User Panel
The first time I've seen drum magazines in use .
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By AZgunner: Same, somewhat surprised. I wonder if certain teams are using them or if it's a gear selection made at the agent level? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By AZgunner: Originally Posted By Easy_E: The first time I've seen drum magazines in use . Same, somewhat surprised. I wonder if certain teams are using them or if it's a gear selection made at the agent level? They may be the designated "suppressive fire" dudes |
|
|
My guess to break contact and provide covering fire so PPD can whisk the POTUS away.
That’s why they probably don’t use suppressors on them. They want it loud. |
|
|
No surpressors, no triple tap muzzle brake? Interesting to see their setup's.
|
|
Fuck Cancer. Love you Pop.
|
|
Pmags for days.
|
|
|
Apart from the rail, are their any significant differences between the two models? Forgive me, I'm not a KAC nerd. Is one model being phased out in favor of the other? When I look on KAC's website I'm only seeing them offering the newer Mlok models now.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By voodochild: No surpressors, no triple tap muzzle brake? Interesting to see their setup's. View Quote Their original 14.5 SR's had NT4 hiders, but still no NT4s. PR optics have always been a top agency priority, which is my guess why cans still aren't standard. CAT's helmets and plate carriers were first issued sometime over the the last decade or so. Change is slow over there. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Cajunkraut: Their original 14.5 SR's had NT4 hiders, but still no NT4s. PR optics have always been a top agency priority, which is my guess why cans still aren't standard. CAT's helmets and plate carriers were first issued sometime over the the last decade or so. Change is slow over there. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Cajunkraut: Originally Posted By voodochild: No surpressors, no triple tap muzzle brake? Interesting to see their setup's. Their original 14.5 SR's had NT4 hiders, but still no NT4s. PR optics have always been a top agency priority, which is my guess why cans still aren't standard. CAT's helmets and plate carriers were first issued sometime over the the last decade or so. Change is slow over there. That's odd especially since they are a counter assault team. You'd think they would be geared up with all necessary items. |
|
Fuck Cancer. Love you Pop.
|
Originally Posted By voodochild: That's odd especially since they are a counter assault team. You'd think they would be geared up with all necessary items. View Quote You'd think. Apparently there's new blood running the firearms program, so they should be caught up to the 21st century eventually. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Cajunkraut: Their original 14.5 SR's had NT4 hiders, but still no NT4s. PR optics have always been a top agency priority, which is my guess why cans still aren't standard. CAT's helmets and plate carriers were first issued sometime over the the last decade or so. Change is slow over there. View Quote Or they realize the funds would be better spent elsewhere within the agency? Having a unit like that as a deterrent or "in case of emergency" is a great contingency, however with little to no call outs or real world operations to justify said expenses, I would think it gets to a point of diminishing returns. Hence, maybe funds could be better well spent/allocated. |
|
|
That last photo with the side mounted Safariland mag pouch. I have never seen anyone using it like that before. See's weird to get a speed reload that you'd have to pull away instead of conventional straight up or canted.
Huh. I've got an extra, maybe I should try it out to see if I am missing something. |
|
|
Those who would give up essential liberty, to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety
|
Originally Posted By sidewaysil80: Or they realize the funds would be better spent elsewhere within the agency? Having a unit like that as a deterrent or "in case of emergency" is a great contingency, however with little to no call outs or real world operations to justify said expenses, I would think it gets to a point of diminishing returns. Hence, maybe funds could be better well spent/allocated. View Quote Maybe. Given the team's priority it's likely a matter of optics and/or internal politics in this case. They have plenty of pricey toys. I'm certain the topic has been kicked around more than once. Again, old school thinking can be slow to change over there. |
|
|
I would think it's in the Secret Service's plan for their SBR's to be loud. If someone ever has to engage a hostile the gunfire will be heard by all.
