Quote History Quoted:
Hard pass. Go with hard head veterans for a cheaper helmet.
To my understanding, the materials are sourced in USA, but production is in China to cut costs.
View Quote
I'm not sure why anyone's comforted by the "DuPont Kevlar" line given that no matter where the raw materials come from, it's still being made by unmonitored, unaccountable chinese labor. If they even have their "own" factory, it's one tiny step up from just buying a conex of God knows what off Alibaba and putting your own packaging around it. Nothing about "American materials" implies high performance or quality by itself, especially given that we're talking about ballistic materials. The newest and most advanced aramid can't be exported, so they're 100% not using that. There are materials superior to Kevlar 29 and 129 made outside the US which could be imported to China, like some of Teijin's laminates or DSM Dyneema which are available Asian-produced. But then they lose their marketing point and all it is is a chinese helmet.
There really is no free lunch. If you want something to have ballistic performance, buy high enough quality that you don't have to think about it. If budget is your absolute #1 concern, get a used ACH/MICH shell and deal with the awful GI pads and chin strap. You can just barely mount a PVS-14 on that and go about your night. No, you don't get any cool guy features but that's life. An Ops-Core bump is totally superior to an ACH for most users, it's not even close, and still cheaper than outfitting a surplus ACH shell with all the accessories or buying a newer entry-level helmet from Revision or a Gentex TBH-IIIA. And if you're not running I2 and you don't need it to be ballistic, why bother? Helmets suck. Even the nice expensive ones. Save yourself the head and neck pain and heat retention during the summer.