Quoted:
Looking to see what everyone's preference is regarding barrel length between the two. I am specifically looking at an SR15. Just trying to decide which barrel to go with. Already have a MK18 10.3 inch. Just trying to add more diversity to the cache. Thanks in advance.
View Quote
Personally, I find it hard to pay for a tax stamp for a 14.5 inch barrel. I would just put a permanently attached muzzle device on it and be done, and never worry about a 5320.20.
When I first got interested in SBRs, I didn't know where to start. I read some things about recommended minimum barrel lengths for silencers and was taking that into account. After some research I decided that Colt might know more about the whole SBR thing than I did so I figured that the specs for the Colt Commando would be my starting point, and the 11.5 inch barrel seemed like a good compromise. Now I have SBRs from 7 inches to 11.5 inches. Funny, the gun I have always wanted to build was a retro GI profile M4 but never have because of the 14.5 inch barrel. Most of my non-sbr ar type guns are mid-length guns and shoot great with the 16 inch barrel and mid-length gas system.
I read a couple articles over the last 6 months about muzzle velocity and accuracy. At the distance most of us will shoot a 5.56 gun, the barrel length (14.5 v 11.5) does not seem to have a measurable difference in accuracy.
You will be giving up, generally, about 100 fps per inch if that matters. If you go shorter than 10 inches then velocity tends to decrease on a steeper slop.
So if it was me, I would go with the 11.5 inch barrel unless I was going to create a semi automatic sniper system (M110) type gun with a big glass optic.
http://www.sadefensejournal.com/wp/?p=1093