Quoted:
Up front, its not me, but I'm hoping to be on the receiving end of this deal.
Say someone that owns a MG is charged with a felony and is prohibited from owning or even having it in their possession. Who holds the MG while the paperwork goes thru? The attorney has possession right now, is that legal? Could I get away with one transfer right to me, or does it have to go thru a dealer which would mean two taxes and wait times.
View Quote
I AM NOT A LAWYER, THIS IS MY OPINION.
Your STATE LAW May well have much more restrictive laws if it is anti-gun. However, in Texas the following is my opinion on this series of questions.
Being charged is not the deciding factor. You must be found GUILTY or convicted before you loose your right to retain firearms title 2 or 1. Their classification I don't think is relevant. So it does not matter at this point. The person charged or even under indictment is not prohibited from owning firearms in any case. Unless there is a COURT ORDERED prohibition of some sort such as a restraining or protective order or other legally ordered court order regarding firearms. The person could not BUY a firearm legally, however if under indictment or charged as this is on the 4473.
I don't believe the lawyer can legally have possession of a machinegun unless it was transferred to him. An NFA dealer could retain it while a transfer is in process however because of the NFA related FFL they possess. I don't think this is a legal act for the lawyer to do as you have described and they are probably in violation of Federal and State Law. The machinegun in my opinion should be returned to the owner and an NFA Dealer take possession of it and the paperwork for transfer started if the person charged is concerned about it. Remember NFA documents can take a year to process.
In-state transfers of NFA firearms do not require a dealer unless your state has made this process illegal under STATE LAW.
The lawyer involved should seek guidance from the ATF to avoid having this mg seized .