Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You guys need to buy in spec lowers and then you won't have problems.
Truth is....Not everyone has the extra cash to buy Colts,or Larue type of quality. We do our best
to buy what will work, Some can buy 100 mags at a time or $1200 scopes with $300 rings, and
then they're are some of us that buying 2 mags a month is tough because we have to feed
a family. If PMags want to cater to Colt, fine. We don't need someone to tell us to buy "Good" Lowers.
How do you think that makes all the other venders that SUPPORT THIS SITE feel? Sorry for
yelling, but I'm one of those guys that could barely scrape up enough for a homebuilt AR. And it
works, and I won't trade it because someones Mag says it's not to spec.
It is pretty simple. Manufacturers need to use a set of parameters for their designs. The most obvious choice in this case is a USGI mil spec lower. Does it make sense for Magpul to go out and design a magazine around the 97 variations of a non mil spec lower? No. They designed it around a known set of values.
It also helps that some of their largest customers use mil spec lowers.
You guys should not get upset with Magpul because their products do not fit your out of spec receivers. You should be upset that the receiver you bought was not manufactured to the standards. If other manufacturers used proper QC, then a lot of you guys would not have this issue.
everyones else magazine fits everyones reciever, I guess we should throw away all our stuff and only buy what fits PMags.
So everybody please send me your out of spec, suspected out of spec or if someone thinks it might be out of spec stuff.
This way I can repay everyone that has given me great information and helped me while I built my AR. Out of gratitude, I will
take the responsibility of disposing of your possibly out of spec stuff so you can buy more inspec stuff to fit your PMags.
Everyone of my USGI mags drop free, empty.
The solution is very simple, use what works for you. If Pmags work, use'm, If they don't, use something else.