User Panel
Originally Posted By HighpowerRifleBrony: With grenade launcher, laser, light, sling, cleaning kit, stock pouch, etc, what's the heaviest these can get? View Quote @HighpowerRifleBrony Well, An M16A4 with an ACOG, M203, leaf sight, M962, PEQ-2A, BFG sling, loaded mag is right at 14 lbs Plus however much a cleaning kit, rail covers, pressure switches, etc. weighs. Might as well add a 1 lb bayonet too. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Dyzastr: Is the rco a4 correct for marines? What era/branch would a TA01 go on? Now I gotta pull the trigger on a barrel. I found an upper for a good price with a 20" rifle length, FN button rifled barrel. I'm considering getting it to pull the barrel. Are the button rifled barrels fn barrels correct in any way? eta: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/471387/C65041DB-E33D-4DF0-93C0-83A56BC124A7_jpe-1995851.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/471387/83AC72F9-0995-408A-AC3A-092CF6A882B6_jpe-1995852.JPG FN AR15 premium button rifled barrels are are manufactured using U.S. sourced Chrome Moly Venadium material per Mil-B-11595E. Each barrel is High Pressure Tested (HPT) and Magnetic Particle Inspected (MPI) to ensure that it is free of microstresses or flaws, resulting in consistency and quality in every barrel shipped from the factory. The bore and chamber are chrome lined to help resist corrosion and provide resistance to heat erosion which greatly improves barrel life and reliable chambering / extraction. The M4 style feed ramps and barrel extension provide consistent feeding and the matte black Manganese Phosphate finish resists external corrosion and oxidation. Currently available in a chambering of 5.56 x 45mm in the following profiles and gas system lengths 10.5" Government Carbine, 14.7" Government Midlength, 14.7" M4 Carbine, 16" M4 Carbine, 16" Government Carbine, 16" Government Midlength, 18" Government Rifle, 20" Government Rifle. View Quote TA01NSN was SOPMOD issue. Army might have bought some TA01NSNs COTS in the 2000s before the M150 was adopted. but the most common was the TA31F. That's a commercial FN barrel. Not clone correct just because of the M4 feedramps and the profile at the end but it's pretty close and is likely a good barrel. |
|
|
Originally Posted By pezboytate: TA01NSN was SOPMOD issue. Army might have bought some TA01NSNs COTS in the 2000s before the M150 was adopted. but the most common was the TA31F. That's a commercial FN barrel. Not clone correct just because of the M4 feedramps and the profile at the end but it's pretty close and is likely a good barrel. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By pezboytate: Originally Posted By Dyzastr: Is the rco a4 correct for marines? What era/branch would a TA01 go on? Now I gotta pull the trigger on a barrel. I found an upper for a good price with a 20" rifle length, FN button rifled barrel. I'm considering getting it to pull the barrel. Are the button rifled barrels fn barrels correct in any way? eta: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/471387/C65041DB-E33D-4DF0-93C0-83A56BC124A7_jpe-1995851.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/471387/83AC72F9-0995-408A-AC3A-092CF6A882B6_jpe-1995852.JPG FN AR15 premium button rifled barrels are are manufactured using U.S. sourced Chrome Moly Venadium material per Mil-B-11595E. Each barrel is High Pressure Tested (HPT) and Magnetic Particle Inspected (MPI) to ensure that it is free of microstresses or flaws, resulting in consistency and quality in every barrel shipped from the factory. The bore and chamber are chrome lined to help resist corrosion and provide resistance to heat erosion which greatly improves barrel life and reliable chambering / extraction. The M4 style feed ramps and barrel extension provide consistent feeding and the matte black Manganese Phosphate finish resists external corrosion and oxidation. Currently available in a chambering of 5.56 x 45mm in the following profiles and gas system lengths 10.5" Government Carbine, 14.7" Government Midlength, 14.7" M4 Carbine, 16" M4 Carbine, 16" Government Carbine, 16" Government Midlength, 18" Government Rifle, 20" Government Rifle. TA01NSN was SOPMOD issue. Army might have bought some TA01NSNs COTS in the 2000s before the M150 was adopted. but the most common was the TA31F. That's a commercial FN barrel. Not clone correct just because of the M4 feedramps and the profile at the end but it's pretty close and is likely a good barrel. |
|
Who said that?
