User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 8/15/2017 8:50:42 AM EDT
[#1]
The CHL must be in-state.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2017 9:01:22 AM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The CHL must be in-state. This was being discussed in a Facebook group and one guy mentioned he has used his AZ non resident permit at 2 different FFLs and was not a problem. According to the poster they simply used the AZ permit to avoid NICS. This is in Arkansas. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2017 9:55:39 AM EDT
[#3]
Florida
Never been able to bypass nics Always have to pay but chl allows bypass of waiting period Am I being ripped off? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2017 10:05:33 AM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Florida Never been able to bypass nics Always have to pay but chl allows bypass of waiting period Am I being ripped off? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2017 10:08:25 AM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Florida Never been able to bypass nics Always have to pay but chl allows bypass of waiting period Am I being ripped off? That does seem to answer my question about however. It does appear to show it must only come from an instate permit. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2017 3:12:27 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Where is that specified? 922 (t) (1) Beginning on the date that is 30 days after the Attorney General notifies licensees under section 103(d) of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act that the national instant criminal background check system is established, a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, or licensed dealer shall not transfer a firearm to any other person who is not licensed under this chapter, unless— (A) before the completion of the transfer, the licensee contacts the national instant criminal background check system established under section 103 of that Act; (3) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to a firearm transfer between a licensee and another person if— (A) (i) such other person has presented to the licensee a permit that— (I) allows such other person to possess or acquire a firearm; and (II) was issued not more than 5 years earlier by the State in which the transfer is to take place; |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2017 4:34:27 PM EDT
[#7]
Seems clear to me. Thanks
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The law. 922 (t) (1) Beginning on the date that is 30 days after the Attorney General notifies licensees under section 103(d) of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act that the national instant criminal background check system is established, a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, or licensed dealer shall not transfer a firearm to any other person who is not licensed under this chapter, unless— (A) before the completion of the transfer, the licensee contacts the national instant criminal background check system established under section 103 of that Act; (3) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to a firearm transfer between a licensee and another person if— (A) (i) such other person has presented to the licensee a permit that— (I) allows such other person to possess or acquire a firearm; and (II) was issued not more than 5 years earlier by the State in which the transfer is to take place; |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2017 10:06:25 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Where is that specified?.... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
The CHL must be in-state. No one bothers to read the damn instructions. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2017 11:18:12 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
On the Form 4473 Instructions to Question 21. No one bothers to read the damn instructions. However the rule copied above seems to make it clear that is had have to be issued in the state where the transfer takes place. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/16/2017 8:30:05 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Sorry I just don't see it under the explanation for question 21. If you reference the Brady Permit Chart it shows AZ is valid. We have several people posting here in AR they used non resident AZ permits to bypass the NICS check at some FFLs. In those instructions AZ seems okay according to the Brady Chart. However the rule copied above seems to make it clear that is had have to be issued in the state where the transfer takes place. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
On the Form 4473 Instructions to Question 21. No one bothers to read the damn instructions. However the rule copied above seems to make it clear that is had have to be issued in the state where the transfer takes place. How on earth could you not understand that sentence? 1. What state is the transfer taking place?...........Arkansas. 2. Does the buyer have a valid permit from that State?.........means an Arkansas permit. The Brady Chart shows what state issue firearm permits that can serve as an exemption IN THOSE STATES. WTF would you look at the Brady chart to see any other state but Arkansas? 
Sounds like some Arkansas dealers are going to get crosswise with ATF at their next compliance inspection. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/16/2017 11:51:57 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Question 21. No NICS check was required because the transferee/buyer has a valid permit from the State where the transfer is to take place, which qualifies as an exception to NICS. How on earth could you not understand that sentence? 1. What state is the transfer taking place?...........Arkansas. 2. Does the buyer have a valid permit from that State?.........means an Arkansas permit. The Brady Chart shows what state issue firearm permits that can serve as an exemption IN THOSE STATES. WTF would you look at the Brady chart to see any other state but Arkansas?
Sounds like some Arkansas dealers are going to get crosswise with ATF at their next compliance inspection. And yes I couldn't believe some were responding they weren't getting NICS checks using an out of state permit. But this is on the FFL not the buyer |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/16/2017 2:59:45 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Where is that specified? This was being discussed in a Facebook group and one guy mentioned he has used his AZ non resident permit at 2 different FFLs and was not a problem. According to the poster they simply used the AZ permit to avoid NICS. This is in Arkansas. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/21/2017 11:57:11 PM EDT
[#13]
This is another case in which having an Out of state permit is stupid. If you actually read Arkansas law, you have 30 days to apply for an Arkansas concealed carry permit if you hold an outside of state permit. Which should render an out of state invalid if you have an Arkansas residence. I really think it's ignorant to get an out of state permit in the first place. Places pushing those rather than legal permit. Arkansas costs $200, chap out of state are cheap.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/22/2017 12:22:04 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
This is another case in which having an Out of state permit is stupid. If you actually read Arkansas law, you have 30 days to apply for an Arkansas concealed carry permit if you hold an outside of state permit. Which should render an out of state invalid if you have an Arkansas residence. I really think it's ignorant to get an out of state permit in the first place. Places pushing those rather than legal permit. Arkansas costs $200, chap out of state are cheap. Gun Free School Zones Act |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
