User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 12:21:09 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MILSPEC556:
#UncoverThatSerialNumberCitizenGang 
 |
|
|
|
JPN
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 12:24:23 PM EDT
[#2]
Cheers and Happy 4th everyone!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 12:26:40 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MrKV:
Cheers and Happy 4th everyone!
https://i.ibb.co/cgdrCCL/B01-B7-B8-B-D7-D2-4-BFC-8252-95-A712-CD33-AA.jpg |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 12:29:07 PM EDT
[Last Edit: MILSPEC556]
[#4]
*wee-oo wee-oo wee-oo*
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 12:29:56 PM EDT
[Last Edit: eMc9001]
[#5]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MILSPEC556:
*wee-oo wee-oo wee-oo*  |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 12:31:37 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By eMc9001:
Alright, that's quality shit. lol'd. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By eMc9001:
Originally Posted By MILSPEC556:
*wee-oo wee-oo wee-oo*
*This is unit 556, we got a PEQ-15er refusing to comply. Requesting to shoot subjects dog, over* *wee-oo wee-oo wee-oo*
|
|
|
|
JPN
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 3:32:10 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MILSPEC556:
I should probably remove it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 3:35:56 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MrKV:
Losing mod status in 3, 2, 1... Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MrKV:
Originally Posted By MILSPEC556:
I should probably remove it.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 4:07:01 PM EDT
[#9]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 4:09:30 PM EDT
[#10]
What's the best price an nt4 can be had for? They are still up there right?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 4:21:02 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By cjwwd2:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/272939/F658C71B-3FAE-4521-809A-FB624ECA2D0B_jpeg-1004089.JPG 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 4:22:11 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MILSPEC556:
www.Trump.WRONG.jpg
|
|
|
|
JPN
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 4:33:14 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MILSPEC556:
www.Trump.WRONG.jpg 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 4:49:46 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MrKV:
Just don't drink and post Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MrKV:
Originally Posted By MILSPEC556:
www.Trump.WRONG.jpg Alright, back to CQBRs. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 4:57:15 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By -KentuckyWindage-:
Iam with you 100%, I just wish a pic of the combat latch was available. It would help my clone ocd....  Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By -KentuckyWindage-:
Originally Posted By 78Staff:
I'm combat latch AF. Mil/hotdog latch blows. But, never seen an ITW pic - has to be one out there though. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 5:29:33 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By UndrGrndPrdcts:
What's the best price an nt4 can be had for? They are still up there right? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 5:30:19 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By cjwwd2:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/272939/F658C71B-3FAE-4521-809A-FB624ECA2D0B_jpeg-1004089.JPG |
|
|
|
JPN
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 5:50:56 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 78Staff:
Sounds like a jobs for @Combat_Diver - CD any chance your'e seeing Pri GB's with Combat/Serrated latches out there? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 78Staff:
Originally Posted By -KentuckyWindage-:
Originally Posted By 78Staff:
I'm combat latch AF. Mil/hotdog latch blows. But, never seen an ITW pic - has to be one out there though. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 6:38:14 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By krdt: You're not going to do much better than around $1,350. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 6:39:35 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By UndrGrndPrdcts: Dang. I like them better. But that's alot. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 7:00:14 PM EDT
[#22]
True, they're expensive... but with RCs showing up at $1,600, they may actually become the less expensive clone correct option eventually, heh.