|
|
Originally Posted By pezboytate: Nope. Started as an AR15A4 thing. Not sure where that's coming from. View Quote So would I need m4 upper with m16 ramps? Or rifle/m16 upper, with m16 ramps? Or are both correct at different times/branches? Oh, and what should the profile be? Sorry for all the questions. I thought I knew what I was doing with piecing one together, but now I'm not sure |
|
Who said that?
|
Maybe it was changed in a later post, but this is from post 1 on the first page:
“What I like to call... "The War Years"...doesn't have so much to do with any particular "war" per se, but is basically from @ 2000 - 2010(ish) These M16A4s are noted by their use of: True A4 barrel assemblies having "M4" feed ramped barrel extensions & "F"-marked (detachable carry handle height) front sight bases. Flat top "M" or "M4" marked upper receivers incorporating "M4" feed ramps.” This is the source of my confusion. |
|
Who said that?
|
|
Originally Posted By Dyzastr: So would I need m4 upper with m16 ramps? Or rifle/m16 upper, with m16 ramps? Or are both correct at different times/branches? Oh, and what should the profile be? Sorry for all the questions. I thought I knew what I was doing with piecing one together, but now I'm not sure View Quote There was a bunch of legit FN surplus ones available, maybe there's still a few floating around. Depends how correct you want to be but you would want an era correct upper receiver without M4 feedramps, an era correct barrel without feedramps and with an F marked FSB. I haven't seen any evidence of M4 upper receivers or barrels with M4 feedramps being issued. I personally have a Colt AR15A4 URG but it's not a clone. It doesn't hurt function to have them, just not correct. The positive is you can't see them from the outside. The FN CHF barrels are nice as well and arguably better than issued, just not correct. This is what an A4 barrel looks like: Attached File |
|
|
Originally Posted By Dyzastr: Maybe it was changed in a later post, but this is from post 1 on the first page: “What I like to call... "The War Years"...doesn't have so much to do with any particular "war" per se, but is basically from @ 2000 - 2010(ish) These M16A4s are noted by their use of: True A4 barrel assemblies having "M4" feed ramped barrel extensions & "F"-marked (detachable carry handle height) front sight bases. Flat top "M" or "M4" marked upper receivers incorporating "M4" feed ramps.” This is the source of my confusion. View Quote I just skimmed through it, I don't know where he's getting that from since those new surplus uppers don't have M4 feedramps. We had Colt M16A4s in the mid 2000s and they didn't have M4 feedramps. |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By pezboytate: I just skimmed through it, I don't know where he's getting that from since those new surplus uppers don't have M4 feedramps. We had Colt M16A4s in the mid 2000s and they didn't have M4 feedramps. View Quote so it looks like the fn barrel with their cage code is the one I'm looking for. |
|
Who said that?
|
Looks like 1 USGI URG on GunBroker for $1K.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By pezboytate: Looks like 1 USGI URG on GunBroker for $1K. View Quote Thanks again for clearing that info up. That info on the first page really threw me off. I’d rather get as close to correct to start with because I know down the line I’ll be swapping parts out for more correct ones if I don’t. |
|
Who said that?
|
Originally Posted By Dyzastr: I was checking that one out. I may hold out for an ee deal and save a few hundred. Now that I'm looking, I'll prob won't see any for a while. That always seems to happen. Thanks again for clearing that info up. That info on the first page really threw me off. I’d rather get as close to correct to start with because I know down the line I’ll be swapping parts out for more correct ones if I don’t. View Quote There’s no way I’d pay $1,135 for an A4 upper receiver assembly, let alone one with no BCG or charging handle. |
|
|
M16A3/A4 upper receiver has rifle ramps and barreled assembly has rifle ramp barrel extension. Different NSNs between M16AA3/4 (1005-01-454-9880) and M4/M4A1 (1005-01-382-6795) uppers. Barrels between M16A2 (1005-01-146-7684) and M16A4 (1005-01-454-1629) are also different NSNs which I would assume to be the F marked FSB for the M16A3/A4.
