User Panel
[#1]
There seems to be very little wear in any of them. Certainly not anything that would impede effectiveness, even on the shorty barrels.
Suppressors are made well. |
|
|
[#2]
Originally Posted By EP4T: What an interesting result… could it be that the 17-4 baffles erode more quickly than the inconel blast baffle? Have there been any 17-4 blast baffles in this thread? I need to look through it again View Quote I would expect the long bearing inside bore diameter of the very thick yhm blast baffle to focus gas (the gas not flowing through the huge peripheral holes) in a laminar tight pencil like cone like a blasting nozzle and probably the wear you see on the more forward baffles is the result of that. It may also be that the cones are very sharp and their geometry is promoting wear from that. |
|
Austin, Managing Partner - www.GriffinArmament.com
|
[#3]
Originally Posted By Green0: I would expect the long bearing inside bore diameter of the very thick yhm blast baffle to focus gas (the gas not flowing through the huge peripheral holes) in a laminar tight pencil like cone like a blasting nozzle and probably the wear you see on the more forward baffles is the result of that. It may also be that the cones are very sharp and their geometry is promoting wear from that. View Quote This and your post on page 6 about the different alloys are why ARFCOM will always be my favorite of the forums. |
|
|
[#4]
Originally Posted By Green0: I would expect the long bearing inside bore diameter of the very thick yhm blast baffle to focus gas (the gas not flowing through the huge peripheral holes) in a laminar tight pencil like cone like a blasting nozzle and probably the wear you see on the more forward baffles is the result of that. It may also be that the cones are very sharp and their geometry is promoting wear from that. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Green0: Originally Posted By EP4T: What an interesting result could it be that the 17-4 baffles erode more quickly than the inconel blast baffle? Have there been any 17-4 blast baffles in this thread? I need to look through it again I would expect the long bearing inside bore diameter of the very thick yhm blast baffle to focus gas (the gas not flowing through the huge peripheral holes) in a laminar tight pencil like cone like a blasting nozzle and probably the wear you see on the more forward baffles is the result of that. It may also be that the cones are very sharp and their geometry is promoting wear from that. |
|
|
[#6]
The YHM brakes seem to deposit carbon on the side walls, which makes sense.
While I don't have the rounds count on some of the Turbo cans posted, I can still see the seam between the blast baffle and tube. |
|
|
[#7]
Originally Posted By 135Patriots: https://i.imgur.com/t2ZUPkn.jpg https://i.imgur.com/ssJY3UH.jpg Full-size Turbo now around 8k or so rounds, almost all on 10 and 11" barrels and all through YHM brakes. I don't do mag dumps but this can sees hard use and has now been through three carbine courses, several rain storms, and countless bumps/knocks against barricades to include a spill off a moving ATV. A few things I found interesting to my non-engineer eyes. - Blast baffle looks fine to me. - It's tough to get a good look at the baffles but I think I can see some of what @STJ exhibited; more wear on the second baffle. Mine is not as exaggerated and it's more accurate to say that the first baffle looks pristine. - There's an obvious concentration of lead/carbon where the first port of the brake is. Recent exposure to heavy rain while shooting introduced specks of surface rust. - The can is steadily picking up weight but performance is otherwise still excellent. View Quote That could be a good candidate for weighing, soaking a couple of days in CLR with at least one changout, drying and re-weighing, and taking before and after pics. Not sure if YHM recommends CLR so that would be something worth checking first. |
|
[quote]Originally Posted By Truman_Sparks:
That's really brilliant. Shove some Chinese made, internet-connected mechanical device up your ass. No problem. [/quote] |
[#8]
Originally Posted By KalmanPhilter: That could be a good candidate for weighing, soaking a couple of days in CLR with at least one changout, drying and re-weighing, and taking before and after pics. Not sure if YHM recommends CLR so that would be something worth checking first. View Quote |
|
|
[#9]
Originally Posted By EP4T: This and your post on page 6 about the different alloys are why ARFCOM will always be my favorite of the forums. View Quote Thanks. I think a lot of people miss that the whole baffle system needs to be durable, and one very durable baffle will always make the stack look durable, but doesn't always guaranty a superior silencer. Sales guys went to a local swat demo shoot today, and at the shoot, they inquired about M4SD II's we sold them in 2016, and the Swat team said their cans have 10,000 rounds on them at this point and only minimal wear and no issues. |
|
Austin, Managing Partner - www.GriffinArmament.com
|
[#10]
|
|
Those who would give up essential liberty, to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety
|
[#11]
|
|
On ne voit bien qu'avec le cœur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux.
