear on the outside. As much as folks will bash Oly, their forged receivers if the original conversion was done well and if the receiver was blueprinted to spec and then reanodized are solid receivers in my experience and you should be able to find an Oly in your pricerange and then send it off to be blueprinted and reanodized. View Quote |
|
[#8]
Tried to send you a PM but your box is full. There's one on GB right now for $17k with zero bidders so far. It's on a F4 though...
|
|
[#9]
Quoted: My mistake. I’ve been out of the game for years, and haven’t owned a converted SP1. That said...unless this is some sort of investment or you live somewhere that you can’t operate a business from your home, the SOT and post sample route is much more satisfying. $39 full auto AR lowers are well worth the squeeze, and NFA transfers cover the cost of licensing. View Quote He seems very happy with his lower and has owned it for quite some time and you do get the Colt pony on the side and theoretically a better Colt forging vs a Oly or Sendra. I just wanted to make sure the OP didn't buy an SP1 under the impression that it could be brought to standard front push pin spec as I have never seen or heard of somebody trying to weld on a fence to an SP1. (or if you would even want somebody to try given how the receiver could probably be warped/weakened in the process) I would rate receivers as follows Top Tier: - Top of the line would be an M16A2 <-- Money is no object option - Next M16/M16A1 <-- Maybe on a slight budget constraint but still a rock solid solution - Colt 613/614 <--- Looking to save a couple grand by not having the "M16" rollmark but all the quality of a Colt M16 *The other top tier wildcard are the Group industries stainless receivers. Some folks will say they are not as good as a Colt M16 and other will claim they are the best registered receiver out there being made of stainless vs. aluminum. Middle Tier: (in no particular order) - Converted SP1 <- Looking to save 3 to 6K over a Colt M16A1/614/613 and can look past the large hole from takedown pin arrangement - Converted Forged Oly (PAWs, SAW, Palmetto, etc.) <- Looking to save 3 to 6K over a Colt M16A1/614/613 but don't want to deal with the large hole takedown pin and may need to modify uppers if not blueprinted. - Converted Forged Sendra <- Looking to save money and are apprehensive about Oly's reputation, potential upper fitment issues, and/or are willing to overlook the purple anodizing that Sendra are infamous for. Lower Tier: (I would personally stay away from all of these) Essential Arms Cast Lowers <- Probably the Top of the lower tier. Rewelds <- yikes Oly "barstock" milled lowers <-- yikes and fugly Married DIAS receivers <- Folks looking for a cheap RDIAS and hope nobody notices the serial starts with "SP1". I am sure there are some I am missing off the top of my head that others can fill in on. In terms of the post sample route, I am always interested to hear current home based 07/02 personal experience with ITAR compliance. Do you pay each year and if not has the BATFE or DOS ever hasseled you for payment? There seems to always be a lot of conflicting information out there and has been one of the reasons I have stayed away from an 07/02 license. |
|
[#10]
Quoted: No worries, I have a buddy in town that has an SP1 that has bushing installed but still has to run some sort of front take down pin with internal detent capability. He seems very happy with his lower and has owned it for quite some time and you do get the Colt pony on the side and theoretically a better Colt forging vs a Oly or Sendra. I just wanted to make sure the OP didn't buy an SP1 under the impression that it could be brought to standard front push pin spec as I have never seen or heard of somebody trying to weld on a fence to an SP1. (or if you would even want somebody to try given how the receiver could probably be warped/weakened in the process) I would rate receivers as follows Top Tier: - Top of the line would be an M16A2 <-- Money is no object option - Next M16/M16A1 <-- Maybe on a slight budget constraint but still a rock solid solution - Colt 613/614 <--- Looking to save a couple grand by not having the "M16" rollmark but all the quality of a Colt M16 *The other top tier wildcard are the Group industries stainless receivers. Some folks will say they are not as good as a Colt M16 and other will claim