User Panel
Posted: 4/21/2018 12:46:35 AM EDT
I purchased a Spikes standard LPK from an online retailer and after it arrived and inspecting it I have my doubts about its authenticity. This is the first spikes kit I have used and my expectations may be too high, but I have noticed a few differences in the kit from the one posted on spikes website so could someone tell me what to look for?
thanks Vince |
|
Pics? I cant tell the difference between most basic LPKs that I have received from many manufactures.
|
|
Most basic .mil spec kits look just about the same.
Why are you doubting on this one, what is different? |
|
|
just the difference in the kit and the pic on spikes website. not the forge marks I expected, but I know that changes from manufacturer to manufacturer. The mag release has a thru hole, I was expecting a blind hole, trigger and hammer pins are different, trigger contact surfaces didnt have the slight polish and a couple other things.
Thanks Vince |
|
Honestly it looks like a standard .mil spec LPK, nothing fancy about it, but nothing looks out of spec and in looking at the tag on the bag that is what it says it is, I am pretty sure you are good to go, but if you are really doubting, send an email to Spikes with the pictures and see what they have to say. Like I said, pretty much a standard .mil spec LPK.
|
|
That stylized handle is the one they include in their .308 kit, their regular kit includes the regular A2 pistol grip, did the company you purchased from show that image on their website that you posted? if so, they have the incorrect LPK displayed for what they are selling.
|
|
Thanks DaveP1, I've only used CMMG LPK so I guess my expectations were a little high.
|
|
Looks like it could be old stock that uses same part no. SLPK101
Quick search shows this http://www.bravotac.com/spikes-tactical-slpk101-standard-lower-parts-kit-lpk-for-ar15-stripped-receiver You can see the standard A2 grip and double grooved trigger pins. It could also be a customer return that someone swapped out parts from. If you got it off eBay or something I would return it asap. |
|
I pulled that off of spikes website, the company I ordered from had a smaller pic with not a lot of detail but did show the standard pistol grip. Im not going to mention the company because I don't want to start any crap just because I don't know what I'm talking about.
|
|
Wayback-machine only has a few archives but Spikes had the old style kit pictured at least last May/2017. It would appear that since then they updated the quality of the what comes in the kit. The people you ordered from may have just had a stockpile of the old inventory. Spikes didn't change the part no. so your seller may not even know there is a difference.
|
|
Spikes uses KNS small parts and coiled roll pins. Are the roll pins coiled or split?
|
|
Back in January I purchased a Spike's LPK without FCG from Primary Arms and it came with the grip and magazine release that you were expecting.
|
|
Spikes has probably sourced LPK parts from different companies over the years
I doubt what you got is fake. More likely the place you ordered it from just had a different kit than what was represented on Spikes website. Possibly a more basic kit or new/old stock |
|
Yep pins are Coiled QtrHorse. Learn something new every day, thanks
|
|
I've been keeping my eye on some LPK's since I need to pick up a few more when I find a good deal and have the money for them at the same time. I really wish I would have bought more Stag kits on black Friday for $15 shipped each minus FCG. Anyways OP since the kit isn't a fake and the company is all good, just curious where did you order it from? Just wondering if they had the best deal or what. I'd prefer to order one of the newer kits if I found somewhere that had one in stock for a good price. AIM has a pretty good price on the Spikes one without FCG with the newer spider logo grip but they are always out of stock.
I never examined LPK's that closely until this past year or two when I started putting together more builds and I have been trying to keep an eye on the parts differences myself. One thing I have found is my favorite parts are the ones that are stamped with an S, they make the triggers, safety, bolt catch, etc. They seem to be top quality parts and I really wish they sold parts kits themselves with all of their parts in them instead of buying from companies that only have 1-2 of their parts. They are also a military contractor from what I remember, just can't think of their full name. I'd prefer not to buy any parts that were made with MIM based on what I have read so tend to stay away from the cheapest parts kits. For the average priced kits the Stag, and CMMG both seem to be pretty nice. My buddy ordered a LPK from RightToBear called "Fire For Effect" and it looks like the parts are mostly CMMG and from what I read it is just their parts rebranded but somehow the price is cheaper. Point is the trigger my buddy got from his $40 lower parts kit in that Fire For Effect kit is nicer then my PNT, 2 QMS's, and 4 PSA Enhanced triggers. It is a very very nice trigger and I am waiting on them to come back in stock because at $40-45 it is a pretty good deal. I am just hoping they aren't discontinued. |
|
Quoted:
I've been keeping my eye on some LPK's since I need to pick up a few more when I find a good deal and have the money for them at the same time. I really wish I would have bought more Stag kits on black Friday for $15 shipped each minus FCG. Anyways OP since the kit isn't a fake and the company is all good, just curious where did you order it from? Just wondering if they had the best deal or what. I'd prefer to order one of the newer kits if I found somewhere that had one in stock for a good price. AIM has a pretty good price on the Spikes one without FCG with the newer spider logo grip but they are always out of stock. I never examined LPK's that closely until this past year or two when I started putting together more builds and I have been trying to keep an eye on the parts differences myself. One thing I have found is my favorite parts are the ones that are stamped with an S, they make the triggers, safety, bolt catch, etc. They seem to be top quality parts and I really wish they sold parts kits themselves with all of their parts in them instead of buying from companies that only have 1-2 of their parts. They are also a military contractor from what I remember, just can't think of their full name. I'd prefer not to buy any parts that were made with MIM based on what I have read so tend to stay away from the cheapest parts kits. For the average priced kits the Stag, and CMMG both seem to be pretty nice. My buddy ordered a LPK from RightToBear called "Fire For Effect" and it looks like the parts are mostly CMMG and from what I read it is just their parts rebranded but somehow the price is cheaper. Point is the trigger my buddy got from his $40 lower parts kit in that Fire For Effect kit is nicer then my PNT, 2 QMS's, and 4 PSA Enhanced triggers. It is a very very nice trigger and I am waiting on them to come back in stock because at $40-45 it is a pretty good deal. I am just hoping they aren't discontinued. View Quote |