|
[#12]
No pics, but I’m already glad I went with the DA Keymo brake for my 7.5” 5.56. Just a few slow mags through my Nomad, and you can already see cratering in the brake. I know this host is on the “harder” end of the spectrum as far as can wear. I’m also glad to hear GA’s take on 17-4 as it regards to baffle design. I don’t baby my stuff, but I like to set my equipment up for success if I can help it.
|
|
|
[Last Edit: sawgunner2001]
[#13]
|
|
|
[#14]
|
|
FREE COLORADO
|
[#15]
Originally Posted By zachsmith526: Rugged Razor, zero rounds: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/171069/736D0004-C4D1-4988-81BB-AB7A120272C5_jpe-1954105.JPG View Quote |
|
|
[Last Edit: mustangfreek]
[#16]
Just got to play with it and different lighting
|
|
|
[#17]
Originally Posted By zachsmith526: Rugged Razor, zero rounds: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/171069/736D0004-C4D1-4988-81BB-AB7A120272C5_jpe-1954105.JPG View Quote That looks like it’s had some rounds through it My friend’s Razor and Surge was grayish but looked different than that |
|
|
[#18]
Originally Posted By 11B3XCIB: That looks like it’s had some rounds through it My friend’s Razor and Surge was grayish but looked different than that View Quote That does look a little dirtier than my Surge's blast baffle when I got it but they do test each can for a shot group before shipping, IIRC. |
|
|
[#19]
|
|
|
[#20]
Originally Posted By 11B3XCIB: That looks like it’s had some rounds through it My friend’s Razor and Surge was grayish but looked different than that View Quote Yeah I would assume test fire at factory? It looks the same as when it arrived at the dealer, so I’m not too worried about it. Here it is with 30 rounds through it: Attached File |
|
FREE COLORADO
|
[#21]
Bumping this awesome thread!
Rex MG7 224. 100ish rounds direct thread on a 10.3: https://i.ibb.co/hXdwcbH/20210713-170245.jpg Digging this can so far!! |
|
|
[#22]
Originally Posted By Mesooohoppy: Bumping this awesome thread! Rex MG7 224. 100ish rounds direct thread on a 10.3: https://i.ibb.co/hXdwcbH/20210713-170245.jpg Digging this can so far!! View Quote Attached File |
|
#NOVABATTLEBUDDIES
"Shooting unsuppressed is just uncivilized." - 1UP5DN PM me for an Active Junky referral link |
[#23]
|
|
|
[#24]
|
|
"I'm Mary Poppins y'all" Yondu-RIP
|
[Last Edit: SSeric02]
[#25]
|
|
|
[#27]
This is a great thread for people who worry about wearing out a can, magic metal, or magic muzzle devices. Tools are meant to be used and enjoyed.
