I keyed your inputs to the best of my ability, if I screwed them up, let me know and I'll fix the issue. But you and you alone are responsible with what you do with this output.
Here's what I input for your bullet. The values I changed from the 120gr SMK highlighted in yellow.
The values I entered for the rifle and cartridge highlighted in yellow for the first powder. Some of those values came in from the bullet input. I did key your cartridge length, case length was default, barrel length from the first post, maximum case capacity from one of your other posts, chose the first powder on your list and set up the load table to go by one grain increments and chose my initial value so the heaviest load shown in the table was DANGEROUS.
My method for this would be to start low at a reasonable charge weight looking at the the factory data for a 120gr SMK. Then I'd shoot a few over a chrony to see if the predicted fps was in the ball park of the measured fps and tweak the model (Ba) to make it even a closer match, then work up, changing Ba to keep predicted and actual fps the same. It's an iterative process you can't do without QL.
To emphasize, I am not saying to start with what I have plugged in for the charge weight. I chose that number to give the dangerous warning as the last line of the table. For the first powder, RL-25, for all I know, the load is dangerous 69.01 grains or considerably lower.
My QL database does not have IMR 8133