Quote History Quoted:
No, the barrel alone is incompatible with salt bath nitriding as the maintained temperatures weaken most stainless. If you've got a 17-4 barrel on the other hand, you're good to go.
Nitriding a complete barrel assembly will break torque between barrel and extension, that and extensions don't benefit from nitriding. Remove the extension? Maybe. Very unlikely that the barrel extension will torque back to 1200 dead center after the SBN.
I was told by a very reputable source that anyone telling you they can nitride anything but 17-4 safely is completely full of shit.
View Quote
A) this thread is about bolt action barrels, not AR15 barrels with extensions installed. More specifically, about if the the removal of cerakote is even necessary or residual cerakote after trying to remove will hinder the nitride process.
B) You can absolutely have an AR barrel with installed extension nitrided. Processors doing firearms parts have a range of temps/times they can favor within the SBN process window to minimize or eliminate tempering issues for certain grades of CS and CRES. A
properly torqued barrel with proper even preheat and post heat treatment and nitriding staying below critical temper thresholds shouldn’t suffer significant torque reduction, if any. Some steels with certain tempers can’t be SBN, but many can.
We have all sorts of grades of steel (and stainless) spec’d for salt bath and plasma nitriding and sent out to finishers. It works just fine. Heck, I’ve had AR barrels with extensions and torqued barreled bolt actions nitrided to no ill effect. I’ve personally been to a couple treatment plants and discussed treatments of various alloys with them
directly. My daily job involves mechanical design and specifying finishes and material testing... Please explain to me why “anything but 17-4” can’t be nitrided safely. Be as detailed as you like... I have a bunch of designs/drawing that need revised.