Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page AR-15 » AR-15 / M-16 Retro Forum
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Posted: 1/14/2021 7:18:50 PM EDT
My father in law showed me this the other day.  He was in the Air Force during Vietnam and did a few tours there.  We were wonduring what kind of AR15 he was issued.

Can you tell from a serial number?

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 1/14/2021 7:40:04 PM EDT
[#1]
Going by the retro guide, his serial number falls in this range:

202,447-379,353
1965
US Property marked US Air Force M16 Colt's Model 604, and a few commercial export models.  There are also examples of commerical/export marked models using the 20X,XXX serial number range produced in the late 1960's.
Link Posted: 1/14/2021 7:43:34 PM EDT
[#2]
Looks like that would be a USAF model 604, without forward assist. See the NSN number (stock number) 1005-00-856-6885 for the rifle at the top of the operator's manual cover:

Attachment Attached File

Link Posted: 1/14/2021 8:02:32 PM EDT
[#3]
Why would they issue 36 rounds of ammunition?  That is such an odd number (even though it is even)
Link Posted: 1/14/2021 8:05:48 PM EDT
[#4]
I was trying to figure out if it was a weirdly written zero, but it sure does look like a six
Link Posted: 1/14/2021 8:17:25 PM EDT
[#5]
Maybe issued 2 20rd magazines, but only loaded to 18rds each.
Link Posted: 1/14/2021 8:21:34 PM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Maybe issued 2 20rd magazines, but only loaded to 18rds each.
View Quote


That is the only semi logical explanation I could one up with also
Link Posted: 1/14/2021 8:48:41 PM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Maybe issued 2 20rd magazines, but only loaded to 18rds each.
View Quote

Makes complete sense.
Link Posted: 1/14/2021 9:00:36 PM EDT
[#8]
We still use that same exact form!! The good ole 1297!
Link Posted: 1/15/2021 2:08:27 AM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


That is the only semi logical explanation I could one up with also
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Maybe issued 2 20rd magazines, but only loaded to 18rds each.


That is the only semi logical explanation I could one up with also


Yes, that NSN is for the 20 rd. magazine (not that 30's were available in '67.)
18 rds. each.
Seems a little light for Vietnam.
Hell, we were issued 4 mags in a relatively safe NATO country in Cold War peacetime.
Oh well, that's the Air Force for you...
Link Posted: 1/15/2021 7:37:06 AM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Why would they issue 36 rounds of ammunition?  That is such an odd number (even though it is even)
View Quote


18 x 2 = 36.  It was SOP back in the day to load 18 in a 20.

Grunt superstition being, that made the magazine more reliable for feeding the first couple rounds but grunt superstition isn't always reality based.  I think really, it's easier to do a hot reload with a mag loaded with 18 than with 20, when the bolt is closed and you're in a hurry.
Link Posted: 1/15/2021 8:05:48 AM EDT
[#11]
22.3 ?
Seriel?
36rds? And 20/30rd mags

Sounds like the govt
Link Posted: 1/15/2021 12:33:22 PM EDT
[#12]
Same rifle i used in my USAF Basic training, M16, with two twenty rd. mags , and remember that the rifle was NEVER called the model 604, that was Colts model number. The USAF always called the Rifle, M16 5.56 Cal.
Link Posted: 1/15/2021 1:08:57 PM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
We still use that same exact form!! The good ole 1297!
View Quote


We use DA Form 2062... basically the same thing and it triggered me when I saw this
Link Posted: 1/15/2021 3:43:35 PM EDT
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Same rifle i used in my USAF Basic training, M16, with two twenty rd. mags , and remember that the rifle was NEVER called the model 604, that was Colts model number. The USAF always called the Rifle, M16 5.56 Cal.
View Quote

Yes, no one in the Air Force called it a 604. In fact, there's probably only 3 guys in the USAF that know what a 604 is.
This might surprise some people, but the Air Force doesn't have much of a small arms culture...
Link Posted: 1/15/2021 6:26:26 PM EDT
[#15]
Flippin awesome.

I’d buy an 80% and have it engraved with the correct markings and serial (seriel?) number.  A fitting tribute.
Link Posted: 1/16/2021 11:36:21 AM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Yes, no one in the Air Force called it a 604. In fact, there's probably only 3 guys in the USAF that know what a 604 is.
This might surprise some people, but the Air Force doesn't have much of a small arms culture...
View Quote


There was at least 5 people in my last unit that new and appreciated it. We also had old school Gau-5's before they switched us to M4's.
Link Posted: 1/17/2021 2:05:25 PM EDT
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


18 x 2 = 36.  It was SOP back in the day to load 18 in a 20.

Grunt superstition being, that made the magazine more reliable for feeding the first couple rounds but grunt superstition isn't always reality based.  I think really, it's easier to do a hot reload with a mag loaded with 18 than with 20, when the bolt is closed and you're in a hurry.
View Quote


My understanding is that on the 20 rounders it was very easy to attach the mag spring to the early metal followers incorrectly and that would cause problems with the first round or two.
Link Posted: 1/17/2021 2:26:45 PM EDT
[#18]
Link Posted: 1/17/2021 9:40:47 PM EDT
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


My understanding is that on the 20 rounders it was very easy to attach the mag spring to the early metal followers incorrectly and that would cause problems with the first round or two.
View Quote



You may be correct.  All I remember being told was, they weren't reliable with 20, but a specific reason was not issued along with the admonition.

You remember.  Right way, wrong way and the Army way?  Army way.
Page AR-15 » AR-15 / M-16 Retro Forum
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top