Quote History Quoted:
I'll admit that a properly installed lo pro gas block shouldn't move... Especially under a handguard. My duty gun doesn't have a pinned gas block but I did dimple, Rocksett, and correctly torque the set screws myself. It's definitely not necessary and there are still name brand companies that don't do it. But, buying a gun off the shelf, I do like the option. We have had a couple gas blocks migrate after set screws become loose.
Concur on the Criterion offerings. That's also the barrel I'm using and it is phenomenal. One of the things I've noticed with it, Is that it shoots well with a wide range of ammo. Even some of the cheaper surprises me. FYI it's one of the chrome-lined 1:8 .223 wylde barrels.
View Quote
I agree 100% and should have mentioned that. All of my gas blocks, whether "pinned" or not are dimpled and installed with a torque tool and high temp thread locker. Good gas blocks have set screws beefy enough to take around 20 in/lbs of torque. About what you'd use on scope rings.
As for the criterion barrel, I opted for a 12.5" hybrid profile. I see a suppressor in my future so I went with that instead of the Core profile. With that short of a barrel there isn't much more heft, although I can also see replacing my 11.3 BA with a Core profile. The BA is likeky on its last leg. Its seen a LOT of rounds. The criterion barrel actually shocked me with how well it shot. I mean, the BA barrel is fine and it does what they say it'll do with match ammo, but the criterion does well with everything. Even wolf. At 50 yards, M193 prints one ragged hole. At 100, about 2 to 3 MOA, but I don't know if that's me or the gun and ammo. I'm only shooting a 6x razor. Yeah, it had a relatively hefty price tag, but a chromelined, phosphate coated barrel just had no business shooting that well.
My next venture is going to be some flavor of adm barrel from criterion. They went with nitride instead of chrome lining on those and I'm really curious.
Honestly, for the premium the OP is gonna pay for the brand names he's throwing around, he could buy the tools to assemble his own upper. Even with the brand names, there are still unknowns. Was the upper trued? Was the barrel bedded, especially if the extension to upper fit was sloppy?
I know these last couple of things are considered "kool-aid" by some, but they can make a difference depending on the fit of the parts. This last build with the criterion barrel ... I used a Wilson combat upper receiver and the face was so far off from square that I could see it just using a square angle tool.
The extension to receiver fit was loose too. I didn't even have to heat the receiver to slide the barrel in and then where was wobble. I squared the face and bedded the extension. It shoots like a champ from a cold bore to being so hot you can't touch it and how it behaves when it's hot is where you'll see the difference in the detail of the assembly.
Point is, you just never know unless you did it yourself.
OK, I'm rambling. If I had to make a choice, LMT or LWRC as a knee jerk, but it seems that ADM could have something to offer that the others don't have. Seems to me, you can't go wrong. Pick the one you think is sexiest.