So, my friend bought this benchmade 940-1 clone from some China dealer, and while he was over a few weeks ago I got to try it out, I bought it from him for what he paid for it ($40) and I decided I really liked it.
But, I got to wondering just how much better the real thing is, so I bought one of those too.
Here are a few comparison pictures and a summary of my feelings between the two.
Attached File
In this image the fake is on the right and the real is on the left.
The fake ones blade has a stone washed finish and is made out of D2 steel, the blade on the fake is of moderate quality, but it seems to have a slightly uneven grind, using my lansky kit the bevel on one side is much more favored. The real blade is S90V steel, and has a satin finish, in the picture the real blade has a darker color, and the reverse tanto tip has a longer point. The benchmade logo on the real one is laser etched, and actually has a sort of pitting in it, while the fake one seems to be some sort of acid/bluing type of effect. Both steels are a pain In the ass to sharpen, but the diamond stones make a huge difference.
Attached FileOnce again the real one being on the left the Osborne logo is different, and the fake has a “patent” number below it that ironically has “RE41” or REAL as the patent number. If you see one with this, it’s fake.
Attached FileSorry for the poor quality of this picture, but once again the real blade on the left, you can see that the spine of the real one tapers more toward the top and is more even, though the blade thickness itself is very similar between the two.
Attached File
This is the last picture I have, but In this one you can see that the standoff’s on the real are a much more vibrant blue, it is my understanding that all 940-1 clones have a much darker and dull colored set of standoff’s.
Another thing that I noticed between the two of them is that the finishing on the CF scales on the fake is much more rough, on the real all of the carbon fiber is smooth and uniform, where in the fake you can see some pitting and tear marks where the scales were ground/milled away.
Overall the fake isn’t horrible, and for the ~$50 that they sell for it isn’t a bad knife, but the real one is much better. $250 better? Well that is for you to decide.
In the long run the things to make note of are: lesser finish and quality on the fake, D2 blade steel rusts easily, and the clone steals the benchmade logo and trademark. Although, if I had t handled the fake in the first place, I likely never would have bought the real one.
Also, the axis lock on the real one is much smoother, the stainless steel liners on the fake one have a rough finish so you have to use two fingers to pull back the axis lock, the real one can be easily actuated by one finger.