User Panel
[#1]
|
|
[#2]
This review demonstrates what happens if you get greedy with the trigger movement. When he is running inconsistent and slow, it is because he is not pulling through and releasing through all the way to reset. If you pull back before reset (but after the gun fires on release,) you lose the pull fire in that sequence (but still get a subsequent release fire.) At the end, he gets it and does operate it efficiently, but it doesn't seem to change his opinion even when the cycle rate is much higher.
It is frustrating to see a review where the technique causes a problem, and to be fair to TFB, I have had a similar complaint, so obviously I need to better communicate how the trigger works. We filmed a video yesterday with a trigger that was supposedly "not working right." It ran perfectly. (We will post in the near future.) To me, it seems simple: "pull through, release through." However, I have more trigger time on this than anyone. Now that there are hundreds of these in the wild, perhaps someone else can provide a better explanation that will allow users to understand the system better. |
|
[#3]
Quoted:
This review demonstrates what happens if you get greedy with the trigger movement. When he is running inconsistent and slow, it is because he is not pulling through and releasing through all the way to reset. If you pull back before reset (but after the gun fires on release,) you lose the pull fire in that sequence (but still get a subsequent release fire.) At the end, he gets it and does operate it efficiently, but it doesn't seem to change his opinion even when the cycle rate is much higher. It is frustrating to see a review where the technique causes a problem, and to be fair to TFB, I have had a similar complaint, so obviously I need to better communicate how the trigger works. We filmed a video yesterday with a trigger that was supposedly "not working right." It ran perfectly. (We will post in the near future.) To me, it seems simple: "pull through, release through." However, I have more trigger time on this than anyone. Now that there are hundreds of these in the wild, perhaps someone else can provide a better explanation that will allow users to understand the system better. View Quote |
|
[#4]
Quoted:
This review demonstrates what happens if you get greedy with the trigger movement. When he is running inconsistent and slow, it is because he is not pulling through and releasing through all the way to reset. If you pull back before reset (but after the gun fires on release,) you lose the pull fire in that sequence (but still get a subsequent release fire.) At the end, he gets it and does operate it efficiently, but it doesn't seem to change his opinion even when the cycle rate is much higher. It is frustrating to see a review where the technique causes a problem, and to be fair to TFB, I have had a similar complaint, so obviously I need to better communicate how the trigger works. We filmed a video yesterday with a trigger that was supposedly "not working right." It ran perfectly. (We will post in the near future.) To me, it seems simple: "pull through, release through." However, I have more trigger time on this than anyone. Now that there are hundreds of these in the wild, perhaps someone else can provide a better explanation that will allow users to understand the system better. View Quote Just to be clear, although the author of that video does write for TFB, the review he is doing is on his own and independent of our site. Most writers at TFB who come across an issue with a product will reach out to the manufacturer first, to give them the opportunity to explain the problem. Posting information on a product with only a little knowledge is unfair to companies and not my style. My commo with you guys during the official TFB review was top notch - phone and email. http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2017/11/21/franklin-armory-bfsiii-hk/ |
|
[#5]
I realize now that that was not an TFB video. I apologize for the error. And yes Pete, you and I did have great communication and the result was a presentation that was honest and fair to all. Thank you for that.
My staff and I will work on a technique video soon. It is really simple though: pull through, release through. |
|
[#6]
Quoted:
I realize now that that was not an TFB video. I apologize for the error. And yes Pete, you and I did have great communication and the result was a presentation that was honest and fair to all. Thank you for that. My staff and I will work on a technique video soon. It is really simple though: pull through, release through. View Quote Honestly, I was a skeptic of binary triggers... until I actually pulled one |
|
[#7]
I got my first one in Nov (it was a double digit preorder). At first it was hard to get a real cadence going and it seemed painfully slow compared to my MPX with BFS III. But...after playing with it the past few months, I have to say I absolutely love it.
