Quote History Quoted:
An interesting point was raised in another thread on this subject.
If an object/device/accessory is required to "convert" and AR-15 to a machine gun, then by implication the AR-15 is NOT a machine gun.
Hard to refute, that one is.
".......... and was able to convert an AR-15 style firearm into a machinegun by cutting out the etching for an auto-sear using a commonly available tool and then inserting the auto-sear into the firearm.
Ergo, it was not a machine gun before the "conversion".
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History Quoted:
An interesting point was raised in another thread on this subject.
If an object/device/accessory is required to "convert" and AR-15 to a machine gun, then by implication the AR-15 is NOT a machine gun.
Hard to refute, that one is.
".......... and was able to convert an AR-15 style firearm into a machinegun by cutting out the etching for an auto-sear using a commonly available tool and then inserting the auto-sear into the firearm.
Ergo, it was not a machine gun before the "conversion".
I've seen a few people restating this in different topics related to the arrest...
What's the big deal?
There are AR-15 style firearms that are MGs, and AR-15 style firearms that aren't MGs, and it's been that way since the beginning.
Am I missing something significant here? If it's just the point that "journalists" often don't know what they're referring to, that's nothing new either. lol
The original AR-15
was a MG and it was designed/intended to be a weapon used in war, so I don't argue those points with people who want to ban them; I just tell them I disagree and they shouldn't be banned.
The 2A is about common people having military weapons, despite what some want to believe.
Quoted:
Yeah, this is not the slam dunk they want you to think it is:
The agents paid for the metal cards etched with a design for an auto-sear using postal money orders, which Ervin then deposited into his account at a local credit union. An ATF expert analyzed one of the devices that had been purchased undercover and was able to convert an AR-15 style firearm into a machinegun by cutting out the etching for an auto-sear using a commonly available tool and then inserting the auto-sear into the firearm
So it was just a drawing until the undercover agent "cut the etching out". Sounds to me like the undercover agent made a machine gun.
I agree.
"An
ATF expert" (probably employed by FATD) made the MG. That's more significant because he's an expert at firearms modification.
Quoted:
And by that logic, blueprints, drawings, etc... of machine guns or machine gun parts are by default.... machine guns.
Nobody is saying that, so we shouldn't either.
Even ITAR doesn't apply to that info if it's in the public domain already.
A good attorney is needed for him.
Absolutely.
I hope he's got a great one.