If the choice is between an RC at $700 and an NT4 at $1,350, it's pretty easy to go with the RC - when it starts becoming an RC or even RC2 at $900-$1100, plus a 4 prong at $300, things become a lot more cloudy. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 7:11:36 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By krdt:
True, they're expensive... but with RCs showing up at $1,600, they may actually become the less expensive clone correct option eventually, heh. If the choice is between an RC at $700 and an NT4 at $1,350, it's pretty easy to go with the RC - when it starts becoming an RC or even RC2 at $900-$1100, plus a 4 prong at $300, things become a lot more cloudy. I think they used to at least. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 7:25:02 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By krdt:
True, they're expensive... but with RCs showing up at $1,600, they may actually become the less expensive clone correct option eventually, heh. If the choice is between an RC at $700 and an NT4 at $1,350, it's pretty easy to go with the RC - when it starts becoming an RC or even RC2 at $900-$1100, plus a 4 prong at $300, things become a lot more cloudy. I wish I had just jumped on the NT4 from the beginning. Probably would have cost roughly the same in the end. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 7:26:03 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MILSPEC556:
That's a good point. NT4 mount is cheap as sin (especially for a KAC product) hell, don't NT4's even come with an M4QD? I think they used to at least. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 8:03:43 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By krdt:
True, they're expensive... but with RCs showing up at $1,600, they may actually become the less expensive clone correct option eventually, heh. If the choice is between an RC at $700 and an NT4 at $1,350, it's pretty easy to go with the RC - when it starts becoming an RC or even RC2 at $900-$1100, plus a 4 prong at $300, things become a lot more cloudy. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 8:48:34 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By UndrGrndPrdcts:
No way I'm buying a 4 prong and I wouldn't pay more than 700 for a rc or sb. I'll be running my sandman for the time being but I need some more suppressors. I feel like the rcs are not made well. Do they work, yes. But strikes, erosion, build up etc just turn me off. Are there any issues with the nt4? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By UndrGrndPrdcts:
Originally Posted By krdt:
True, they're expensive... but with RCs showing up at $1,600, they may actually become the less expensive clone correct option eventually, heh. If the choice is between an RC at $700 and an NT4 at $1,350, it's pretty easy to go with the RC - when it starts becoming an RC or even RC2 at $900-$1100, plus a 4 prong at $300, things become a lot more cloudy. I don't think erosion is any different than any other can made with similar materials - it's just that RCs tend to be used on short barrels with prong flash hiders and have been well documented with pictures. People also mistake cosmetic erosion with actual damaging erosion. In reality, the RC has a quite thick Inconel blast baffle - I'd estimate it's twice as thick as the NT4 blast baffle. Naturally, some of the baffle thickness is offset by the 4 prong causing more targeted erosion, but if you used an SFCT to be comparable to the M4QD, I wouldn't be surprised if an RC could last as long as an NT4, maybe even longer due to the thicker baffle. If not, the RC has the huge added benefit of being able to be rebuilt. The RC does have a tighter bore than the NT4 and the occasional baffle kiss happens, but it's usually entirely cosmetic. I don't hear of many RCs needing to rebuilt because of a legitimate strike. As far as carbon buildup, the shape of the NT4 baffles actually lends itself to faster accumulation (and my limited testing backs this up - the NT4 was accumulating weight quite fast). You can see why it'd pick up weight below: 
I would say in a purely pragmatic comparison, the RC is probably superior to the NT4 in many ways (better mount, less gas leakage, less back pressure, lighter, etc.). But they are both very well built, tough cans. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 8:49:23 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By UndrGrndPrdcts:
No way I'm buying a 4 prong and I wouldn't pay more than 700 for a rc or sb. I'll be running my sandman for the time being but I need some more suppressors. I feel like the rcs are not made well. Do they work, yes. But strikes, erosion, build up etc just turn me off. Are there any issues with the nt4? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By UndrGrndPrdcts:
Originally Posted By krdt:
True, they're expensive... but with RCs showing up at $1,600, they may actually become the less expensive clone correct option eventually, heh. If the choice is between an RC at $700 and an NT4 at $1,350, it's pretty easy to go with the RC - when it starts becoming an RC or even RC2 at $900-$1100, plus a 4 prong at $300, things become a lot more cloudy. |
|
|
AZ, USA
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 8:49:59 PM EDT
[Last Edit: julyAZ]
