User Panel
[#1]
This is a really interesting product. The OSS design appears to benefit from additive manufacturing, and I would not be surprised if they transition completely to this manufacturing process for their suppressors. If this suppressor has the durability and flash suppression of legacy baffeled suppressors, this may truly be a generational change. Additionally, I am curious how flow-through suppressors sound indoors vs baffeled suppressors, as you think the higher report at the muzzle could potentially reverberate indoors.
Regarding the mount discussion, I agree that people do not pay enough attention to mount weight. I like surefire's closed tine flash hider (yes I know it doesn't have labyrinth seals), because it saves 1.3oz over the 3 prong. I think there is room for mount manufacturers to reduce mount weight while still having acceptable durability. |
|
[#2]
Quoted: This is a really interesting product. The OSS design appears to benefit from additive manufacturing, and I would not be surprised if they transition completely to this manufacturing process for their suppressors. If this suppressor has the durability and flash suppression of legacy baffeled suppressors, this may truly be a generational change. Additionally, I am curious how flow-through suppressors sound indoors vs baffeled suppressors, as you think the higher report at the muzzle could potentially reverberate indoors. Regarding the mount discussion, I agree that people do not pay enough attention to mount weight. I like surefire's closed tine flash hider (yes I know it doesn't have labyrinth seals), because it saves 1.3oz over the 3 prong. I think there is room for mount manufacturers to reduce mount weight while still having acceptable durability. View Quote Same here. Jay said that he will be testing this. |
|
[#3]
Quoted: This is a really interesting product. The OSS design appears to benefit from additive manufacturing, and I would not be surprised if they transition completely to this manufacturing process for their suppressors. If this suppressor has the durability and flash suppression of legacy baffeled suppressors, this may truly be a generational change. Additionally, I am curious how flow-through suppressors sound indoors vs baffeled suppressors, as you think the higher report at the muzzle could potentially reverberate indoors. View Quote Yes, traditional baffled suppressors like the Helios qd, ea arx, rugged razor 556...oh wait, the flow 556k is quieter at the muzzle than all of those, NEWLY designed, dedicated 5.56 cans, and a full 10 points higher at the ear than the closest ear competitor (Helios qd). |
|
[#4]
Quoted: Without knowing what the internals look like, if there's an unstable projectile or jacket seperation, assuming there's no issues based on the mount backing off, based on where the serial is... Maybe they're banking on E-Forms being quick turn around in the future? At least other 3d printed options like CGS put their serial at the base where I could see them chopping off the baffle area and reprinting on top. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Ok so question from a newbie. How does this deal with a baffle strike? Looks like they wouldn't be able to just replace an end cap if it is 3d printed? Without knowing what the internals look like, if there's an unstable projectile or jacket seperation, assuming there's no issues based on the mount backing off, based on where the serial is... Maybe they're banking on E-Forms being quick turn around in the future? At least other 3d printed options like CGS put their serial at the base where I could see them chopping off the baffle area and reprinting on top. Looks like I was right, can't be repaired. Attached File |
|
[#5]
Quoted: Looks like I was right, can't be repaired.https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/147676/ppH4Eew_jpeg-2481064.JPG View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Ok so question from a newbie. How does this deal with a baffle strike? Looks like they wouldn't be able to just replace an end cap if it is 3d printed? Without knowing what the internals look like, if there's an unstable projectile or jacket seperation, assuming there's no issues based on the mount backing off, based on where the serial is... Maybe they're banking on E-Forms being quick turn around in the future? At least other 3d printed options like CGS put their serial at the base where I could see them chopping off the baffle area and reprinting on top. Looks like I was right, can't be repaired.https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/147676/ppH4Eew_jpeg-2481064.JPG That nato guy seems like he likes to party |
|
[#6]
|
|
[#7]
Quoted: Looks like I was right, can't be repaired.https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/147676/ppH4Eew_jpeg-2481064.JPG View Quote That’s disappointing. I would have guessed they could have just chopped it back and started 3D printed on the base. |
|
[#8]
Quoted: That’s disappointing. I would have guessed they could have just chopped it back and started 3D printed on the base. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Looks like I was right, can't be repaired.https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/147676/ppH4Eew_jpeg-2481064.JPG That’s disappointing. I would have guessed they could have just chopped it back and started 3D printed on the base. The serial number is on the very end next the the muzzle. I just bought one and that’s why I asked about it. Also it says OSS as the manufacture. No where on the suppressor does it say huxworx, just OSS |
|
[#9]
|
|
[#10]
Quoted: That is very disappointing. I'm not sure I want a suppressor that can't be repaired. I'm careful, but shit does happen and I like a safety net. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: That's disappointing. I would have guessed they could have just chopped it back and started 3D printed on the base. I'm not sure I want a suppressor that can't be repaired. I'm careful, but shit does happen and I like a safety net. They are $1100 plus stamp too |
|
[#11]
I kind of want one of these but the price is a turn off right now.