they are the best registered receiver out there being made of stainless vs. aluminum. Middle Tier: (in no particular order) - Converted SP1 <- Looking to save 3 to 6K over a Colt M16A1/614/613 and can look past the large hole from takedown pin arrangement - Converted Forged Oly (PAWs, SAW, Palmetto, etc.) <- Looking to save 3 to 6K over a Colt M16A1/614/613 but don't want to deal with the large hole takedown pin and may need to modify uppers if not blueprinted. - Converted Forged Sendra <- Looking to save money and are apprehensive about Oly's reputation, potential upper fitment issues, and/or are willing to overlook the purple anodizing that Sendra are infamous for. Lower Tier: (I would personally stay away from all of these) Essential Arms Cast Lowers <- Probably the Top of the lower tier. Rewelds <- yikes Oly "barstock" milled lowers <-- yikes and fugly Married DIAS receivers <- Folks looking for a cheap RDIAS and hope nobody notices the serial starts with "SP1". I am sure there are some I am missing off the top of my head that others can fill in on. In terms of the post sample route, I am always interested to hear current home based 07/02 personal experience with ITAR compliance. Do you pay each year and if not has the BATFE or DOS ever hasseled you for payment? There seems to always be a lot of conflicting information out there and has been one of the reasons I have stayed away from an 07/02 license. View Quote |
|
[#11]
Quoted:
We never paid. We don’t export or import and regardless of what the transferable shills will tell you, if you’re not doing any significant manufacturing then ITAR is a non-issue. View Quote §122.1 Registration requirements. (a) Any person who engages in the United States in the business of manufacturing or exporting or temporarily importing defense articles, or furnishing defense services, is required to register with the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls under §122.2. For the purpose of this subchapter, engaging in such a business requires only one occasion of manufacturing or exporting or temporarily importing a defense article or furnishing a defense service. A manufacturer who does not engage in exporting must nevertheless register. (See part 129 of this subchapter for requirements for registration of persons who engage in brokering activities.) (b) Exemptions. The registration requirements of paragraph (a) of this section do not apply to: (1) Officers and employees of the U.S. Government acting in an official capacity; (2) Persons whose pertinent business activity is confined to the production of unclassified technical data only; (3) Persons all of whose manufacturing and export activities are licensed under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; or (4) Persons who engage in the fabrication of articles solely for experimental or scientific purposes, including research and development. Note to paragraph (b): Persons who qualify for the exemptions in paragraphs (b)(2) or (b)(4) of this section remain subject to the requirements for licenses or other approvals for exports of defense articles and defense services and may not receive an export license or approval unless registered under §122.2. (c) Purpose. Registration is primarily a means to provide the U.S. Government with necessary information on who is involved in certain manufacturing and exporting activities. Registration does not confer any export rights or privileges. It is generally a precondition to the issuance of any license or other approval under this subchapter, unless an exception is granted by the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls. [78 FR 52686, Aug. 26, 2013] |
|
[#12]
|
|
[#13]
Thank you all for the info and sorry for the full inbox.... I let my paid membership here expire and havent decided to renew or not. (lots of old messages from when i was a paid member)
I'd really really prefer on a Form3 or if on a F4 to be in Utah however i may shoot the folks a message about the one listed at 17250 and the one on GB. |
|
[#14]