[#29]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2019 9:51:21 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By krdt: I will just tell you flat out that's nonsense. The RC is extremely well made - tough, low back pressure, little gas leakage and one of the best mounting systems out there. I don't think erosion is any different than any other can made with similar materials - it's just that RCs tend to be used on short barrels with prong flash hiders and have been well documented with pictures. People also mistake cosmetic erosion with actual damaging erosion. In reality, the RC has a quite thick Inconel blast baffle - I'd estimate it's twice as thick as the NT4 blast baffle. Naturally, some of the baffle thickness is offset by the 4 prong causing more targeted erosion, but if you used an SFCT to be comparable to the M4QD, I wouldn't be surprised if an RC could last as long as an NT4, maybe even longer due to the thicker baffle. If not, the RC has the huge added benefit of being able to be rebuilt. The RC does have a tighter bore than the NT4 and the occasional baffle kiss happens, but it's usually entirely cosmetic. I don't hear of many RCs needing to rebuilt because of a legitimate strike. As far as carbon buildup, the shape of the NT4 baffles actually lends itself to faster accumulation (and my limited testing backs this up - the NT4 was accumulating weight quite fast). You can see why it'd pick up weight below: http://wkd.site.nfoservers.com/CQBR/knights.carbon.buildup.png I would say in a purely pragmatic comparison, the RC is probably superior to the NT4 in many ways (better mount, less gas leakage, less back pressure, lighter, etc.). But they are both very well built, tough cans. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/5/2019 12:03:14 AM EDT
[#31]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/5/2019 12:12:07 AM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By UndrGrndPrdcts: Ah I forgot about that picture. That's terrible. I do like the fact that guys are getting their rc rebuilt for a reasonable price.  Attached File |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/5/2019 12:14:03 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 78Staff: Sounds like a jobs for @Combat_Diver - CD any chance your'e seeing Pri GB's with Combat/Serrated latches out there? CD |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/5/2019 12:25:12 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By wissota4:
Here's another pic, not sure if it's an RC but it is a surefire. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/384425/161833_jpeg-1004674.JPG Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By wissota4:
Originally Posted By UndrGrndPrdcts: Ah I forgot about that picture. That's terrible. I do like the fact that guys are getting their rc rebuilt for a reasonable price. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/384425/161833_jpeg-1004674.JPG |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/5/2019 1:16:39 AM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Combat_Diver:
Just the standard PRI M84 Gas Buster. Next rotation shortly should have the Geissele Airborne charging handles on the URGIs. CD Thanks :) |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/5/2019 6:03:12 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Combat_Diver:
Just the standard PRI M84 Gas Buster. Next rotation shortly should have the Geissele Airborne charging handles on the URGIs. CD
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/5/2019 8:16:35 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By AR_Marv:
All this talk of the NT4. The wait begins. Check hasn't even been cashed yet. 
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/465788/IMG_2320_JPG-1004668.JPG |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/5/2019 10:25:30 AM EDT
[#38]
Would I be banished from the clone community if I just got a Turbo K and sprayed it FDE?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/5/2019 10:40:22 AM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By UndrGrndPrdcts:
Would I be banished from the clone community if I just got a Turbo K and sprayed it FDE? But eventually, I will. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/5/2019 10:40:30 AM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By UndrGrndPrdcts:
Would I be banished from the clone community if I just got a Turbo K and sprayed it FDE? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/5/2019 10:42:15 AM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By eMc9001: Yep.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/5/2019 10:45:22 AM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By eMc9001: Yep. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/5/2019 10:46:44 AM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By wissota4:
They say that about 10.5 barrels, hotdog selectors, incorrect sights and stocks. But we get those all the time. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/5/2019 10:58:06 AM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By eMc9001: I nominate you the new clone moderator then. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/5/2019 11:04:35 AM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By wissota4:
We had an old one?? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/5/2019 11:18:06 AM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By eMc9001: CHINASPEC556. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/5/2019 12:15:30 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By eMc9001: CHINASPEC556.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/5/2019 12:30:28 PM EDT
[#48]
Hey you guys can suck my nuts. Ain't no China in my spec.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/5/2019 12:38:45 PM EDT
[#49]
Which 45 degree Surefire Scout mount will work with the ATPIAL? Thinking about ditching my Unity Tactical micro hub.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/5/2019 12:42:21 PM EDT
[Last Edit: -KentuckyWindage-]
[#50]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By J_MONEY:
Which 45 degree Surefire Scout mount will work with the ATPIAL? Thinking about ditching my Unity Tactical micro hub.  
https://arisakadefense.com/collections/frontpage/products/side-scout-mount-picatinny |
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
Attached File
Attached File