Quote History Quoted:
My understanding is that the more restrictive local ordinance is valid and enforceable; until challenged at the state level.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History Quoted:
Quoted:
The state level license specifically allows carrying of "a knife" ... and a Buck Pathfinder with a 6" blade is still "a knife".
Quoted:
There is no State preemption for knives.
My understanding is that the more restrictive local ordinance is valid and enforceable; until challenged at the state level.
Agreed. But that doesn't change the fact that it is an omission is the CC statute not to say that weapons other than firearms are subject to local restrictions because they're not pre-empted, if that was the intention of the act. 11 words - "Weapons other than firearms are subject to local ordinances and restrictions" - is all it would take.
Or, it could've granted them some pre-emption for licensees. One sentence in the statute would do it, along these lines.... "all weapons permitted for licensees of this act are not subject to local ordinances or restrictions of such weapons for those licensees".
By omission, maybe the legislature wanted them to remain subject to local ordinances, but I really don't think so, as it was never discussed one way or the other (AFAIK).
Same could be said for electric weapons as well as knives. AFAIK, they have no pre-emptions neither.
This is a non-issue, until such time that a licensee gets cited for violating a local blade length ordinance. Then it gets interesting.
I have no idea, but does anyone know if the DOJ's criteria for CCW classes mentions this issue? Are students of these classes made aware of this, or do the classes just focus on firearms?