User Panel
Quoted:
Still waitin View Quote If you have a pre-order in with us you realize you have not been charged nor will you be until it's ready to ship. And we cover all that in the pre-order email and the email updates you get. Suffice to say the original quote from FLIR of "8 weeks" on the PRO PTS233s was not even close. ALL we can do is not charge until the order is ready to ship, ship in the order received (sans me putting customers in front of my personal orders) and push FLIR to ship quicker. Everyone is in the same damn boat unfortunately. Remember, as we cover succinctly in the pre-order email and the update emails, we are more than happy to cancel any pre-orders, just EMAIL me and let me know. If you'd like to cancel just shoot me an email with your full name and I will email back confirming cancellation. |
|
I’m normally excited about the new thermal products at ShowShow, but now I just want last years shot show products to start shipping in decent volume.
|
|
|
|
https://youtu.be/3bL62nKnbXo
Breach video announcement! http://www.flir.com/ots/breach/ new info here |
|
$500 more and less features, so much for a years worth of improvements.
|
|
Yep, and I still want one damit! I had the old Q-14 336 it needed a few improvements at the time, however was wicked small and cool. It’s a tiny pocket thermal mono everyone needs one for their pocket
|
|
FB Page
“We we're excited to announce a series of products, the one pictured, FLIR Breach is $2495.” |
|
Can anyone comment on how FLIR products price in terms of actual retail vs MSRP?
|
|
Quoted:
Can anyone comment on how FLIR products price in terms of actual retail vs MSRP? View Quote The PTS233 hasn’t been on shelves enough to be seen much below MSRP. Optics planet did sell some in the $1700 range for Black Friday weekend but I don’t think many dealers are going to cut into prices that much. That may have even been below cost for all I know. |
|
I have no doubt you'll be able to find one less than full retail
|
|
Well - what was the msrp for the pts233 when it was announced? from a historical price standpoint we could figure out (or close to it) what they may retail for...
|
|
I'm guessing everyone will know more after SHOT is over. I'll find out what I can.
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Forgive me if I don’t take anything FLIR says during SS at face value. Otherwise we’d all have weapons capable $1995 Q14Bs already. View Quote |
|
Quoted: I have it on good authority that Flir got back from SHOT 2017 and realized that making the Boson Q14B weapons-mountable was a mistake, because it would cut into their TWS sales. They intentionally removed the reticle to make sure they could sell us a monocular and a scope. View Quote |
|
I can't believe Angelo does that video with a straight face....
Here is what I showed you last year...but now it's not weapons capable, over a year past due....and msrp went up 500 bucks. ..seriously...what a shit show. I can't believe they didn't at least have someone else do the video...it's like twisting the knife. |
|
Quoted:
which was obvious to everyone, despite the vehement denial by a few here - insisting that the Q14 having that extra capability would be terrible for all users because it wouldn't be as good as a dedicated $10k TWS. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: I have it on good authority that Flir got back from SHOT 2017 and realized that making the Boson Q14B weapons-mountable was a mistake, because it would cut into their TWS sales. They intentionally removed the reticle to make sure they could sell us a monocular and a scope. |
|
I have to agree overall FLIR should have left the weapons crossarrows inside. That said I owned and used the old model Q14 just before FLIR bought out Armasight. I bought the 336 Q14 to carry at work in my day pack since it was super lite weight, worked as a monocular and in a pinch could be used was a weapon sight even though not a ideal weapons system from my testing.
I had two issues with Q14 as a weapon site first being the weapon mount sucked and second the back eye optic didn’t have hardly and eye relief for weapons use. You needed to be right on top of it to get a good picture. FLIR would need to fix both those issues before I would buy another for weapon site use, however I would buy another for monocular use it’s crazy tiny and cool overall. I ended up going to the IR Patrol 300 and also added the Reap-IR later on both of them do all the same things much better overall. Both the Wilcox and DLOC mounts are way better and the IRD back PVS-14 glass gives decent eye relief. |
|
Quoted: I have it on good authority that Flir got back from SHOT 2017 and realized that making the Boson Q14B weapons-mountable was a mistake, because it would cut into their TWS sales. They intentionally removed the reticle to make sure they could sell us a monocular and a scope. View Quote |
|
Who knows for sure, but suffice to say I've run down a ton of internet speculation and rumors over the last 3/4 of a year concerning this model. Everyone and their brother "knew" someone at FLIR was that "in the know" that said some shit that wasn't correct. I spent a lot of time running down these rumors finding damn near all of them to be BS.