|
|
|
[#28]
Originally Posted By Green0: 30SDK 50,000 documented rounds fired mostly .556mm on 12.5" and shorter barrels at high rates of fire mostly at carbine courses by an industry instructor. Silencer sound tested 2DB louder than new when compared to a new 30SDK silencer of the same baffle revision. Only the first baffle has eroded through to the secondary slot cut near the aperture. This pre mod-4 unit is being re-baffled for the customer under an elective service, but is currently serviceable. This was a cool can to see, it is the highest documented round count Griffin can I have ever seen. That's $25,000 worth of ammunition through a can streeting for $851 MAP. Second place goes to a Optimus micro that spent its life on a machine gun rental range (no known round count on that unit but the first baffle was also erroded through at the aperture a little worse than this one). That one was rebuilt also- it took us like 2 hours to get the baffles out, which we replaced. The micro also soldiers on. https://scontent-msp1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/273170109_10161952867234569_4371443725881013575_n.jpg?_nc_cat=109&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=0debeb&_nc_ohc=_rnKZsgL_pUAX-RVwiJ&_nc_ht=scontent-msp1-1.xx&oh=00_AT80wZW4HyPc2Ok0MnbTCt3j31tuui5rE_o5mOFol7zHNQ&oe=62045612 https://scontent-msp1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/273162676_10161952867169569_4457703410237309875_n.jpg?_nc_cat=106&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=0debeb&_nc_ohc=YJ-iS4VS7FMAX89tydz&_nc_ht=scontent-msp1-1.xx&oh=00_AT8NO0SyfrL_kBda5OfDk75vo9Mg6fwvzxj7Jq_rfMDlqA&oe=62044BA7 View Quote |
|
|
[#29]
Originally Posted By KalmanPhilter: This is a great thread for people who worry about wearing out a can, magic metal, or magic muzzle devices. Tools are meant to be used and enjoyed. View Quote |
|
|
[#30]
Dead Air Nomad L
10” 300blk 30 good quality subs 30 good quality supers 60 steel casedWolf Attached File |
|
|
[#31]
|
|
Austin, Managing Partner - www.GriffinArmament.com
|
[#32]
|
|
|
[#33]
YHM Turbo t2, 60 rounds.
Attached File Omega 300. Zero rounds. Attached File SWR Spectre. Several thousand rounds through it. Maybe 50 since last cleaning. Attached File SWR Octane 9hd. Around 1k rounds. Attached File |
|
Ever since the riots, all I really wanted was a black girlfriend.
|
[Last Edit: Mitikoki]
[#34]
Specwar 5.56 , lives on a 7.5” PWS , about 2500 rounds on it, no wear on the inside but heavy discoloration outside , especially where the break fits inside, the brake is the sacrificial baffle .
Attached File Attached File Attached File |
|
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
|
[#35]
@StrikeEagle15
Are you running your Nomad with the DT adapter or some sort of FH/MB adapter? I have about 300 rounds of 308 through my Nomad and have zero wear to the blast baffle. I'm using a Griffin Armament Plan A along with an EZ Brake. |
|
|
[#36]
Originally Posted By McGruff1533: @StrikeEagle15 Are you running your Nomad with the DT adapter or some sort of FH/MB adapter? I have about 300 rounds of 308 through my Nomad and have zero wear to the blast baffle. I'm using a Griffin Armament Plan A along with an EZ Brake. View Quote All with the factory 3 port brake. |
|
|
[#37]
|
|
|
[Last Edit: Green0]
[#38]
I'm impressed to see wear through that manhole cover looking blast baffle. That thing is pretty thick, and all those big holes for gas to have somewhere to go.
It looks like the cone of gas debris was right at the edge of the holes. |
|
Austin, Managing Partner - www.GriffinArmament.com
|
[#39]
Originally Posted By aksahsalahs: YHM Turbo (OG Turbo) used a demo suppressor on our rental "Mk18" (10.5") using a flashhider. No idea of the round count but shot daily for 2 years. maybe 70-80K. Waiting to hear back from YHM on RMA. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/101965/unnamed__2_-2367454.jpg Flashhider has some build up: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/101965/unnamed__1_-2367456.jpg Suppressor finish: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/101965/unnamed-2367458.jpg View Quote Machine gun lower I assume? Even at that round count, i can't imagine semi auto fire blowing out the blast baffle unless it's seeing a ton of intentional mag dumps. Wow. |
|
|
[#40]
You can kind of see that the abrasives kept the baffles from packing up. There is nothing particularly noteworthy in there as far as fouling. If there are no coaxial chambers the cans probably won't gain considerable weight. Ours don't. The YHM looks pretty much clear.