Note: Somewhere the M16A3 moved from fixed A2 upper to A4 flat top. FCG is still full auto instead of burst. Only ones I've ever came across belong to the SEABEEs early in Iraq 04' that had A2 carrying handle uppers. Source: TM 9-1005-319-23&P November 2008 Armory builds Attached File Attached File CD |
|
De Oppresso Liber
Iraq: 91,03,04,05,06,08,09,15&16' Afghanistan: 09,10,11',14',17',18',19',20'&21' |
Originally Posted By 86HMMWV: There's no way I'd pay $1,135 for an A4 upper receiver assembly, let alone one with no BCG or charging handle. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By 86HMMWV: Originally Posted By Dyzastr: I was checking that one out. I may hold out for an ee deal and save a few hundred. Now that I'm looking, I'll prob won't see any for a while. That always seems to happen. Thanks again for clearing that info up. That info on the first page really threw me off. I'd rather get as close to correct to start with because I know down the line I'll be swapping parts out for more correct ones if I don't. There's no way I'd pay $1,135 for an A4 upper receiver assembly, let alone one with no BCG or charging handle. |
|
Who said that?
|
Originally Posted By Combat_Diver: M16A3/A4 upper receiver has rifle ramps and barreled assembly has rifle ramp barrel extension. Different NSNs between M16AA3/4 (1005-01-454-9880) and M4/M4A1 (1005-01-382-6795) uppers. Barrels between M16A2 (1005-01-146-7684) and M16A4 (1005-01-454-1629) are also different NSNs which I would assume to be the F marked FSB for the M16A3/A4. Note: Somewhere the M16A3 moved from fixed A2 upper to A4 flat top. FCG is still full auto instead of burst. Only ones I've ever came across belong to the SEABEEs early in Iraq 04' that had A2 carrying handle uppers. Source: TM 9-1005-319-23&P November 2008 Armory builds https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/32677/IMG_1888_JPG-1996453.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/32677/IMG_1889_JPG-1996454.JPG CD View Quote Eta- here is an example of one with the ris style numbering. Attached File |
|
Who said that?
|
Originally Posted By Dyzastr: Thanks for the info. Did the A4's happen to have a standard m5 ras, or have you happen to see any of the navy m5 ras' with odd number ris style t-marks with a locking lower portion? I came across some navy m5 ras, like what I described, and just wondered if you could verify their use? Eta- here is an example of one with the ris style numbering. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/471387/FDC27730-9D24-4C95-87D7-89771FA2B9E1_jpe-1998150.JPG View Quote Those uppers were built back in 16’. While we did have Navy, they were SEAL support there. The M16s on hand then belonged to MARSOC. Don’t remember the numbering CD |
|
De Oppresso Liber
Iraq: 91,03,04,05,06,08,09,15&16' Afghanistan: 09,10,11',14',17',18',19',20'&21' |
My daughter a few months ago. I need to get her back out. Attached File
|
|
|
Why is it so hard to come across m16 barrels seems to be non existent finding barrels for these
The last couple years ever since I joined I’ve only have seen a handful for sale |
|
|
Can't never could 'til try came along.
|
I get email notifications on every ad that I’m subscribed too lol I look daily if I have been missing out please show me we’re .
We’re these easier to find back in the day ? I am a newer member they definitely don’t pop up like 14.5 colt barrels do |
|
|
Man, I shoulda jumped when I had the chance. Missed a complete colt m16a4 upper in the EE for an awesome price too. Stupid me.
|
|
Who said that?