1. Rock solid, ive been shooting it now for 4 months and it never fils me (though every now and then i get happy and fail it by not letting it fully reset). I believe in it enough that it now sits in my bedside mp5. Its the first non factory part ive ever trusted in a ccw/bedside weapon. 2. Its not quite as fast as full auto, but once you know just how far to pull and just how short you can release and still get reset, you can get in a great cadence without failure. I have an mpx with bfs iii and a full auto swd m11/9 with max 11 upper. The full auto is definately a different animal, but i can get both the mpx and now the mp5s running pretty close. 3. Simulated burst - this is where i actually use it now (mag dumps i leave to the mac). The fact i can squeeze off two controlled bursts in the time a single shot normally takes, putting both safely and securly on target is amazing. I always loved the mp5 2-3 rd burst and this is as close as you will get reliably every time. Binary was meant for a heavy hk in 9mm...i need not say more, this is where binary shines. I dont do videos, but ill say this...i immediatly ordered another on optics planet in Nov (still waiting), and picked up another on gunbroker. Once they become more pentiful, i want one for all my hks. |
|
[#9]
Ordered from Optics Planet in November. Anyone else receive theirs from OP yet?
|
|
[#12]
Considering the POTUS' rather generic verbiage on what he feels is appropriate gun control, I fear this trigger might be DOA.
|
|
[#13]
I preordered one directly from Franklin the other week. I don't like the big red sticker and useless markings so I bought a 2rd burst housing for it from Gatewood.
Have any of you that already have the trigger run it suppressed? I was curious if it affects the function in any way. I don't see why it would but you never know. |
|
[#14]
Quoted:
I preordered one directly from Franklin the other week. I don't like the big red sticker and useless markings so I bought a 2rd burst housing for it from Gatewood. Have any of you that already have the trigger run it suppressed? I was curious if it affects the function in any way. I don't see why it would but you never know. https://www.gatewoodsupplyco.com/assets/images/AMBI-Lower-0-1-2-Burst-Housing--1.jpg View Quote I thought about changing the locking piece but after putting a few hundred rounds through the suppressor with the binary trigger I don't think its necessary. |
|
[#15]
Rec'd my BFS that was on order from OP for 4 months, just in time for a possible ban in FL.
|
|
[#17]
Quoted:
Scott signed the bill, so my BFS is now illegal in FL. View Quote What was the cyclic rate of your firearm when you bought it? What is it now that the trigger is installed? The answer: It should not have changed. If you have a viable technique, you can run your old trigger just as fast as a Binary Trigger. If you have not increased the rate of fire, it is not covered under the legislation. |
|
[#18]
Quoted:
I do not believe so... What was the cyclic rate of your firearm when you bought it? What is it now that the trigger is installed? The answer: It should not have changed. If you have a viable technique, you can run your old trigger just as fast as a Binary Trigger. If you have not increased the rate of fire, it is not covered under the legislation. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Scott signed the bill, so my BFS is now illegal in FL. What was the cyclic rate of your firearm when you bought it? What is it now that the trigger is installed? The answer: It should not have changed. If you have a viable technique, you can run your old trigger just as fast as a Binary Trigger. If you have not increased the rate of fire, it is not covered under the legislation. |
|
[#19]
Quoted:
I hope you are right. Time will tell, I'll see what my local range says to me. Thanks for your response. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Scott signed the bill, so my BFS is now illegal in FL. What was the cyclic rate of your firearm when you bought it? What is it now that the trigger is installed? The answer: It should not have changed. If you have a viable technique, you can run your old trigger just as fast as a Binary Trigger. If you have not increased the rate of fire, it is not covered under the legislation. Obviously bump-firing without a bump-fire stock, using two fingers in a trigger guard, and other techniques can fire just as fast as a machinegun. In that case, it is not mimicking anything; it is just the natural rate of fire for the firearm. Changing a trigger does not increase that rate of fire. |
|
[#20]
@franklinarmory
Will your trigger pack 'drop in' a Zenith MKE Z 5RS? Thanks Bishop3 |
|
[#21]
Quoted:
