User Panel
Posted: 6/24/2018 11:13:40 PM EDT
I love the aug, I think it’s the best Bullpup’s on the market. Since I picked up my first one I have been looking for a cqc. Years later I still haven’t found one. Two questions to the guru’s out there.
Are these impossible to find at this point? How many were even made? I ask because for the last couple years I have looked and never seen one for sale. Edit: arms list doesn’t count since those seem to be fakes from what I have read |
|
I too have wanted one for years, due largely to Rainbow Six. Used to be Pete would sell you one, sell you the conversion kit, or let you mail it in so he could do the conversion. I may be wrong, but I think the ship on all of that has sailed. They show up on the secondary market from time to time, sometimes reasonably priced, sometimes not.
|
|
Quoted:
I love the aug, I think it’s the best Bullpup’s on the market. Since I picked up my first one I have been looking for a cqc. Years later I still haven’t found one. Two questions to the guru’s out there. Are these impossible to find at this point? How many were even made? I ask because for the last couple years I have looked and never seen one for sale. Edit: arms list doesn’t count since those seem to be fakes from what I have read View Quote MSAR VS AUG AUG vs MSAR ACCURACY |
|
Quoted:
The MSAR is going to be the closest thing to the AUG that is fairly easy to fing. It was made by Microtech (super Gucci knife company). I've shot the MSAR, it's accurate! MSAR VS AUG AUG vs MSAR ACCURACY View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I love the aug, I think it’s the best Bullpup’s on the market. Since I picked up my first one I have been looking for a cqc. Years later I still haven’t found one. Two questions to the guru’s out there. Are these impossible to find at this point? How many were even made? I ask because for the last couple years I have looked and never seen one for sale. Edit: arms list doesn’t count since those seem to be fakes from what I have read MSAR VS AUG AUG vs MSAR ACCURACY The MSAR doesn't have anything to do with a CQC AUG. Plus its a product of a defunct company and only exchanges some parts with a real aug so I'm not sure how it applies to his question. |
|
Quoted: Yes, the cqc ship has sailed and I don't think too many where ever made. I think the big issue was that conversion was designed for the AUG A3 which has been replaced with the AUG A3 M1. At least that's from what I remember. It was a good looking gun but from handling one at one of the bullpup shoots a few years ago I don't think id want one. It made the gun heavy and threw off the neutral balance to front heavy. If I'm wrong about its availability I'm sure melanoite will come in and correct me soon he's pretty much the AUG expert. The MSAR doesn't have anything to do with a CQC AUG. Plus its a product of a defunct company and only exchanges some parts with a real aug so I'm not sure how it applies to his question. View Quote |
|
The CQC still retains the QD barrel capability, you just have to remove the QD forend first.
And good point, MSAR is junk AND unsupported. Buying an AUG is at an all time high for availability and low cost. |
|
Quoted:
You slaughtered my username CQC only works with the A3 receivers, and the complete new gun or new parts kit ship sailed years ago. While heavy, I really like them for what they are. An oddity of the CQC is that they're designed for 18" barrels but steyr couldn't get FN to make them during the panic of 2013, so the guns all had 16" barrels and extended flash hiders. Very very few CQC's have the correct 18" barrel as it was intended. CQC porn: https://i.imgur.com/iucCCS5.jpg View Quote |
|
Quoted: Yes, the cqc ship has sailed and I don't think too many where ever made. I think the big issue was that conversion was designed for the AUG A3 which has been replaced with the AUG A3 M1. At least that's from what I remember. It was a good looking gun but from handling one at one of the bullpup shoots a few years ago I don't think id want one. It made the gun heavy and threw off the neutral balance to front heavy. If I'm wrong about its availability I'm sure melanoite will come in and correct me soon he's pretty much the AUG expert. The MSAR doesn't have anything to do with a CQC AUG. Plus its a product of a defunct company and only exchanges some parts with a real aug so I'm not sure how it applies to his question. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I love the aug, I think it’s the best Bullpup’s on the market. Since I picked up my first one I have been looking for a cqc. Years later I still haven’t found one. Two questions to the guru’s out there. Are these impossible to find at this point? How many were even made? I ask because for the last couple years I have looked and never seen one for sale. Edit: arms list doesn’t count since those seem to be fakes from what I have read View Quote i see a few pop up every year. |
|
Quoted:
The CQC still retains the QD barrel capability, you just have to remove the QD forend first. And good point, MSAR is junk AND unsupported. Buying an AUG is at an all time high for availability and low cost. View Quote Keep your eyes peeled; or you could just call Pete. If you think you might suppress it ask him to swap out the flash hider for you. |
|
@maleante, how is that scope you're showing off? Useable, clear, affordable, available?