|
|
[#12]
|
|
[#13]
Quoted: That is very disappointing. I'm not sure I want a suppressor that can't be repaired. I'm careful, but shit does happen and I like a safety net. View Quote It would be one thing if the eform 4 actually lived up to the sub-90-day promise, but the typical approval times seem to be around 5 months and rising. The proprietary mount also means I couldn't just slap a spare can onto that host while waiting to get the Flow replaced. |
|
[#14]
Quoted: It would be one thing if the eform 4 actually lived up to the sub-90-day promise, but the typical approval times seem to be around 5 months and rising. The proprietary mount also means I couldn't just slap a spare can onto that host while waiting to get the Flow replaced. View Quote |
|
[#15]
|
|
[#16]
This would be the perfect application of the ring patented by Energetic Arms for the manufacturer info and serial number. Saving the consumer and Huxworks many future headaches.
|
|
[#17]
Are any of the newer 3d printed cans repairable? What about the SLX?
|
|
[#18]
Quoted: Are any of the newer 3d printed cans repairable? What about the SLX? View Quote Sig is at the bottom, looks to be repairable. Definitely a big Achilles heel on the flow 556, found this old excerpt from paco at cgs (please come back, we miss you) “Since 99% of strikes occur on the front cap, since we don't use any welds in our silencers, and since our DMLS process creates a superior product in every meaningful way there's nothing that's going to need repairing other than on extremely rare occasion the front cap which is easily sent in the mail. In over three or four years no DMLS rifle silencers have been returned for repair from military, government, or commercial customers or consultants because the root of the primary problems are eliminated. Take the Helios QD series as an example which is a 5.56 silencer but the bore is .355" in diameter tapering larger going forward to .375. This eliminates strikes from unstable projectiles when fired out of super short barrels such as the 5.5" Maxim PDX. This is the end result of the Helios QD on a Maxim 5.5" 5.56 PDX For the performance I would still risk it but I live life with reckless abandon like that...probably would stick it on my 11.5 or 16” mcx virtus barrel and not look back. |
|
[#19]
|
|
[#20]
Quoted: I don't know their warranty policy but couldn't they make a replacement can with your serial number and destroy your damaged one? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Plus another $200 tax stamp. I don't know their warranty policy but couldn't they make a replacement can with your serial number and destroy your damaged one? Lol you should ask Kevin Brittingham |
|
[#21]
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Plus another $200 tax stamp. I don't know their warranty policy but couldn't they make a replacement can with your serial number and destroy your damaged one? Lol you should ask Kevin Brittingham Yah turns out the ATF isn't amused by such creativity |
|
[#22]
Quoted: Thanks for the informed response. And yes it's cool to see 3D printing in the NFA world. I know CGS was doing 3D as well. Maybe it will be the new thing and more and more kickass suppressors will come out. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Am I missing something? Pew rates it as 33 which is minimal suppression. The at-ear rating is the highest so far. People looking for that metric would be happy with this suppressor. To me, I personally don't get the hype. It's a 556 supersonic round so you're wearing ear pro regardless. There's the less gassiness but all my rifles are tuned. And to be honest, if I'm taking a shot not on the range it's probably going down a hallway which is where I'd want both quiet at muzzle and ear anyway. It's cool to see progress with 3d printed designs and all but I personally think people are reading too much into the results. Time will tell I guess. Thanks for the informed response. And yes it's cool to see 3D printing in the NFA world. I know CGS was doing 3D as well. Maybe it will be the new thing and more and more kickass suppressors will come out. Several companies are on board the 3D printed/DMLS suppressor train. Ones that come to mind (in rough order of adoption) are: -Delta P Design -Daniel Defense -CGS Group -Sig Sauer -Radical Firearms -Huxwrx -PWS I'm probably missing some. There are also a number of DIY FDM 3D printed designs for what that's worth. |