Quoted: Whether you import or export does not matter. State Definition of MFG is much different than BATFE. §122.1 Registration requirements. (a) Any person who engages in the United States in the business of manufacturing or exporting or temporarily importing defense articles, or furnishing defense services, is required to register with the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls under §122.2. For the purpose of this subchapter, engaging in such a business requires only one occasion of manufacturing or exporting or temporarily importing a defense article or furnishing a defense service. A manufacturer who does not engage in exporting must nevertheless register. (See part 129 of this subchapter for requirements for registration of persons who engage in brokering activities.) (b) Exemptions. The registration requirements of paragraph (a) of this section do not apply to: (1) Officers and employees of the U.S. Government acting in an official capacity; (2) Persons whose pertinent business activity is confined to the production of unclassified technical data only; (3) Persons all of whose manufacturing and export activities are licensed under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; or (4) Persons who engage in the fabrication of articles solely for experimental or scientific purposes, including research and development. Note to paragraph (b): Persons who qualify for the exemptions in paragraphs (b)(2) or (b)(4) of this section remain subject to the requirements for licenses or other approvals for exports of defense articles and defense services and may not receive an export license or approval unless registered under §122.2. (c) Purpose. Registration is primarily a means to provide the U.S. Government with necessary information on who is involved in certain manufacturing and exporting activities. Registration does not confer any export rights or privileges. It is generally a precondition to the issuance of any license or other approval under this subchapter, unless an exception is granted by the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls. [78 FR 52686, Aug. 26, 2013] View Quote |
|
[#15]
I skimmed franks (Midwest tactical) latest mailer and found the following in your price range. Call 417-850-1649
Paws M16 Transferable $17,495 https://www.gunspot.com/listings/detail/2324/m16-transferable-machine-gun/ *Bushmaster M16 $17,995 *Colt SP1 M16 $17,995 Websites to watch for good deals on machine guns: http://www.sturmgewehr.com http://www.atfmachinegun.com https://www.rockislandauction.com/ http://www.autoweapons.com http://www.impactguns.com http://www.subguns.com http://www.capitolarmory.com/class-3-nfa/machine-guns.html http://www.onlythebestfirearms.com http://www.davidspiwak.com http://dealernfa.com http://www.gunbroker.com http://www.nfasales.com https://www.machineguncentral.com https://www.machineguncentral.com/default.aspx http://mtmmfg.com http://www.classiiidealers.com/ http://www.westernfirearms.com/ http://www.collectorsfirearms.com/class-iii-full-auto/ http://www.urban-armory.com/ http://www.ar15.com/forums/f_7/118_NFA_Firearms_andamp__Parts.html FWIW I checked over a dozen websites twice a day for over a month before I found the RR I was looking for. I wanted a Non-colt RR with fence, and safe/semi/auto markings. Ended up picking up a Oly Arms and had the upper shelf and rear radius milled down and then anodized by USAnodizing. Looks like a brand new lower now. |
|
[#16]
Quoted:
My only advice is get exactly what you want because you may never have the opportunity to upgrade Sure saving $1000 because it is a large pan front may seem like a good idea but if you're the kind of person that it would bother I would say just do it right the first time. Although you may be fortunate enough to buy it such a good price that you could sell it later and transition into what you really want do not count on it View Quote |
|
[#17]
I passed on multiple Olys and an SP1 for the mythical in spec Sendra, finally found one and it was just as out of spec as the worse Oly I came across...
|
|
[#18]
Quoted:
I passed on multiple Olys and an SP1 for the mythical in spec Sendra, finally found one and it was just as out of spec as the worse Oly I came across... View Quote With that said there are gunsmiths that will work on them while you wait for your Form 4. |
|
[#19]
Buy my SP1 for 18.5 and you’ll be happy. Front pin isn’t really an issue since adaptors are easy. Comes with big pin upper too
|
|
[#21]
https://www.gunbroker.com/item/857044383
M16A2 (not mine, and not affiliated, but do want) Unfired low starting bid for 24,999 How many A2's had the tear drop forward asssist |
|
[#22]
If someone gets that for $24.9 that's a steal. I paid almost that much for my A1 carbine.