This would alert everyone to the direction of the immediate threat and place the entire team on high alert. Suppressors are heavier to lug around all day, so there's that. |
|
|
Originally Posted By borderpatrol: I would think it's in the Secret Service's plan for their SBR's to be loud. If someone ever has to engage a hostile the gunfire will be heard by all. This would alert everyone to the direction of the immediate threat and place the entire team on high alert. Suppressors are heavier to lug around all day, so there's that. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By borderpatrol: I would think it's in the Secret Service's plan for their SBR's to be loud. If someone ever has to engage a hostile the gunfire will be heard by all. This would alert everyone to the direction of the immediate threat and place the entire team on high alert. Suppressors are heavier to lug around all day, so there's that. Originally Posted By AZgunner: Same, somewhat surprised. I wonder if certain teams are using them or if it's a gear selection made at the agent level? Originally Posted By borderpatrol: I would think it's in the Secret Service's plan for their SBR's to be loud. If someone ever has to engage a hostile the gunfire will be heard by all. This would alert everyone to the direction of the immediate threat and place the entire team on high alert. Suppressors are heavier to lug around all day, so there's that. Yeah I know cans are cool but I'm thinking they aren't going for some high speed assault. If these guys are shooting chances are they want it to be loud. I'm sure the vehicle weapons are on a whole other level as far as the guys in black suits. |
|
|
For the guys running ear muffs, not having suppressors isn't a big issue in terms of communications.
For the guys without, suppressors would let them communicate. Even with the in ear buds, those SBRs are going to be too loud to hear radio traffic. Never mind shouted coordination. |
|
|
Why no CQB Mod 2.1 pics?
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Ursus_Americanus: For the guys running ear muffs, not having suppressors isn't a big issue in terms of communications. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Ursus_Americanus: For the guys running ear muffs, not having suppressors isn't a big issue in terms of communications. I was gonna mention that, but didn't wanna start down the "but most Tier 1 units use both" rabbit hole. For the guys without, suppressors would let them communicate. Even with the in ear buds, those SBRs are going to be too loud to hear radio traffic. Never mind shouted coordination. Bingo. |
|
|
Bump
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Munsta750: These may have been stolen from the OG thread. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/513394/CE39461A-928E-4286-B9BE-500C48F52829_jpe-1859266.JPGhttps://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/513394/D04746C4-247B-48FE-9C64-D259B6DED2C4_jpe-1859268.JPG View Quote What mlok handguard? |
|
I expect a girl to get freaky. You know, get really enthusiastic about the opportunity to eat my ass. ----- posted by Fiver
|
Have Bill call me - the45man
Pack LaRue Dillo #10 [SS17] I like oranges. |
|
|
Booya. I been stacking urx 2 mids since 2004 man.
I am cashing the fuck out on these man..where’s the clone boi que. my for sale sign is up and out!.. |
|
|
|
Those are two different units in SOD, CAT (Counter Assault Team) Agents and ERT (Emergency Response Team) Uniform Division Officers
|
|
|
Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.
-- Antoine de Saint-Exupery |
Originally Posted By ar-jedi: dear smart(er) people, what is this piece of kit? http://ziva.losdos.dyndns.org/public/misc/kit-id.JPG View Quote Just a taped bundle of chemlights for marking. |
|
|
Originally Posted By AZgunner: Same, somewhat surprised. I wonder if certain teams are using them or if it's a gear selection made at the agent level? View Quote Looks like one Surfire 60 rounder in there too. After dropping one and it spewing all of the ammo out like a fountain I decided a 30 round PMAG was just fine. |
|
|
Originally Posted By evlblkwpnz: Looks like one Surfire 60 rounder in there too. After dropping one and it spewing all of the ammo out like a fountain I decided a 30 round PMAG was just fine. View Quote Certainly don't blame you. With how finicky everyone reports the various coffin mags and drums as being, I just don't see enough benefit over a 30 round mag with plenty of spares. From my experience toting a rifle around for a living, the extra weight is felt pretty quickly too. I'd rather have a lighter more comfortable setup than have an extra 20 or 30 rounds before reloading. |
|
|
Originally Posted By AZgunner: Certainly don't blame you. With how finicky everyone reports the various coffin mags and drums as being, I just don't see enough benefit over a 30 round mag with plenty of spares. From my experience toting a rifle around for a living, the extra weight is felt pretty quickly too. I'd rather have a lighter more comfortable setup than have an extra 20 or 30 rounds before reloading. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By AZgunner: Originally Posted By evlblkwpnz: Looks like one Surfire 60 rounder in there too. After dropping one and it spewing all of the ammo out like a fountain I decided a 30 round PMAG was just fine. Certainly don't blame you. With how finicky everyone reports the various coffin mags and drums as being, I just don't see enough benefit over a 30 round mag with plenty of spares. From my experience toting a rifle around for a living, the extra weight is felt pretty quickly too. I'd rather have a lighter more comfortable setup than have an extra 20 or 30 rounds before reloading. I've only run into one Surefire mag in the Army - one of my Infantry officers, who carried a 60-rounder with him in eastern Afghanistan as a platoon leader in the 101st and still had it as a company commander. He said it always worked perfectly for him. He would have been using it in Afghanistan in the 2011-2013 timeframe, I think, so I believe that would have made it their original design, which I always heard had reliability issues. As far as the weight goes, he's a beast who was a bouncer and MMA fighter before joining the Army, so I doubt he noticed it. |
|
|
Interesting to see so many Streamlights, I thought tier 1 oper8tors only used Surefire's.