|
[#23]
Quoted: This would be the perfect application of the ring patented by Energetic Arms for the manufacturer info and serial number. Saving the consumer and Huxworks many future headaches. View Quote I was going to say exactly this but you beat me to it. It would be nice to see it licensed to other manufacturers but who knows if that will ever happen. Otherwise the patent doesn't expire until 2039 if I'm understanding correctly. For reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5oJPVttIDo Serial ID RIng | US 11,326,849 |
|
[#24]
Quoted: Yah turns out the ATF isn't amused by such creativity View Quote But the EA ring thing is okay? Seems pretty similar. Build replacement can, add old ring back. I know there is some legalese around the actual serialized part, but seems rather similar in the outcome. Regardless of how they do it, I'm hoping they will have a solution for repairs just in case. Probably my next can. |
|
[#25]
Quoted: But the EA ring thing is okay? Seems pretty similar. Build replacement can, add old ring back. I know there is some legalese around the actual serialized part, but seems rather similar in the outcome. Regardless of how they do it, I'm hoping they will have a solution for repairs just in case. Probably my next can. View Quote The ATF allows repairs on a suppressor, but not replacement of the suppressor. That engraved ring is the suppressor, legally. It can't be replaced, but every other part can be (by an SOT). Destroy the part with the engraving on it and that suppressor is gone forever. |
|
[#26]
They probably don’t have a letter for the ring, so the ring is probably semantical. The regs say you are supposed to mark the tube and the way that is written I believe that is supposed to be the largest part, and a ring is obviously not the tube nor is it the largest part.
Well built suppressors rarely have issues. The notion that people are guaranteed to have baffle strikes is more related to young companies having no quality control who are making cans that aren’t straight to begin with. In the face of those issues, the companies dissemble with statements like, “its not a matter of if but when you will have a baffle strike”. That’s preposterous. People wouldn’t be selling $5000 marked up kac cans if they were guaranteed to self destruct in use. I just saw a can back yesterday for customer service from 2008- early gate lock m4sd (prior to m4sd-2 in 2010). The owner had over-deflected and bent the spring and lost or damaged the gate. Thats a 14 year old can without baffle strikes. It wasn’t worn out- it had zero baffle strikes or grazes. |
|
[#28]
Did y’all listen to the podcat? 3D printing is a gift for oss/hux, 3D printing is the future, the performance is in a different league (hard to call the arx and flow 556 both suppressors because of the performance difference), and will need frequent-ish cleaning every 1500 rounds
|
|
[#29]
I spoke with a nice guy at HUXWRS today regarding the "baffle" strike issues. (I know, it's a 3D printed can.) He said at this point they will deal with it on a case-by-case basis. HUXWRX theory is that if you use their muzzle device, an alignment rod, and the correct ammo the probability of an "incident" is extremely low. If there is and "incident", they will take care of the customer assuming no abuse or foul play was to blame.