So in short I'm not too concerned about he said she said anymore on this as most of it has been rumor and fake news. But to be clear, FLIR definitely effed up the "launch" of this unit, including sending a data sheet showing it was weapons mountable, etc. A big part of the problem with some of these conglomerations of big corporations is that they are so SEGMENTED. Something is built in one part of the country, it's sold via an office in another part of the country, it's billed and charged through an office in another part of the country. Communications is typically SHITTY inside these big companies so that further messes up the plot.. "Production" says we have 50 units coming out on the 10th, sales (in another state) hears they have units coming so they tell dealers "we can ship all these orders in two weeks", then only 30 units are received, 4 weeks later (in yet another office in yet another state), then you get the "allotment" system going to be make everything "fair", so the dealer that has first order in at 30 units receives 2 and everyone else also receives 2. All the way each segment of the company thinks everything is going well and sees no problem with it, or can blame "production" for this or that. Or more to the point, "production" tells "sales" that this model will have a rotating super widget on it because someone thinks that's a good idea, then R and D steps in and says "oh no you can't put a super widget on that model, the core isn't beefed up enough to take the recoil." Meanwhile sales has told everyone the unit will definitely have a super widget capability.... This doesn't just apply to the company being referenced in this thread, I've seen this a ton in a LOT of big corporations. So to be sure it's a sucky situation for both consumers and dealers as well. To be honest I wished I had never listed these before I received my first shipment of them. But often times we are still AT SHOT show and having people call and ask "do you have the new XYZ unit?" You mean the one they just debuted here today that won't even be in production for six months? Seriously, this happens every year. So you want to have the info out there for customers, but then you get screwed when the launch is messed up by the manufacturer. |
|
Quoted:
Is anyone really shocked by this. Its almost ALWAYS about money and never about the customer. View Quote JRH's comments are spot-on. |
|
Quoted:
I can't believe Angelo does that video with a straight face.... Here is what I showed you last year...but now it's not weapons capable, over a year past due....and msrp went up 500 bucks. ..seriously...what a shit show. I can't believe they didn't at least have someone else do the video...it's like twisting the knife. View Quote |
|
Quoted: Try not to take it out on Angelo. He's just doing his job. He's a good guy and just making the best out of a less-than-ideal situation. I'd wager a lot changed when Armasight took over the PVS segment. I still believe there were export issues that played a part in removing the reticle from the original concept design. View Quote Angelo is the only one there I can get straight answers out of, or even timely replies from. Good guy in my book. |
|
Quoted:
I have to agree overall FLIR should have left the weapons crossarrows inside. That said I owned and used the old model Q14 just before FLIR bought out Armasight. I bought the 336 Q14 to carry at work in my day pack since it was super lite weight, worked as a monocular and in a pinch could be used was a weapon sight even though not a ideal weapons system from my testing. I had two issues with Q14 as a weapon site first being the weapon mount sucked and second the back eye optic didn’t have hardly and eye relief for weapons use. You needed to be right on top of it to get a good picture. FLIR would need to fix both those issues before I would buy another for weapon site use, however I would buy another for monocular use it’s crazy tiny and cool overall. I ended up going to the IR Patrol 300 and also added the Reap-IR later on both of them do all the same things much better overall. Both the Wilcox and DLOC mounts are way better and the IRD back PVS-14 glass gives decent eye relief. View Quote |
|
I think the Breach(Q14) just fills a limited role as a micro monocular when size and weight matters more than battery life and features. I don’t think the new breach will ever fill the role as a bigger more featured monocular such as the Helion, Patrol and etc for hunters.