|
|
Austin, Managing Partner - www.GriffinArmament.com
|
[Last Edit: aksahsalahs]
[#41]
Originally Posted By 135Patriots: Machine gun lower I assume? Even at that round count, i can't imagine semi auto fire blowing out the blast baffle unless it's seeing a ton of intentional mag dumps. Wow. View Quote 97% semi auto. I’d be lying if I said we didn’t use one of our Full Auto Lowers for so mags dumps. Not uncommon for this MK18 to have several 200-300 round sessions a day on weekends. |
|
|
[Last Edit: aksahsalahs]
[#42]
Originally Posted By Green0: You can kind of see that the abrasives kept the baffles from packing up. There is nothing particularly noteworthy in there as far as fouling. If there are no coaxial chambers the cans probably won't gain considerable weight. Ours don't. The YHM looks pretty much clear. View Quote I was amazed how how little build up there was. We have an SiCo Omega 30 that lives on a 16” full auto M16 full time that has gained a quite a bit of weight over time. I wouldn’t have even noticed the damage, but I wanted to show a customer the mounting system. After you posted the 50k suppressor I’ve been looking at getting a griffin as a rental can |
|
|
[Last Edit: Green0]
[#43]
Originally Posted By aksahsalahs: I was amazed how how little build up there was. We have an SiCo Omega 30 that lives on a 16” full auto M16 full time that has gained a quite a bit of weight over time. I wouldn’t have even noticed the damage, but I wanted to show a customer the mounting system. After you posted the 50k suppressor I’ve been looking at getting a griffin as a rental can View Quote A demo can is an effective sales and marketing tool, we have a demo program for dealers, you can get those at a discount on a couple cans a year as demos. For 200-300 rounds at a crack on a short barrel, our sdqd stuff is pretty solid for heavy use like that. They cool faster with the tube fluting and they are a bit heavier for durability. The first test for the original smooth tube 30sd was 500 rds of 16” barrel 308 in under two hours. I can’t remember the exact time it might have been 90 minutes, we had a temp gun and kept it at 1200F for the 500rds. |
|
Austin, Managing Partner - www.GriffinArmament.com
|
[#44]
Blast baffle design is a fine art. There are some basic truths for blast baffle design and there are some techniques or shapes that are much more resistant to erosion.
|
|
|
[#45]
|
|
|
[#46]
|
|
|
[#47]
It's odd the baffle is silver colored around the ID. I have an M4-2000 with less than 20 rounds on it that was shiny and new, and the whole baffle is dark with carbon at 20 rounds. It looks like you might have been his first stop.
|
|
Austin, Managing Partner - www.GriffinArmament.com
|
[Last Edit: SSeric02]
[#48]
|
|
|
[#49]
Originally Posted By Mesooohoppy: Sierra 5 blast baffle. Rep said its right around/over the 1k mark. https://i.ibb.co/Jdd2v19/20220601-105744.jpg View Quote Does the Sierra 5 have MIM baffles? Those look a lot like ejector marks. |
|
On ne voit bien qu'avec le cœur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux.
|
[Last Edit: Green0]
[#50]
Originally Posted By SMFdarkangel: Does the Sierra 5 have MIM baffles? Those look a lot like ejector marks. View Quote They are probably cast. I think most stellite baffles are cast. If so those would be the ejector marks of the lost wax part that was ceramic slurried and baked as the sacrificial mold for the poured stellite parts on the tree comprising the casting for that pour. The properties of cast materials are unique to that process, and the properties of those processes are almost tradecraft to the casting industry. They have special publications they pay a lot of money for that are not generally public knowledge that discuss the formulas and properties of the various material/process parameter pairings. I had one bad experience with cast properties using 625 inconel, where I learned that 625 derives 50% of its strength from cold reduction (rolling bar or sheet), and the cast process for that material yields a high nickel alloy part about as strong as rolled 316L stainless steel. In other words stamped 625 is totally superior to cast 625. Obviously this is a different material application so I’m only illustrating the complexities of casting that can potentially complicate that. |
|
Austin, Managing Partner - www.GriffinArmament.com
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.