|
Quoted: The ones with the S are made by LW Schneider and I agree with you, they are my favorite. Tom's Tactical used to use them but they changed and I'm not pleased with my latest purchase. I've been trying to find another company that uses them so let me know! View Quote |
|
The hammer and triggers marked with the double S is supposedly made by this company. http://www.schmidtool.com/index.html
I have never seen LW list that they manufacture fire control parts. |
|
Quoted:
The hammer and triggers marked with the double S is supposedly made by this company. http://www.schmidtool.com/index.html I have never seen LW list that they manufacture fire control parts. View Quote FWIW if you go to the LW Schnedier site they list Colt, Stag and FN as their customers |
|
Quoted: For a long time people said the S was LW Schneider but then recently people have been saying it's Schmid. All I know is they are my favorites and as I said before, now that Tom's Tactical doesn't use them anymore, I'm trying to find builder kits made by them. FWIW if you go to the LW Schnedier site they list Colt, Stag and FN as their customers View Quote |
|
Quoted:
It was pretty much confirmed who makes them a few years ago https://www.ar15.com/forums/ar-15/Who-makes-the-trigger-and-hammer-marked-with-S-in-square-casting-/12-633058/ View Quote |
|
That's the place! Almost every single mil-spec trigger that is of quality uses the S stamped ones, they are on the ALG QMS/ACT , BCM PNT, PSA's Enhanced trigger, and many others. That says a lot about their quality when every single enhanced trigger uses them.
For safeties I prefer the longer armed one like in the newer Spikes kit listed above that has an S stamp on it. I got a PSA kit a few years back and again more recently that both had this safety selector in it as well. I believe Damage Industries offers it on it's own but I'm not sure if you are guaranteed the one they have in the pic which is the longer lever S stamped one. For bolt catches I have had the S stamped one in many kits as well including Stag, Spikes, PSA, etc. So the question is, why doesn't this company just make it's own lower parts kit since it makes the majority of the parts already for many/most kits out there? I would very gladly purchase them since they seem to be of top quality in all regards. From best I can tell the newer Spikes LPK's have all the major parts made by them with the S stamp so I will likely start buying them when there are good sales on them. Seems like the best deals are the ones without the trigger groups in them and then buy a upgraded trigger for your kit like the one from PSA or RightToBear. |
|
Quoted:
This is what i thought i was getting.http://i149.photobucket.com/albums/s73/vpost/SLPK101_2048x2048.jpg" target="_blank">http://i149.photobucket.com/albums/s73/vpost/SLPK101_2048x2048.jpg View Quote |
|
Quoted: For a long time people said the S was LW Schneider but then recently people have been saying it's Schmid. All I know is they are my favorites and as I said before, now that Tom's Tactical doesn't use them anymore, I'm trying to find builder kits made by them. FWIW if you go to the LW Schnedier site they list Colt, Stag and FN as their customers View Quote The .gov parts that I have seen, I noticed were marked "MP", which I assumed was "Military" and "Police". Again, I could be mistaken. It wouldn't be the first time, and probably not the last. |
|
Quoted:
I could be mistaken, but I believe the "S" marking designates parts for Semi-auto only systems? The .gov parts that I have seen, I noticed were marked "MP", which I assumed was "Military" and "Police". Again, I could be mistaken. It wouldn't be the first time, and probably not the last. View Quote The MP you are seeing is more then likely on the bolt or barrel etc. and is for Magnetic Particle Inspection. A form of testing that is done when the part is manufactured and has nothing to do with Military or Police and is seen on civilian rifles as well. There are very few differences on a civilian Colt M4 and a Military M4. The fire control group/auto sear and the way the receiver is milled to accept them would be about the only difference. |
|
Quoted:
That stylized handle is the one they include in their .308 kit, their regular kit includes the regular A2 pistol grip, did the company you purchased from show that image on their website that you posted? if so, they have the incorrect LPK displayed for what they are selling. View Quote That said, I do not know if they were including the butt ugly spider grips in their LPK's. Just food for thought. |
|
Quoted: FWIW, I purchased a Spike's complete lower in 2016 with the "stylized" (read: ugly) grip factory installed. It was immediately removed in favor of an MOE and relegated to a role in a spare-parts basher build. That said, I do not know if they were including the butt ugly spider grips in their LPK's. Just food for thought. View Quote |
|
I wanted to check out the quality of the spikes kits so I went ahead and ordered one on the "new ones" sans trigger.
The good NOT an S marked mag catch but it's still Excellent, it's the type without the seam in the middle and the fine lines on the face which is my favorite. S marked Phosphated selector, my favorite All the detents, springs and roll pins went in easily. Allen bolt grip screw with locking washer is a nice touch as well. The wonky While the pivot pins were nicely machined, they didn't have a phosphate finish but instead that shiny/glossy blued finish I've been seeing more and more of. The spikes grip. I'm going to replace it anyway but there is a noticeable gap where it meets with the trigger guard and there are sharp edges on it. The mag release button. I don't mind that it's billet, it looks okay but it sticks out past the cage on the lower and it feels odd to me. I left it on, going to play with it a bit before swapping it out with one of my spares. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.