Don't understand the second part of the request,(I guess I'm a little slow). I'll get that first one to you when I get home.

Ok, length folded along the top is about 2.25", along the bottom about 1.9".
There is no spring involved only a locking detent in the deployed mode(needed) and one in the folded position(unnecessery IMO).
I will be removing the ear that protects the button in the folded position to give a better purchese on the button for deploying the sight.
If it sounds like I'm slamming this sight, I'm not. Anything that is brand new can use improvements.
Wilson should be given cudos for a nice product at a VERY competitve price. If it fit on a carbine with an MRE rail, I would purchase another in a heartbeat.


IMO Wilson should remove both ridges and make the protective ears thinner = Winner!

Just disregard the second part, I hadn't looked closely enough at the images, and thought the axis point for the actual 'sight' portion of the gasblock was further forward.

Thanks again!

While we're suggesting things, I'd like to add the following....how about a CROSS BOLT version similar to the ARMS #41B. Don't make cross bolt section unnecessarily thick like the GG&G's...why you ask? Because it's better when it fits into a Daniel Defense FSP/FSP-M rail system! Why cross bolt? Because it's stronger then a set-screw setup. I've seen many set-screw blocks come loose and move and the only real way to fix it is to dimple the barrel...cross bolts solve that problem..plus, unlike a pinned version, it's user installable and Vltor has proven the strength of a cross bolt setup. Also, a cross bolt setup allows you get the FSB on a painted barrel easier w/o messing up the finish.

So for version 2.0:

1) Thinner ears and/or HK style hood (if possible...there might not be enough room on top of the sight now that I look at it)...I'd offer both, like Troy.
2) NO LOCK in the down position or remove the protective tab so that it can be more easily deployed (I think NO lock for deployment is better). Lock in the UP position is good.
3) Bayo Lug version - Why? Not for a Bayo, just for a BIG FUCK YOU to the anti-gun idiots...
4) Cross bolt version with a slim enough profile so that it'll fit into a Daniel Defense FSP/FSP-M rail system

Outside of that, it looks great. DEFINITELY see how it was inspired by the KAC FSB/BUIS but IMO, KAC can SUCK IT for not offering their FSB/BUIS for general sale. I'll buy SEVERAL of the V2 model once it comes out...

Got rid of the annoying ridge and the sight deploys SSSOOOO much easier.

where did the pics go?

reds X's

The pics are hosted at M4carbine.net they can only be seen if you're logged in over there.