|
|
[#23]
Quoted:
https://www.gunbroker.com/item/857044383 https://p1.gunbroker.com/pics/857044000/857044383/pix685577366.jpg M16A2 (not mine, and not affiliated, but do want) Unfired low starting bid for 24,999 How many A2's had the tear drop forward asssist View Quote |
|
[#24]
Quoted:
https://www.gunbroker.com/item/857044383 https://p1.gunbroker.com/pics/857044000/857044383/pix685577366.jpg M16A2 (not mine, and not affiliated, but do want) Unfired low starting bid for 24,999 How many A2's had the tear drop forward asssist View Quote Still, very nice gun. I'd be very surprised if that goes for under $30. |
|
[#25]
Quoted: I’m sure someone out there could do a front push pin conversion if the screw bothers you. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: M60Joe has been out of the game for sometime now... I’m sure someone out there could do a front push pin conversion if the screw bothers you. If it's just a shooter, why does it matter if the gun can be had at a good price? I use a non-captured pushpin on all my SP1 uppers. Attached File |
|
[#26]
1. M60joe is out of business but he recommended Gary's Bunker to do the conversion.. However he charges $500 for the work. Basically it is a epoxy bushing then worked from there to clean up the look. He recommends not to do it though.. He sent me a photo of the work part of the way done. If you do the work, you can buy KNS .250 push pins.
2. Ruben/Frank prices are like 85% of the time above market price but gives you a rough idea how much it could cost. Once in a while he has a good deal but typically disappears every time I inquire.. 3. SP1 is pretty nice but definitely saved $$$ getting it over the M16. You can find them for $16k if your lucky. A reputable dealer sold one for that last month. I think Ruben has one for 18k. 4. I have ideas for the large pin.. Been working on an idea using KNS .250 push pin, one bushing adapter, and a captive cap with the shape of the bushing adapter. Planning to CAD it out but need a place to produce them for a reasonable price. This idea makes it a fast takedown without the need for a Screwdriver! |
|
[#27]
Bump.If anyone knows of a good deal, I'm in the market. I don't want an SP1, but I'm interested in budget Colts, Oly's and Sendras. Prettymuch anything with proper pins.
|
|
[#28]
|
|
[#29]
|
|
[#30]
|
|
[#31]
|
|
[#32]
I've got a Bushy/Sendra on a Form 5 from my fathers estate I'm going to sell.
Runs perfect with every upper I've put on it. Looks great, low mileage type of gun since I think it was purchased in '87 PM or email me for details Asking $18k |
|
[#33]
|
|
[#34]
|
|
[#35]
|
|
[#36]
|
|
[#37]
Quoted: Half a machinegun: https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/57761/Resized_20200830_193025_jpeg-1570515.JPG View Quote Are you buying a machine gun or traffic drugs |
|
[#38]
|
|
[#39]
Quoted: I would rate receivers as follows Top Tier: - Top of the line would be an M16A2 <-- Money is no object option - Next M16/M16A1 <-- Maybe on a slight budget constraint but still a rock solid solution - Colt 613/614 <--- Looking to save a couple grand by not having the "M16" rollmark but all the quality of a Colt M16 View Quote @jbntex I know the comment I am replying to was made a while back but I just saw this thread... According to my paperwork, I have a 613 but my lower says M16. |
|
[#40]
Quoted:@jbntexI know the comment I am replying to was made a while back but I just saw this thread...According to my paperwork, I have a 613 but my lower says M16. View Quote Mind posting pics? My first offer was on a 614, but they didn't take it. I ended up with a Oly/SAW that has been redone by US Anodizing. It fits my budget better with less stretching required. |
|
[#41]
Quoted: Mind posting pics? My first offer was on a 614, but they didn't take it. I ended up with a Oly/SAW that has been redone by US Anodizing. It fits my budget better with less stretching required. View Quote Below is a pic of the lower of my 613 showing the roll mark. Attached File |
|
[#42]
|
|
[#43]
Quoted: Looks great! I really like the Colts! View Quote It has been a good gun, never had any problems with it. I bought it back in the 90's when things were a lot less expensive. Before buying the M16 I had a Colt AR-15 SP1 and when I bought the M16 I recall thinking that I just paid 3x for the M16 that I paid for the SP1 and it is almost exactly the same thing.... so I must be the dumbest person on the planet. Also, back then everyone wanted a RR and not a DIAS so RRs cost a lot more than a DIAS. Of course there were no new styles of AR-15 put them in. My, how times change. On a side note, I have an extra upper... as I recall, it is a Colt DC6700 HBAR upper with a Gemtech Trek suppressor mounted on it and a Gemtech suppressed bolt carrier. Works great and is surprisingly quiet compared to other 5.56mm guns using standard ammo. My only complaint is that with the full stock and suppressor, the gun is 44" overall and is very heavy. |
