Quoted:
Thanks. That's what I figured.
This is the carbine in question:
https://www.inland-mfg.com/Inland-Carbines/M1A1-Paratrooper.html
View Quote
If your interested in a modern production M1A1 I would strongly suggest avoiding the "New" production Inlands. Their basically rebadged Auto Ordnance with a 3rd party bolt group. The later has had major problems with QC and bolt shearing issues as listed in the Carbine Collectors write up.
For what "New" Inland asks for their M1A1 your better off spending the $421 price difference and getting the Fulton Armory model. If that's a issue then I suggest getting the A/O version instead. You can find them cheaper on Gunbroker with some work, this for example
https://www.gunbroker.com/item/869259228 Or this NIB one
https://www.gunbroker.com/item/868815939The major differences between the "New" Inland and A/O Paratrooper models with be the rear sight, bolt and bayonet lug, The A/O is a "correct" WWII configuration, the "New" Inland postwar rebuild.
I owned the A/O "standard" Carbine years ago (2007-08) and it was a POS IMO, constantly jamming and having FTF's. I sent it back 2-3 times to A/O and all they would do is chop the USGI magazines I would send them (which worked in the Carbines I owned at the time) to fit the receiver, not correct the issues mention in the write linked.
I currently own a Fulton Armory M-1, it's like owning a new issue USGI Carbine, no issues and the only FTF I've had so far is mag related. I'm really tempted to buy the Para model myself but own 3 other Carbines now, I don't really need a 5th one
Just to wet your whistle
My FA is on the left, then 2 USGI Inlands and a "Howa" Made in Japan model. The latter 3 have been through complete rebuilds by Fulton and have new chrome lined barrels, plus the FA I bought the upgraded chrome lining. That extends the life on a barrel and gives you a better rifle overall than the USGI issue ones imo