The breach will be small and handy, but run through single 123A batteries like kids at the candy store. Folks looking to make a full service hunting mono out of it will be disappointed. Guys looking for a micro mono for packing around and limited use will be thrilled with it. I may buy a Breach but Given the choice I would buy the PT233 scope with a better lower profile/bulk single through lever mount. The scopes small enough,, dual batteries and much better outdoor useful range wise with 19mm lens plus can be used as weapons sight and monocular both. Just my thoughts after owning the Q14 take them for what they are. |
|
I’m glad I used a q14 before making a mistake in buying one. You nailed it it’s a niche product. I can see it being a nice second scanner helmet mounted on a stalk.
|
|
I tried the Q14 helmet mounted also and wasn’t impressed. A PVS-14 works way better for moving around, that said just for sitting on stand and scanning hands free the Q-14 worked well for that. Battery life was a huge negative during cold weather I wouldn’t get 30 minutes run time on a single 123A.
Not trying to be a bummer just giving folks a idea of what to expect when the breach starts shipping. It has a lot of pluses the size/weight being number 1. The Q14 also was build very well didn’t have a cheap feel at all to it very solid overall. The controls and menu were easy to use I never had a issue there. The breach pricing will be very attractive for most people with newest 12 micron boson core and software. Overall it’s cool little unit for the money and I hope FLIR improved the battery life and performance by adding the new core. The only thing I didn’t like was the fact they went to a fixed focus lens on the new model I’m waiting to see if that was a good or bad thing vs old model. I think most folks will be thrilled with the breach as long as they buy it for what it is not thinking it will replace a full sized, larger lens and more feature rich model. |
|
I used my Q14 640 for a scanner and a sight quite effectively. ( was it perfect no, but it was light and versatile) although It was pretty useless for helmet mount. I’m surprised they keep pushing that as a selling point yet they use the excuse “comfort and ergonomics” as a reason for dumping the rest. Honestly $2500 for a 320 fixed focus scanner with poor battery life is just not worth it. I have a cheap seek 320 that can fill that roll for $500
|
|
Quoted:
I used my Q14 640 for a scanner and a sight quite effectively. ( was it perfect no, but it was light and versatile) although It was pretty useless for helmet mount. I’m surprised they keep pushing that as a selling point yet they use the excuse “comfort and ergonomics” as a reason for dumping the rest. Honestly $2500 for a 320 fixed focus scanner with poor battery life is just not worth it. I have a cheap seek 320 that can fill that roll for $500 View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I think the Breach(Q14) just fills a limited role as a micro monocular when size and weight matters more than battery life and features. I don’t think the new breach will ever fill the role as a bigger more featured monocular such as the Helion, Patrol and etc for hunters. The breach will be small and handy, but run through single 123A batteries like kids at the candy store. Folks looking to make a full service hunting mono out of it will be disappointed. Guys looking for a micro mono for packing around and limited use will be thrilled with it. I may buy a Breach but Given the choice I would buy the PT233 scope with a better lower profile/bulk single through lever mount. The scopes small enough,, dual batteries and much better outdoor useful range wise with 19mm lens plus can be used as weapons sight and monocular both. Just my thoughts after owning the Q14 take them for what they are. View Quote For this, is the Q14 still very viable or should I be looking at something else? I have zero interest in a thermal scope and I'd much prefer to keep it helmet mounted. I'd even go with a PAS23 but apparently you cannot get it oriented to where you can use it over your right eye with a dovetail mount. I'd love to give FLIR the finger and buy something else, but I'm still interested in hearing if the Q14 is the best option for what I'm looking for and would absolutely want to punch something if I finally get one after all this BS, and it sucks. |
|
|
I’ve not seen the flir breach in action, but have used the patrol helmet mounted, it’s a little heavy because it sits further away from you, but I don’t think you’ll beat the image . Ird produces best image on the screen . But it cost twice as much too. I’ve not had a chance to use the skeet ir , except for about 30 seconds . Was much more suited to extended use. But it cost even more. Hope this helps
|
|
Quoted:
Some pics of the redesigned FLIR Breach Thermal monocular https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/92237/Breach1-431510.jpg https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/92237/Breach2-431511.jpg https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/92237/Breach3-431512.jpg Very durable feel and build to this unit IMO. Great resolution for the price point. Got the standard "shipping in March" to which I replied- "so tell customers June then?" Given the previous snafu(s) on FLIR ship dates, I would say "sometime this year" to be safe :) View Quote |
|
Breach has the same USB-C connector as PTS, which most likely means it can be powered with an external battery.