|
(Edited)
|
|
|
Has anyone ever seen an SDO/TA11 on a USMC M16A4? I'm committed to the USMC clone but God I hate the RCO eye relief
I'll do it if it's the only correct thing though, and I suspect it is. |
|
|
As far as my knowledge they only ran the 4x32s never seen a pic in the wild of a ta11.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By FriendlyLocalYugo: Has anyone ever seen an SDO/TA11 on a USMC M16A4? I'm committed to the USMC clone but God I hate the RCO eye relief I'll do it if it's the only correct thing though, and I suspect it is. View Quote Brownells has the Cav Arms A1 stock for sale. The buttplate is horrid dog$hit but the shell is usable. Swap the buttplate of your A2 stock onto the A1 shell, put it on, and tell me you can see the difference. I was in the same boat after coming back from the range with my former "S-DMR-ish" clone and those 5/8" are hardly missed visually. |
|
|
I’ve noticed having shorter arms it’s not very comfortable reaching to get that eye relief on the Acog like your saying you could go A1 stock, no rear buis run Acog as far back as possible, or get the larue rco Acog mount
|
|
|
Other option is to get a Vltor A5 kit and install that on the lower. Technically never deployed but it was proposed iirc and looks just as milspec.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By nightshade1: Brownells has the Cav Arms A1 stock for sale. The buttplate is horrid dog$hit but the shell is usable. Swap the buttplate of your A2 stock onto the A1 shell, put it on, and tell me you can see the difference. I was in the same boat after coming back from the range with my former "S-DMR-ish" clone and those 5/8" are hardly missed visually. View Quote If the Cav arms stock is a copy of the Type E A1 stock, I can tell you right now that I can spot the difference immediately. If it's just an A1 length A2 style then maybe not. |
|
|
Originally Posted By JupiterMaximus: If the Cav arms stock is a copy of the Type E A1 stock, I can tell you right now that I can spot the difference immediately. If it's just an A1 length A2 style then maybe not. View Quote It looks like an A1 length A2 but I forgot the sling mount slot lets it move 180* so never mind, its still garbage. |
|
|
Can you guys direct me to the correct issue magazine coupler... you know where there was another magazine hooked up to the one inserted... thanks
|
|
ALL COMMIES MUST DIE
|
Originally Posted By CharlesBukowski: Can you guys direct me to the correct issue magazine coupler... you know where there was another magazine hooked up to the one inserted... thanks View Quote SOCOM issued the Redi-Mag for the M4A1. Never was one for the M16 series to my knowledge besides 100mph tape. CD |
|
De Oppresso Liber
Iraq: 91,03,04,05,06,08,09,15&16' Afghanistan: 09,10,11',14',17',18',19',20'&21' |
Never confuse motion with progress; never confuse a college degree with intelligence.
|
Originally Posted By Creature: So...how 'incorrect' would a Brownells Retro 4x scope look on A4?https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/153820/20200112_053442-2040686.jpg https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/153820/Screenshot_20210805-104300_DuckDuckGo-2040691.jpg View Quote about 40 yrs in techinology. CD |
|
De Oppresso Liber
Iraq: 91,03,04,05,06,08,09,15&16' Afghanistan: 09,10,11',14',17',18',19',20'&21' |
Never confuse motion with progress; never confuse a college degree with intelligence.
|
De Oppresso Liber
Iraq: 91,03,04,05,06,08,09,15&16' Afghanistan: 09,10,11',14',17',18',19',20'&21' |
|
|
ALL COMMIES MUST DIE
|
|
Finally complete:
Attached File My own tribute to the Marine M16A4 while also nodding to how my Army unit’s rifles were set up in Iraq. Aero Precision lower built on a PSA premium upper kit, MaTech BUIS, RCOA4 Acog, and BFG sling. I think this is complete for now. With its little brother, which is the spitting image of my M4 from Iraq with a nod to the slings they issued us in Afghanistan: Attached File |
|
The people that will come to take your rights and freedoms away conduct physical exercise everyday. You should as well.
“Get fucked and stay fucked.’ - Michael fucking Collins to ‘The Nation.’ |
Lots of beautiful builds here! Mine is underway - hopefully wrapped in a month or so. Does anyone have a spare M203 spacer? My NIB M5 kit arrived with three panels but no other accessories.
ETA - Have one! Thank you all for the generous offers! I really appreciate it! |
|
|
Would the full size KAC 600m Rear BUIS be a clone correct option for the A4? I have several of them, but do not have a matech.
I’ve been looking, but haven’t seen one on an A4….just thought I’d ask before buying another sight. Thanks! |
|
|
Originally Posted By BlueFalconer: Would the full size KAC 600m Rear BUIS be a clone correct option for the A4? I have several of them, but do not have a matech. I’ve been looking, but haven’t seen one on an A4….just thought I’d ask before buying another sight. Thanks! View Quote Your BUIS is an issued sight just not commonly seen on an A4. I'm sure its been done. CD |
|
De Oppresso Liber
Iraq: 91,03,04,05,06,08,09,15&16' Afghanistan: 09,10,11',14',17',18',19',20'&21' |
|
|
Edit
|
|
-Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American G.I. ~ One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.
|
Any good source for stock kit's for A4's
I have one stripped lower left and i dont have a 20" rifle Eyeing a colt 20" upper right now |
|
|
Originally Posted By kbi: Any good source for stock kit's for A4's I have one stripped lower andi dont have a 20" rifle Eyeing a colt 20" upper right now View Quote Shark Arms has FN M16A2 buttstock kits for $115 shipped. |
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.