User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 6/24/2019 8:30:37 PM EDT
[#1]
It's slightly heavier than a carbine buffer. Honestly, I doubt you'll notice any real difference in performance. I have one in a 10" with a Sprinco blue and it works just fine. Unremarkable, but that's my opinion of nearly all buffers.
Run it! |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2019 8:32:55 PM EDT
[#2]
4.05 oz compared to 3.0 std carbine.
Eta: H1 (3.8 ounces), H2 (4.6 ounces) and H3 (5.4 ounces). |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2019 8:41:04 PM EDT
[#3]
It’s the only buffer I use.
8.5” .300blk out suppressed and unsuppressed has functioned flawlessly. 16” 5.56 suppressed and unsuppressed has functioned flawlessly. 7.5” 5.56 unsuppressed still no issues. I like em. The tungsten “powder” feels nicer than the usual weights during recoil. Id say keep it and run it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2019 8:50:40 PM EDT
[#4]
I used the spikes T2 in a Colt 6940 didn't care for it. Switched to a Colt H2 and it felt much better to me.
I think the moving weights in a standard buffer gives a better feel than a buffer stuffed with tungsten powder. Just my personal experience. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2019 9:03:03 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It's slightly heavier than a carbine buffer. Honestly, I doubt you'll notice any real difference in performance. I have one in a 10" with a Sprinco blue and it works just fine. Unremarkable, but that's my opinion of nearly all buffers. Run it! |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2019 9:15:47 PM EDT
[#6]
I like em. Recoil feels smooth, less noisy, heavier than an H1 without going all the way up to the H2
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2019 9:41:56 PM EDT
[#7]
I run one with a springco blue in my sbr, I like it!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2019 9:48:36 PM EDT
[#8]
Thanks everyone. Good mix of info and impressions that I was looking for. The moving weights vs. the powder ought to give a different feel. It's a little more nicely finished than the other units I've seen. I might move it around, rifle to rifle, and see what it does.
Thanks again. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2019 9:54:36 PM EDT
[#9]
I automatically put an ST-T2 in everything. From 18" to 10.5". Don't know if I really noticed much of a difference but never had an issue with them.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/25/2019 1:08:46 AM EDT
[#10]
Does the powder really make a difference?
Is there room for it to move around or is it filled? I assume that there is a fair bit of empty space inside. The only non standard buffer I have used is the A5, and I think the main difference is the rifle spring. Though there is a spring inside the buffer holding the weights forward. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/25/2019 9:40:30 PM EDT
[#11]
I use them. I like them.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/26/2019 5:26:17 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Thanks everyone. Good mix of info and impressions that I was looking for. The moving weights vs. the powder ought to give a different feel. It's a little more nicely finished than the other units I've seen. I might move it around, rifle to rifle, and see what it does. Thanks again. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
