Quote History Quoted:
Colt ... basically built the SP1s with a lot of leftover parts from the military production lines, other than the lower receivers. It's not likely, but not certain that a 1978 might not have come with a full auto carrier from Colt.
View Quote
No. No. No. While it's impossible to prove something didn't happen, Colt DID NOT just throw together SP-1s from leftover M16 parts from the "military production lines."
If that's true, why didn't we see any SP-1s with select-fire FGCs, etc.?
Because no Sporter ever left Colt's with any military/full-auto parts, period. Even the hammers weren't ground-down M16 hammers, they were semi-auto from the get-go. If that ever happened, which is extremely doubtful, it was an unauthorized act by an employee too lazy or careless to open a box of the semiauto part, and managed to slip by whatever QC Colt had in place.
Colt has kept sloppy records and it's true that they have been known to deplete inventories of old parts before switching to a newer spec (Colt Government models, for example, that started with A1 uppers then switched to A2 uppers with no fanfare whatsoever).
Does anybody really think that, after having to jump through multiple hoops to please the ATF including designing a completely different lower with different sized pins
and a bolt carrier specifically designed to pass muster with the ATF, that Colt would just blow that off and put full auto parts, i.e. bolt carriers, in an SP-1? Well, obviously some people think that, but you have to wonder why Colt would blithely risk the wrath of the ATF during the CARTER ADMINISTRATION? The same idiot who made the military stop using the XM177 flash hider because he thought it made the gun quieter and that was somehow cheating? And then had the ATF classify that FH as an NFA silencer? You think Colt would risk pissing off
that guy? And if that's not enough, at the time (don't know about now), Colt actually had a couple of dedicated ATF agents literally stationed in-house. Seriously, does anybody really think Colt would risk stepping on that land mine? Come. On.
It's amazing that after all these years and not one proven instance, that people persist in perpetrating that gun-culture myth of full-auto parts in AR-15s.
I have owned several ARs from the 60s and 70s that were LNIB complete with the original 5-round blocked mags, hang tags and the tampon in place, and never saw anything but semiauto parts.
I have an AR with a three-digit serial number from 1964, and it has a chrome bolt and park'd semi-auto bolt carrier just like in every single verified picture of such.
My guess is that that people are getting the early BC with the milled-out underside confused with the FA version. They look similar, but when you see them side by side it's pretty obvious.
IIRC, it wasn't until after the AWB expired in 2004 that the ATF finally relented on the M16 BC issue.
Puh-leeze.