|
|
[#30]
Quoted: I spoke with a nice guy at HUXWRS today regarding the "baffle" strike issues. (I know, it's a 3D printed can.) He said at this point they will deal with it on a case-by-case basis. HUXWRX theory is that if you use their muzzle device, an alignment rod, and the correct ammo the probability of an "incident" is extremely low. If there is and "incident", they will take care of the customer assuming no abuse or foul play was to blame. View Quote Just make sure you attach that muzzle device to the barrel properly! How To Install Your OSS Muzzle Device |
|
[#31]
Quoted: I spoke with a nice guy at HUXWRS today regarding the "baffle" strike issues. (I know, it's a 3D printed can.) He said at this point they will deal with it on a case-by-case basis. HUXWRX theory is that if you use their muzzle device, an alignment rod, and the correct ammo the probability of an "incident" is extremely low. If there is and "incident", they will take care of the customer assuming no abuse or foul play was to blame. View Quote That doesn’t give a warm and fuzzy |
|
[#32]
Quoted: Quoted: I spoke with a nice guy at HUXWRS today regarding the "baffle" strike issues. (I know, it's a 3D printed can.) He said at this point they will deal with it on a case-by-case basis. HUXWRX theory is that if you use their muzzle device, an alignment rod, and the correct ammo the probability of an "incident" is extremely low. If there is and "incident", they will take care of the customer assuming no abuse or foul play was to blame. That doesn’t give a warm and fuzzy Which part? Their muzzle device works best with the can perf and fitment wise. An alignment rod is a pretty good practice to ensure clearance. They'll take care of you if there's a problem as long as no abuse in play. |
|
[#33]
Quoted: Which part? Their muzzle device works best with the can perf and fitment wise. An alignment rod is a pretty good practice to ensure clearance. They'll take care of you if there's a problem as long as no abuse in play. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I spoke with a nice guy at HUXWRS today regarding the "baffle" strike issues. (I know, it's a 3D printed can.) He said at this point they will deal with it on a case-by-case basis. HUXWRX theory is that if you use their muzzle device, an alignment rod, and the correct ammo the probability of an "incident" is extremely low. If there is and "incident", they will take care of the customer assuming no abuse or foul play was to blame. That doesn’t give a warm and fuzzy Which part? Their muzzle device works best with the can perf and fitment wise. An alignment rod is a pretty good practice to ensure clearance. They'll take care of you if there's a problem as long as no abuse in play. "The correct Ammo" part. Where does huxwrx draw the line? |
|
[#34]
|
|
[#35]
Quoted: Quoted: I spoke with a nice guy at HUXWRS today regarding the "baffle" strike issues. (I know, it's a 3D printed can.) He said at this point they will deal with it on a case-by-case basis. HUXWRX theory is that if you use their muzzle device, an alignment rod, and the correct ammo the probability of an "incident" is extremely low. If there is and "incident", they will take care of the customer assuming no abuse or foul play was to blame. That doesn’t give a warm and fuzzy Agreed, and I’m in the market for a 556 can. Looks like Dead Air for me….again |
|
[#36]
|
|
[#37]
I want to shoot one. On paper it looks amazing but what is the "boomy" sound that pewscience keeps referencing? How "boomy" will it be for me, as the shooter?
|
|
[#38]
|
|
[#39]
|
|
[#40]
|
|
[#41]
|
|
[#42]
|
|
[#43]
|
|
[#44]
I just got my FLOW556K in today, I'll shoot it at dusk this week and record some video for a flash test on a 10.5" with winchester M193.
|
|
[#45]
|
|
[#46]
Quoted: How long was the wait? View Quote |
|
[#47]
Quoted: Probably a few days for the form 3 to clear. Riley is a manufacturer: Liberty Precision Machine . View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: How long was the wait? Makes much more sense |
|
[#48]
Quoted: I just got my FLOW556K in today, I'll shoot it at dusk this week and record some video for a flash test on a 10.5" with winchester M193. View Quote Looking forward to it. Sound, back pressure, flash are all important performance metrics to be balanced or traded off against cost, size/weight, durability, maintainability/repairability, mounting or modularity or host integration or interoperability, etc. |
|
[#50]
Here are some stills of the video from last night. 10.5" 5.56 shooting Winchester M193. The can had maybe 10 rounds total through it before this test but was allowed to cool and fill back up with ambient air. First round had some visible flash. Rounds 2-5 all had a small shock diamond out the front along with some sparking. Perhaps the sparking is just loose powder from the DMLS and will clear out over time. Since I'm a competitor I don't want to give my biased opinions on it, other than it is slightly less ugly in person lol.
HUXWRX FLOW556K Dusk Flash Test 10.5" 5.56 M193 |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.