Quoted: I think we are at the point where we can do a lubeless gun, or nearly so. In 20 years it will be common, and someone has already figured it out but we will be slow to trust them. So it is here now if we just learn which process we should believe in.
POF needs to do a dual (200 round) Beta-mag dump in full auto with temp probes embedded in the receiver -- and compare this to a normal gun with oil. When I see that data, if it looks fine (compared to a gun with lube), I will be all over it.
|
Rsilvers,
You have some valid points and concerns. The corrosive & wear resistant coating/plating have been in use for decades in the aerospace industry for use of many moving parts used in aircraft. The use hard chrome greatly extended the life cycle between PM's, of products that were coated. Applying the same plating processes to materials used in firearms makes sense if it benefits the products life cycle and eliminates the need for lubricant. We choose to think out of the box and apply these processes to our weapon system / firearms. The coating provides corrosion resistant and wear resistant surfaces of all moving parts and surfaces in our gas piston operating system. Which allows our operating system to run without the need for lube.
A gas piston weapon system will operate cooler and cleaner then the standard DI weapon system that brings the hot gases and carbon into the bolt carrier/upper receiver. Heat and carbon in the bolt carrier/ upper receiver, will have an adverse affect to operating system in any weapon system over time. Most likely you have experienced this when testing weapons in full auto with suppressors, which increases heat and carbon into the bolt carrier /upper receiver. Without the use of temp probes as you suggested, I've shot (2) beta-C mags (200 rounds) and pulled out the bolt carriers assemble with my bare hands and touch the bolt to my face without burning myself. Try to bare hand a standard DI system after (2) beta-C been shot. You would be seriously injured (maybe 3rd degree burned).
The "Team America" video you did was Very Cool. It also showed some serious issues with Heat, carbon, and rate of fire when shooting a full auto M16 with a suppressor. The back pressure with the use of the suppressor cycle's the weapon extremely fast. It looked like the rate of fire was about 1,100 RPM, and the M16 looked like it was going to come apart when shooting. When the video camera got close to the ejection port, with two burst of the M16, the carbon covered the lense so you could barely see thru the camera lens. The back pressure generates alot more heat and carbon into the bolt carrier / upper receiver. This was some things I observed with the cool video you made!
I hope I answered your questions and concerns. Sorry for being long winded. The biggest issue is change. Most people don't like change, but it is part of life. Think out of the box.
Best regards,
Patriot Ordnance Factory salute
AMERICA FIRST!