Quote History Quoted:
I have done exactly what you did, which is to submit paperwork with the exact same details as the approved paperwork to your dealer, even though I was pretty sure it might get kicked back for updated wording. You want them to tell you to change the details, not do it on your own and find out they do not like your changes.
View Quote
No, in my experience it's better to "update" the data to current standards (whenever necessary) and submit it that way.
This is called Data Quality Assurance (data QA) in most industries.
I've only listed single calibers on any form, since the first rejections (and guidance) for that in 2007.
If the prior form had multiple calibers, I'd either list the current caliber of the weapon or, in the case of a MG conversion device, just pick one.
I've had them approved as "MG conversion device" but years ago I saw the actual abbreviations the ATF uses in-house, so I adopted them:
MG=Machinegun (any type)
SR=SBR
SS=SBS
SI=Silencer
DD=Destructive Device
AW (although I still use AOW since I forget this one... It's used so rarely.
)
You can find all these on their Form 6 and importation guidance:
https://www.atf.gov/firearms/import-firearms-ammunition-and-defense-articlesI've never had a rejected NFA form, and I've submitted hundreds as an SOT and LE agency employee.
I correct addresses too, if they're sketchy. Usually I'll leave importer alone if they've moved since the importation occurred.
All standardized USPS abbreviations are accepted (RD, PKWY, BLVD, HWY, etc.)
I double-check all data I can by verifying against the FFL database or other online sources (if there's no current FFL).