|
[#44]
Quoted: @jbntex I know the comment I am replying to was made a while back but I just saw this thread... According to my paperwork, I have a 613 but my lower says M16. View Quote Its Colt.....so if history is any guide just about any combination of receiver markings, forging type, serial# range, and model number on the paperwork seems to be possible. (the exception being the endlessly debated factory full auto "SP1" unicorn) That said, in most cases a Colt model 613 would traditionally be a rollmarked "AR-15" and "MOD. 613" and in the 5M serial number range like the ones below. Attached File On you picture with the sling in the way we can't see the serial or mod rollmark, out of curiosity does yours say "613" on the receiver and what serial number range does it fall into? |
|
[#45]
Quoted:Its Colt.....so if history is any guide just about any combination of receiver markings, forging type, serial# range, and model number on the paperwork seems to be possible. (the exception being the endlessly debated factory full auto "SP1" unicorn)That said, in most cases a Colt model 613 would traditionally be a rollmarked "AR-15" and "MOD. 613" and in the 5M serial number range like the ones below.https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/3567/Colt_613_png-1571367.JPGOn you picture with the sling in the way we can't see the serial or mod rollmark, out of curiosity does yours say "613" on the receiver and what serial number range does it fall into? View Quote All three of the 613's in your picture have the model above the caliber and then the third line is the serial number. Interesting that 8afuzzball's has the caliber on the first line. Mind explaining the differences between the 613's and 614's? You seem to have quite a bit of knowledge about Colts. |
|
[#46]
Quoted: All three of the 613's in your picture have the model above the caliber and then the third line is the serial number. Interesting that 8afuzzball's has the caliber on the first line. Mind explaining the differences between the 613's and 614's? You seem to have quite a bit of knowledge about Colts. View Quote Both were export versions and the difference between the two models was the configuration of the upper receiver group. The main difference was 614 generally came from the factory with a non-forward assist upper ("slickside") and the 613 had a older style teardrop forward assist button. I believe some of the 614s also had the older style 3 prong flash hider where the 613s generally came with the birdcage hider. Somebody more knowledgeable on these guns may be able to update and correct my understanding of the attribute difference between these two. |
|
[#47]
I can get the gun and take more pics and gather info. But before I do, could you let me know what other info you want as it is sort of hard to get to and I'd like to do it just once.
As I recall, there the sling was put there intentionally to mask the serial number and there was nothing else written there. I'm pretty sure the serial number is in the 9 million range, there is a tear drop forward assist, it has triangular hand guards and a birdcage flash suppressor, not 3 prong. |
|
[#48]
Quoted: To the best of my knowledge the lower receivers on on the 613 and 614 are basically identical. (other than the roll mark and SN# range) Both were export versions and the difference between the two models was the configuration of the upper receiver group. The main difference was 614 generally came from the factory with a non-forward assist upper ("slickside") and the 613 had a older style teardrop forward assist button. I believe some of the 614s also had the older style 3 prong flash hider where the 613s generally came with the birdcage hider. Somebody more knowledgeable on these guns may be able to update and correct my understanding of the attribute difference between these two. View Quote Guns marked “M16” don’t have the model marking down by the serial number but may be papered as 613 or 614. A friend had one with the original f2 showing the model as 614, but it was marked M16 only. I have one too, but I’ve not done a FOIA request to see how it is listed on the f2. I have also seen 613s with a partial fence lower and with full fence lower. As always with Colt, it’s a mixed bag. |
|
[#49]
Is there any difference in metallurgy between the 614 and later M16's ?
|
|
[#50]
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.