Quote History Originally Posted By AEnemaBay:Nah, I wasn't the first to build one. But I think I was first to document the parts and their differences. Even scouring Russian forums I couldn't find anything at the time. Now I find my reference pictures on Russian forums
. That's a damn fine looking AK-12. Probably one of the few to have an actual Russian barrel. Can also see from the pics that they nicely dimpled the rivet holes on the receiver into the trunnions.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History Originally Posted By AEnemaBay:Originally Posted By TX-Zen:
I believe you were the first person to actually build the 12
Nah, I wasn't the first to build one. But I think I was first to document the parts and their differences. Even scouring Russian forums I couldn't find anything at the time. Now I find my reference pictures on Russian forums
. That's a damn fine looking AK-12. Probably one of the few to have an actual Russian barrel. Can also see from the pics that they nicely dimpled the rivet holes on the receiver into the trunnions.
You did a hell of a job too and I'm not surprised your photos are making it around the world. I know the feeling when it comes to seeing my photos on Russian forums too, it means you did something right
The builder did a good job overall, but the rear trunnion cuts for the folder are noticeably terrible. Almost like the builder had never done a 5.5 trunnion (or perhaps in his defense the Childers receiver cuts didn't line up with the trunnion hardware and he did the best he could, but I find it hard to believe Childers would have botched those cuts)
If I had a builder do it that way and they sent my clone gun back looking like this one I'd have some strong words for sure. To me it's unacceptable from a collector/clone perspective, but the buyer wasn't familiar enough to know the issue and it does in fact work properly, so it probably seemed GTG from his point of view
TBH after I discovered it, I decided I don't particularly care because this is a shooter for me (just like everything else I own I guess), and I do plan to run it hard and hang it up wet to see how it holds up
The rest of the gun seems to be really nicely done, and I will give the builder credit for that. The Russian paint is not as even or perfect it could be but again no problem for me, and I think the buyer said he had about 1.5 rifles worth of paint but it got used on 2 builds, so he wasn't expecting perfection. Compared to my RPK that Two Rivers did the AK12 paint isn't nearly as nice (in fact the Russian paint work they did on my RPK is better than any factory Molot or Izhmash gun I've seen), but again in the buyers defense it was good enough and it was applied properly, just not quite thick enough to get that perfect Izzy look
The buyer used a Bulgarian BCG and a remarked Bulgarian front trunnion, otherwise it appears all Russian. So far I haven't had issues with the selector stop that 9-Hole and Herrera have mentioned, but I also haven't tested the HG return to zero yet or even the top cover return to zero yet
I'm actually optimistic about the top cover though. It's an interesting design and looks like it will work, but time will tell. The AK12 HGs are definitely straight up Russian Tapco, which is odd for Izhmash because they actually know how to do HGs right
(And if anyone has a Sport-12 kit they want to sell LMK
)
The truth is I've seen worse, but this shouldn't have come back from a clone builder like this