|
|
|
Quoted:
yea but...26 hunnit...come on!!! View Quote Keep in mind up to the not so distant past, this much $$ would barely get you a Scout II with internal battery, not nearly as clear, definitely not 12um. That being said, I wish they would have stuck with their original stated price. This whole thing has been a cluster from the beginning- raising the retail price on top of that is a bad move IMO. But I don't work at FLIR and I don't set prices unfortunately. However it is 60 hz. |
|
Quoted: I think they stated MSRP to be around $2495. Keep in mind up to the not so distant past, this much $$ would barely get you a Scout II with internal battery, not nearly as clear, definitely not 12um. That being said, I wish they would have stuck with their original stated price. This whole thing has been a cluster from the beginning- raising the retail price on top of that is a bad move IMO. But I don't work at FLIR and I don't set prices unfortunately. However it is 60 hz. View Quote Not blaming you at all because they make shit decisions and you end up having to deal with unhappy customers; this approach just shows what order of shitbird their leadership really is - just curious how this all goes down. Hell, at this point I'd rather pay the $600 to punch someone at FLIR in the mouth. |
|
|
Quoted: If we have a pre order in from back when these had more features at $1995, are we now paying $600 more because FLIR is a bunch of faggots? Or is the original price somehow still good on the pre order? Also, why do I have a feeling that the extra $600 is theei cost per unit on literally remaking a new unit with less features, that I now have the privilege to pay for? Not blaming you at all because they make shit decisions and you end up having to deal with unhappy customers; this approach just shows what order of shitbird their leadership really is - just curious how this all goes down. Hell, at this point I'd rather pay the $600 to punch someone at FLIR in the mouth. View Quote If you have a pre-order in with us on the Breach, you'll be getting an email soon- I'm waiting for confirmed pricing on the Breach. For the people that stuck with it patiently all this time, I'll do everything I can- someone has to try to straighten out this frickin mess!! Applicable only to pre-orders that have stuck with it. We actually shut down pre-orders for this item a couple months back when the info stopped flowing for a bit there, so between that and the fact that a lot of folks switched over to the PRO PTS233s when they started shipping, plus cancellations, our pre-order list for the Breach isn't but maybe 1/4 of what it was for the PRO PTS233s when they came out. |
|
Quoted: Legit question and I asked that very thing- WTF is the deal with the pre-orders I've had in since last spring at the lower price? The reply was they were working on figuring that part out. I'm guessing it's easier to pass that info along via email versus in person. If you have a pre-order in with us on the Breach, you'll be getting an email soon- I'm waiting for confirmed pricing on the Breach. For the people that stuck with it patiently all this time, I'll do everything I can- someone has to try to straighten out this frickin mess!! Applicable only to pre-orders that have stuck with it. We actually shut down pre-orders for this item a couple months back when the info stopped flowing for a bit there, so between that and the fact that a lot of folks switched over to the PRO PTS233s when they started shipping, plus cancellations, our pre-order list for the Breach isn't but maybe 1/4 of what it was for the PRO PTS233s when they came out. View Quote |
|
If you have a pre-order in with us on the Breach, be sure you read and respond to the email sent this morning.
|
|
A little news on the "Breach"- take it for what it's worth-
Saw an estimated ship date of April 15th on a NEW order that was just sent in to them. Again, a new order just from a few days ago, not the dozens of pre-orders already in. As we all should know by now, this is FLIR so it is just an "estimate", but does give a little hope on this module!!! So for the "I'll wait till after they start shipping and then try to find one in stock" types- I have a feeling this is going to be a situation just like the PRO PTS233, there will be a backup for a while and you'd be hard pressed to find one just sitting on someone's shelf just waiting for you to order it! Hence it would be wise to get your pre-order in somewhere now if your considering a Breach unit. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.