Hmm. Ranges can be a great place to get information, but it generally needs to be vetted by source data. Page 27 of the new bill covers the bump stock issue. It states, "As used in this section, the term “bump-fire stock” means a conversion kit, a tool, an accessory, or a device used to alter the rate of fire of a firearm to mimic automatic weapon fire or which is used to increase the rate of fire to a faster rate than is possible for a person to fire such semiautomatic firearm unassisted by a kit, a tool, an accessory, or a device." Obviously bump-firing without a bump-fire stock, using two fingers in a trigger guard, and other techniques can fire just as fast as a machinegun. In that case, it is not mimicking anything; it is just the natural rate of fire for the firearm. Changing a trigger does not increase that rate of fire. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Scott signed the bill, so my BFS is now illegal in FL. What was the cyclic rate of your firearm when you bought it? What is it now that the trigger is installed? The answer: It should not have changed. If you have a viable technique, you can run your old trigger just as fast as a Binary Trigger. If you have not increased the rate of fire, it is not covered under the legislation. Obviously bump-firing without a bump-fire stock, using two fingers in a trigger guard, and other techniques can fire just as fast as a machinegun. In that case, it is not mimicking anything; it is just the natural rate of fire for the firearm. Changing a trigger does not increase that rate of fire. 1) ATF, the Nation's default technical-legal authority on such issues, has already determined that a binary trigger is NOT a machinegun and has issued multiple technical determination letters to that effect. Therefore an ATF approved binary trigger system is not converting to nor "mimicking" an machinegun. If it were, ATF would (and has) vigorously prosecute individuals for violation of the NFA'34. If the State of Florida had intended to outlaw binary trigger operation, then they should have stated so in clear, well defined terms. Ambiguous language is ambiguous. I can only read words, not minds. 2) I built my AR from a virgin receiver. The ONLY trigger system it has ever been equipped with is the BFS3 so, the performance of MY gun the way it was originally (and legally) constructed MUST become the default baseline for determining if I ever "altar" MY gun with a "conversion kit, a tool, an accessory, or a device... is used to increase the rate of fire to a faster rate than is possible for a person to fire such semiautomatic firearm unassisted by a kit, a tool, an accessory, or a device." DISCLAIMER- I am NOT a lawyer and I am NOT giving legal advice. Interpret any laws or regulations at your own risk. |
|
[#22]
I won't argue with your analysis. We have come to similar conclusions about Florida's new unconstitutional law. It is my understanding that the statute will become effective 10/1. It also sounds like NRA has initiated a lawsuit against the state over this issue. Unless we are advised otherwise by counsel or a state authority, we will continue to ship until 9/1. Hopefully by then, the NRA suit will have progressed to the point if an injunction by then.
...and yes, we tested the BFSIII in a Zenith K model. We also tested it in a configuration similar to the model Z-5RS. |
|
[#23]
What the best place to buy one of these? Also can I use my zenith rd lower housing or do I need to get a new one. Not a big fan of the bright warning label.
|
|
[#24]
Quoted:
What the best place to buy one of these? Also can I use my zenith rd lower housing or do I need to get a new one. Not a big fan of the bright warning label. View Quote |
|
[#26]
Just saw on the local SW FL. news a segment on bump stocks. They mentioned Binary triggers and said they were included. They are saying, after Oct. 1st if you own it you must destroy it, with no compensation. WOW! Looks like mine will stay in Ohio till they do the same. SB 260 in the works.
|
|
[#28]
Quoted:
Just saw on the local SW FL. news a segment on bump stocks. They mentioned Binary triggers and said they were included. They are saying, after Oct. 1st if you own it you must destroy it, with no compensation. WOW! Looks like mine will stay in Ohio till they do the same. SB 260 in the works. View Quote |
|
[#29]
|
|
[#30]
Quoted:
Who was "they?" Some reporter? ....not really authoritative. View Quote |
|
[#31]
https://www.gunsamerica.com/blog/florida-banned-ar-15-triggers/
GA article talking a bit about it. |
|
[#32]
That article does a good job of showing the ambiguity of the section. I doubt the statute will stand, so we have decided to continue selling our BFSIII to FL residents until September 1. At that point, we will have to see if any injunction on the statute has taken hold.