|
|
|
Yea...streamlights . I would assumed more surefires or modlites
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Exorpmtech: Wild guess: .gov didn't buy them; the user added it. Contrary to popular ARF belief, most people, even the pros, aren't willing to spend $400+.....for a flashlight. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Exorpmtech: Originally Posted By axeeclipse14: Yea...streamlights . I would assumed more surefires or modlites Wild guess: .gov didn't buy them; the user added it. Contrary to popular ARF belief, most people, even the pros, aren't willing to spend $400+.....for a flashlight. The fact that so many have the same light is a pretty good indicator that they are indeed issued. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Claytonhoneyberry: The fact that so many have the same light is a pretty good indicator that they are indeed issued. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Claytonhoneyberry: Originally Posted By Exorpmtech: Originally Posted By axeeclipse14: Yea...streamlights . I would assumed more surefires or modlites Wild guess: .gov didn't buy them; the user added it. Contrary to popular ARF belief, most people, even the pros, aren't willing to spend $400+.....for a flashlight. The fact that so many have the same light is a pretty good indicator that they are indeed issued. TLR series...oof |
|
Those who would give up essential liberty, to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety
|
Originally Posted By skindroid: Just a taped bundle of chemlights for marking. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By skindroid: Originally Posted By ar-jedi: dear smart(er) people, what is this piece of kit? http://ziva.losdos.dyndns.org/public/misc/kit-id.JPG Just a taped bundle of chemlights for marking. Great for smacking the nads! |
|
|
Bump
|
|
|
|
|
Have Bill call me - the45man
Pack LaRue Dillo #10 [SS17] I like oranges. |
Originally Posted By Jonny1904: That last photo with the side mounted Safariland mag pouch. I have never seen anyone using it like that before. See's weird to get a speed reload that you'd have to pull away instead of conventional straight up or canted. Huh. I've got an extra, maybe I should try it out to see if I am missing something. View Quote Think reloads while seated inside a vehicle |
|
|
Originally Posted By Exorpmtech: Wild guess: .gov didn't buy them; the user added it. Contrary to popular ARF belief, most people, even the pros, aren't willing to spend $400+.....for a flashlight. View Quote This. So much this. Also, streamlights work, and one need not spend $400 to get a flashlight. |
|
|
Thanks for the thread. Interesting stuff, I like the idea of using the annoying muzzle blast and flash of short barrels in an offensive way to get the targets deafened, disoriented, etc.
|
|
|
I see lots of BUIS in the rear, but no fronts... Or do I need to make appt w/ optometrist?
|
|
There is many a slip between the cup and the lip.
|
|
Originally Posted By Claytonhoneyberry: The fact that so many have the same light is a pretty good indicator that they are indeed issued. View Quote probably so, the USSS picks things that work. My guess it was determined the Streamlight HL gave them the performance and features they wanted at the right price point. |
|
|
I genuinely don’t get the desire to emulate a weapon system just because XYZ agency uses it. If people knew how purchase decisions are made...
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.