Thank you. |
|
The CQC concept was brilliant, but IMO the design was flawed and exacerbated minor issues that the AUG had into more visible issues. It also made the rifle extremely nose heavy and extremely poorly balanced. I sold mine a few years back and while I regret not having the rifle for the collector value, I don't miss it as a shooter.
|
|
|
|
|
The CQC looks cool, but is a heavy pig in real life- way too much weight fir what you get feature wise.
We looked at doing a forend system for the AUG but in all reality I think there just isnt the actual market demand for one. Sven Manticore Arms |
|
Quoted:
@maleante, how is that scope you're showing off? Useable, clear, affordable, available? Thank you. View Quote These are a purist optic, there are more effective and lighter options in its price range. |
|
I'd say the Atrax will be better for rail space than most of the AUG options, but the lack of QD barrel and whittled down receiver doesn't seem worth it to me. Especially if the ATF tells them to put the receiver as the serialized component, then there upper swap out will be more of an issue since you gotta buy the entire receiver to change barrel length or calibers if they get to that point.
|
|
Quoted:
Will this new lithgow f90 be any good if it ever comes out? View Quote Lithgow has had the F90 out at Bullpup Shoot the last two years and I am pretty sure they will be there this year if you want to travel to come try one out in person. www.bullpupshoot.com on sept. 15th, 2018 at The Site Training in northwestern Illinois. Sven Manticore Arms |
|
What was the serialized part on the Title II F90 post samples?
|
|
|
Quoted:
What was the serialized part on the Title II F90 post samples? View Quote I can always check if they bring the guns back out to Bullpup Shoot 2018. Sven Manticore Arms |
|
|
I have a A3 CQC from Pete that spends most of its time paired with a Qualified machinegun sear/hammerpack.
The CQC does add a bit of weight to the front end, but nothing that I would consider to be egregious or that makes that gun a pig weight wise. There are only a handful of parts that transform a normal A3 into a CQC, the top rail is taller and a smidge longer than the standard A3 rail, the forearm seating ring on the barrel, the slightly longer flash hider, and the front rail assembly. Most of the parts are close to a wash weight wise as you are just swapping one rail or flash hider for another. The most significant weight delta comes from the railed forearm which is ~14oz with the side rails installed and about ~11oz without the side picatinny rails removed. In my estimation attaching a standard rifle caliber suppressor adds about the same amount of weight (or more depending upon the can) and that weight sits much farther out front than the CQC forearm does. I actually think the CQC balances a bit better with a little more weight out front than the standard A3. In full auto the extra weight makes muzzle climb almost non-existent and the gun that much more controllable. As easy as it is to swap my auto hammer pack around to different AUGs, its spends most of its time in the CQC. Just my 2 cents anyway. As always this post is worthless without pictures. Attached File |
|
|
Quoted: Nah, this is rubbing it in. Just sold the kit and am down to two CQC's now. https://i.imgur.com/vpq99il.png View Quote |
|
|
11lbs empty, yeah. The can and Vortex Razor do it no favors.
Still taking it out to 3-gun tomorrow because MIKE MIKE MIKE GUESS WHAT MONTH IT IS |
|
|
|
Quoted:
The CQC is the basis for my suppressable marksman's AUG, or for short, the SMAUG. https://i.imgur.com/RWi5kE3.jpg https://i.imgur.com/o6m88AY.jpg View Quote |
|
|
|
|
|
I pulled mine out yesterday just to cop a feel. It didn't feel that much heavier but I'm sure after hiking around 39# boxes of books it's gonna feel light!
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.