|
|
[#33]
For those that are running the Franklin Armory HK binary trigger pack, is the pack supposed to wiggle around in the grip housing? Mine passes the 8 function tests but there seems to be a lot of play between the unit and the housing.
|
|
[#34]
Quoted:
For those that are running the Franklin Armory HK binary trigger pack, is the pack supposed to wiggle around in the grip housing? Mine passes the 8 function tests but there seems to be a lot of play between the unit and the housing. View Quote |
|
[#36]
R3dundantC
The "Con" you mentioned about not having a selector paddle for the right side may have been addressed by Franklin. I just got one from Franklin at the end of April and it had a selector paddle for the right side. Its just like the one on the left side and attaches with a little screw like the one on the left. |
|
[#37]
Quoted:
R3dundantC The "Con" you mentioned about not having a selector paddle for the right side may have been addressed by Franklin. I just got one from Franklin at the end of April and it had a selector paddle for the right side. Its just like the one on the left side and attaches with a little screw like the one on the left. View Quote |
|
[#38]
I finally took my Franklin Armory BFS-HKC1 trigger pack out to the range this weekend as well.
It ran great in my SBR (HK94 converted to MP5 specs by Mike @TSC). I normally run this gun with my Fleming auto-sear in a 4pos trigger pack. A few observations; The BFS pack does not turn your firearm into a machinegun. What it does offer is amazingly fast double-taps with the split time of a two round burst. My double-taps with the BFS were more accurate than shooting bursts from my registered sear pack. Shooting my sear pack usually results in my first shot being dead on target but subsequent shots rising to the left. With the BFS, both the first and second shot were within an inch of each other @ 25 yards. This was consistent for the whole mag as I would double-tap, take a second to find my sight picture and then double-tap again. The result being that all 30 rounds from the mag were in a tight orbit around my POA. If you get into the cadence of fire, you can dump the mag with impressive speed but the novelty of that wore off for me years ago. Instead, I just practiced making those super fast and tight double-taps. Even just doing that, a friend thought I was shooting my sear pack. The trigger pack is loose in the grip housing. I would say there is about 1/16" of play all the way around the selector axle. I was concerned this would be a problem but after 200 rounds, I inspected both the BFS trigger pack and the bolt carrier and receiver of the host gun and could find no evidence of galling or eccentric wear. The hammer had what I would consider a normal degree of worn finish where the bolt carrier drags across it and the ejector (which was brand new) had the expected wear on the top edges. Still, the amount of play seems unsettling. If you are on the fence about spending the money, the Franklin Armory BFS-HC1 is not a gimmick. It is a well made trigger pack that really offers an advantage over the standard trigger. ETA- Like R3 stated, the selector design is uncomfortable to shoot on the trigger finger. I am a lefty so I removed the selector lever on the left side and installed the cover disc that was included in the package in its place. |
|
[#39]
Quoted:
My double-taps with the BFS were more accurate than shooting bursts from my registered sear pack. Shooting my sear pack usually results in my first shot being dead on target but subsequent shots rising to the left. With the BFS, both the first and second shot were within an inch of each other @ 25 yards. This was consistent for the whole mag as I would double-tap, take a second to find my sight picture and then double-tap again. The result being that all 30 rounds from the mag were in a tight orbit around my POA. View Quote We always planned to work on additional levers that were shorter, but we simply have not had the machine time to push it through. It will happen, but I can't say when. |
|
[#40]
Quoted:
This is my exact experience as well, and we believe that LE will see the benefit of this at some point. We always planned to work on additional levers that were shorter, but we simply have not had the machine time to push it through. It will happen, but I can't say when. View Quote |
|
[#41]
I would love it if you made some replacement levers that looked as close to HK levers as possible.
|
|
[#42]
|
|
[#43]
Will the trigger work with the Zenith 5RS. And when is the Scorpion trigger going out? Thanks.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.